Argumentation methods for artificial intelligence in law

Argumentation Methods for Artificial Intelligence in Law

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1-270

  Walton, Douglas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINNIPEG   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892058842     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-27881-8     Document Type: Book

References (245)

1. Achinstein Peter (1983) The Nature of Explanation, New York, Oxford University Press
2. Alberts Laurie (2001)'Causation in Toxic Tort Litigation', Villanova Environmental Law Journal, 12: 33-63
3. Anderson Barrie, Anderson Dawn (1998) Manufacturing Guilt: Wrongful Convictions in Canada, Halifax, Fernwood Publishing
4. Anderson Terence J (1999)'On Generalizations I: A Preliminary Exploration', South Texas Law Review, 40: 455-481
5. Anderson Terence, Twining William (1991) Analysis of Evidence: How to do Things with Facts Based on Wigmore's Science of Judicial Proof, Boston, Little Brown & Co
6. Aristotle (1928) On Sophistical Refutations, Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press
7. Aristotle (1937) Rhetoric, Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press
8. Aristotle (1938) Prior Analytics, Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press
9. Aristotle (1939) Topics, trans Forster ES, Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press
10. Ashley Kevin D, Rissland Edwina L (2003) 'Law, Learning and Representation', Artificial Intelligence, 150: 17-58
11. Ball Vaughn C (1980) 'The Myth of Conditional Relevancy', Georgia Law Review, 14, 435-469
12. Bench-Capon Trevor (1997) 'Argument in Artificial Intelligence and Law', Artificial Intelligence and Law, 5, 249-261
13. Bench-Capon Trevor (1998) 'Specification and Implementation of Toulmin Dialogue Game', Jurix 1998: The Eleventh Conference, ed Jaap Hage et al, Nijmegen, Gerard Noodt Instituut, 5-20
14. Bench-Capon Trevor (2002) 'Agreeing to Differ: Modelling Persuasive Dialogue between Parties with Different Values', Informal Logic, 22: 231-245 Version available (2003) on the web page of the Department of Computer Science at the University of Liverpool: http://www.csc.liv.ac.uk/~tbc/projects/ifl.pdf
15. Bench-Capon Trevor, Sartor Giovanni (2003) 'A Model of Legal Reasoning with Cases Incorporating Theories and Values', Artificial Intelligence, 150, 97-143
16. Bex Floris, Prakken Henry (2004) 'Reinterpreting Arguments in Dialogue: An Application to Evidential Reasoning', Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, ed Thomas F Gordon, Amsterdam, IOS Press, 119-130
17. Bex Floris, Prakken Henry, Reed Chris, Walton Douglas (2003) 'Towards a Formal Account of Reasoning about Evidence: Argumentation Schemes and Generalizations', Artificial Intelligence and Law, 12, 125-165
18. Bibel Wolfgang (2004) 'AI and the Conquest of Complexity in Law', Invited Lecture, Seventeenth Annual Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, available on the web site of the JURIX 2004 Conference: http://gi-fg612.fokus.fhg.de/Jurix2004/
19. Boutlier C, Becher V (1995) 'Abduction as Belief Revision', Artificial Intelligence, 77, 43-94
20. Branting L Carl (2000) Reasoning with Rules and Precedents: A Computational Model of Legal Analysis, Dordrecht, Kluwer
21. Bromberger Sylvain (1966) 'Why-Questions', Mind and Cosmos, ed Robert G Colodny, Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press, 86-111
22. Burke Michael (1985) 'Unstated Premises', Informal Logic, 7, 107-118
23. Burnyeat Myles F (1994) 'Enthymeme: Aristotle on the Logic of Persuasion', Aristotle's Rhetoric: Philosophical Essays, ed David J Furley and Alexander Nehemas, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 3-55
24. Callen Craig R (2003) 'Rationality and Relevancy: Conditional Relevancy and Constrained Resources', Michigan State University Law Review, 4, 1243-1303
25. Campbell Stephen K (1974) Flaws and Fallacies in Statistical Thinking, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall
26. Carberry Sandra (1990) Plan Recognition in Natural Language Dialogue, Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press
