Social exclusion modulates pre-reflective interpersonal body representation

Psychological Research

Volumn 78, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 28-36

  Ambrosini, Ettore ^a   Blomberg, Olle ^b   Mandrigin, Alisa ^b   Costantini, Marcello ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BODY IMAGE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; SOCIAL ISOLATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; BODY IMAGE; FEMALE; HUMANS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SOCIAL ISOLATION; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84891661776     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-012-0476-2     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596-612. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 63. 4. 596.
2. Baumeister, R. F., Twenge, J. M., & Nuss, C. K. (2002). Effects of social exclusion on cognitive processes: anticipated aloneness reduces intelligent thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 817-827. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 83. 4. 817.
3. Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 83-93. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 71. 1. 83.
4. Cardellicchio, P., Sinigaglia, C., & Costantini, M. (2012). Grasping affordances with the other's hand: a TMS study. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience,. doi: 10. 1093/scan/nss017.
5. Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 893-910. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 76. 6. 893.
6. Colzato, L. S., Beest, I. v., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Scorolli, C., Dorchin, S., Meiran, N., et al., (2010). God: Do I have your attention? Cognition, 117(1), 87-94, doi: 10. 1016/j. cognition. 2010. 07. 003.
7. Costantini, M., Ambrosini, E., Scorolli, C., & Borghi, A. (2011a). When objects are close to me: affordances in the peripersonal space. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(2), 302-308.
8. Costantini, M., Ambrosini, E., Sinigaglia, C., & Gallese, V. (2011b). Tool-use observation makes far objects ready-to-hand. Neuropsychologia, 49(9), 2658-2663. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuropsychologia. 2011. 05. 013.
9. Costantini, M., Ambrosini, E., Tieri, G., Sinigaglia, C., & Committeri, G. (2010). Where does an object trigger an action? An investigation about affordances in space. Experimental Brain Research, 207(1), 95.
10. Costantini, M., Committeri, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2011c). Ready both to your and to my hands: mapping the action space of others. PLoS ONE, 6(4), e17923.
11. Costantini, M., & Sinigaglia, C. (2012). Grasping affordance: a window onto social cognition. In Axel Seemann (Ed.), Joint attention: new developments. Cambridge: MIT press.
12. Ferri, F., Riggio, L., Gallese, V., & Costantini, M. (2011). Objects and their nouns in peripersonal space. Neuropsychologia, 49(13), 3519-3524. doi: 10. 1016/j. neuropsychologia. 2011. 09. 001.
13. Galati, G., Committeri, G., Pitzalis, S., Pelle, G., Patria, F., Fattori, P., et al. (2011). Intentional signals during saccadic and reaching delays in the human posterior parietal cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience, 34(11), 1871-1885. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1460-9568. 2011. 07885. x.
14. Galati, G., Committeri, G., Spitoni, G., Aprile, T., Di Russo, F., Pitzalis, S., et al. (2008). A selective representation of the meaning of actions in the auditory mirror system. NeuroImage, 40(3), 1274-1286.
15. Gonsalkorale, K., & Williams, K. D. (2007). The KKK won't let me play: ostracism even by a despised outgroup hurts. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(6), 1176-1186. doi: 10. 1002/ejsp. 392.
16. Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., & van den Wildenberg, W. P. M. (2009). How social are task representations? Psychological Science, 20(7), 794-798. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9280. 2009. 02367. x.
17. Hommel, B., Musseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behav Brain Sci, 24(5), 849-878; discussion 878-937.
18. Iani, C., Anelli, F., Nicoletti, R., Arcuri, L., & Rubichi, S. (2011). The role of group membership on the modulation of joint action. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3), 439-445. doi: 10. 1007/s00221-011-2651-x.
19. Kuhbandner, C., Pekrun, R., & Maier, M. A. (2010). The role of positive and negative affect in the "mirroring" of other persons' actions. Cognition and Emotion, 24(7), 1182-1190. doi: 10. 1080/02699930903119196.
20. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224-253. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295x. 98. 2. 224.
21. Morey, R. D. (2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: a correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4(2), 61-64.
22. Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291-310. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295x. 108. 2. 291.
23. Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006a). Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. Trends Cogn Sci, 10(2), 70-76.
24. Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others' actions: just like one's own? Cognition, 88(3), B11-B21.
25. Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G. n., Prinz, W., & Wascher, E. (2006b). Twin peaks: An ERP study of action planning and control in coacting individuals. (Vol. 18, pp. 859-870).
26. Sebanz, N., Rebbechi, D., Knoblich, G., Prinz, W., & Frith, C. D. (2007). Is it really my turn? An event-related fMRI study of task sharing. Social Neuroscience, 2(2), 81-95. doi: 10. 1080/17470910701237989.
27. Sebastian, C., Viding, E., Williams, K. D., & Blakemore, S.-J. (2010). Social brain development and the affective consequences of ostracism in adolescence. Brain and Cognition, 72(1), 134-145. doi: 10. 1016/j. bandc. 2009. 06. 008.
28. Simon, J., & Rudell, A. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51(3), 300-304.
29. Thomas, R., Press, C., & Haggard, P. (2006). Shared representations in body perception. Acta Psychol (Amst), 121(3), 317-330.
30. Tipper, S. P. (2010). From observation to action simulation: the role of attention, eye-gaze, emotion, and body state. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(11), 2081-2105. doi: 10. 1080/17470211003624002.
31. Tipper, S., Paul, M., & Hayes, A. (2006). Vision-for-action: the effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(3), 493-498. doi: 10. 3758/bf03193875.
32. van Baaren, R. B., Maddux, W. W., Chartrand, T. L., de Bouter, C., & van Knippenberg, A. (2003). It takes two to mimic: behavioral consequences of self-construals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 1093-1102. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 84. 5. 1093.
33. Weik, U., Maroof, P., Zöller, C., & Deinzer, R. (2010). Pre-experience of social exclusion suppresses cortisol response to psychosocial stress in women but not in men. Hormones and Behavior, 58(5), 891-897. doi: 10. 1016/j. yhbeh. 2010. 08. 018.
34. Williams, K. D., Cheung, C. K. T., & Choi, W. (2000). Cyberostracism: effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 748-762. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 79. 5. 748.
35. Williams, K. D., & Jarvis, B. (2006). Cyberball: a program for use in research on interpersonal ostracism and acceptance. Behavior Research Methods, 38(1), 174-180.
36. Zadro, L., Williams, K. D., & Richardson, R. (2004). How low can you go? Ostracism by a computer is sufficient to lower self-reported levels of belonging, control, self-esteem, and meaningful existence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(4), 560.