National systems of innovation in comparison: Structure and performance indicators for knowledge societies

National Systems of Innovation in Comparison: Structure and Performance Indicators for Knowledge Societies

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-314

  Schmoch, Ulrich ^a   Rammer, Christian ^b   Legler, Harald ^c  

^a FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS AND INNOVATION RESEARCH ISI   (Germany)

^b CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN ECONOMIC RESEARCH ZEW   (Germany)

^c IPF PHARMACEUTICALS GMBH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892336769     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-4949-1     Document Type: Book

References (330)

1. AAAS (2003): Research and Development FY 2004. In: AAAS Report, 28, Washington: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
2. Acs, Z., Audretsch, D. (1990): Innovation and Small Firms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Acs, Z. A., Arenius, P., Hay, M., Minniti, M. (2005): Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. 2004 Executive Report. Babson Park, MA and London: Babson College and London Business School.
4. Almus, M., Engel, D., Prantl, S. (2000): The Mannheim Foundation Panels of the Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW). Mannheim: Centre for European Economic Research.
5. Amable, B., Verspagen, B. (1995): The Role of Technology in Market Shares Dynamics. In: Applied Economics, 27, pp. 197-204.
6. Amable, B., Barré, R., Boyer, R. (1997): Les Systèmes d'Innovation à l'Ere de la Globalisation. Paris: Economica.
7. Ammermüller, A., Dohmen, D. (2003): Individuelle und soziale Renditen von Bildungsinvestitionen. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem, 1-2004, Köln.
8. Anker, R. (1997): Theories of Occupational Segregation by Sex. An Overview. In: International Labour Review, 136 (3).
9. Archibugi, D., Howells, J., Michie, J. (1999): Innovation Policy in a Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Arundel, A., Patel, P. (2003): Strategic Patenting. Background Report for the Trend Chart Policy Benchmarking Workshop 'New Trends in IPR Policy'.
11. Arvanitis, S., von Arx, J., Hollenstein, H., Sydow, N. (2004): Innovationsaktivitäten in der Schweizer Wirtschaft. Eine Analyse der Ergebnisse der Innovationserhebung 2002. In: Strukturberichterstattung, 24, Bern: Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft.
12. Arvanitis, S., Hollenstein, H., Marmet, D., Sydow, N. (2005): Forschungs- und Technologiestandort Schweiz: Stärken-/Schwächenprofil im internationalen Vergleich. Strukturberichterstattung No. 32, Bern: State Secretariat for Economic Affairs - Economic Policy Directorate.
13. Audretsch, D. B., Mahmood, T. (1995): New Firm Survival: New Results Using a Hazard Function. In: Review of Economics and Statistics, 77, pp. 97-103.
14. Audretsch, D. B., Bozeman, B., Combs, K. L., Feldman, M., Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., Stephan, P., Tassey, G., Wessner, C. (2002): The Economics of Science and Technology. In: The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27, pp. 155-203.
15. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2005): Innovation in Australian Business. Melbourne: ABS.
16. Balassa, B. (1965): Trade Liberalization and Revealed Comparative Advantage. In: The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 33, pp. 99-123.
17. Becker, G. S. (1995): Human Capital and Poverty Alleviation. Working Papers HROWP (World Bank, Human Resources Development and Operations Policy), 52.
18. Beicht, U., Walden, G., Herget. H. (2004a): Costs and Benefits of In-Company Vocational Education and Training in Germany. Bielefeld: Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildung.
19. Beicht, U., Walden, G., Herget, H. (2004b): Kosten und Nutzen der betrieblichen Berufsausbildung in Deutschland. Berichte zur Beruflichen Bildung, H. 264, Bielefeld.
20. Beicht, U. et al. (2003): Technische Berufe im dualen System der Berufsausbildung - Stellenwert und Entwicklungstendenzen. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem, 3-2003. Bonn (http://technologische-leistungsfaehigkeit.de/ pub/3-2003.pdf).
21. Beise, M. (2001): Lead Markets: Country-Specific Success Factors of the Global Diffusion of Innovations. Heidelberg: Physika-Verlag.
22. Beise, M., Belitz, H. (1999): Internationalisation of R&D in Multinational Enterprises: The German Perspective. In: Barrell, R., Pain, N. (eds.), Innovation, Investment and Diffusion of Technology in Europe. German Direct Investment and Economic Growth in Postwar Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 89-119.
23. Beise, M., Belitz, H. (1998): Trends in the Internationalisation of R&D - the German Perspective. In: Vierteljahrsheft des DIW, 2, Berlin: DIW, pp. 67-85.
24. Belitz, H. (2004a): Forschung und Entwicklung in multinationalen Unternehmen. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem, 8-2004. Berlin.
25. Belitz, H. (2004b): Foreign Companies Expand Research and Development in Germany. In: Economic Bulletin, 41(6), 2004, pp. 199-204.
26. Belitz, H. (2002): Germany as a Location for Research and Development by Multinational Companies. In: Economic Bulletin, 39(5), pp. 175-180.
27. Belitz, H. (2000): German Companies Intensify their Research and Development Activities Abroad. In: DIW Economic Bulletin, 37(6), June 2000, pp. 175-182.
28. Bertschek, I., Kaiser, U. (2004): Productivity Effects of Organizational Change: Microeconometric Evidence. In: Management Science, 50(3), pp. 394-404.
29. Biersack, W. (2002): Überblick zur Beschäftigung und Arbeitslosigkeit von Frauen nach Berufen. In: Engelbrech, G. (ed.): Arbeitsmarktchancen für Frauen. Nürnberg, BeitrAB 258, pp. 127-144.
30. Biersack, W. et al. (2001): Arbeitssituation, Tätigkeitsprofil und Qualifikationsstruktur von Personengruppen des Arbeitsmarktes. Ergebnisse der BIBB/IAB-Erhebung 1998/1999 im Überblick. Nürnberg, BeitrAB 248.
31. Blind, K., Frietsch, R. (2003): Sector-Based Multidimensional Forecasting Model (SEFORM). Report to the European Patent Office Within the Research Programme: Improvement of Methods for Forecasting Patent Filings. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI.
32. Blind, K., Edler, J., Frietsch, R., Schmoch, U. (2004): The Patent Upsurge in Germany: The Outcome of a Multi-motive Game Induced by Large Companies. Working Paper presented at the 8th Schumpeter Conference in Milano. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI.
33. Blind, K., Edler, J., Frietsch, R., Schmoch, U. (2003a): Erfindungen kontra Patente. Schwerpunktstudie 'Zur technologischen Leistungsfähigkeit Deutschlands'. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI.
34. Blind, K., Edler, J., Schmoch, U., Andersen, B., Howells, J., Miles, I., Roberts, J., Hipp, C., Green, L., Herstatt, C., Evangelista, R. (2003b): Patents in the Service Industries. Final Report. Brussels: European Commission (ed.).
35. Bloningen, B. A., Davies, R. B., Head, K. (2002): Estimating the Knowledge-Capital Model of the Multinational Enterprise: Comment. NBER Working Paper, No. 8929, May.
36. Blossfeld H.-P. (1990): Changing Educational Careers in the Federal Republic of Germany. A Longitudinal Study of Three Birth Cohorts. In: Sociology of Education, 63, pp. 165-177.
