Medial parietal cortex activation related to attention control involving alcohol cues

Frontiers in Psychiatry

Volumn 4, Issue DEC, 2013, Pages

  Gladwin, Thomas E ^a,b   ter Mors Schulte, Mieke H J ^a,c   Richard Ridderinkhof, K ^a   Wiers, Reinout W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^c ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Addiction; Alcohol; Attention; Dual process; FMRI; Medial posterior cortex

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ADULT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTIONAL BIAS; AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR; BEVERAGE; BRAIN REGION; CONFLICT; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISTRACTIBILITY; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PARIETAL CORTEX; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VOLUNTEER; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84891718536     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16640640     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00174     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Field M, Cox WM. Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: a review of its development, causes, and consequences. Drug Alcohol Depend (2008) 97(1-2):1-20. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.03.030.
2. Mogg K, Bradley BP. Some methodological issues in assessing attentional biases for threatening faces in anxiety: a replication study using a modified version of the probe detection task. Behav Res Ther (1999) 37(6):595-604. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00158-2.
3. Cooper RM, Langton SRH. Attentional bias to angry faces using the dot-probe task? It depends when you look for it. Behav Res Ther (2006) 44(9):1321-9. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.10.004.
4. Baum C, Schneider R, Keogh E, Lautenbacher S. Different stages in attentional processing of facial expressions of pain: a dot-probe task modification. J Pain (2013) 14(3):223-32. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2012.11.001.
5. MacLeod CM, Mathews A. Cognitive bias modification approaches to anxiety. Annu Rev Clin Psychol (2012) 8:189-217. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143052.
6. Field M, Mogg K, Zetteler J, Bradley BP. Attentional biases for alcohol cues in heavy and light social drinkers: the roles of initial orienting and maintained attention. Psychopharmacology (2004) 176(1):88-93. doi:10.1007/s00213-004-1855-1.
7. Townshend JM, Duka T. Attentional bias associated with alcohol cues: differences between heavy and occasional social drinkers. Psychopharmacology (2001) 157(1):67-74. doi:10.1007/s002130100764.
8. Noël X, Colmant M, Van Der Linden M, Bechara A, Bullens Q, Hanak C, et al. Time course of attention for alcohol cues in abstinent alcoholic patients: the role of initial orienting. Alcohol Clin Exp Res (2006) 30(11):1871-7. doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00224.x.
9. Townshend JM, Duka T. Avoidance of alcohol-related stimuli in alcohol-dependent inpatients. Alcohol Clin Exp Res (2007) 31(8):1349-57. doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00429.x.
10. Vollstädt-Klein S, Loeber S, von der Goltz C, Mann K, Kiefer F. Avoidance of alcohol-related stimuli increases during the early stage of abstinence in alcohol-dependent patients. Alcohol Alcohol (2009) 44(5):458-63. doi:10.1093/alcalc/agp056.
11. Berridge KC, Robinson TE. What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? Brain Res Rev (1998) 28(3):309-69. doi:10.1016/S0165-0173(98)00019-8.
12. Robinson TE, Berridge KC. Review. The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: some current issues. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci (2008) 363(1507):3137-46. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0093.
13. Zhang J, Berridge KC, Tindell AJ, Smith KS, Aldridge JW. A neural computational model of incentive salience. PLoS Comput Biol (2009) 5(7):e1000437. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000437.
14. George MS, Anton RF, Bloomer C, Teneback C, Drobes DJ, Lorberbaum JP, et al. Activation of prefrontal cortex and anterior thalamus in alcoholic subjects on exposure to alcohol-specific cues. Arch Gen Psychiatry (2001) 58(4):345-52. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.58.4.345.
15. Grüsser SM, Wrase J, Klein S, Hermann D, Smolka MN, Ruf M, et al. Cue-induced activation of the striatum and medial prefrontal cortex is associated with subsequent relapse in abstinent alcoholics. Psychopharmacology (2004) 175(3):296-302. doi:10.1007/s00213-004-1828-4.
16. Ray S, Hanson C, Hanson SJ, Bates ME. fMRI BOLD response in high-risk college students (part 1): during exposure to alcohol, marijuana, polydrug and emotional picture cues. Alcohol Alcohol (2010) 45(5):437-43. doi:10.1093/alcalc/agq042.
17. Tapert SF, Cheung EH, Brown GG, Frank LR, Paulus MP, Schweinsburg AD, et al. Neural response to alcohol stimuli in adolescents with alcohol use disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry (2003) 60(7):727-35. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.60.7.727.
