Burden of proof in dialogue games and Dutch civil procedure

Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages 109-118

  Leenes, Ronald E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BURDEN OF PROOF; COMPUTATIONAL DIALECTIC; DIALOGUE GAME; DIALOGUE SYSTEMS;

SPEECH PROCESSING;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 33845347223     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/383535.383549     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. R. Alexy. A Theory of Legal Argumentation; The Theory of Rational Legal Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.
2. T.J.M. Bench-Capon. Argument in Artificial Intelligence and Law. In J.C. Hage, T.J.M. Bench-Capon, M.J. Cohen, H.J. van den Herik (eds.) Legal knowledge based systems JURIX '95: Telecommunication and AI & Law. Lelystad: Koninklijke Vermande, 5-14, 1995.
3. T.J.M. Bench-Capon. Specification and Implementation of Toulmin Dialogue Game. In J.C. Hage, T.J.M. Bench-Capon, A.W. Koers, C.N.J. de Vey Mestdagh, C.A.F.M. Grütters (eds) Jurix 1998: Jurix: The Eleventh Conference. Nijmegen: Gerard Noodt Instituut, 5-20, 1998.
4. G. Betlem. Civil Liability for Transfrontier Pollution. London: Graham and Trotman, 1993.
5. K. Freeman and A.M. Farley. A Model of Argumentation and Its Application to Legal Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 4:163-197, 1996.
6. T.F. Gordon. The Pleadings Game: An excercise in computational dialectics. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2:239-292, 1994.
7. Jaap C. Hage, Ronald Leenes and Arno R. Lodder. Hard cases: a procedural approach. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2:113-166, 1994.
8. Jaap C. Hage. A Model of Legal Reasoning and a Logic to Match. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 4 nos. 3-4:199-273, 1996.
9. Jaap C. Hage. Reasoning with rules. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997.
10. Jaap C. Hage. Dialectical Models in Artificial Intelligence and Law. Artificial Intelligence and Law, vol 8 no 2-3, 137-172, 2000.
11. C.L. Hamblin. Fallacies. London: Methuen, 1970.
12. Ronald E. Leenes. Hercules of Karneades, Hard cases in recht en rechtsinformatica. (Hercules of Karneades, Hard cases in Law and AI and Law), PhD thesis University of Twente, Enschede: Twente University Press, 1998 (in Dutch).
13. Arno R. Lodder. DiaLaw: On legal justification and dialog games. Boston, Mass.: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.
14. J.D. Mackenzie. Question-Begging in Non-Cumulative Systems. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8:159-177, 1979.
15. Henry Prakken and Giovanni Sartor, Modelling Reasoning with Precedents in a Formal Dialogue Game. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 6:231-287, 1998.
16. Henry Prakken. On Formalising Burden of Proof in Legal Argument. In H. Jaap van den Herik et al. (eds), Legal Knowledge Based Systems, JURIX 1999, The Twelfth Conference, Nijmegen: GNI, 85-97, 1999.
17. Henry Prakken. Modelling Reasoning about Evidence in Legal Procedures. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, (this volume), 2001.
18. J. Rawls. A theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972.
19. S.E. Toulmin. The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.
20. Bart Verheij. Rules, Reasons, Arguments. Formal studies of argumentation and defeat. PhD-thesis Maastricht University, 1996.
21. Gerard A.W. Vreeswijk. Representation of Formal Dispute with a Standing Order. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 8 nos. 2-3:205-231, 2000.
22. D.N. Walton and E.C.W. Krabbe. Commitment in Dialogue; Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. New York: State University of New York Press, 1995.