37. BMBF (2005): Berufsbildungsbericht 2005. Bonn, Berlin: BMBF.
38. BMBF (2004a): Bundesbericht Forschung 2004. Berlin: Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany.
39. BMBF (2004b): Zukunftsnavigation. Jugend und Ausbildung. Broschüre zum Jahr der Technik. Bonn, Berlin: BMBF
40. BMBF (ed.) (2002): Germany's Technological Performance 2001. Bonn: BMBF.
41. BMBWK; BMVIT; BMWA (eds.) (2005): Österreichischer Forschungs- und Technologiebericht 2005. Vienna: Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Culture.
42. BMWA (2004): Wirtschaftsbericht 2004. Zukunftsfaktor Innovation. Berlin: Federal Ministry of Economics and Labour.
43. Borga, M., Mann, M. (2003): U. S. International Services, Cross-border Trade and Sales Through Affiliates in 2001. In: Survey of Current Business, October, pp. 58-118.
44. Boskin, M. J., Lau, L. J. (1992): Capital, Technology, and Economic Growth. In: Rosenberg, N., Landau, R., Mowery, D. C. (eds.): Technology and the Wealth of Nations. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 17-55.
45. Boutellier, R. et al. (1999): Managing Global Innovation. Uncovering the Secrets of Future Competitiveness. Berlin et al.: Springer-Verlag.
46. BPM5 (1993): Balance of Payments Manual 1993. 5th edition. International Monetary Fund.
47. Brenner, H. (1997): Entwicklung anerkannter Ausbildungsberufe. Fortschreibung überkommener Regelungen oder Definition zukunftsbezogener Ausbildungsgänge? In: Euler, D., Sloane P. F. E. (eds.): Duales System im Umbruch. Eine Bestandsaufnahme der Modernisierungsdebatte. Pfaffenweiler, pp. 53-69.
48. Bresnahan, T. F., Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L. M. (2002): Information Technology, Workplace Organization, and the Demand for Skilled Labor. Firm-Level Evidence. In: Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), pp. 339-376.
49. Bresnahan, T. F., Greenstein, S. (1998): Technical Progress and Co-Invention in Computing and in the Uses of Computers. In: Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, pp. 1-77.
50. Bresnahan, T. F., Trajtenberg, M. (1995): General Purpose Technologies: 'Engines of Growth'? In: Journal of Econometrics, 65(1), pp. 83-108.
51. Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L. M. (2000): Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance. In: Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), pp. 23-48.
52. Buck, H., Kistler, E., Mendius, H. G. (2002): Demographischer Wandel in der Arbeitswelt. Stuttgart: IRB Verlag.
53. Bund-Länder Commission for Educational Planning and Research Promotion (BLK) (2002): Zukunft von Bildung und Arbeit - Perspektiven von Arbeitskräftebedarf und -angebot bis 2015. Bonn: Bericht der BLK an die Regierungschefs von Bund und Ländern.
54. Bürgel, O., Fier, A., Licht, G., Murray, G. (2004): The Internationalisation of Young High-tech Firms. Heidelberg, New York: Physica.
55. Cantwell, J. (1995): The Globalisation of Technology: What Remains of the Product Life Cycle model. In: Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), pp. 155-174.
56. Cantwell, J., Kosmopoulou, E. (2001): What Determines the Internationalisation of Corporate Technology. In: Forsgren, M. et al. (eds): Critical Perspectives on Internationalisation. mimeo.
57. Cantwell, J., Janne, O. (1999): Technological Globalisation and Innovation Centres: the Role of Corporate Technological Leadership and Locational Hierarchy. In: Research Policy, 28, pp. 119-144.
58. Cantwell, J., Harding, R. (1998): The Internationalisation of German Companies R&D. In: National Institute Economic Review, 163, pp. 99-124.
59. Cap Gemini (2004): Online Availability of Public Services: How Does Europe Progress? Web-Based Survey on Electronic Public Services. Report of the Fourth Measurement. October 2003 (http://europa.eu.int/information-society/ eeurope/2005/index-en.htm).
60. Cassiman, B., Ueda, M. (2002): Optimal Project Rejection and New Firm Startups. mimeo, IESE Business School.
61. Cefis, E., Marsili, O. (2004): A Matter of Life and Death: Innovation and Firm Survival. mimeo, Utrecht School of Economics, Utrecht University.
62. Clough, G. W. (2003): National Priorities for Science and Technology: A View from the Academic Sector. In: AAAS (ed.), Science and Technology Policy Yearbook 2003. Washington, pp. 23-42.
63. Cohen, W. M., Levinthal, D. A. (1990): Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, pp. 128-152.
64. Cohen, W. M., Levinthal, D. A. (1989): Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D. In: Economic Journal, 99, pp. 569-596.
65. Cohen, W. M., Goto, A., Nagata, A., Nelson, R. R., Walsh, J. P. (2002): R&D Spillovers, Patents and the Incentives to Innovate in Japan and the United States. In: Research Policy, 31, pp. 1349-1367.
66. Coombs, R. (2003): The Changing Character of 'Service Innovation' and the Emergence of 'Knowledge-Intensive Business Services'. In: Dankbaar, B. (ed.): Innovation Management in the Knowledge Economy. London: Imperial College Press, pp. 83-96.
67. Cowan, R., van de Paal, G. (2000): Innovation Policy in a Knowledge-Based Economy. Brussels and Luxembourg: ECSC-EC-EAEC.
68. Criscuolo, P., Narula, R., Verspagen, B. (2001): Measuring Knowledge Flows Among European and American Multinationals: A Patent Citation Analysis. Eindhoven: Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies (Ecis).
69. Curzio, A. Q., Fortis, M., Zoboli, R. (eds.) (1994): Innovation, Resources and Economic Growth. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
70. Dalton, D. H., Serapio, M. G. (1999): Globalizing Industrial Research and Development. U. S. Department of Commerce, Technology Administration. Washington D. C.: Office of Technology Policy.
71. Deissinger, T. (2004): Apprenticeship Systems in England and Germany: Decline and Survival. In: Greinert, W. D.; Hanf, G. (eds.): Towards a History of Vocational Education and Training in Europe in a Comparative Perspective. Luxembourg: Cedefop Panorama Series, 103, pp. 28-45.
72. Dernis, H., Kahn, M. (2004): Triadic Patent Families Methodology. Paris: OECD.
73. DEST (2003): Mapping Australian Science and Innovation. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training.
74. Deutsche Bundesbank (2004): The Significance of Information and Communication Technology. In: Monthly Report April, pp. 45-55.
75. DIHK (ed.) (2005): FuE-Verlagerung: Innovationsstandort Deutschland auf dem Prüfstand, Berlin: DIHK.
76. DIW (1988): Exportgetriebener Strukturwandel bei schwachem Wachstum. Analyse der strukturellen Entwicklung der deutschen Wirtschaft - Strukturberichterstattung 1987. In: DIW-Beiträge zur Strukturforschung, Heft 103.
77. Dohmen, D. (2005): Deutschlands Bildungssystem im internationalen Vergleich vor dem Hintergrund der technologischen Leistungsfähigkeit. Auswertung der OECD-Studie 'Bildung auf einen Blick'. Studie für den Bericht zur technologischen Leistungsfähigkeit, 2-2005, Köln.
78. Dohmen, D. (1999): Ausbildungskosten, Ausbildungsförderung und Familienlastenausgleich (Educational Cost, Student Support and Family Allowances). Eine ökonomische Analyse unter Berücksichtigung rechtlicher Rahmenbedingungen. Berlin.
