Q-statistic and t2-statistic pca-based measures for damage assessment in structures

Structural Health Monitoring

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 539-553

  Mujica, L E ^a   Rodellar, J ^a   Fernandez A ^b   Guemes A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

aircraft structures; damage detection; principal component analysis

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT STRUCTURE; BASE LINE; DAMAGE ASSESSMENTS; DYNAMICAL RESPONSE; EXPERIMENTAL ASSESSMENT; HIGH-FREQUENCY VIBRATIONS; LOW-FREQUENCY VIBRATION; PCA MODEL; PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS; PZT; T2-STATISTIC; TURBINE BLADE; VIBRATION SIGNAL;

AIRCRAFT DETECTION; AIRCRAFT MANUFACTURE; AIRFRAMES; DAMAGE DETECTION; SENSORS; STATISTICS; STEEL SHEET; STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING; SURFACE DEFECTS; TURBINES; TURBOMACHINE BLADES; VIBRATION ANALYSIS;

PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 80052075757     PISSN: 14759217     EISSN: 17413168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1475921710388972     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Worden K. and Farrar CR Structural Health Monitoring. Theme issue of. Philos Trans R Soc: Ser A 2007; 365: 539-560.
2. Doebling W., Farrar CR, Prime MB and Shevitz DW Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: a literature review. Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LA-13070-MS, Los Alamos, NM. 1996.
3. International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring. Since 1997.
4. European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring. Since 2002.
5. World Conference on Structural Control and Monitoring. Since 2000.
6. Structural Control and Health Monitoring. http://www.3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/117861846/grouphome/home.html.
7. Structural Health Monitoring. An International Journal. Available at: http://shm.sagepub.com/.
8. Staszewski WJ, Boller C. and Tomlinson GR Health monitoring of aerospace structures: smart sensor technologies and signal processing. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2004.
9. Adams D. Health monitoring of structural materials and components. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 2007.
10. Farrar CR, Doebling SW and Nix DA Vibration-based structural damage identification. Philos Trans R Soc Ser A 2001; 359: 131-149.
11. McCullagh P. What is a statistical Model? Ann Stat 2002; 30(5): 1225-1310.
12. Jolliffe IT Principal component analysis. Springer series in statistics, 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 2002.
13. Worden K. and Manson G. Visualization and dimension reduction of high-dimensional data for damage detection. IMAC 1999; 17: 1576-1585.
14. Zang C. and Imregun M. Structural damage detection using artificial neural networks and measured FRF data reduced via principal component projection. J Sound Vib 2001; 242(5): 813-827.
15. Mujica LE, Vehí J., Ruiz M., Verleysen M., Staszewski W. and Worden K. Multivariate statistics process control for dimensionality reduction in structural assessment. Mech Syst Signal Process 2008; 22: 155-171.
16. Yan AM, Kerschen G., De Boe P. and Golinval JC Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditions-part II: local PCA for non-linear cases. Mech Syst Signal Process 2005; 9: 865-880.
17. Park S., Lee JJ, Yun CB and Inman DJ Electro-mechanical impedance-based wireless structural health monitoring using PCA-data compression and k-means clustering algorithms. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 2007; 19(4): 509-520.
18. Sophian A., Tian GY, Taylor D. and Rudlin J. A feature extraction technique based on principal component analysis for pulsed Eddy current NDT. NDTE Int 2003; 36: 37-41.
19. Tang J. Frequency response based damage detection using principal component analysis. In: IEEE International Conference on Information Acquisition, Hong Kong, China, June 27 to July 3, 2005, pp.407-412.
20. Zhong A., Song H. and Han B. Extracting structural damage features: comparison between PCA and ICA. In: Huang DS, Li K and Irwin G eds. Intelligent computing in signal processing and pattern recognition, Lectures notes in control and informatic, Vol. 345. Berlin/ Heidelberg: Springer, 2006, pp.840-845.
21. Sohn H., Czarnecki JA and Farrar CR Structural health monitoring using statistical process control. J Struct Eng 2000; 126(1): 1356-1363.
22. De Boe P. and Golinval JC Principal component analysis of a piezosensor array for damage localization. Struct Health Monitor J 2003; 2(2): 137-144.
23. Golinval JC, De Boe P., Yan AM and Kerschen G. Structural damage detection based on PCA of vibration measurements. In: Proceedings of the 58th Meeting of the Society for Machinary Failure Prevention Technology On CD, Virginia, 2004.
24. Mustapha F., Worden K., Pierce SG and Manson G. Damage detection using stress waves and multivariate statistics: an experimental case study of an aircraft component. Strain 2007; 43(1): 47-53.
25. Trendafilova I., Cartmell MP and Ostachowicz W. Vibration-based damage detection in an aircraft wing scaled model using principal component analysis and pattern recognition. J Sound Vib 2008; 313(3): 560-566.
26. Johnson M. Waveform based clustering and classification of AE transients in composite laminates using principal components analysis. NDTE Int 2002; 35: 367-376.
27. Wise BM, Gallagher NB, Butler SW, White D. and Barna GG Development and benchmarking of multivariate statistical process control tools for a semiconductor etch process: impact of measurement selection and data treatment on sensitivity. In: IFAC SAFEPROCESS '97, Kingston Upon Hull, UK, 1997, pp.35-42.
28. Qin SJ Statistical process monitoring: basics and beyond. J Chemometrics 2003; 17: 480-502.
29. Westerhuis J., Kourti T. and MacGregor J. Comparing alternative approaches for multivariate statistical analysis of batch process data. J Chemometrics 1999; 13: 397-413.