Nanoscience, nanoscientists, and controversy

Nanotechnology and Society: Current and Emerging Ethical Issues

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 225-239

  Robert, Jason Scott ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892204201     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6209-4_12     Document Type: Chapter

References (16)

1. Abraham, C. 2006. Critics troubled by new fertility panel. The Globe and Mail (23 December).
2. Bush, V. 1950. Science, the Endless Frontier. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
3. Eggertson, L. 2007. New reproductive technology board belies expert selection process. Canadian Medical Association Journal 176:611-612.
4. Kitcher, P. 2001. Science, Truth, and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Maienschein, J et al. 1998. Scientific literacy. Science 281:917.
6. Mooney, C. 2005. The Republican War on Science. New York: Basic Books.
7. Mott, M. 2005. Animal-human hybrids spark controversy. National Geographic News. 25 January. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/01/ 0125-050125-chimeras.html. Cited 1 June 2007.
8. Parens, E et al., eds. 2005. Wrestling with Behavioral Genetics: Science, Ethics, and Public Conversation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
9. Robert, J. S. 2004. Embryology, Epigenesis, and Evolution: Taking Development Seriously. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Robert, J. S. 2006. The science and ethics of making part-human animals in stem cell research. FASEB Journal 20:838-845.
11. Robert, J. S. 2007. Systems bioethics. The American Journal of Bioethics 7. 4:80-82.
12. Robert, J. S et al. 2006. Systems bioethics and stem cell biology. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3:19-31.
13. Sarewitz, D. 2006. Scientizing politics. Issues in Science and Technology 22.2 (Winter). http://www.issues.org/22.2/br-sarewitz.html. Cited 1 June 2007.
14. Sherwin, S. and F. Baylis. 2003. The feminist health care ethics consultant as architect and advocate. Public Affairs Quarterly 17:141-158.
15. Walker, M. U. 1993. Keeping moral space open. Hastings Center Report 23. 2:33-40.
16. Wilsdon, J. and R. Willis. 2004. See-through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream. London: Demos.