79. Dohmen, D., Hoi, M. (2004): Bildungsaufwand in Deutschland - eine erweiterte Konzeption des Bildungsbudgets. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem, 3-2004, Köln.
80. Dohmen, D., Abraham H. (2003): Die Entwicklung der bildungspolitischen Situation Deutschlands im internationalen Vergleich. Gutachten im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem, 19-2003, unpublished, Köln.
81. Dorsch-Schweizer, M. (2004): Die Ambivalenz moderner Beruflichkeit für Frauen. In: Berufsbildung in Wissenschaft und Praxis (BWP), 33(5), pp. 43-46.
82. Dosi, G., Pavitt, K., Soete, L. (1990): The Economics of Technical Change and International Trade. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
83. DTI (2003): Innovation Report. Competing in the Global Economy: the Innovation Challenge. London: Department of Trade and Industry.
84. Dunning, J. (1979): Explaining Changing Patterns of International Production. Defence of the Eclectic Theory. In: Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 41(4), pp. 269-295.
85. Dunning, J., Wymbs, C. (1999): The Geographical Sourcing of Technology-Based Assets by Multinational Enterprises. In: Archibugi, D. et al. (eds.): Innovation Policy in a Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
86. Edler, J. (2004): International Research Strategies of Multinational Enterprises: A German Perspective. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71, special issue 'Science Policy and Innovation Systems', ed. by Heitor, M. et al., pp. 599-621.
87. Edler, J. (2003): Germany and the Internationalisation of Industrial R&D. New Trends and Old Patterns. In: Canwell, J., Molero, J. (eds.): Multinational Enterprises, Innovative Strategies and Systems of Innovation. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 105-128.
88. Edler, J., Kuhlmann, S. (2005): Towards One System? The European Research Area Initiative, the Integration of Research Systems and the Changing Leeway of National Policies. In: Technikfolgenabschätzung - Theorie und Praxis, 14(1), pp. 59-68.
89. Edler, J., Döhrn, R., Rothgang, M. (2003): Internationalisierung industrieller Forschung und grenzüberschreitendes Wissensmanagement. Eine empirische Analyse aus der Perspektive des Standortes Deutschland. Fraunhofer ISI Series No. 54. Heidelberg: Physica.
90. Edler, J., Meyer-Krahmer, F., Reger, G. (2001): Managing Technology in the Top R&D Spending Companies Worldwide - Results of a Global Survey. In: Engineering Management Journal, 13(1), special issue of the 'Managing High Technology Research Organizations', pp. 5-11.
91. Edquist, C. (ed.) (1997): Systems of Innovation. Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London: Pinter.
92. Egeln, J., Gottschalk, S., Rammer, C., Spielkamp, A. (2003): Public Research Spin-offs in Germany. ZEW Documentation 03-04, summary report, Mannheim: Centre for European Economic Research.
93. EITO (2005): European Information Technology Observatory 2005. Frankfurt: EITO.
94. EITO (2004): European Information Technology Observatory 2004. Frankfurt: EITO.
95. Engel, D.; Fryges, H. (2002): Aufbereitung und Angebot der ZEW Gründungsindikatoren. ZEW Dokumentation Nr. 02-01. Mannheim: Centre for European Economic Research.
96. EPO (2005): Annual Report 2004. Munich: EPO.
97. EPO, JPO, USPTO (2004): Trilateral Statistical Report - Edition 2003. Munich, Tokyo, Alexandria, VA: EPO, JPO, USPTO.
98. Ertl, H., Sloane, P. F. E. (2004): The German Training System and the World of Work: The Transfer Potential of the Lernfeldkonzept. In: bwp@ issue 7 (http://www.bwpat.de/7eu/ertl-sloane-de-bwpat7.pdf).
99. European Commission (2005): European Innovation Scoreboard. http://trendchart.cordis.lu.
100. European Commission (2004): European Innovation Scoreboard 2004. Comparative Analysis of Innovation Performance. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities, pp. 1475.
101. European Commission (2003a): Raising EU R&D Intensity. Improving the Effectiveness of the Mix of Public Support Mechanisms for Private Sector Research and Development. Fiscal Measures. Brussels: European Commission.
102. European Commission (2003b): Commission Staff Working Paper. Investing in Research: An Action Plan for Europe. Brussels: European Commission, p. 489.
103. European Commission (2003c): Science and Technology Policies in Europe: New Challenges and New Responses. Final report from the STRATA Consolidating Workshop. Brussels: European Commission.
104. European Commission (2002): Corporate Tax and Innovation. In: Innovation Papers, 19, Brussels: European Commission.
105. European Commission (2000): Towards a European Research Area - Communication from the Commission to the Council. The European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels: European Commission.
106. European Commission (1997): Second European Report on Science & Technology Indicators. Luxemburg, Brussels: European Commission.
107. European Commission (1995): Action Plan for Innovation in Europe. Innovation for Growth and Employment. Brussels: European Commission.
108. European Council (2004): Allgemeine und berufliche Bildung 2010 - Die Dringlichkeit von Reformen für den Erfolg der Lissabon-Strategie. Brussels: European Council, pp. 1-43.
109. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (2002): Quality of Women's Work and Employment. Tools for Change. Foundation Paper No. 3, December 2002, Luxembourg.
110. Eurostat (2004): Business Demography in Europe. Results for 10 Member States and Norway. Data 1997-2001. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Commission.
111. Eurostat (ed.) (2003): High Tech Industries and Knowledge Based Services. Doc. ESTAT/A4/STI/-May 03/4.4. To be presented in Luxembourg on 7 and 8 May 2003.
112. Fagerberg, J. (1997): Competitiveness, Scale and R&D. In: Fagerberg, J., Hansson, P., Lundberg, L., Melchior, A. (eds.): Technology and Trade. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
113. Fagerberg, J. (1988): International Competitiveness. In: Economic Journal, 98, pp. 355-374.
114. Federal Agency of Labour (BA) (various years): Statistik der sozialversicherungspflichtigen Beschäftigten.
115. Federal Statistical Office Germany (2002): Studentenstatistik 2002.
116. Federal Statistical Office Germany (various years): Hauptberichte 1993-2002.
117. Federal Statistical Office Germany (1992): Klassifizierung der Berufe. Systematisches und alphabetisches Verzeichnis der Berufsbenennungen. Stuttgart: Metzler-Poeschel.
118. Federal Statistical Office Germany (various years): Nicht-monetäre hochschulstatistische Kennzahlen 1980-1997 und 1980-2000. In: Bildung und Kultur, Fachserie 11, Reihe 4.3.1, Wiesbaden.
119. Florida, R. (1997): The Globalization of R&D: Results of a Survey of Foreign-Affiliated R&D Laboratories in the USA. In: Research Policy, 26; pp. 85-103.
120. Freeman, C. (1987): Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
121. Freeman, C. (1982): The Economics of Industrial Innovation. London: Pinter.
122. Freeman, C., Soete, L. (1997): The Economics of Industrial Innovation. London: Pinter.
123. Frier, A., Czarnitzki, D. (2004): Zum Stand der empirischen Wirkungsanalyse der öffentlichen Innovations- und Forschungsförderung. Mannheim: ZEW, unpublished manuscript.
124. Frietsch, R. (2004a): Combining Databases for Forecasting Purposes. Patents and Further Economic Data. Paper presented at the WIPO-OECD Workshop on the Use of Patent Statistics, 11th/12th October 2004, Geneva.
