Exploring nurses' confirmed expectations regarding health IT: A phenomenological study

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 83, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 89-98

  Zadvinskis, Inga M ^a   Chipps, Esther ^b   Yen, Po Yin ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY WEXNER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Barcode medication administration system; Electronic health record; Expectation; Health IT; Phenomenology; Qualitative research; Satisfaction

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATION SYSTEM; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; EXPECTATION; HEALTH IT; PHENOMENOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SATISFACTION;

BAR CODES; NURSING; RECORDS MANAGEMENT;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER; COMPUTERIZED PROVIDER ORDER ENTRY; DRUG ADMINISTRATION; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EXPECTATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MIDDLE AGED; NORMAL HUMAN; PERFORMANCE; PHENOMENOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SATISFACTION; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; STAFF NURSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEAMWORK; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

BARCODE MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION SYSTEM; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; EXPECTATION; HEALTH IT; PHENOMENOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SATISFACTION;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMATION SERVICES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING STAFF; PATIENT CARE TEAM;

EID: 84891837042     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: 18728243     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Chaudhry B., Wang J., Wu S., et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Annals of Internal Medicine 2006, 144(10 May 16):742-752.
2. Jha A.K., DesRoches C.M., Campbell E.G., et al. Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. New England Journal of Medicine 2009, 360(16):1628-1638.
3. Ash J.S., Berg M., Coiera E. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system-related errors. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2004, 11(2):104-112.
4. Han Y.Y., Carcillo J.A., Venkataraman S.T., et al. Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system. Pediatrics 2005, 116(6):1506-1512.
5. Van Der Sijs H., Rootjes I., Aarts J. The shift in workarounds upon implementation of computerized physician order entry. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2011, 169:290-294.
6. Rathert C., Williams E.S., Lawrence E.R., Halbesleben J.R.B. Emotional exhaustion and workarounds in acute care: cross sectional tests of a theoretical framework. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2012, 49(8):969-977. 8//.
7. U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics Health Care. Spotlight on Statistics: Health Care 2009, http://www.bls.gov/spotlight/2009/health_care/ (accessed 25.12.12).
8. Furukawa M.F., Raghu T.S., Shao B.B.M. Electronic medical records, nurse staffing, and nurse-sensitive patient outcomes: evidence from California hospitals, 1998-2007. Health Services Research 2010, 45(4):941-962.
9. Holden R.J., Karsh B.-T. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2010, 43(1):159-172.
10. Weber R. Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly 2001, 25(3):321.
11. Usability Net. What is usability?, 2013, (accessed 22.11.13). http://www.usabilitynet.org/management/b_what.htm.
12. Kjeldskov J., Skov M.B., Stage J. A longitudinal study of usability in health care - does time heal?. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2007, 130:181-191.
13. Beuscart-Zéphir M.C., Borycki E., Carayon P., Jaspers M.W.M., Pelayo S. Evolution of human factors research and studies of health information technologies: the role of patient safety. IMIA Yearbook 2013: Evidence-based Health Informatics 2013, 8(1):67-77.
14. Berg M. Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach. International Journal of Medical Informatics 1999, 55:87-101.
15. Ward M.M., Vartak S., Schwichtenberg T., Wakefield D.S. Nurses' perceptions of how clinical information system implementation affects workflow and patient care. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 2011, 29(9):502-511.
16. Carayon P., Cartmill R., Blosky M.A., et al. ICU nurses' acceptance of electronic health records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2011, 18(6):812-819.