27. Cawsey Alison (1992) Explanation and Interaction: The Computer Generation of Explanatory Dialogue, Cambridge, Mass, The MIT Press
28. Chakrabarti Kisor Kumar (1995) Definition and Induction: A Historical and Comparative Study, Honolulu, University of Hawaii Press
29. Chandrasekaran B (1986) 'Generic Tasks in Knowledge Based Reasoning', IEEE Expert, 1, 23-30
30. Chorley Alison, Bench-Capon Trevor (2004) 'AGATHA: Automation of the Construction of Theories in Case Law Domains, Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, ed Thomas F Gordon, Amsterdam, IOS Press, 89-98
31. Coffa J Alberto (1974) "Hempel's Ambiguity", Synthese, 28, pp 141-163
32. Collingwood Robin G (1946) The Idea of History, Oxford, Clarendon Press
33. Collingwood Robin G (1939) An Autobiography, Oxford, Oxford University Press
34. Collins Allan, Warnock Eleanor H, Aiello Nelleke, Miller Mark L (1975)'Reasoning from Incomplete Knowledge', Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science, ed Daniel G Bobrow and Allan Collins, New York, Academic Press, 383-415
35. Copi Irving M (1982) Introduction to Logic, 6th ed, New York, Macmillan
36. th ed, New York, Macmillan
37. Dieks Dennis, de Regt Henk W (1998) 'Reduction and Understanding', Foundations of Science, 1, 45-59
38. Doyle J (1979) 'A Truth Maintenance System', Artificial Intelligence, 12, 231-272
39. Doyle J (1992) 'Reason Maintenance and Belief Revision', Belief Revision, ed Peter Gar-denfors, Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press, 29-51
40. Dray William (1964) Philosophy of History, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall
41. Dray William (1995) History as Re-enactment: R G Collingwood's Idea of History, Oxford, Oxford University Press
42. Dung P (1995) 'On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Progamming and n-person Games', Artificial Intelligence, 77, 321-357
43. Ennis Robert H (1982), 'Identifying Implicit Assumptions', Synthese, 51, 61-86
44. Farley Arthur M, Freeman Kathleen (1995) 'Burden of Proof in Legal Argumentation', Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, New York, ACM Press
45. Faye Jan (1999) 'Explanation Explained', Synthese, 120, 61-75
46. Federal Rules of Evidence, Federal Rulemaking-Rules in Effect (2002) The latest versions of the federal rules of evidence as well as other rules can be found on the following web page: http://www.uscourts.gov/rules/newrules4.html
47. Feteris Eveline T (1999) Fundamentals of Legal Argumentation: A Survey of Theories of the Justification of Legal Decisions, Dordrecht, Kluwer
48. Finocchiaro Maurice (1980) 'Scientific Discoveries as Growth of Understanding: The Case of Newton's Gravitation', Scientific Discovery, Logic, and Rationality, ed Thomas Nickles, Dordrecht, Reidel, 235-255
49. Finocchiaro Maurice (1980a) Galileo and the Art of Reasoning, Dordrecht, Reidel
50. Frank Jerome (1963) Courts on Trial, New York, Atheneum
51. Freeman James B (1991) Dialectics and the Macrostructure of Arguments, Berlin, Foris
52. Freeman James B (1995) 'The Appeal to Popularity and Presumption by Common Knowledge', Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings, ed Hans V Hansen and Robert C Pinto, University Park, The Pennsylvania State University Press, 265-273
53. Friedman Michael (1974) 'Explanation and Scientific Understanding', The Journal of Philosophy, 71, 5-19
54. Friedman Michael (1988) 'Explanation and Scientific Understanding', Theories of Explanation, ed J C Pitt, New York, Oxford University Press, 188-198
55. Friedman Richard D (1986) 'A Diagrammatic Approach to Evidence', Boston University Law Review, 66, 571-622
56. Friedman Richard D (1994) 'Conditional Probative Value: Neoclassicism Without Myth', Michigan Law Review, 93, 439-460
57. Gardenfors Peter (1988) Knowledge in Flux, Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press
58. Gelfond Michael, Przymusinska Halina (1990) 'Formalization of Inheritance Reasoning in Autoepistemic Logic', Fundamenta Informaticae, 13, 403-443
59. th ed, Philadelphia, John Cruikshank
60. Goldman Alvin I (1970) A Theory of Human Action, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall
61. Goodwin Jean (2000) 'Wigmore's Chart Method', Informal Logic, 20, 2000, 223-243
62. Gordon Robert M (1986) 'Folk Psychology as Simulation', Mind and Language, 1, 158-171
63. Gordon Thomas F (1996) 'Computational Dialectics', available at the web page: http://www.tfgordon.de/publications/Gordon1996a.pdf
64. Gordon Thomas F (1995) The Pleadings Game: An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice, Dordrecht, Kluwer
65. Gordon Thomas F (1996) 'Computational Dialectics', Computers as Assistants-A New Generation of Support Systems, ed P Hoschka, Mahwah, New Jersey, Erlbaum, 108-123
66. Gordon Thomas F, Karacapilidis Nikos (1997) 'The Zeno Argumentation Framework', Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Melbourne, Australia, 10-18
67. Gough James, Tindale Christopher (1985) 'Hidden or Missing Premises', Informal Logic, 7, 99-106
68. Grasso Floriana (2002) 'Towards Computational Rhetoric', Informal Logic, 22, 195-230
69. Grennan Wayne (1997) Informal Logic: Issues and Techniques, Montreal, McGill-Queen's University Press
70. Grice H Paul (1975) 'Logic and Conversation', The Logic of Grammar, ed Donald Davidson and Gilbert Harman, Encino, California, Dickenson, 64-75
71. Guthrie WKC (1981) A History of Greek Philosophy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
72. Hage Jaap (2000) 'Dialectical Models in Artificial Intelligence and Law', Artificial Intelligence and Law, 8, 137-172
73. Hage Jaap (1997) Reasoning With Rules: An Essay on Legal Reasoning and Its Underlying Logic, Dordrecht, Kluwer
74. Halonen Ilpo, Hintikka Jaakko (1997) 'Unification-It's Magnificent But Is It Explanation?', Synthese, 120, 27-47
75. Hamblin Charles L (1970) Fallacies, London, Methuen
76. Hamblin, Charles L (1971) 'Mathematical Models of Dialogue', Theoria, 37, 130-155
77. Hansen Hans V, Pinto Robert C (1995) Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings, University Park, The Pennsylvania State University Press
78. Hart HLA, Honore AM (1962) Causation in the Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press
79. Hastings Arthur C (1963) A Reformulation of the Modes of Reasoning in Argumentation, Evanston, Illinois, Ph D Dissertation
80. Hempel Carl G (1965) Aspects of Scientific Explanation, New York, The Free Press
81. Hintikka Jaakko (1995) 'The Games of Logic and the Games of Inquiry', Dialectica, 49, 229-249
82. Hitchcock David (1985) 'Enthymematic Arguments', Informal Logic, 7, 83-97
83. Hitchcock David (2004) 'Toulmin's Warrants',: available on David Hitchcock's personal web page: http://www.humanities.mcmaster.ca/~hitchckd/ Toulminswarrants.pdf
84. Hitchcock David, McBurney Peter, Parsons Simon (2001) 'A Framework for Deliberation Dialogues', Argument and Its Applications: Proceedings of the Fourth Biennial Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), eds H V Hansen, CW Tindale, JA Blair and RH Johnson, compact disk. Also available on Peter McBurney's web page at the University of Liverpool, Department of Computer Science: http://www.csc.liv.ac.uk/~peter/
85. Hohmann Hanns (1989) 'The Dynamics of Stasis: Classical Rhetorical Theory and Modern Legal Argumentation', American Journal of Jurisprudence, 34, 171-197
86. Hohmann Hanns (1990) 'The Nature of the Common Law and the Comparative Study of Legal Reasoning', American Journal of Comparative Law, 38, 143-170
87. Hohmann Hanns (2001) 'Stasis', Encyclopedia of Rhetoric, ed Thomas O Sloane, New York, Oxford University Press, 741-745
88. Horacek Helmut (1997)'A Model for Adapting Explanations to the User's Likely Inferences', User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 7, 1-55
89. Huber Peter W (1991) Galileo's Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom, New York, Basic Books
90. th ed, Belmont, California, Wadsworth
91. th ed, Belmont, California, Wadsworth
92. th ed, Belmont, California, Wadsworth
93. Jacobs Scott (1989) 'Speech Acts and Arguments', Argumentation, 3, 345-365
94. Johnson Ralph H (2002) Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument, Mahwah, New Jersey, Erlbaum