125. Frietsch, R. (2004b): Intensivierung von Bildungsabschlüssen zwischen 1970 und 2000, Analysen im Rahmen der jährlichen Berichterstattung zur technologischen Leistungsfähigkeit Deutschlands. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem, 4-2004, Bonn.
126. Frietsch, R., Gehrke, B. (2004): Bildungs- und Qualifikationsstrukturen in Deutschland und Europa. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem, 3-2005. Karlsruhe, Hannover: Fraunhofer ISI, NIW.
127. Frommberger, D., Reinisch, H. (2004): Development of Disparate Structures of Dutch and German Vocational Education. In: Greinert, W. D., Hanf, G. (eds.): Towards a History of Vocational Education and Training in Europe in a Comparative Perspective. In: Cedefop Panorama Series, 103, Luxembourg, pp. 28-45.
128. Fryges, H. (2004): Stepping In and Out of the International Market: Internationalisation of Technology-Oriented Firms in Germany and the UK. ZEW Discussion Paper 04-65, Mannheim: ZEW.
129. Fuchs, M. (1994): Forschungslinien im Maschinenbau. Relevanzstrukturen der technikwissenschaftlichen Forschung an Hochschulen. In: Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 23(1), pp. 41-55.
130. Fuchs, J., Söhnlein, D., Weber, B. (2004): Konsequenzen des demografischen Wandels für den Arbeitsmarkt der Zukunft. Herausforderung demografischer Wandel! Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, GWV Fachverlage GmbH, pp. 122-139.
131. Fuente de la, A., Ciccione, A. (2002): Human Capital in a Global and Knowledge-Based Economy. Luxembourg: European Commission.
132. Gallouj, F. (2002): Innovation in Services and the Attendant Old and New Myths. In: Journal of Socio-Economics, 31.
133. Gallouj, F. (1997): Towards a Neo-Schumpeterian Theory of Innovation in Services? In: Science and Public Policy, 24(6), pp. 405-420.
134. Geroski, P. A. (1991): Market Dynamics and Entry. Oxford: Blackwell.
135. Geroski, P. A., Mata, J., Portugal, P. (2002): Founding Conditions and the Survival of New Firms. mimeo.
136. Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (2004): Analysing Scientific Networks Through Co-authorship. In: Moed, H. F., Glänzel, W., Schmoch, U. (eds.): Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 257-276.
137. Glänzel, W., de Lange, C. (2002): A Distributional Approach to Multinational Measures of International Scientific Collaboration. In: Scientometrics, 54, pp. 75-89.
138. Gokhberg, L., Kouznetsova. I. et al. (2004): Indicators of Innovation. Data Book. Moscow: State University - Higher School of Economics.
139. Gompers, P., Lerner, J., Scharfstein, D. (2003): Entrepreneurial Spawning: Public Corporations and the Genesis of New Ventures, 1986-1999. NBER Working Paper No. 9816.
140. Gomulka, S. (1990): The Theory of Technological Change and Economic Growth. London, New York: Routledge.
141. Granato, M., Schittenhelm, K. (2004): Junge Frauen: Bessere Schulabschlüsse - aber weniger Chancen beim Übergang in die Berufsausbildung. In: Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, B28, pp. 31-39.
142. Grandstrand, O. (1999): Internationalisation of Corporate R&D: A Study of Japanese and Swedish Corporations. In: Research Policy, 28; pp. 275-302.
143. Granstrand, O., Patel, P.; Pavitt, K. (1997): Multi-technology Corporations: Why they have 'Distinctive Core' Competencies. In: California Management Review, 39, pp. 8-25.
144. Greinert, W. D., Hanf, G. (eds.) (2004): Towards a History of Vocational Education and Training in Europe in a Comparative Perspective. In: Cedefop Panorama Series, 103, Luxembourg.
145. Grenzmann, Chr. (2004): Forschung und Entwicklung in der Wirtschaft - Die FuE-Statistik des Wirtschaftssektors. In: Legler, H., Grenzmann, Chr. (eds.): Forschung und Entwicklung in der deutschen Wirtschaft. Materialien zur Wissenschaftsstatistik, 13, Essen: SV Wissenschaftsstatistik, pp. 7-17.
146. Grömling, M. (2004): Weniger Volk, weniger Wohlstand? Die Auswirkungen des demographischen Wandels auf das Wirtschaftswachstum. In: Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium, 11, pp. 640-646.
147. Grupp, H. (1998): Foundations of the Economics of Innovation - Theory, Measurement and Practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
148. Grupp, H., Jungmittag, A. (1999): Convergence in Global High Technology? A Decomposition and Specialisation Analysis for Advanced Countries. In: Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 218 (5+ 6).
149. Grupp, H., Schmoch, U. (1992): Wissensbindung von Technik. Panorama der internationalen Entwicklung und sektorales Tableau für Deutschland, Heidelberg: Physica.
150. Grupp, H., Schmoch, U., Hinze, S. (2001): International Alignment and Scientific Regard as Macro-indicators for International Comparisons of Publications. In: Scientometrics, 51(2), pp. 359-380.
151. Grupp, H., Legler, H., Jungmittag, A., Schmoch, U. (2000): Hochtechnologie 2000. Neudefinition der Hochtechnologie für die Berichterstattung zur technologischen Leistungsfähigkeit Deutschlands. Karlsruhe and Hannover: Fraunhofer-ISI and NIW.
152. Gundlach, E., Wößmann, L. (2003): Bildungsressourcen, Bildungsinstitutionen und Bildungsqualität: Makroökonomische Relevanz und mikroökonomische Evidenz. Kiel.
153. Günterberg, B., Kayser, G. (2004): SMEs in Germany. Facts and Figures 2004. In: IfM-Materialien, 161, Bonn: Institute for SME Research.
154. Gustavsson, P., Hansson, P., Lundberg, L. (1997): Technical Progress, Capital Accumulation and Changing International Competitiveness. In: Fagerberg, J., Hansson, P., Lundberg, L., Melchior, A. (eds.): Technology and Trade. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
155. Hall, B. H., Ziedonis, R. M. (2001): The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the U. S. Semiconductor Industry, 1979-1995. In: The Rand Journal of Economics, 32(1), pp. 101-128.
156. Hall, B. H., van Reenen, J. (2000): How Effective Are Fiscal Incentives for R&D? A Review of the Evidence. In: Research Policy 29, 449-469.
157. Hammer, M. (1990): Reengineering Work: Don't Automate, Obliterate. In: Harvard Business Review, 68(4), pp. 104-112.
158. Harhoff, D., Stahl, K., Woywode, M. (1998): Legal Form, Growth and Exit of West German Firms - Empirical Results for Manufacturing, Construction, Trade and Service Industries. In: Journal of Industrial Economics, 46, pp. 453-488.
159. Hartung, S., Leber, U. (2004): Betriebliche Ausbildung und wirtschaftliche Lage. Empirische Ergebnisse des IAB-Betriebspanels. In: Krekel, E., Walden, G. (eds.): Zukunft der Berufsausbildung in Deutschland. Ergebnisse der BIBB-Fachtagung am 4./5. November 2003 in Bonn. Bielefeld: BIBB, pp. 111-129.
160. Hatzichronoglou, T. (1997): Revision of the High-technology Sector and Product Classification. In: STI Working Paper, 1997(2), OECD/GD (97) 216, Paris: OECD.
161. Hempell, T. (2005a): Does Experience Matter? Innovation and the Productivity of ICT in German Services. In: Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14(4), pp. 277-303.