18. Tapert SF, Brown GG, Baratta MV, Brown SA. fMRI BOLD response to alcohol stimuli in alcohol dependent young women. Addict Behav (2004) 29(1):33-50. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2003.07.003.
19. Vollstädt-Klein S, Wichert S, Rabinstein J, Bühler M, Klein O, Ende G, et al. Initial, habitual and compulsive alcohol use is characterized by a shift of cue processing from ventral to dorsal striatum. Addiction (2010) 105(10):1741-9. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03022.x.
20. Vollstädt-Klein S, Loeber S, Kirsch M, Bach P, Richter A, Bühler M, et al. Effects of cue-exposure treatment on neural cue reactivity in alcohol dependence: a randomized trial. Biol Psychiatry (2011) 69(11):1060-6. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.12.016.
21. Bechara A. Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: a neurocognitive perspective. Nat Neurosci (2005) 8(11):1458-63. doi:10.1038/nn1584.
22. Gladwin TE, Figner B, Crone EA, Wiers RW. Addiction, adolescence, and the integration of control and motivation. Dev Cogn Neurosci (2011) 1(4):364-76. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2011.06.008.
23. Volkow ND, Fowler JS, Wang G-J. The addicted human brain viewed in the light of imaging studies: brain circuits and treatment strategies. Neuropharmacology (2004) 47(Suppl 1):3-13. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2004.07.019.
24. Wiers RW, Stacy AW. Implicit cognition and addiction. Curr Dir Psychol Sci (2006) 15:292-6. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00455.x.
25. Kastner S, Ungerleider LG. The neural basis of biased competition in human visual cortex. Neuropsychologia (2001) 39(12):1263-76. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00116-6.
26. Santangelo V, Olivetti Belardinelli M, Spence C, Macaluso E. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities. J Cogn Neurosci (2009) 21(12):2384-97. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.21178.
27. Serences JT, Yantis S. Spatially selective representations of voluntary and stimulus-driven attentional priority in human occipital, parietal, and frontal cortex. Cereb Cortex (2007) 17(2):284-93. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj146.
28. Cavanna AE, Trimble MR. The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain (2006) 129(Pt 3):564-83. doi:10.1093/brain/awl004.
29. Nagahama Y, Okada T, Katsumi Y, Hayashi T, Yamauchi H, Sawamoto N, et al. Transient neural activity in the medial superior frontal gyrus and precuneus time locked with attention shift between object features. Neuroimage (1999) 10(2):193-9. doi:10.1006/nimg.1999.0451.
30. Luijten M, Veltman DJ, van den Brink W, Hester R, Field M, Smits M, et al. Neurobiological substrate of smoking-related attentional bias. Neuroimage (2011) 54(3):2374-81. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.064.
31. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia (1971) 9(1):97-113. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4.
32. Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de La Fuente JR, Grant M. Development of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption-II. Addiction (1993) 88(6):791-804. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x.
33. Allen J, Litten R, Fertig J, Babor T. A review of research on the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT). Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. (1997) 21(4):613-9. doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.1997.tb03811.x.
34. Lieberman MD, Cunningham WA. Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research: re-balancing the scale. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci (2009) 4(4):423-8. doi:10.1093/scan/nsp052.
35. Schultz J, Lennert T. BOLD signal in intraparietal sulcus covaries with magnitude of implicitly driven attention shifts. Neuroimage (2009) 45(4):1314-28. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.012.
36. Wiers RW, Rinck M, Dictus M, van Den Wildenberg E. Relatively strong automatic appetitive action-tendencies in male carriers of the OPRM1 G-allele. Genes Brain Behav (2009) 8(1):101-6. doi:10.1111/j.1601-183X.2008.00454.x.
37. Martinotti G, Di Nicola M, Tedeschi D, Callea A, Di Giannantonio M, Janiri L, et al. Craving Typology Questionnaire (CTQ): a scale for alcohol craving in normal controls and alcoholics. Compr Psychiatry (2013) 54(7):925-32. doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.03.023.
38. Poldrack RA. Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends Cogn Sci (2006) 10(2):59-63. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.004.
39. Fadardi JS, Cox WM. Reversing the sequence: reducing alcohol consumption by overcoming alcohol attentional bias. Drug Alcohol Depend (2009) 101(3):137-45. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.11.015.
40. Schoenmakers TM, de Bruin M, Lux IFM, Goertz AG, Van Kerkhof DHAT, Wiers RW. Clinical effectiveness of attentional bias modification training in abstinent alcoholic patients. Drug Alcohol Depend (2010) 109(1-3):30-6. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.11.022.