95. Josephson John R, Josephson Susan G (1994) Abductive Inference: Computation, Philosophy, Technology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
96. Keppens Jeroen, Zeleznikow John (2002) 'On the Role of Model-based Reasoning in Decision Support in Crime Investigation', Report of the Centre for Forensic Statistics and Legal Reasoning, Edinburgh, University of Edinburgh
97. Kienpointner Manfred (1992) Alltagslogik: Struktur und Funktion von Argumentations-mustern, Stuttgart, Fromman-Holzboog
98. Kienpointner Manfred (1997) 'On the Art of Finding Arguments: What Ancient and Modern Masters of Invention Have to Tell Us About the Ars Inveniendi', Argumentation 11, 225-236
99. th ISSA Conference on Argumentation, Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, ed Frans H van Eemeren, J Anthony Blair, Charles A Willard and Francisca Snoek Henkemans, Amsterdam, Sic Sat, 611-616
100. Kitcher Philip (1989) 'Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World', Scientific Explanation: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 13, ed Philip Kitcher and Wesley Salmon, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 410-505
101. Krabbe Erik CW (1995) 'Appeal to Ignorance', Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings, ed Hans V Hansen and Robert C Pinto, University Park, The Pennsylvania State University Press, 251-264
102. Krabbe Erick CW (1996) 'Can We Ever Pin One Down to a Formal Fallacy?', Logic and Argumentation, ed Johan van Benthem, Frans H van Eemeren and Frank Veltman, Amsterdam, North-Holland, 129-141
103. th Birthday, ed Jelle Gerbrandy, Maarten Marx, Maarten de Rijke and Yde Venema, Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, 25-36
104. Krabbe Erik CW (2001) 'The Problem of Retraction in Critical Discussion', Synthese, 127, 141-159
105. th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, St Louis, Missouri, ACM Press, 109-118
106. Lester J, Porter B (1997) 'Developing and Empirically Evaluating Robust Explanation Generators: The KNIGHT Experiments', Computational Linguistics, 2, 65-101
107. Lodder Arno R (1999) Dialaw: On Legal Justification and Dialogical Models of Argumentation, Dordrecht, Kluwer
108. Lodder Arno R (2000) 'Book Review of Gordon (1995)', Artificial Intelligence and Law, 8, 255-264
109. Loftus Elisabeth (1979) Eyewitness Testimony, Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press
110. Loui Ronald P (1998) 'Process and Policy: Resource-Bounded Nondemonstrative Reasoning', Computational Intelligence, 14, 1-38
111. Loui Ronald P, Gordon Thomas F (1994), Call for papers for 1994 AAAI Seattle Workshop on Computational Dialectics http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~loui/ comectics.text
112. Mackenzie Jim (1981) 'The Dialectics of Logic', Logique et Analyse, 94, 159-177
113. Mackenzie Jim (1990) 'Four Dialogue Systems', Studia Logica, 49, 567-583
114. Mackie John L (1965) 'Causes and Conditions', American Philosophical Quarterly, 2, 245-264
115. Mates Benson (1996) The Skeptic Way: Sextus Empiricus's Outlines of Pyrrhonism, Oxford, Oxford University Press
116. Mayfield James (2000) 'Evaluating Plan Recognition Systems: Three Properties of a Good Explanation', Artificial Intelligence Review, 14, 351-376
117. McBurney Peter, Parsons Simon (2002) 'Dialogue Games in Multi-Agents Systems', Informal Logic, 22, 257-274
118. Michael Jerome, Adler Mortimer (1934) 'The Trial of an Issue of Fact: I', Columbia Law Review, 34, 1224-1306
119. Michael Jerome, Adler Mortimer (1934), 'The Trial of an Issue of Fact: II', Columbia Law Review, 34, 1462-1493
120. Moore Johanna D (1991) 'A Reacting Approach to Explanation: Taking the User's Feedback into Account', Natural Language Generation in Artificial Intelligence and Computational Linguistics, ed CL Paris, WR Swartout and WC Mann, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 3-48
121. Moore Johanna D (1995) Participating in Explanatory Dialogues, Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press
122. Moore Robert C (1985) 'Semantical Considerations on Nonmonotonic Logic', Artificial Intelligence, 25, 75-94
