DNA duplex stability as discriminative characteristic for Escherichia coli σ54- and σ28- dependent promoter sequences

Biologicals

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 22-28

  De Avila e Silva, Scheila ^a   Forte, Franciele ^a   T S Sartor, Ivaine ^a   Andrighetti, Tahila ^a   J L Gerhardt, Günther ^a   Longaray Delamare, Ana Paula ^a   Echeverrigaray, Sergio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAXIAS DO SUL   (Brazil)

Author keywords

DNA duplex stability; Neural networks; Promoter prediction

Indexed keywords

DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; RNA POLYMERASE SIGMA 24; RNA POLYMERASE SIGMA 28; RNA POLYMERASE SIGMA 38; RNA POLYMERASE SIGMA 70; SIGMA FACTOR; SIGMA FACTOR RPON; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENE EXPRESSION; LEARNING ALGORITHM; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ESCHERICHIA COLI;

DNA DUPLEX STABILITY; NEURAL NETWORKS; PROMOTER PREDICTION;

DNA, BACTERIAL; ESCHERICHIA COLI; PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC; SIGMA FACTOR;

EID: 84891743019     PISSN: 10451056     EISSN: 10958320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2013.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ramprakash J., Schwarz F.P. Energetic contributions to the initiation in E.coli. Biophys Chem 2008, 138:91-98.
2. Hook-Barnard I., Johnson X.B., Hinton D.M. Escherichia coli RNA polymerase enzyme of σ70- dependent promoter requiring a-35 DNA element and an extended-10 TGn motif. JBacteriol 2006, 188:8352-8359.
3. Huffmann J.L., Brennan R.G. Prokaryotic transcription regulators: more than just the helix-turn-helix motif. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002, 12:98-106.
4. Borukhov S., Nudler E. RNA polymerase: the vehicle of transcription. Trends Microbiol 2008, 16(3):126-134.
5. de Avila Silva S., Echeverrigaray S. Bacterial promoter features description and their application on E. coli in silico prediction and recognition approaches. Bioinformatics 2012, 241-260. InTech, Rijeka. H. Pérez-Sánchez (Ed.).
6. Potvin E., Sanschagrin F., Levesque R.C. Sigma factors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Feder Eur Microbiol Soc 2008, 32:38-55.
7. Janga S.C., Collado-Vides J. Structure and evolution of gene regulatory networks in microbial genomes. Res Microbiol 2007, 158:787-794.
8. Jacques P.-E., Rodrigue S., Gaudreau L., Goulet J., Brzezinski R. Detection of prokaryotic promoters from the genomic ditribution of hexanucleotides pairs. BMC Bioinform 2006, 7:423.
9. Towsey M., Timms P., Hogan J., Mathews S.A. The cross-species prediction of bacterial promoters using a support vector machine. Comput Biol Chem 2008, 32:359-366.
10. Polate K., Günes S. Anovel approach to estimation of E.coli promoter gene sequences: combining feature selection and least square support vector machine (FS_LSSVN). Appl Math Comput 2007, 190:1574-1582.
11. 70 promoters in Escherichia coli K-12. JTheor Biol 2006, 242:135-141.
12. Gordon L., Chervonenkis A., Gammerman A.J., Shahmuradov I.A., Solovyev V.V. Sequence alignment for recognition of promoter regions. Bioinformatics 2003, 19(15):1964-1971.
13. Burden S., Lin Y.-X., Zhang R. Improving promoter prediction for the NNPP2.2 algorithm: a case study using Escherichia coli DNA sequences. Bioinformatics 2005, 21(5):601-607.
14. de Avila Silva S., Echeverrigaray S., Gerhardt G.J.L. BacPP: bacterial promoter prediction-a tool for accurate sigma-factor specific assignment in enterobacteria. JTheor Biol 2011, 287:92-99.
15. Kalate R.N., Tambe S.S., Kulkarni B.D. Artificial neural networks for prediction of mycobaterial promoter sequences. Comput Biol Chem 2003, 27:555-564.
16. Rani T.S., Bhavani S.D., Bapi R.S. Analysis of E.coli promoter recognition problem in dinucleotide feature space. Bioinformatics 2007, 23(5):582-588.
17. Askary A., Masoudi-Nejad A., Sharafi R., Mizbani A., Parizi S.N., Purmasjedi M. N4: a precise and highly sensitive promoter predictor using neural network fed by nearest neighbors. Genes Genet Syst 2009, 84(6):425-430.
