Erratum to Kinesthesis Can Make an Invisible Hand Visible (Psychological Science, (2013), 25, 1 (66-75), 10.1177/0956797613497968);Kinesthesis Can Make an Invisible Hand Visible

Psychological Science

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 66-75

  Dieter, Kevin C ^a   Hu, Bo ^a   Knill, David C ^a   Blake, Randolph ^b,c   Tadin, Duje ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

kinesthesis; motion perception; motor processes; multisensory perception; perception; predictive coding; synesthesia; vision; visual motion perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; KINESTHESIA; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; KINESTHESIS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS;

EID: 84891939692     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0956797613520537     Document Type: Erratum

References (40)

1. Bargary G.,Mitchell K. J.Synaesthesia and cortical connectivity.Trends in Neurosciences. 2008;31:335-342.
2. Barnett K. J.,Finucane C.,Asher J. E.,Bargary G.,Corvin A. P.,Newell F. N.,Mitchell K. J.Familial patterns and the origins of individual differences in synaesthesia.Cognition. 2008;106:871-893.
3. Bays P. M.,Wolpert D. M.Sensorimotor foundations of higher cognition: Attention and performance XXII. Haggard P.Rosetti Y.Kawato M., ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2007:339-358.
4. Berryhill M. E.,Chiu T.,Hughes H. C.Smooth pursuit of nonvisual motion.Journal of Neurophysiology. 2006;96:461-464.
5. Blakemore S. J.,Frith C. D.,Wolpert D. M.Spatio-temporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 1999;11:551-559.
6. Bolognini N.,Senna I.,Maravita A.,Pascual-Leone A.,Merabet L. B.Auditory enhancement of visual phosphene perception: The effect of temporal and spatial factors and of stimulus intensity.Neuroscience Letters. 2010;477:109-114.
7. Botvinick M.,Cohen J.Rubber hands "feel" touch that eyes see.Nature. 1998;391:756.
8. Carlson T. A.,Alvarez G.,Wu D. A.,Verstraten F. A. J.Rapid assimilation of external objects into the body schema.Psychological Science. 2010;21:1000-1005.
9. Christensen A.,Ilg W.,Giese M. A.Spatiotemporal tuning of the facilitation of biological motion perception by concurrent motor execution.The Journal of Neuroscience. 2011;31:3493-3499.
10. Cole J.Pride and a daily marathon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1995:.
11. Davies P.Effects of movements upon the appearance and duration of a prolonged visual afterimage: 1. Changes arising from the movement of a portion of the body incorporated in the afterimaged scene.Perception. 1973;2:147-153.
12. DiCarlo J. J.,Zoccolan D.,Rust N. C.How does the brain solve visual object recognition?.Neuron. 2012;73:415-434.
13. DieterK. C.HuB.KnillD. C.TadinD. (2011). Visual smooth pursuit of proprioceptive signals is enhanced by task-irrelevant dynamic noise. Journal of Vision, 11(11), Article 786. Retrieved from www.journalofvision.org/content/11/11/786.
14. Di Luca M.,Ernst M. O.,Backus B. T.Learning to use an invisible visual signal for perception.Current Biology. 2010;20:1860-1863.
15. Eagleman D. M.,Kagan A. D.,Nelson S. S.,Sagaram D.,Sarma A. K.A standardized test battery for the study of synesthesia.Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 2007;159:139-145.
16. Ehrsson H. H.The experimental induction of out-of-body experiences.Science. 2007;317:1048.
17. Flanagan J. R.,Wing A. M.The role of internal models in motion planning and control: Evidence from grip force adjustments during movements of hand-held loads.The Journal of Neuroscience. 1997;17:1519-1528.
18. Funk M.,Shiffrar M.,Brugger P.Hand movement observation by individuals born without hands: Phantom limb experience constrains visual limb perception.Experimental Brain Research. 2005;164:341-346.
19. Glenny G.,Heywood S.Hans Gertz revisited: The different effects of invisibility and darkness on pursuit eye movements.Perception. 1979;8:31-36.
20. Gori M.,Del Viva M.,Sandini G.,Burr D. C.Young children do not integrate visual and haptic form information.Current Biology. 2008;18:694-698.
21. Gregory R. L.Eye movements and the stability of the visual world.Nature. 1958;182:1214-1216.
22. Hänggi J.,Wotruba D.,Jäncke L.Globally altered structural brain network topology in grapheme-color synesthesia.The Journal of Neuroscience. 2011;31:5816-5828.
23. Hu B.,Knill D. C.Kinesthetic information disambiguates visual motion signals.Current Biology. 2010;20:R436-R437.
24. Jordan S.Ocular pursuit movement as a function of visual and proprioceptive stimulation.Vision Research. 1970;10:775-780.
25. Kowler E.Eye movements: The past 25 years.Vision Research. 2011;51:1457-1483.
26. LallyN.FrendoB.DiedrichsenJ. (2011). Sensory cancellation of self-movement facilitates visual motion detection. Journal of Vision, 11(14), Article 5. Retrieved from http://www.journalofvision.org/content/11/14/5.
27. Linn M. C.,Petersen A. C.Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis.Child Development. 1985;56:1479-1498.
28. Marks D. F.Visual mental imagery in the recall of pictures.British Journal of Psychology. 1973;64:17-24.
29. Maruya K.,Yang E.,Blake R.Voluntary action influences visual competition.Psychological Science. 2007;18:1090-1098.
30. Oldfield R. C.The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory.Neuropsychologia. 1971;9:97-113.
31. Pavlov I. P.Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex. London, England: Oxford University Press; 1927:.
32. Ramachandran V. S.,Rogers-Ramachandran D.Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors.Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 1996;263:377-386.
33. Ramos-Estebanez C.,Merabet L. B.,Machii K.,Fregni F.,Thut G.,Wagner T. A., Pascual-Leone A.Visual phosphene perception modulated by subthreshold crossmodal sensory stimulation.The Journal of Neuroscience. 2007;27:4178-4181.
34. Synesthesia: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience. Robertson L. C.Sagiv N., ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2005:.
35. Romei V.,Murray M. M.,Cappe C.,Thut G.Preperceptual and stimulus-selective enhancement of low-level human visual cortex excitability by sounds.Current Biology. 2009;19:1799-1805.
36. Rouw R.,Scholte H. S.Increased structural connectivity in grapheme-color synesthesia.Nature Neuroscience. 2007;10:792-797.
37. SalomonR.LimM.HerbelinB.HesselmannG.BlankeO. (2013). Posing for awareness: Proprioception modulates access to visual consciousness in a continuous flash suppression task. Journal of Vision, 13(7), Article 2. Retrieved from www.journalofvision.org/content/13/7/2.
38. Terhune D. B.,Tai S.,Cowey A.,Popescu T.,Cohen Kadosh R.Enhanced cortical excitability in grapheme-color synesthesia and its modulation.Current Biology. 2011;21:2006-2009.
39. Watanabe K.,Shimojo S.Suppressive effect of multimodal surface representation on ocular smooth pursuit of invisible hand.Perception. 1997;26:277-285.
40. Wolpert D. M.,Ghahramani Z.,Jordan M. I.An internal model for sensorimotor integration.Science. 1995;269:1880-1882.