123. Morgan Edmund L (1929) 'Functions of Judge and Jury in the Determination of Preliminary Questions of Fact', Harvard Law Review, 43, 1929, 165-191
124. Moulin B, Irandoust H, Belanger M, Desbordes G (2002) 'Explanation and Argumentation Capabilities', Artificial Intelligence Review, 17, 169-222
125. Nance Dale A (1995) 'Conditional Probative Value and the Reconstruction of the Federal Rules of Evidence', Michigan Law Review, 94, 419-456
126. Nissan Ephraim (2001) 'The Bayesianism Debate in Legal Scholarship', Artificial Intelligence and Law, 9, 199-214
127. Nuchelmans Gabriel (1993) 'On the Fourfold Root of the Argumentum Ad Hominem', Empirical Logic and Public Debate, ed Erik CW Krabbe, Renee Jose Dalitz and Pier A Smit, Amsterdam, Rodopi, 37-47
128. Palmer Andrew (2003) Proof and the Preparation of Trials, Sydney, Australia, Lawbook Co
129. Park Roger C (1998) 'Character at the Crossroads', Hastings Law Journal, 49, 749-754
130. Park Roger C, Leonard David P, Goldberg Steven H (1998) Evidence Law, St Paul, Minnesota West Group
131. Pearl Judea (1991) 'Probabilistic Semantics for Nonmonotonic Reasoning', Philosophy and AI: Essays on the Interface, ed Robert Cummins and John Pollock, Cambridge, Mass, The MIT Press, 157-187
132. Pearl Judea (2000) Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
133. Peirce Charles S (1965) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol V, 'Pragmatism and Pragmaticism', ed Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss, Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press
134. Peirce Charles S (1965II) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol II, 'Elements of Logic', ed Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss, Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press
135. Peirce Charles S (1992) Reasoning and the Logic of Things, ed Kenneth Laine Kettner, Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press
136. Peng Yun, Reggia James A (1990) Abductive Inference Models for Diagnostic Problem-Solving, New York, Springer-Verlag
137. Perelman Chaim, Olbrechts-Tyteca Lucie (1971) The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation, trans J Wilkinson and P Weaver, 2nd ed, Notre Dame, University of Notre Dame Press, (First published, as La Nouvelle Rhetorique, in 1958)
138. Pollock John L (1987) 'Defeasible Reasoning', Cognitive Science, 11, 481-518
139. Pollock John L (1995) Cognitive Carpentry, Cambridge, Mass, The MIT Press
140. Prakken Henry (1991) 'On Formalizing Burden of Proof in Legal Argument', Legal Knowledge-Based Systems: JURIX 99, the Twelfth Conference, Nijmegen, Gerard Noodt Instituut, 85-97
141. Prakken Henry (1997) Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument, Dordrecht, Kluwer
142. Prakken Henry 'Relating Protocols for Dynamic Dispute with Logics for Defeasible Argumentation', Synthese, 127, 187-219
143. Prakken Henry (2001) 'Modelling Defeasibility in Law: Logic or Procedure?', Fundamenta Informaticae, 20, 1-20
144. Prakken Henry (2002) 'Incomplete Arguments in Legal Discourse: a Case Study', Legal Knowledge and Information Systems ed TJM Bench-Capon, A Daskalopulu and R Winkels JURIX 2002: The Fifteenth Annual Conference, Amsterdam, IOS Press, 93-102
145. Prakken Henry (2003) 'Perelman Formalized? On Reconciling the Ideals of Logical Validity and Persuasiveness', Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, ed Frans H van Eemeren, J Anthony Blair, Charles A Willard and Francisca Snoek Henkemans, Amsterdam, Sic Sat, 857-860
146. th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, University of Edinburgh, New York, Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 32-41
147. Prakken Henry, Reed Chris, Walton Douglas (2005) 'Dialogues about the Burden of Proof', unpublished paper
148. Prakken Henry, Renooij Silja (2001) 'Reconstructing Causal Reasoning about Evidence: A Case Study', Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, ed Bart Verheij, Arno R Lodder, Ronald P Loui and A Muntjewerjj, Amsterdam, IOS Press, 131-142
149. Prakken Henry, Sartor Giovanni (1996) 'A Dialectical Model of Assessing Conflicting Arguments in Legal Reasoning', Artificial Intelligence and Law, 4, 331-368