162. Hempell, T. (2005b): Computers and Productivity - How Firms Make a General Purpose Technology Work. In: ZEW Economic Studies, 33, Heidelberg: Physica.
163. Hempell, T. (2004): Einsatz von Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien 2003. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem, 13-2005, Mannheim: Centre for European Economic Research.
164. Hempell, T., Vanberg, M., Schäfer, A., Ohnemus, J. (2005): Benchmark 'Internationale Telekommunikationsmärkte'. Report for the Federal Ministry of Economics and Labour (BMWA), Mannheim: ZEW (ftp://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/ gutachten/Benchmark-Telekommunikation.pdf).
165. Heublein, U., Schmelzer, R., Sommer, D. (2005): Studienabbbruchstudie 2005. Die Studienabbrecherquoten in den Fächergruppen und Studienbereichen der Universitäten und Fachhochschulen. Hannover: HIS-Kurzinformation A 1/2005.
166. Heublein, U., Spangenberg, H., Sommer, D. (2003): Ursachen des Studienabbruchs. Analyse. Hannover: HIS-Hochschulplanung, Bd. 163.
167. HIS (2000): HIS-Workshop OECD-Bildungsindikatoren. Methoden und Ergebnisse des internationalen Bildungsvergleichs. Hannover: HIS-Kurzinformation A4/2000.
168. Ietto-Gillies, G. (2000): What Role for Multinationals in the New Theories of International Trade and Location. In: International Review of Applied Economics, 14(4), pp. 413-426.
169. Ijichi, T., Iwasa, T., Odagiri, H., Keira, H., Koga, T., Goto, A., Tawara, Y., Nagata, A., Hirano Y. (2004): Statistics on Innovation in Japan. Report on the Japanese National Innovation Survey 2003 (J-NIS 2003), selected tables, Tokio: National Institute of Science and Technology Policy.
170. ILO Cinterfor (2001): Decent Work and Vocational Training. Montevideo: ILO Cinterfor (http://www.cinterfor.org.uy/public/english/region/ampro/ cinterfor/publ/sala/dec-work/index.htm).
171. Jaffe, A. B., Lerner, J., Stern, S. (eds.) (2002): Innovation Policy and the Economy. Vol. 3, Cambridge: MIT Press.
172. Janz, N., Ebling, G., Gottschalk, S., Peters, B., Rammer, C., Schmidt, T. (2002): Innovationsverhalten der deutschen Wirtschaft. Indikatorenbericht zur Innovationserhebung 2001. Mannheim.
173. Janz, N., Licht, G., Doherr, T. (2001): Innovation Activities and European Patenting of German Firms: A Panel Data Analysis. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the European Association of Research in Industrial Economics.
174. Jorgenson, D. (2005): Accounting for Growth in the Information Age. In: Aghion P.; Durlauf, S. (eds.): Handbook of Economic Growth. Amsterdam, North-Holland (forthcoming).
175. Kash, D. E., Kingston, W. (2001): Patents in a World of Complex Technologies. In: Science and Public Policy, 28(1), pp. 11-22.
176. Katz, J. S., Martin, B. R. (1997): What is Research Collaboration? In: Research Policy, 26, pp. 1-18.
177. Kazemzadeh, F., Teichgräber, M. (1998): Europäische Hochschulsysteme. Ein Vergleich anhand statistischer Indikatoren. Hannover: HIS Hochschulplanung, Bd. 132.
178. Kf W-Bankengruppe (2004): Kf W-Gründungsmonitor 2004. Gründungen aus der Arbeitslosigkeit gewinnen an Bedeutung. Frankfurt/M.: KfW-Bankengruppe.
179. Klodt, H., Mauer, R.; Schimmelpfenning, A. (1997): Tertiarisierung der deutschen Wirtschaft. Kiel: Mohr Siebeck.
180. KMK (2003): Fächerspezifische Prognose der deutschen Hochschulabsolventen. In: KMK Statistische Veröffentlichungen, 168.
181. Kölling, A., Schank, T. (2002): Skill-Biased Technological Change, International Trade and the Wage Structure. Discussion papers No. 14. Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg.
182. Koopmann, G., Münnich, F. (1999): National und International Developments in Technology. In: INTERECONOMICS, 34(6), pp. 267-278.
183. Kortum, S., Lerner, J. (1999): What is Behind the Recent Surge in Patenting? In: Research Policy, 28, pp. 1-22.
184. Krekel, E. M., Troltsch, K., Ulrich J. G. (2003): Betriebliche Ausbildungsbeteiligung bei schwieriger Wirtschaftslage. BIBB startet neues Forschungsprojekt. In: Berufsbildung in Wissenschaft und Praxis (BWP), 32, special edition 'Jugendliche in Ausbildung bringen', pp. 13-16.
185. Krekel, E. M., Troltsch, K., Ulrich J. G. (2004): Keine Besserung in Sicht? Zur aktuellen Lage auf dem Ausbildungsstellenmarkt. In: Berufsbildung in Wissenschaft und Praxis (BWP), 33(3), pp. 11-14.
186. Kuhlmann, S., Arnold, E. (2001): RCN in the Norwegian Research and Innovation System. Synthesis Report in the Evaluation of the Research Council of Norway. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI.
187. Kumar, N. (2001): Determinants of Location of Overseas R&D Activity of Multinational Enterprises: The Case of US and Japanese Corporations. In: Research Policy, 31, pp. 159-174.
188. Kutscha, G. (2000): General Education and Initial Vocational Training in Germany. The 'Flexicurity Route' of Modernization under Aspects of Flexibility, Transferability and Mobility. A contribution to COST A11, working group 1: VET policy (Draft Ku-COST1, Ver2).
189. Kutscha, G. (1999): Pluralisierung der Berufsbildung als Innovationsstrategie, Modernisierung der Qualifikationsentwicklung im Spannungsfeld von Regulierung und Deregulierung. In: Senatsverwaltung für Arbeit, Berufliche Bildung und Frauen (ed.): Expertisen für ein Berliner Memorandum zur Modernisierung der Beruflichen Bildung. Berlin, pp. 101-125.
190. Laafia, I. (1999): Beschäftigung im Hochtechnologiebereich. In: Statistik kurz gefasst, Thema 9: Wissenschaft und Technologie, 1/1999. Luxembourg: Eurostat.
191. Lafay, G. (1987): La Mesure des Avantages Comparatifs Révélés. In: ÉSconomie prospective internationale, 41.
192. Larédo, P., Mustar, P. (eds.) (2001): Research and Innovation Policies in the New Global Economy. An International Comparative Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
193. Laudel, G. (2002): What Do We Measure by Co-authorship? In: Research Evaluation, 11, pp. 3-15.
194. Legler, H. (1987): Zur internationalen Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der westdeutschen Wirtschaft NIW-Forschungsbericht No. 3. Hannover: NIW.
195. Legler, H., Grenzmann, Chr., Marquardt, R. (2003): Forschungs- und Entwicklungsaktivitäten der deutschen Wirtschaft. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem, 10-2004, Han-nover, Essen: BMBF
196. Les Bas, Ch., Sierra, Ch. (2002): Location Versus Home Country Advantages in R&D Activities: Some Further Results on Multinationals Locational Strategies. In: Research Policy, 31, pp. 589-609.
197. Licht, G., Moch, D. (1999): Innovation and Information Technology in Services. In: Canadian Journal of Economics, 32(2), pp. 363-383.
198. Link, A. N., Scott, J. T. (2003): U. S. Science Parks: The Diffusion of an Innovation and Its Effects on the Academic Mssions of Universities. In: International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, pp. 1323-1356.
