Data-driven multivariate algorithms for damage detection and identification: Evaluation and comparison

Structural Health Monitoring

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 19-32

  Torres Arredondo, Miguel A ^a   Tibaduiza, Diego A ^b   Mujica, Luis E ^b   Rodellar, José ^b   Fritzen, Claus Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SIEGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Damage detection; discrete wavelet transform; hierarchical non linear principal component analysis; independent component analysis; principal component analysis; ultrasonic guided waves

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT COMPOSITES; DAMAGE DETECTION AND IDENTIFICATION; EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATIONS; MULTILAYERED COMPOSITE PLATES; PIEZOELECTRIC ACTIVE SENSORS; SQUARED PREDICTION ERRORS; ULTRASONIC GUIDED WAVE; WAVELET COEFFICIENTS;

ALGORITHMS; CONFORMAL MAPPING; DISCRETE WAVELET TRANSFORMS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SENSOR NETWORKS; STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS; STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING;

DAMAGE DETECTION;

EID: 84891954999     PISSN: 14759217     EISSN: 17413168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1475921713498530     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Chang F-K.Ultra reliable and super safe structures for the new century. Proceeding of the 1st European workshop on structural health monitoring; Paris, France;. 3.
2. Brandt JPart I: the composite material research requirements of the aerospace industry. Germany: EADS; 2004.
3. Fritzen C-P,Mengelkamp G,Guemes A.A CFRP plate with piezo-electric actuators and sensors as self-diagnostic intelligent structure. Proceedings of ISMA; Leuven, Belgium;. 185.
4. Balageas D,Fritzen C-P,Guemes AStructural health monitoring. Iste Publishing Company; 2006.
5. Staszewski W,Boller C,Tomlinson GRHealth monitoring of aerospace structures: smart sensor technologies and signal processing. Munich: Wiley; 2004.
6. Rose JL.Ultrasonic guided waves in structural health monitoring.Key Eng Mat. 2004;270-273:14-21.
7. Staszewski WJ.Ultrasonic/guided waves for structural health monitoring.Key Eng Mat. 2005;293-294:49-62.
8. Torres-Arredondo M-A,Jung H,Fritzen C-P.A study of attenuation and acoustic energy anisotropy of Lamb waves in multilayered anisotropic media for NDT and SHM applications. Proceedings of the 6th international workshop NDT in progress; Brno University of Technology, Prague, Czech Republic;. 313.
9. Torres-Arredondo M-A,Fritzen C-P.Characterization and classification of modes in acoustic emission based on dispersion features and energy distribution analysis.Shock Vib. 2012;19:1-9.
10. Sohn H,Dutta D,Yang JY, et al.Automated detection of delamination and disbond from wavefield images obtained using a scanning laser vibrometer.Smar Mat St. 2011;20 (4): 45017-45026.
11. Farrar CR,Worden K.An introduction to structural health monitoring.Philos T R Soc A. 2007;365 (1851): 303-315.
12. RytterA. Vibration based inspection of civil engineering structures. PhD Thesis, Department of Building Technology and Structural Engineering, University of Aalborg, Denmark, 1993.
13. Sohn H,Farrar CR,Hunter NF, et al.Structural health monitoring using statistical pattern recognition techniques.J Dyn Syst: T ASME. 2001;123:706-711.
14. Staszewski WJ.Advanced data pre-processing for damage identification based on pattern recognition.Int J Syst Sci. 2000;31 (11): 1381-1396.
15. Staszewski WJ.Intelligent signal processing for damage detection in composite materials.Compos Sci Technol. 2002;62 (7-8): 941-950.
16. Worden K,Manson G.The application of machine learning to structural health monitoring.Philos T R Soc A. 2007;365 (1851): 515-537.
17. Taha MMR,Noureldin A,Lucero JL, et al.Wavelet transform for structural health monitoring: a compendium of uses and features.Struct Health Monit. 2006;5 (3): 267-295.
18. Wang D,Ye L,Su Z, et al.Probabilistic damage detection identification based on correlation analysis using guided wave signals in aluminium plates.Struct Health Monit. 2010;9 (2): 133-144.
19. Mujica LE,Vehi J,Ruiz M, et al.Multivariate statistics process control for dimensionality reduction in structural assessment.Mech Syst Signal Pr. 2008;22:155-171.
20. Yan A-M,Kerschen G,Boe PD, et al.Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditions. Part II: local PCA for non-linear cases.Mech Syst Signal Pr. 2005;19 (4): 865-880.
21. Kerschen G,Boe PD,Golinval J-C, et al.Sensor validation using principal component analysis.Smar Mat St. 2005;14:36-42.
22. Zang C,Friswell MI,Imregun M.Structural damage detection using independent component analysis.Struct Health Monit. 2004;3 (1): 69-83.
23. Song H,Zhong L,Han B.Structural damage detection by integrating independent component analysis and support vector machines.Int J Syst Sci. 2005;37 (13): 961-967.
