Tool characteristics in imagery of tool actions

Psychological Research

Volumn 78, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 10-17

  Rieger, Martina ^a,b   Massen, Cristina ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY FOR HEALTH SCIENCES   (Austria)

^b GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c LEIBNIZ RESEARCH CENTRE FOR WORKING ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN FACTORS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; KINESTHESIA; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; KINESTHESIS; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84891661094     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-013-0481-0     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Anderson, N. H., & Weiss, D. J. (1971). Test of a multiplying model for estimated area of rectangles. American Journal of Psychology, 84, 543-548.
2. Beilock, S. L., Carr, T. H., MacMahon, C., & Starkes, J. L. (2002). When paying attention becomes counterproductive: impact of divided versus skill-focused attention on novice and experienced performance of sensorimotor skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 6-16.
3. Campos, J. L., Siegle, J. H., Mohler, B. J., Bülthoff, H. H., & Loomis, J. M. (2009). Imagined self-motion differs from perceived self-motion: evidence from a novel continuous pointing method. PLoS ONE, 4(11), e7793.
4. Courtine, G., Papaxanthis, C., Gentili, R., & Pozzo, T. (2004). Gait-dependent motor memory facilitation in covert movement execution. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 67-75.
5. Creem-Regehr, S. H., & Lee, J. N. (2005). Neural representations of graspable objects: are tools special? Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 457-469.
6. Davidson, P. R., & Wolpert, D. M. (2005). Widespread access to predictive models in the motor system: a short review. Journal of Neural Engineering, 2, 313-319.
7. Davoli, C. C., Brockmole, J. R., & Witt, J. K. (2011). Compressing perceived distance with remote tool-use: real, imagined, and remembered. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology: Human Perception and Performance. Advance online publication.
8. Decety, J. (1991). Motor information may be important for updating the cognitive processes involved in mental imagery of movement. European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 415-426.
9. Decety, J. (1996). The neurophysiological basis of motor imagery. Behavioural Brain Research, 77, 45-52.
10. Decety, J., & Jeannerod, M. (1996). Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality: does Fitts's law hold in motor imagery? Behavioural Brain Research, 72, 127-134.
11. Decety, J., Jeannerod, M., & Prablanc, C. (1989). The timing of mentally represented actions. Behavioural Brain Research, 34, 35-42.
12. Decety, J., & Michel, F. (1989). Comparative analysis of actual and mental movement times in two graphic tasks. Brain and Cognition, 11, 87-97.
13. Fourkas, A. D., Bonavolontà, V., Avenanti, A., & Aglioti, S. M. (2008). Kinaesthetic imagery and tool-specific modulation of corticospinal representations in expert tennis players. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 2382-2390.
14. Grealy, M. A., & Shearer, G. F. (2008). Timing processes in motor imagery. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20(5), 867-892.
15. Grush, R. (2004). The emulation theory of representation: motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(3), 377-396.
16. Guillot, A., & Collet, C. (2005). Duration of mentally simulated movement: a review. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37, 10-20.
17. Guillot, A., Debarnot, U., Louis, M., Hoyek, N., & Collet, C. (2010). Motor imagery and motor performance: evidence from the sport science literature. In A. Guillot & C. Collet (Eds.), The neurophysiological foundations of mental and motor imagery (pp. 215-226). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Higuchi, S., Imamizu, H., & Kawato, M. (2007). Cerebellar activity evoked by common tool-use execution and imagery tasks: an fMRI study. Cortex, 43, 350-358.
19. Imazu, S., Sugio, T., Tanaka, S., & Inui, T. (2007). Differences between actual and imagined usage of chopsticks: an fmri study. Cortex, 43, 301-307.
20. Jeannerod, M. (1994). The representing brain: neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 187-245.
21. Komesu, Y., Urwitz-Lane, R., Ozel, B., Lukban, J., Kahn, M, Muir, T. Fenner, D., & Rogers, R. (2009). Does mental imagery prior to cytoscopy make a difference? A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 201(2), 218e1-218e9.
22. Kunz, B. R., Creem-Regehr, S. H., & Thompson, W. B. (2009). Evidence for motor simulation in imagined locomotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(5), 1458-1471.
23. Logan, G. D., & Crump, M. J. C. (2009). The left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing. Psychological Science, 20(10), 1296-1300.
24. Macuga, K. L., Papailiou, A. P., & Frey, S. H. (2012). Motor imagery of tool use: relationship to actual use and adherence to Fitts' law across tasks. Experimental Brain Research, 218, 169-179.
25. McAvinue, L. P., & Robertson, I. H. (2008). Measuring motor imagery ability: a review. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 232-251.
26. Munzert, J., Lorey, B., & Zentgraf, K. (2009). Cognitive motor processes: the role of motor imagery in the study of motor representations. Brain Research Reviews, 60, 306-326.
27. Noel, R. C. (1980). The effects of visuo-motor behavior rehearsal on tennis performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 2, 221-226.
28. Papaxanthis, C., Schieppati, M., Gentili, R., & Pozzo, T. (2002). Imagined and actual arm movements have similar durations when performed under conditions of direction and mass. Experimental Brain Research, 143, 447-452.
29. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2002). Mental imagery: in search of a theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 157-238.
30. Rieger, M., Martinez, F., & Wenke, D. (2011). Imagery of errors in typing. Cognition, 121, 163-175.
31. Schwartz, D. L., & Holton, D. L. (2000). Tool use and the effect of action on the imagination. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1655-1665.
32. Taylor, J. A., & Shaw, D. F. (2002). The effects of outcome imagery on golf-putting performance. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20(8), 607-613.
33. Witt, J. K., & Proffitt, D. R. (2008). Action-specific Influences on Distance Perception: a Role for Motor Simulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1479-1492.