Day-surgery versus overnight stay surgery for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn 2013, Issue 7, 2013, Pages

  Vaughan, Jessica ^a   Gurusamy, Kurinchi Selvan ^a   Davidson, Brian R ^a  

^a ROYAL FREE AND UNIVERSITY COLLEGE MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMBULATORY SURGERY; GALLSTONE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; META ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OVERNIGHT STAY SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RETURN TO WORK; REVIEW; SURGERY; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; ADULT; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; FEMALE; GALLSTONES; HOSPITALIZATION; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; STATISTICS;

ADULT; AMBULATORY SURGICAL PROCEDURES; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; FEMALE; GALLSTONES; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT READMISSION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84891646222     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1469493X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006798.pub4     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Barthelsson C, Anderberg B, Ramel S, Bjorvell C, Giesecke K, Nordstrom G. Outpatient versus inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized study of symptom occurrence, symptom distress and general state of health during the first post-operative week. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2008;14(4):577-84.
2. Dirksen CD, Schmitz RF, Hans KM, Nieman FHM, Hoogenboom LJ, Go PMNYH. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an ambulatory treatment is just as effective as an overnight stay and from a social perspective is cheaper; a randomised study. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 2001;145(50):2434-9.
3. Hollington P, Toogood GJ, Padbury RT. A prospective randomized trial of day-stay only versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Surgery 1999;69(12):841-3.
4. Johansson M, Thune A, Nelvin L, Lundell L. Randomized clinical trial of day-care versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy. British Journal of Surgery 2006;93(1):40-5.
5. Thune A, Nelvin L, Johansson MG, Lundell L. Randomized clinical trial of day-care versus overnight stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gastroenterology 2005;128(4):A785.
6. Keulemans Y, Eshuis J, De Haes H, De Wit LT, Gouma DJ. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: day-care versus clinical observation. Annals of Surgery 1998;228(6):734-40.
7. Keulemans YCA, Eshuis JH, De Haes J, Leeuwenberg A, Wit TL, Gouma DJ. Day care or hospital admission after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a prospective randomized trial. Gastroenterology 1998;114(4):A1271.
8. Keulemans YCA, Eshuis JH, De Haes JCJM. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: admittance or day care? A randomised study. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 1998;142(14):822.
9. Keulemans YCA, Eshuis JH, De Haes JCJM, De Wit L, Gouma DJ. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in day care as effective as during hospitalization, and cheaper; a randomized trial. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 1999;143(12):621-6.
10. Keulemans YCA, Eshuis JH, De Haes JCJM, Leeuwenberg A, De Wit L, Gouma DJ. Day care or hospital admission after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a prospective randomized trial [abstract]. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology 1998;10(Suppl 12):A25.
11. Young J, O'Connell B. Recovery following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in either a 23 hour or an 8 hour facility. Journal of Quality in Clinical Practice 2001;21(1-2):2-7.
12. Bews-Hair M, Coulter G, Frizelle FA. A prospective randomized trial of day-stay only versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comment [1]. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery 2000;70(10):743.
13. Burney RE, Jones KR. Ambulatory and admitted laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients have comparable outcomes but different functional health status. Surgical Endoscopy 2002;16(6):921-6.
14. Curet MJ, Contreras M, Weber DM, Albrecht R. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy - outpatient vs inpatient management. Surgical Endoscopy 2002;16(3):453-7.
15. Parvaiz MA, Hafeez R. Randomized clinical trial of day-care versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Br J Surg 2006; 93: 40-5). British Journal of Surgery 2006;93(5):639-40.
16. Rosen MJ, Malm JA, Tarnoff M, Zuccala K, Ponsky JL. Cost-effectiveness of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques 2001;11(3):182-4.
17. Selas PR, Santiuste AC. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and outpatient surgery. Revista Espanola de Enfermedades Digestivas 2004;96(7):435-8.
18. Sharma A, Hayden JD, Reese RA, Sedman PC, Royston CMS, OCloseCurlyBoyle CJ. Prospective comparison of ambulatory with inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Outcome, patient preference and satisfaction. Ambulatory Surgery 2004;11(1-2):23-6.
19. AAGBI Day case and short stay surgery: 2. Anaesthesia 2011;66(5):417-34.
20. Brok J, Thorlund K, Gluud C, Wetterslev J. Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2008;61:763-9.
21. Brok J, Thorlund K, Wetterslev J, Gluud C. Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive - Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses. International Journal of Epidemiology 2009;38(1):287-98.
22. Copenhagen Trial Unit. TSA - Trial Sequential Analysis. http://ctu.dk/tsa/ 2011 (accessed 5 July 2013).
23. DeMets DL. Methods for combining randomized clinical trials: strengths and limitations. Statistics in Medicine 1987;6(3):341-50.
24. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 1986;7(3):177-88.
25. Egger M, Davey SG, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed) 1997;315(7109):629-34.
26. Giger U, Ouaissi M, Schmitz SF, Krahenbuhl S, Krahenbuhl L. Bile duct injury and use of cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The British Journal of Surgery 2011;98(3):391-6.
27. Gluud C, Nikolova D, Klingenberg SL, Alexakis N, Als-Nielsen B, Colli A, et al. Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group. About The Cochrane Collaboration (Cochrane Review Groups (CRGs)). 2013, Issue 1. Art. No.: LIVER.
28. Brozek JL, Oxman A, Schünemann HJ. Grade Profiler 3.6. 3.6. Grade Profiler, 2004-2007.
29. Gurusamy KS, Gluud C, Nikolova D, Davidson BR. Assessment of risk of bias in randomized clinical trials in surgery. British Journal of Surgery 2009;96(4):342-9.
30. Halldestam I, Enell EL, Kullman E, Borch K. Development of symptoms and complications in individuals with asymptomatic gallstones. British Journal of Surgery 2004;91(6):734-8.
31. Hospital Episode Statistics. Main operations. 4 character. http://www.hesonline.nhs.uk/Ease/servlet/ContentServer?siteID=1937&categoryID=215 (accessed 5 July 2013).
32. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2002;21(11):1539-58.
33. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
34. International Conference on Harmonisation Expert Working Group. International conference on harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use. ICH harmonised tripartite guideline. Guideline for good clinical practice1997 CFR & ICH Guidelines. Vol. 1, PA 19063-2043, USA: Barnett International/PAREXEL, 1997.
35. Jørgensen T. Prevalence of gallstones in a Danish population. American Journal of Epidemiology 1987;126(5):912-21.
36. Kjaergard LL, Villumsen J, Gluud C. Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses. Annals of Internal Medicine 2001;135(11):982-9.
37. Lundh A, Sismondo S, Lexchin J, Busuioc OA, Bero L. Industry sponsorship and research outcome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 12. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000033.pub2]
38. Macaskill P, Walter SD, Irwig L. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2001;20(4):641-54.
39. Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Moher M, et al. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?. Lancet 1998;352(9128):609-13.
40. Muhrbeck O, Ahlberg J. Prevalence of gallstone disease in a Swedish population. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 1995;30(11):1125-8.
41. Newell DJ. Intention-to-treat analysis: implications for quantitative and qualitative research. International Journal of Epidemiology 1992;21(5):837-41.
42. NIH Gallstones and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, NIH Consens Statement Online 1992 Sep 14-16. http://consensus.nih.gov/1992/1992GallstonesLaparoscopy090html.htm 1992 (accessed 28 February 2007); Vol. 10, issue 3:1-20.
43. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). 5.2. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012.
44. Royle P, Milne R. Literature searching for randomized controlled trials used in Cochrane reviews: rapid versus exhaustive searches. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2003;19(4):591-603.
45. Savović J, Jones HE, Altman DG, Harris RJ, Jüni P, Pildal J, et al. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials. Health Technology Assessment 2012;16(35):1-82.
46. Savović J, Jones HE, Altman DG, Harris RJ, Jüni P, Pildal J, et al. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials. Annals of Internal Medicine 2012;157(6):429-38.
47. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995;273(5):408-12.
48. Shamiyeh A, Wayand W. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early and late complications and their treatment. Langenbecks Archives of Surgery 2004;389(3):164-71.
49. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 Statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Annals of Internal Medicine 2013;158:200-7.
50. Thorlund K, Devereaux PJ, Wetterslev J, Guyatt G, Ioannidis JP, Thabane L, et al. Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses. International Journal of Epidemiology 2009;38(1):276-86.
51. Thorlund K, Anema A, Mills E. Interpreting meta-analysis according to the adequacy of sample size. An example using isoniazid chemoprophylaxis for tuberculosis in purified protein derivative negative HIV-infected individuals. Clinical Epidemiology 2010;2:57-66.
52. Thorlund K, Engstrøm J, Wetterslev J, Brok J, Imberger G, Gluud C. User manual for Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA). http://ctu.dk/tsa/files/tsa_manual.pdf 2011 (accessed 5 July 2013).
53. Todd KH, Funk JP. The minimum clinically important difference in physician-assigned visual analog pain scores. Academic Emergency Medicine 1996;3(2):142-6. [PUBMED: 8808375]
54. Wetterslev J, Thorlund K, Brok J, Gluud C. Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2008;61(1):64-75.
55. Wetterslev J, Thorlund K, Brok J, Gluud C. Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in a random-effects meta-analysis. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2009;9:86.
56. Wood L, Egger M, Gluud LL, Schulz KF, Jüni P, Altman DG, et al. Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed) 2008;336(7644):601-5.
57. Gurusamy KS, Junnarkar S, Farouk M, Davidson BR. Day-case versus overnight stay in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006798.pub2]
58. Gurusamy KS, Junnarkar S, Farouk M, Davidson BR. Day-case versus overnight stay for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006798.pub3]
59. Gurusamy K, Junnarkar S, Farouk M, Davidson BR. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy. British Journal of Surgery 2008;95(2):161-8.