24. Senguler T,Karatoprak E,Seker S, et al.ICA and wavelet packet decomposition approaches for monitoring the incipient bearing damage in electrical motors. Proceedings of 4th international IEEE conference on intelligent systems; IEEE;. 2413.
25. Tibaduiza D-A,Mujica LE,Anaya M, et al.Independent component analysis for detecting damages on aircraft wing skeleton. Proceedings of the 5th European conference on structural control; Genove, Italy.
26. Worden K.Sensor validation and correction using auto-associative neural networks and principal component analysis.; Kissimmee, Florida;. 1.
27. Worden K.Structural fault detection using a novelty measure.J Sound Vib. 1997;201 (1): 85-101.
28. Sohn H,Worden K,Farrar CR.Novelty detection under changing environmental conditions. Proceedings of SPIE's 8th annual international symposium on smart structures and materials; 2001Newport Beach, CA, USA; 2001.
29. Torres-Arredondo M-A,Fritzen C-P.Impact monitoring in smart structures based on Gaussian processes. Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on NDT in aerospace; Augsburg, Germany (on CD-ROM).
30. Mallat SA wavelet tour of signal processing. 2nd ed.San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1997.San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1997.
31. Mallat SG.A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation.IEEE T Pattern Anal. 1989;11 (7): 674-693.
32. Subasi A.Application of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for epileptic seizure detection using wavelet feature extraction.Comput Biol Med. 2007;37 (2): 227-244.
33. Coifman RR,Wickerhauser MV.Entropy-based algorithms for best basis selection.IEEE T Inform Theory. 1992;38 (2): 713-718.
34. Jollife ITPrincipal component analysis. New York: Springer; 2002.
35. Westerhuis JA,Kourti T,MacGregor JF.Comparing alternative approaches for multivariate statistical analysis of batch process data.J Chemometr. 1999;13 (3-4): 397-413.
36. Mujica LE,Rodellar J,Fernandez A, et al.Q-statistic and T2-statistic PCA-based measures for damage assessment in structures.Struct Health Monit. 2010;10 (5): 539-553.
37. Joe Qin S.Statistical process monitoring: basics and beyond.J Chemometr. 2003;17 (8-9): 480-502.
38. Worden K,Manson G,Allman D.Experimental validation of a structural health monitoring methodology: part I. Novelty detection on a laboratory structure.J Sound Vib. 2003;259 (3): 323-343.
39. Kramer MA.Nonlinear principal component analysis using autoassociative neural networks.AIChE J. 1991;37 (2): 233-243.
40. Scholz M,Fraunholz M,Selbig JPrincipal manifolds for data visualization and dimension reduction. Gorban ANKégl BWunsch DC, ed. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer; 44-67.
41. ScholzM. Approaches to analyse and interpret biological profile data. PhD Thesis, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam University, Germany, 2006.
42. Scholz M,Vigario R.Nonlinear PCA: a new hierarchical approach. Proceedings of European symposium on artificial neural networks (ESANN); Bruges, Belgium;. 439.
43. Hyvarinen A,Karhunen J,Oja EIndependent component analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2001.
44. Gavert H,Hurri J,Sarela J, et alHelsinki: Laboratory of Computer and Information Science, University of Helsinki; 2005.
45. Kohonen TSelf organizing maps. New York: Springer; 2001.
46. Ultsch ASelf-organizing neural networks for visualization and classification: concepts, methods and applications in information and classification. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 1993.
47. Vesanto J,Himberg J,Alhoniemi E, et alSOM Toolbox for MATLAB 5. Helsinki: Helsinki University of Technology; 2000.
48. Tibaduiza D-A,Torres-Arredondo M-A,Mujica LE, et al.A study of two unsupervised data driven statistical methodologies for detecting and classifying damages in structural health monitoring.Mech Syst Signal Pr. in press;.
49. Wold S,Geladi P,Esbensen K, et al.Multi-way principal components and PLS analysis.J Chemometr. 1987;1 (1): 41-56.
50. Nomikos P,MacGregor JF.Monitoring batch processes using multiway principal component analysis.AIChE J. 1994;40 (8): 1361-1375.
51. Valle S,Li W,Joe Qin S.Selection of the number of principal components: the variance of the reconstruction error criterion with a comparison to other methods.Ind Eng Chem Res. 1999;38 (11): 4389-4401.
52. Li Y,Tang X-C.Improved performance of fault detection based on selection of the optimal number of principal components.Acta Automat Sinica. 2009;35 (12): 1550-1557.
53. Cheung Y-M,Xu L.Independent component ordering in ICA time series analysis.Neurocomputing. 2001;41 (1-4): 145-152.
54. Hyvaerinen A.Survey on independent component analysis.Neural Comput Surv. 1999;2:94-128.
55. Liu Y,Weisberg RH,Mooers CNK.Performance evaluation of the self-organization map for feature extraction.J Geophys Res. 2006;11:1-14.