18. Odajima K., Hayashi Y., Tianxia G., Setiono R. Greedy rule generation from discrete data and its use in neural network rule extraction. Neural Networks 2008, 21:1020-1028.
19. Andrews R., Diederich J., Tickle A.B. Asurvey and critique of techniques for extracting rules from trained artificial neural networks. Knowledge-Based Syst 1995, 8(6):373-389.
20. Kanhere A., Bansal M. Structural properties of promoters: similarities and differences between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33(10):3165-3175.
21. Rangannan V., Bansal M. Identification and annotation of promoter regions in microbial genome sequences on the basis of DNA stability. JBiosci 2007, 32(5):851-862.
22. Akan P., Deloukas P. DNA sequence and structural properties as predictors of human and mouse promoters. Gene 2008, 410(1):165-176.
23. de Avila Silva S., Gerhardt G.J.L., Echeverrigaray S. Rules extraction from neural networks applied to the prediction and recognition of prokaryotic promoters. Genet Mol Biol 2011, 34(2):353-360.
24. Breslauer K.J., Frank R., Blocker H., Marky L.A. Predicting DNA duplex stability from the base sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1986, 83:3746-3750.
25. SantaLucia J., Hicks D. The thermodynamics of DNA structural motifs. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2004, 33:415-440.
26. Gama-Castro S., Jimenez-Jacinto V., Peralta-Gil M., Santos-Zavaleta A., Peñaloza-Spinola M.I., Contreras-Moreira B., et al. RegulonDB (version 6.0): gene regulation model of Escherichia coli K-12 beyond transcription, active (experimental) annotated promoters and Text press navigation. Nucleic Acids Research 2008, 36:D120-D124.
27. Kanhere A., Bansal M. Anovel method for prokaryotic promoter prediction based on DNA stability. BMC Bioinform 2005, 6:1471-2105.
28. Hegger R., Kantz H., Schreiber T. Practical implementation of nonlinear time series methods: the TISEAN package. CHAOS 1999, 9:413-435.
29. Battistella E., Cechin A.L. The protein folding problem solved by a fuzzy inference system extracted from an artificial neural network. Lecture Notes Comput Sci 2004, 3315:474-483.
30. Tan Ah.-H., Pan H. Predictive neural networks for gene expression data analysis. Neural Networks 2005, 18:297-306.
31. R Development Core Team R: a language and environment for statistical computing 2008, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, URL:. http://www.R-project.org.
32. Sokolova M., Lapalme G. Asystematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks. Inform Process Manage 2009, 427:427-437.
33. Sonego P., Kocsor A., Pongor S. ROC analysis: applications to the classification of biological sequences and 3D structures. Brief Bioinform 2008, 9(3):198-209.
34. Song K. Recognition of prokaryotic promoters based on a novel variable-window Z-curve method. Nucleic Acids Res 2012, 40(3):963-971.
35. 54-dependent promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 1999, 27(22):4305-4313.
36. 54-dependent transcription. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2011, 35(3):425-440.
37. L. J. Friedman, J.Gelles, Mechanism of transcription initiation at an activator-dependent promoter defined by single-molecule observation, Cell 148(4) 679-689.
38. Song W., Maiste P.J., Naiman D.Q., Ward M.J. Sigma 28 promoter prediction in members of the gammaproteobacteria. FEMS 2007, 271:222-229.
39. Koo B.M., Rhodius V.A., Nonaka G., deHaseth P.L., Gross C.A. Reduced capacity of alternative sigmas to melt promoters ensures stringent promoter recognition. Genes Dev 2009, 23:2426-2436.
40. van Hijum S.A.F., Medema M.H., Kuipers O.P. Mechanisms and evolution of control logic in prokaryotic transcriptional. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2009, 73(3):481-509.
41. Huerta A.M., Collado-Vides J. Sigma70 promoters in Escherichia coli: specific transcription in dense regions of overlapping promoter-like signals. JMol Biol 2003, 333:261-278.