17. Smith J.B., Lacey S.R., Williams A.R., et al. Developing and testing a clinical information system evaluation tool: prioritizing modifications through end-user input. The Journal Of Nursing Administration 2011, 41(6):252-258.
18. deVeer A.J.E., Francke A.L. Attitudes of nursing staff towards electronic patient records: a questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2010, 47:846-854.
19. Moody L.E., Slocumb E., Berg B., Jackson D. Electronic health records documentation in nursing: nurses' perceptions, attitudes, and preferences. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 2004, 22(6):337-344.
20. Smith D., Morris A., Janke J. Nursing satisfaction and attitudes with computerized software implementation: a quasi-experimental study. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 2011, 29(4):245-250.
21. Fowler S.B., Sohler P., Zarillo D.F. Bar-code technology for medication administration: medication errors and nurse satisfaction. MEDSURG Nursing 2009, 18(2):103-109.
22. Topps C., Lopez L., Messmer P.R., Franco M. Perceptions of pediatric nurses toward bar-code point-of-care medication administration. Nursing Administration Quarterly 2005, 29(January-March (1)):102-107.
23. Ulanimo V.M., O'Leary-Kelley C., Connolly P.M. Nurses' perceptions of causes of medication errors and barriers to reporting. Journal of Nursing Care Quality 2007, 22(January-March (1)):28-33.
24. Young J., Slebodnik M., Sands L. Bar code technology and medication administration error. Journal of Patient Safety 2010, 6(2):115-120.
25. Woods D.D., Hollnagel E. Joint Cognitive Systems: Patterns in Cognitive Systems Engineering 2006, Taylor and Francis, New York.
26. Bargren M., Lu D. An evaluation process for an electronic bar code medication administration information system in an acute care unit. Urologic Nursing 2009, 29(5):355.
27. Patterson E.S., Cook R.I., Render M.L. Improving patient safety by identifying side effects from introducing bar coding in medication administration. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2002, 9(September (5)):540-553.
28. Marini S.D., Hasman A., Huijer H.A-S., Dimassi H. Nurses' attitudes toward the use of the bar-coding medication administration system. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 2010, 28(2):112-123.
29. Gooder V.J. Nurses' perceptions of a (BCMA) bar-coded medication administration system. Online Journal of Nursing Informatics 2011, 15(2):11.
30. Collingridge D.S., Gantt E.E. The quality of qualitative research. American Journal of Medical Quality 2008, 23(5):389-395.
31. Carrington J.M., Effken J.A. Strengths and limitations of the electronic health record for documenting clinical events. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 2011, 29(6):360-367.
32. Roham M., Gabrielyan A.R., Archer N.P. Predicting the impact of hospital health information technology adoption on patient satisfaction. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 2012, 56(2):123-135.
33. Strayer S.S., Semler M.W.K., Marit L., Tanabe K.O. Patient attitudes toward physician use of tablet computers in the exam room. Family Medicine 2010, 42(9):643-647.
34. Marini S.D., Hasman A. Impact of BCMA on medication errors and patient safety: a summary. Studies in Health Technology Informatics 2009, 146:439-444.
35. DesRoches C.M., Miralles P., Buerhaus P., Hess R., Donelan K. Health information technology in the workplace: findings from a 2010 national survey of registered nurses. The Journal of Nursing Administration 2011, 41(9):357-364.
36. Sittig D.F., Singh H. A red-flag-based approach to risk management of EHR-related safety concerns. Journal of Healthcare Risk Management 2013, 33(2):21-26.
37. Middleton B., Bloomrosen M., Dente M.A., et al. Enhancing patient safety and quality of care by improving the usability of electronic health record systems: Recommendations from AMIA. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2013, 20(e1):e2-e8.
38. Karsh B-T., Weinger M.B., Abbott P.A., Wears R.L. Health information technology: Fallacies and sober realities. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2010, 17(6):617-623.
39. Yen P.-Y., Bakken S. Review of health information technology usability study methodologies. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2012, 19(3):413-422.
40. Kuziemsky C., Nohr C., Aarts J., Jaspers M., Beuscart-Zephir M-C. Context sensitive health informatics: concepts, methods, and tools. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2013, 194:1-7.
41. The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, Glossary, Putting the "I" in Health IT 2013, http://www.healthit.gov/unintended-consequences/content/glossary.html%23h.