199. Lockett, A., Wright, M., Franklin, S. (2003): Technology Transfer and Universities' Spin-out Strategies. In: Small Business Economics, 20, pp. 185-200.
200. Lucke, D., Schröder, P., Schumacher, D. (2004): R&D and Price Elasticity of Demand. In: DIW Discussion Paper No. 430, Berlin.
201. Lundvall, B.-A. (1990): National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London: Pinter.
202. Lundvall, B.-A. (1988): Innovation as an Interactive Process: From User-Producer Interaction to the National System of Innovation. In: Dosi, G., Freeman, C, Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., Soete, L. (eds.): Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter, pp. 349-369.
203. Lundvall, B.-Å., Tomlinson, M. (2001): Learning-by-Comparing: Reflections on the Use and Abuse of International Benchmarking. In: G. Sweeny (ed.): Innovation, Economic Progress and the Quality of Life. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 120-136.
204. Lundvall, B.-Å. (ed.) (1992): National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.
205. Machin, S. (2005): Skill-Biased Technical Change and Educational Outcomes. In: Johnes, G.; Johnes, J. (eds.): International Handbook on the Economics of Education. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 189-210.
206. Marklund, G. (2000): Indicators of Innovation Activities in Services. In: Boden, M., Miles, I. (eds.): Services and the Knowledge Based Economy. London: Continuum, pp. 86-108.
207. Markusen, J. R. (2001/2002): Integrating Multinational Firms into International Economics. In: NBER Reporter, winter 2001/2002, pp. 5-7.
208. Mataloni, R. J. (2004): U. S. Multinational Companies, Operations in 2002. In: Survey of Current Business, July, pp. 10-29.
209. Mataloni, R. J. (2003): U. S. Multinational Companies, Operations in 2001. In: Survey of Current Business, November, pp. 85-105.
210. Mataloni, R. J., Yorgason, D. R. (2002): Operations of U. S. Multinational Companies. Preliminary Results from the 1999 Benchmark Survey. In: Survey of Current Business, March, pp. 24-54.
211. MED (2003): Growth and Innovation Framework. Benchmark Indicators Report 2003. Wellington: Mnistry of Economic Development.
212. Mendonca, S., Pereira, T. S., Godinho, M. M. (2004): Trademarks as an Indicator of Innovation and Industrial Change. LEM Working Paper Series No. 2004/15, Pisa: Laboratory of Economics and Management, Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies.
213. Meyer-Krahmer, F., Reger, G. (1997): Konsequenzen veränderter industrieller FuE-Strategien für die nationale Forschungs- und Technologiepolitik. In: Gerybadze, A., Meyer-Krahmer, F., Reger, G.: Globales Management von Forschung und Innovation. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel, pp. 196-215.
214. Moed, H. (2005): Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Berlin et al.: Springer.
215. Mowery, D. C., Rosenberg, N. (1989): Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
216. Mowery, C. D., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B., Ziedonis, A. A. (2001): The Growth of Patenting and Licensing by U. S. Universities: An Assessment of the Effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980. In: Research Policy, 30, pp. 99-199.
217. Narula, R. (2002): The Implications of Growing Cross-border Interdependence for Systems of Innovation. Maastricht: Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
218. Narula, R. (2000): Explaining Inertia in R&D Internationalisation: Norwegian Firms and the Role of Home Country Effects. MERIT Research Memoranda, 2000-021.
219. Nelson, R. R. (2001): Observations on the Post-Bayh-Dole Rise of Patenting at American Universities. In: The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, pp. 13-19.
220. Nelson, R. R. (1988): Institutions Supporting Technical Change in the United States. In: Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., Soete, L. (eds.): Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter, pp. 312-329.
221. Nelson, R. R., Rosenberg, N. (1993): Technical Innovation and National Systems. In: Nelson, R. R. (ed.): National Innovation Systems. A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3-21.
222. Nelson, R. R. (ed.) (1993): National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
223. Nesta, L., Patel, P. (2004): National Patterns of Technology Accumulation: Use of Patent Statistics. In: Moed, H. F., Glänzel, W., Schmoch, U. (eds.): Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher, pp. 531-551.
224. NSF (2004): Science and Engineering Indicators 2004. Washington: National Science Foundation.
225. Nyström, K. (2005): Interdependencies in the Dynamics of Firm Entry and Exit. In: CESIS Electronic Working Paper Series No. 28.
226. OECD (2005a): Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2005. Paris: OECD.
227. OECD (2005b): Main Science and Technology Indicators. Paris: OECD.
228. OECD (2004a): The Economic Impact of ICT - Measurement, Evidence and Implications. Paris: OECD.
229. OECD (2004b): Handbook for Internationally Comparative Education Statistics: Concepts, Standards, Definitions and Classifications. Paris: OECD.
230. OECD (2003): ICT and Economic Growth - Evidence from OECD Countries, Industries and Firms. Paris: OECD.
231. OECD (2002a): Frascati Manual 2002: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development. Paris: OECD.
232. OECD (2002b): Measuring the Information Economy. Paris: OECD.
233. OECD (2002c): Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2002. Paris: OECD.
234. OECD (2002d): Tax Incentives for Research and Development: Trends and Issues. Paris: OECD.
235. OECD (2002e): Investment in Human Capital Through Post-Compulsory Education and Training: Selected Efficiency and Equity Aspects. Economics Department Working Paper No. 333, Paris: OECD.
236. OECD (1999): Classifying Educational Programmes. Manual for ISCED-97 Implementation in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD.
237. OECD (1989): The Measurement of Scientific and Technical Activities. R&D Statistics and Output Measurement in the Higher Education Sector - Supplement to the Frascati Manual. Paris: OECD.
238. OECD (ed.) (2005): OECD Handbook on Economic Globalisation Indicators. Paris: OECD.
239. OECD (ed.) (2004a): Science, Technology and Industry Outlook. Paris: OECD.
240. OECD (ed.) (2004b): Compendium of Patent Statistics 2004. Paris: OECD.
241. OECD (ed.) (2004c): Patents and Innovation: Trends and Policy Challenges. Paris: OECD.
242. OECD (ed.) (2004d): Education at a Glance 2004. Paris: OECD.
243. OECD (ed.) (2003a): Science Technology and Industry Scoreboard. Paris: OECD.
244. OECD (ed.) (2003b): Main Science and Technology Indicators. Vol. 2003/1. Paris: OECD.
245. OECD (ed.) (2003c): Turning Science into Business. Patenting and Licensing at Public Research Organisations. Paris: OECD.
246. OECD (ed.) (2003d): Education at a Glance 2003. Paris: OECD.
247. OECD (ed.) (2002): Education at a Glance 2002. Paris: OECD.
248. OECD (ed.) (2001a): The Well-Being of Nations. The Role of Human and Social Capital. Paris: OECD.
249. OECD (ed.) (2001b): Education at a Glance 2001. Paris: OECD.
250. OECD (ed.) (2000a): Fostering High-tech Spin-offs: A Public Strategy for Innovation. In: STI Review, 26, Paris: OECD.
251. OECD (ed.) (2000b): Education at a Glance 2000. Paris: OECD.
252. OECD (ed.) (1999): Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 1999. Benchmarking Knowledge-Based Economies. Paris: OECD.
253. OECD (ed.) (1995): The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities. Manual on the Measurement of Human Resources Devoted to Science and Technology 'Canberra Manual'. OECD/GD (95) 77. Paris: OECD.
