Patient attitudes toward physician use of tablet computers in the exam room

Family Medicine

Volumn 42, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 643-647

  Strayer, Scott M ^a   Semler, Matthew W ^b   Kington, Marit L ^c   Tanabe, Kawai O ^a  

^a Department of Family Medicine ^*

^b UPR   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; ELECTRONIC PRESCRIBING; FEMALE; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MICROCOMPUTER; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; COMPUTERS, HANDHELD; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; ELECTRONIC PRESCRIBING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS APPLICATIONS; MEDICAL ORDER ENTRY SYSTEMS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; VIRGINIA; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77958090621     PISSN: 07423225     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Martin JC, Avant RF, Bowman MA, et al. The future of family medicine: a collaborative project of the family medicine community. Ann Fam Med 2004;2 Suppl 1:S3-S32.
2. Sullivan F, Mitchell E. Has general practitioner computing made a difference to patient care? A systematic review of published reports. BMJ 1995;311(7009):848-52.
3. Solomon GL, Dechter M. Are patients pleased with computer use in the examination room? J Fam Pract 1995;41(3):241-4.
4. Ridsdale L, Hudd S. Computers in the consultation: the patient's view. Br J Gen Pract 1994;44(385):367-9.
5. Legler JD, Oates R. Patients' reactions to physician use of a computerized medical record system during clinical encounters. J Fam Pract 1993;37(3):241-4.
6. Rethans JJ, Hoppener P, Wolfs G, Diederiks J. Do personal computers make doctors less personal? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988;296(6634):1446-8.
7. Brownbridge G, Herzmark GA, Wall TD. Patient reactions to doctors' computer use in general practice consultations. Soc Sci Med 1985;20(1):47-52.
8. Hsu J, Huang J, Fung V, Robertson N, Jimison H, Frankel R. Health information technology and physician-patient interactions: impact of computers on communication during outpatient primary care visits. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005;12(4):474-80.
9. Lelievre S, Schultz K. Does computer use in patient-physician encounters influence patient satisfaction? Can Fam Physician 2010;56(1):e6-e12.
10. Garrison GM, Bernard ME, Rasmussen NH. 21st-century health care: the effect of computer use by physicians on patient satisfaction at a family medicine clinic. Fam Med 2002;34(5):362-8.
11. Rudkin SE, Langdorf MI, Macias D, Oman JA, Kazzi AA. Personal digital assistants change management more often than paper texts and foster patient confidence. Eur J Emerg Med 2006;13(2):92-6.
12. Johnson KB, Serwint JR, Fagan LM, Thompson RE, Wilson MH. Computer-based documentation: effect on parent and physician satisfaction during a pediatric health maintenance encounter. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005;159(3):250-4.
13. Houston TK, Ray MN, Crawford MA, Giddens T, Berner ES. Patient perceptions of physician use of handheld computers. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003:299-303.
14. Mitchell E, Sullivan F. A descriptive feast but an evaluative famine: systematic review of published articles on primary care computing during 1980-1997. BMJ 2001;322(7281):279-82.
15. Main DS, Quintela J, Araya-Guerra R, Holcomb S, Pace WD. Exploring patient reactions to pen-tablet computers: a report from CaReNet. Ann Fam Med 2004;2(5):421-4.