150. Prakken Henry, Sartor Giovanni (1997) 'Argument-based Extended Logic Programming with Defeasible Priorities', Journal of Applied Non-classical Logics, 7, 25-75
151. Prakken Henry, Sartor Giovanni (2003) 'The Three Faces of Defeasibility in the Law', Ratio Juris, 16, 495-516
152. Preyer Gerhard, Mans Dieter (1999) 'On Contemporary Developments in the Theory of Argumentation', Protosociology, 13, 3-13
153. Reed Chris (1998) 'Dialogue Frames in Agent Communication', Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, ed Y Demazeau, IEEE Press, 246-253
154. Reed Chris, Rowe Glenn (2002) 'Araucaria Software for Puzzles in Argument Diagramming and XML', Technical Report, Department of Applied Computing, University of Dundee Available at http://www.computing.dundee.ac.uk/staff/creed/ araucaria/
155. Reed Chris, Rowe Glenn (2003) Araucaria, Version 2, User Manual, Available at http://www.computing.dundee.ac.uk/staff/creed/araucaria/
156. Reed Chris, Norman Timothy J 2003 Argumentation Machines: New Frontiers in Argument and Computation, Dordrecht, Kluwer
157. Reed Chris, Walton Doug (2005) 'Towards a Formal and Implemented Model of Argumentation Schemes in Agent Communication', Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, to appear
158. Reiter Raymond (1980) 'A Logic for Default Reasoning', Artificial Intelligence, 13, 81-132
159. Reiter Raymond (1987) 'Nonmonotonic Reasoning', Annual Review of Computer Science, 2, 147-186
160. Renon Luis Vega (1998) 'Aristotle's Endoxa and Plausible Argumentation', Argumentation, 12, 95-113
161. Rissland Edwina L (1990, 1957-1980) 'Artificial Intelligence and Law: Stepping Stones to a Model of Legal Reasoning', Yale Law Journal, 99
162. Rissland Edwina L, Ashley Kevin D, Loui RP (2003) 'AI and Law: A Fruitful Synergy', Artficial Intelligence, 150, 1-15
163. Rescher Nicholas (1976) Plausible Reasoning, Assen, Van Gorcum
164. nd ed, Oxford, Clarendon Press
165. Roth Bram, Verheij Bart (2004) 'Dialectical Arguments and Case Comparison', Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, ed Thomas F Gordon, Amsterdam, IOS Press, 99-108
166. Roth Bram, Verheij Bart (1995) 'Cases and Dialectical Arguments: An Approach to Case-Based Reasoning', WORM'04: The Second International Workshop on Regulatory Ontologies, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3292, ed R Meersman, Z Tari and A Corsaro, Heidelberg, Springer, 634-651
167. Russell Stuart J, Norvig Peter (2004) Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall
168. Salmon Wesley C (1970) 'Statistical Explanation', The Nature and Function of Scientific Theories, ed Robert G Colodny, Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press, 173-231
169. Salmon Wesley C (1989) 'Four Decades of Scientific Explanation', Scientific Explanation, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 13, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 3-219
170. Salmon Wesley C (1992) 'Scientific Explanation', Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, ed Merrilee H Salmon et al, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, 7-41
171. Salmon Wesley C (1998) 'The Importance of Scientific Understanding', Causality and Explanation, ed Wesley Salmon, New York, Oxford University Press, 79-91
172. Saunders Kevin W (1993) 'Informal Fallacies in Legal Argumentation', South Carolina Law Review, 44, 343-382
173. Schank Roger C (1986) Explanation Patterns: Understanding Mechanically and Creatively, Hillsdale, New Jersey, Erlbaum
174. Schank Roger C, Abelson Robert P (1977) Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding, Hills-dale, N J Erlbaum
175. Schum David A (1994) Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning, New York, John Wiley and Sons
176. Schurz Gerhard (1999) 'Explanation as Unification', Synthese, 95-114
177. Scott AC, Clancey WJ, Davis R, Shortliffe EH (1977) 'Explanation Capabilities of Knowledge-Based Production Systems', Rule-Based Expert Systems, ed BG Buchanan and EH Shortliffe, Addison Wesley, 338-362
178. Scriven Michael (1962) 'Explanations, Predictions and Laws', Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 3, ed H Feigl and G Maxwell, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 171-174
