|
Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 921-926
|
Ambulatory and admitted laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients have comparable outcomes but different functional health status
a b |
Author keywords
Ambulatory surgical procedures; Cholecystectomy; Health status; Laparoscopy; Outcome assessment
|
Indexed keywords
ABDOMINAL PAIN;
ADULT;
AMBULATORY SURGERY;
ARTICLE;
CHOLECYSTECTOMY;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DEPRESSION;
ELECTIVE SURGERY;
EMOTION;
FEMALE;
FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT;
GALLSTONE;
HEALTH STATUS;
HOSPITALIZATION;
HUMAN;
LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
NAUSEA;
OUTCOMES RESEARCH;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
VOMITING;
AMBULATORY CARE;
CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC;
COST OF ILLNESS;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW-UP STUDIES;
HEALTH STATUS;
HUMANS;
LENGTH OF STAY;
MALE;
POPULATION SURVEILLANCE;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;
SEX DISTRIBUTION;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
|
EID: 0036271630
PISSN: 09302794
EISSN: 14322218
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-001-8201-z Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (19)
|
References (11)
|