254. OECD (ed.) (1993): The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities. Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys of Research and Experimental Development. Paris: OECD.
255. OECD: Online Bildungs-Datenbank 2002, 2004.
256. OECD; Eurostat (1997): Oslo-Manual. Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data. Paris: OECD.
257. Oerlemans, L. A. G., Pretorius, M. W., Buys, A. J., Rooks, G. (2003): Industrial Innovation in South Africa 1998-2000. Report on the South African Innovation Survey for the Period 1998-2000. Pretoria: University of Pretoria, Department of Engineering and Technology Management.
258. Omenn, G. S. (2003): Science and Technology Policies Concerning the Life Sciences. In: AAAS (ed.): Science and Technology Policy Yearbook 2003. Washington: AAAS, pp. 145-167.
259. Patel, P., Pavitt, K. (2000): National Systems of Innovation under Strain: The Internationalisation of Corporate R&D. In: Barré, R. et al. (eds.): Productivity, Innovation and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
260. Patel, P., Vega, M. (1999): Patterns of Internationalisation of Corporate Technology: Location Versus Home Country Advantages. In: Research Policy, 28(2/3), pp. 145-155.
261. Pearce, R. (1999): Decentralised R&D and Strategic Competitveness: Globalised Approaches to Generation and Use of Technology in Multinational Enterprises (MNEs). In: Research Policy, 29, pp. 157-178.
262. Pearce, R., Singh, S. (1997): Motivation and Organization of Decentraliced R & D. In: Pearce, R. (ed.): Global Competition and Technology. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
263. Petersen et al. (1993): Die Bedeutung des internationalen Dienstleistungshandels für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. DIW-Beiträge zur Strukturforschung, No. 145, Berlin.
264. Plünnecke, A., Werner, D. (2004): Das duale Ausbildungssystem. Die Bedeutung der Berufsausbildung für die Jugendarbeitslosigkeit und Wachstum. Beiträge zur Ordnungspolitik des Instituts der deutschen Wirtschaft, 9, Köln.
265. Polt, W., Rammer, C., Gassler, H., Schibany, A., Schartinger, D. (2001): Benchmarking Industry-Science Relations: The Role of Framework Conditions. In: Science and Public Policy, 28, pp. 247-258.
266. Porter, M. E. (1998): The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: The Free Press.
267. Pottelsberghe van, B. et al. (2003): Improving the Effectiveness of Fiscal Measures to Stimulate Private Investment in Research. Brussels: Expert Working Group for the EC Research DG.
268. Prantl, S. (2003): Bankruptcy and Voluntary Liquidation: Evidence for New Firms in East and West Germany after Unification. ZEW Discussion Paper 03-72. Mannheim: ZEW.
269. PREST (2002): A Comparative Analysis of Public, Semi-Public and Recently Privatised Research Centres. Manchester: PREST.
270. Raan van, A. F. J. (2004): Measuring Science. Capita Selecta of Current Main Issues. In: Moed, H. F., Glänzel, W., Schmoch, U. (eds.): Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 19-50.
271. Rammer, C. (2005): European Trend Chart on Innovation. Country Report Germany, Covering Period October 2004 - September 2005. Luxembourg: European Commission.
272. Rammer, C. (2004): Unternehmensdynamik in Deutschland 1995-2003: Die Rolle forschungsund wissensintensiver Branchen und eine Einordnung im internationalen Vergleich. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem, 11-2005. Berlin: BMBF.
273. Rammer, C., Peters, B., Schmidt, T., Aschhoff, B., Doherr, T., Niggemann, H. (2005a): Innovationen in Deutschland. Ergebnisse der Innovationserhebung 2003 in der deutschen Wirtschaft. ZEW-Wirtschaftsanalysen, 78, Baden-Baden: Nomos.
274. Rammer, C., Aschhoff, B., Doherr, T., Peters, B., Schmidt, T. (2005b): Innovation in Germany. Results of the German Innovation Survey 2004. Mannheim: ZEW.
275. Rammer, C., Aschhoff, B., Peters, B., Schmidt, T. (2005c): Kurzbericht zur Innovationserhebung 2004. Auswertung der Schwerpunktfrage 'Aufnahme/Ausweitung von Innovationsaktivitäten'. Mannheim: ZEW.
276. Rammer, C., Polt, W., Egeln, J., Licht, G., Schibany, A. (2004): Internationale Trends der Forschungs- und Innovationspolitik - Fällt Deutschland zurück? ZEW-Wirtschaftsanalysen 73, Baden-Baden: Nomos.
277. Rammer, C., Schmidt, T. (2003): Innovationsverhalten der Unternehmen in Deutschland. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem, 15-2004. Berlin: BMBF.
278. Reger, G., Beise, M., Belitz, H. (1999): Innovationsstandorte multinationaler Unternehmen. Heidelberg: Physica.
279. Reich, R. (1993): The Work of Nations. Buenos Aires.
280. Reinberg, A., Hummel, M. (2002): Zur langfristigen Entwicklung des qualifikationsspezifischen Arbeitskräfteangebots und -bedarfs in Deutschland. Empirische Befunde und aktuelle Projektionsergebnisse. In: Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, 35(4), pp. 580-600.
281. Revermann, C., Schmidt, E. M. (1999): Erfassung und Messung von Forschungs- und Entwicklungsaktivitäten im Dienstleistungssektor. Essen: RWI, Wissenschaftsstatistik.
282. Ricardo, D. (1996): Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. In: Great Minds Series. Amherst: Prometheus Books.
283. Rigby, D. K., Reichheld, F. F., Schefter, P. (2002): Avoid the Four Perils of CRM. In: Technology Review, 80(2), pp. 101-109.
284. Rip, A. (1992): Science and Technology as Dancing Partners. In: Kroes, P., Bakker, M. (eds.): Technological Development and Science in the Industrial Age. New Perspectives on the Science-Technology Relationship. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 231-269.
285. Roberts, G. (2003): Review of Research Assessment. Report by Sir Gareth Roberts to the UK Funding Bodies, London.
286. Sapir, A. et al. (2003): An Agenda for a Growing Europe. Making the EU Economic System Deliver ('Sapir-Report'). Brussels: European Commission.
287. Schaan, S., Anderson, F. (2001): Innovation in Canadian Manufacturing: National Estimates. Survey of Innovation 1999. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
288. Schmid, H., Liebig, T. (2001): Quo vadis, duales System? Das neue Berufsbildungsgesetz und die Berufsbildungsreformen in der Europäischen Union. Diskussionspapiere, 71, St. Gallen: Forschungsinstitut für Arbeit und Arbeitsrecht an der Hochschule St. Gallen
289. Schmoch, U. (2005): Leistungsfähigkeit und Strukturen der Wissenschaft im internationalen Vergleich, 2004. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem, 6-2005. Bonn, Berlin: BMBF (accessible by: www.technologische-leistungsfaehigkeit.de).
290. Schmoch, U. (2003a): Hochschulforschung und Industrieforschung - Perspektiven der Interaktion. Frankfurt, New York: Campus.
291. Schmoch, U. (2003b): Service Marks as Novel Innovation Indicator. In: Research Evaluation, 12(2), pp. 149-156.
292. Schmoch, U., Hinze, S. (2004): Opening the Black Box. In: Moed, H. F., Glänzel, W., Schmoch, U. (eds.): Handbook of Qualitative Science and Technology Research. The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 215-235.