179. Scriven Michael (1964) 'Critical Study of The Structure of Science', Review of Metaphysics, 17, 403-424
180. Scriven Michael (1976) Reasoning, New York, McGraw-Hill
181. Segal Martin E (2004) 'In Inheritance Case, Try Shifting Burden of Proof', Ask Doctor Law, The Miami Herald, December 13, 8
182. Sextus Empiricus (1933) Against the Logicians (AL), trans RG Bury, Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press
183. Sidgwick Alfred (1883) Fallacies: A View of Logic from the Practical Side, London, Kegan Paul, Trench and Company
184. Sidgwick Alfred (1893) The Process of Argument, London, Adam and Charles Black
185. Singh Munindar P (2000) 'A Social Semantics for Agent Communication Languages', Issues in Agent Communication, ed Frank Dignum and Mark Greaves, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 31-45
186. Singh Munidar P (1998) 'Agent Communication Languages: Rethinking the Principles', Computer, 31, 425-445
187. Snoeck Henkemans A F (1992) Analyzing Complex Argumentation: The Reconstruction of Multiple and Coordinatively Compound Argumentation in a Critical Discussion, Amsterdam, SICSAT
188. Snoeck Henkemans A Francisca (2001) 'Argumentation Structures', Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory, ed Frans H van Eemeren, Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, 101-134
189. Sterling TD, Rosenbaum WL, Weinkam JJ (1995) 'Publication Decisions Revisited: The Effect of the Outcome of Statistical Tests on the Decision to Publish and Vice Versa', The American Statistician, 49, 108-112
190. Stevenson Charles L (1944) Ethics and Language, New Haven, Yale University Press
191. Strong John W (ed) (1992) McCormick on Evidence, 4th ed, St Paul, Minn, West Publishing Co
192. Thayer James Bradley (1889)A Preliminary Treatise on Evidence at the Common Law, New York, Little Brown & Co
193. Thayer James Bradley (1989) 'Presumptions and the Law of Evidence', Harvard Law Review, 3, 141-166
194. nd ed, Englewood Cliffs Prentice-Hall
195. Tillers Peter (1994) 'Exaggerated and Misleading Reports of the Death of Conditional Relevance', Michigan Law Review, 93, 478-484
196. Toulmin Stephen (1958) The Uses of Argument, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
197. Trout JD (2002) 'Scientific Explanation and the Sense of Understanding', Philosophy of Science, 69, 212-233
198. Twining William (1985) Theories of Evidence: Bentham and Wigmore, London, Wei-denfeld and Nicolson
199. Twining William (1999) 'Narrative and Generalizations in Argumentation About Questions of Fact', South Texas Law Review, 40, 351-365
200. Twining William, Miers David (1976) How To Do Things With Rules, London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson
201. van Eemeren Frans H, Grootendorst Rob (1984) Speech Acts in Communicative Discussions, Dordrecht, Foris
202. van Eemeren Frans H, Grootendorst Rob (1987) 'Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective', Argumentation, 1, 283-301
203. van Eemeren Frans H, Grootendorst Rob (1992) Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies, Hillsdale, N J, Erlbaum
204. van Eemeren Frans H, Kruiger Tjark (1987) 'Identifying Argumentation Schemes', Argumentation: Perspectives and Approaches, ed Frans H van Eemeren et al, Dordrecht, Foris, 70-81
205. van Fraassen Bas C (1980) The Scientific Image, Oxford, Clarendon Press
206. van Fraassen Bas C (1993) 'The Pragmatics of Explanation', Explanation, ed David-Hillel Ruben, Oxford, Oxford University press, 275-309
207. Verheij Bart (1996) Rules, Reasons, Arguments: Formal Studies of Argumentation and Defeat, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Maastricht
208. Verheij Bart (2000)'Dialectical Argumentation as a Heuristic for Courtroom Decision Making', web page of Bart Verheij, Department of Metajuridica, Universiteit Maastricht
209. Verheij Bart (2000) 'Logic, Context and Valid Inference Or: Can There be a Logic of Law', available on the following web page:www.ai.rug.nl/~verheij/
210. Verheij Bart (2003) Dialectical Argumentation with Argumentation Schemes: An Approach to Legal Logic', Artificial Intelligence and Law, 11, 167-195
211. Verheij Bart (2005) Virtual Arguments: On the Design of Argument Assistants for Lawyers and Other Arguers, The Hague, TMC Asser Press
212. von Wright Georg Henrik (1971) Explanation and Understanding, Ithaca, New York, Cornell University Press
213. Wagenaar, Willem A, van Koppen Peter J, Crombag Hans FM (1993) Anchored Narratives: The Psychology of Criminal Evidence, Hertfordshire, Harvester Wheatsheaf
214. Walton Douglas N (1984) Logical Dialogue-Games and Fallacies, Lanham, Maryland, University Press of America
215. Walton Douglas (1989) Informal Logic, New York, Cambridge University Press
216. Walton Douglas (1990) 'Ignoring Qualifications (Secundum Quid) as a Subfallacy of Hasty Generalization', Logique et Analyse, 129-130, 113-154
217. Walton Douglas (1992) 'Nonfallacious Arguments from Ignorance', American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol 29, 381-387
218. Walton Douglas (1995) A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy, The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa and London
219. Walton Douglas (1996) Arguments from Ignorance, University Park, Pennsylvania, Penn Sate Press
220. Walton Douglas (1996)Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning, Mahwah, New Jersey, Erlbaum
221. Walton Douglas (1997) Appeal to Expert Opinion, University Park, Pennsylvania, Penn State Press
222. Walton Douglas (1998) The New Dialectic, Toronto, University of Toronto Press
223. Walton Douglas (1998a) Ad Hominem Arguments, Tuscaloosa, University of Alabama Press
224. Walton Douglas (1999) 'Rethinking the Fallacy of Hasty Generalization', Argumentation, 13, 161-182
225. Walton Douglas (1999) 'Dialectical Relevance in Persuasion Dialogue', Informal Logic, 19: 119-143 Available at www.uwinnipeg.ca/~walton
226. Walton Douglas (1999) One-Sided Arguments: A Dialectical Analysis of Bias, Albany, State University of New York Press
227. Walton Douglas (2001) 'Abductive, Presumptive and Plausible Arguments', Informal Logic, 21, 141-169
228. Walton Douglas (2002) Legal Argumentation and Evidence, University Park, Pennsylvania, The Pennsylvania State University Press
229. Walton Douglas (2003) 'Argumentation Schemes: The Basis of Conditional Relevance', Michigan State University Law Review, 4, 1205-1242
230. Walton Douglas (2004) 'A New Dialectical Theory of Explanation', Philosophical Explorations, 7, 71-89
231. Walton Douglas (2004a) Abductive Reasoning, Tuscaloosa, University of Alabama Press
232. Walton Douglas (2004) Relevance in Argumentation, Mahwah, New Jersey, Erlbaum
233. Walton Douglas, Krabbe Erik CW (1995)Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning, Albany, State University of New York Press
234. Walton Douglas, Reed Chris (2003) 'Diagramming, Argumentation Schemes and Critical Questions', Anyone Who Has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argumentation, ed Frans H van Eemeren, J Anthony Blair, Charles A Willard, and A Fran-cisca Snoek Henkemans, Dordrecht, Kluwer, pp 195-211
235. Walton Douglas, Reed Chris (2004) 'Enthymemes and Argumentation Schemes', Synthese, to appear
236. Weber Erik, van Dyck Maarten (2002) 'Unification and Explanation', Synthese, 131, 145-154
237. Whatley Richard (1836) Elements of Logic, 6th ed, London, B Fellowes
238. Wick MR, Thompson WB (1992) 'Reconstructive Expert System Explanation', Artificial Intelligence, 54, 33-70
239. Wigmore John H (1913) The Principles of Judicial Proof, Boston, Little, Brown and Company (second edition, 1931)
240. Wigmore John H (1935) A Student's Textbook of the Law of Evidence, Chicago, The Foundation Press
241. rd ed, vol 1, Boston, Little, Brown and Company
242. Wigmore John H (1983) Evidence in Trials at Common Law, vol 1a, ed Peter Tillers, Boston, Little, Brown and Company
243. Woods John (1999) 'Peirce's Abductive Enthusiasms', Protosociology, 13: 117-125
244. Wooldridge Michael (2002) Reasoning About Rational Agents, Cambridge Mass, The MIT Press
245. Wright Richard W (1985) 'Causation in Tort Law', California Law Review, 73, 1735-1828