293. Schmoch, U., Grupp, H., Mannsbart, W., Schwitalla, B. (1988): Technikprognosen mit Patentindikatoren. Köln: Verlag TÜV Rheinland.
294. Schultz, S., Weise, Ch. (1999): der deutsche Dienstleistungshandel im internationalen Vergleich. DIW-Beiträge zur Strukturforschung, 180, Berlin: DIW.
295. Schumpeter, J. (1911): Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Eine Untersuchung über Unternehmergewinn, Kapital, Kredit, Zins und den Konjunkturzyklus. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
296. Siegel, D., Waldman, D., Link, A. (2003): Assessing the Impact of Organizational Practices on the Productivity of University Technology Transfer Offices: An Exploratory Study. In: Research Policy, 32, pp. 27-48.
297. Siegfried, J. J., Evans, L. B. (1994): Empirical Studies of Entry and Exit: A Survey of the Evidence. In: Review of Industrial Organization, 9, pp. 121-155.
298. Stach, M. (1998): Die Krise des Dualen Systems - Phasen, Symptome, Gründe, Reformen. In: TNTEE Publications, 1 (1).
299. Stadler, M.; Wapler, R. (2004): Endogenous Skilled-biased Technological Change and Matching Unemployment. In: Journal of Economics, 81, pp. 1-24.
300. Statistics New Zealand (2004): Innovation in New Zealand 2003. Wellington: Statistics New Zealand.
301. Stifterverband für die Deutsche Wissenschaft (2004): FuE-Datenreport 2003/04. Forschung und Entwicklung in der Wirtschaft. Bericht über die FuE-Erhebungen 2001 und 2002. Essen: Wissenschaftsstatistik GmbH im Stifterverband für die Deutsche Wissenschaft.
302. Storey, D., Wynarczyk, P. (1997): The Survival and Non Survival of Micro Firms in the UK. In: Review of Industrial Organization, 11, pp. 209-229.
303. Strack, G. (2003): Hightech- und wissensintensive Sektoren schaffen Arbeitsplätze in Europa. In: Statistik kurz gefasst, Thema 9: Wissenschaft und Technologie, 10/2003. Luxembourg: Eurostat.
304. Tae, Y. S. et al. (2002): Korean Innovation Survey 2002: Manufacturing Sector. Seoul: Science & Technology Policy Institute.
305. Tessaring, M., Wannan, J. (2004): Vocational Education and Training - Key to the Future, Lisbon-Copenhagen-Maastricht: Mobilising for 2010. CEDEFOP Synthesis of the Maastricht Study, Luxembourg.
306. Thurik, R., Grilo, I. (2005): Determinants of Entrepreneurial Engagement Levels in Europe and the US. Discussion Papers of Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy, 20-2005, Jena: Max Planck Institute of Economics.
307. Tidd, J., Hull F. M. (eds.) (2003): Service Innovation. London: Imperial College Press.
308. tns infratest (2004): Monitoring Informationswirtschaft 7. Faktenbericht 2004, Munich.
309. Troltsch, K. (2004a): Strukturen und Entwicklung der dualen Ausbildung in Technikberufen und Trends im Fachkräfteangebot bis 2015. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem, 6-2004, Bonn.
310. Troltsch, K. (2004b): Berufsbildung und Strukturwandel. Zum Einfluss wirtschaftsstruktureller Veränderungen auf das betriebliche Ausbildungsstellenangebot seit 1980. In: BIBB (ed.): der Ausbildungsmarkt und seine Einflussfaktoren. Ergebnisse des Experten-Workshops vom 1. und 2. Juli 2004 in Bonn, Bonn: BIBB.
311. Tunzelmann von, N., Kraemer Mbula, E. (2003): Changes in Research Assessment Practices in other Countries since 1999. Final report, Brighton: SPRU.
312. Uhly, A. (2005): Die Zukunftsfähigkeit technischer Berufe im dualen System. Empirische Analysen auf der Basis der Berufsbildungsstatistik. Gutachten im Rahmen der Berichterstattung zur technologischen Leistungsfähigkeit Deutschlands. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem, 5-2005, Bonn (http://technologische-leistungsfaehig-keit.de/pub/sdi-05-05.pdf).
313. Ulrich, J. G., Troltsch, K. (2003): Stabilisierung des Lehrstellenmarktes unter wirtschaftlich schwierigen Rahmenbedingungen? Aktuelle Analysen der Berufsberatungsstatistik zur Lage auf dem Ausbildungsstellenmarkt. Forschung Spezial, 5, Bielefeld: Bertelsmann.
314. Um, M.-J. et al. (2004): Korean Innovation Survey (KIS) 2003: Service Sector. Seoul: Science & Technology Policy Institute.
315. UNESCO (1999): Operational Manual for ISCED 1997. Paris: UNESCO.
316. UNESCO (1997): International Standard Classification of Education - ISCED 1997. Paris: UNESCO.
317. VDG (2004): Bedarfslücke in der Gründungsfinanzierung schliessen! Press information, 27 September 2004, Berlin: Verband deutscher Gründungsinitiativen (VDG).
318. Voßkamp, R. (2005): Die Beiträge von Forschung, Entwicklung und Innovation zu Produktivität und Wachstum. Berlin: DIW.
319. Wagner, J. (1994): The Post-Entry Performance of New Small Firms in German Manufacturing Industries. In: Journal of Industrial Economics, 62, pp. 141-154.
320. Wakelin, K. (1997): Trade and Innovation. Theory and Evidence. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
321. Walden, G., Herget, H. (2002): Nutzen der betrieblichen Ausbildung für Betriebe. Erste Ergebnisse einer empirischen Erhebung. In: Berufsbildung in Wissenschaft und Praxis, 31(6), pp. 32-37.
322. Warda, J. (2002): A 2001-2002 Update of R&D Tax Treatment in OECD Countries. Report Prepared for the OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry, Paris: OECD.
323. Weißhuhn, G., Wichmann, T. (2000): Beschäftigungseffekte von Unternehmensgründungen. Berlin: Berlicon Research.
324. Wenger, L. (1997): Forschungsrahmen zukünftiger Qualifikationsforschung. In: Zeitschrift für Berufs- und Wirtschaftspädagogik (ZBW), 4(93), pp. 384-404.
325. Wennekers, S., van Stel, A., Thurik, R., Reynolds, P. (2005): Nascent Entrepreneurship and the Level of Economic Development. In: Small Business Economics, 24, pp. 293-309.
326. Werner, R. (2003): Die Bedeutung der neuen Ausbildungsberufe für den Strukturwandel des dualen Systems. In: Beicht, U. et al.: Technische Berufe im dualen System der Berufsausbildung - Stellenwert und Entwicklungstendenzen. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem, Nr. 3-2003, Bonn, pp. 6-25.
327. Westerhuis, A. (2001): European Structures of Qualification Levels. Reports on Recent Developments in Germany, Spain, France, the Netherlands and in the United Kingdom (England and Wales). Vol. II. Luxembourg.
328. World Bank (2005): Doing Business in 2006: Removing Creating Jobs. Washington: The World Bank.
329. World Bank (2004): Doing Business in 2005: Removing Obstacles to Growth. Washington: The World Bank.
330. Youtie, J., Shapira, P., Brice, K., Hegde, D., Changeau, D., Wang, J. (2002): Manufacturing Needs, Practices, and Performance in Georgia, 1999-2002. GaMEP Evaluation Working Paper E 200201, Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology.