Day-case versus overnight stay in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn , Issue 1, 2008, Pages

  Gurusamy, Kurinchi S ^a   Junnarkar, S ^b   Farouk, M ^b   Davidson, B R ^b  

^a ROYAL FREE AND UNIVERSITY COLLEGE MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIA; ANXIETY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; FOLLOW UP; GALLSTONE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE VOMITING; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AMBULATORY SURGERY; HOSPITAL READMISSION; LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; META ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; STATISTICS; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONVALESCENCE; ELECTIVE SURGERY; HEALTH CARE COST; HOSPITAL CHARGE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MORBIDITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

AMBULATORY SURGICAL PROCEDURES; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; PATIENT READMISSION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 44949096487     PISSN: 1469493X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006798.pub2     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Dirksen 2001 {published data only} Dirksen CD, Schmitz RF, Hans KM, Nieman FHM, Hoogenboom LJ, Go PMNYH. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an ambulatory treatment is just as effective as an overnight stay and from a social perspective is cheaper; a randomised study. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 2001;145(50):2434-9.
2. Hollington 1999 {published data only} Hollington P, Toogood GJ, Padbury RT. A prospective randomized trial of day-stay only versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Australia New Zealnd Journal of Surgery 1999;69(12):841-3.
3. Johansson 2006 {published data only} *Johansson M, Thune A, Nelvin L, Lundell L. Randomized clinical trial of day-care versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The Bristish Journal of Surgery 2006;93(1):40-5.
4. Thune A, Nelvin L, Johansson MG, Lundell L. Randomized clinical trial of day-care versus overnight stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gastroenterology 2005;128(4):A785-A785.
5. Keulemans 1998 {published data only} *Keulemans Y, Eshuis J, de Haes H, de Wit LT, Gouma DJ. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: day-care versus clinical observation. Annals of Surgery 1998;228(6):734- 40.
6. Keulemans YCA, Eshuis JH, De Haes J, Leeuwenberg A, Wit TL, Gouma DJ. Day care or hospital admission after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a prospective randomized trial. Gastroenterology 1998;114(4):A1271-A1271.
7. Keulemans YCA, Eshuis JH, De Haes JCJM. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: admittance or day care? A randomised study (Dutch) [abstract]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 1998;142(14):822.
8. Keulemans YCA, Eshuis JH, De Haes JCJM, De Wit L, Gouma DJ. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in day care as effective as during hospitalization, and cheaper; a randomized trial. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 1999;143(12):621-6.
9. Keulemans YCA, Eshuis JH, De Haes JCJM, Leeuwenberg A, de Wit L, Gouma DJ. Day care or hospital admission after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a prospective randomized trial [abstract]. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology 1998;10(Suppl 12):A 25.
10. Young 2001 {published and unpublished data} Young J, O CB. Recovery following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in either a 23 hour or an 8 hour facility. Journal of Quality in Clinical Practice 2001;21(1-2):2- 7.
11. Bews-Hair 2000 Bews-Hair M, Coulter G, Frizelle FA. A prospective randomized trial of day-stay only versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comment [1]. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery 2000;70(10):743.
12. Burney 2002 Burney RE, Jones KR. Ambulatory and admitted laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients have comparable outcomes but different functional health status. Surgical Endoscopy 2002;16(6):921-6.
13. Curet 2002 Curet MJ, Contreras M, Weber DM, Albrecht R. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy - outpatient vs inpatient management. Surgical Endoscopy 2002;16(3):453-7.
14. Parvaiz 2006 Parvaiz MA, Hafeez R. Randomized clinical trial of day-care versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Br J Surg 2006; 93: 40-5). British Journal of Surgery 2006;93(5):639-40.
15. Rosen 2001 Rosen MJ, Malm JA, Tarnoff M, Zuccala K, Ponsky JL. Cost-effectiveness of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques 2001;11(3):182-4.
16. Selas 2004 Selas PR, Santiuste AC. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and outpatient surgery. Revista Espanola De Enfermedades Digestivas 2004;96(7):435-8.
17. Sharma 2004 Sharma A, Hayden JD, Reese RA, Sedman PC, Royston CMS, O BCJ. Prospective comparison of ambulatory with inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Outcome, patient preference and satisfaction. Ambulatory Surgery 2004;11(1-2):23-6.
18. ASA 2007 American Association of Anesthesiologists. ASA Physical Status Classification System. www.asahq.org/clinical/physicalstatus.htm (accessed 9 January 2007).
19. Bakken 2004 Bakken IJ, Skjeldestad FE, Mjåland O, Johnson E. Cholecystectomy in Norway 1990-2002 [Kolecystektomi i Norge i 1990-2002]. Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening 2004;124(18):2376-8.
20. DeMets 1987 DeMets DL. Methods for combining randomized clinical trials: strengths and limitations. Statistics in Medicine 1987;6(3):341-50.
21. DerSimonian 1986 DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 1986;7(3):177-88.
22. DOH 2006 Department of Health. NHS reference costs 2005-06. http://wwwdhgovuk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/ PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_062884 (accessed 17 July 2007).
23. Egger 1997 Egger M, Davey SG, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 1997;315(7109):629-34.
24. Fullarton 1994 Fullarton GM, Bell G. Prospective audit of the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the west of Scotland. West of Scotland Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Audit Group. Gut 1994;35(8):1121-6.
25. Gluud 2007 Gluud C, Nikolova D, Klingenberg SL, Als-Nielsen B, D'Amico G, Davidson B, et al.Hepato-Biliary Group. About The Cochrane Collaboration (Cochrane Review Groups (CRGs)) 2007, Issue 3.Art. No.: LIVER.
26. Gurusamy 2006 Gurusamy KS, Samraj K. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD005440. DOI: 10.1002/14651858. CD005440.pub2.
27. Halldestam 2004 Halldestam I, Enell EL, Kullman E, Borch K. Development of symptoms and complications in individuals with asymptomatic gallstones. British Journal of Surgery 2004;91(6):734-8.
28. HES 2006 Hospital Episode Statistics. Main operations. 4 character. http://www.hesonline.nhs.uk/Ease/servlet/ContentServer?siteID= 1937&categoryID=215 (accessed 28 February 2007).
29. Higgins 2002 Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2002;21(11):1539-58.
30. Higgins 2006 Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention 4.2.6 [updated September 2006]. The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2006. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
31. Jørgensen 1987 Jørgensen T. Prevalence of gallstones in a Danish population. American Journal of Epidemiology 1987;126(5):912-21.
32. Kjaergard 2001 Kjaergard LL, Villumsen J, Gluud C. Reportedmethodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses. Annals of Internal Medicine 2001;135(11):982-9.
33. Lepner 2003 Lepner U, Goroshina J, Samarutel J. Postoperative pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised prospective double-blind clinical trial. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery 2003;92(2):121-4.
34. Livingston 2004 Livingston EH, Rege RV. A nationwide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. American Journal of Surgery 2004;188(3):205-11.
35. Macaskill 2001 Macaskill P, Walter SD, Irwig L. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2001;20(4):641-54.
36. Mjäland 1998 Mjäland O, Adamsen S, Hjelmquist B, Ovaska J, Buanes T. Cholecystectomy rates, gallstone prevalence, and handling of bile duct injuries in Scandinavia. A comparative audit. Surgical Endoscopy 1998;12(12):1386-9.
37. Moher 1998 Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Moher M, et al.Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported inmeta-analyses?. Lancet 1998;352(9128):609-13.
38. Moher 2001 Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG (for the CONSORT Group). The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001;357(9263) :1191-4.
39. Muhrbeck 1995 Muhrbeck O, Ahlberg J. Prevalence of gallstone disease in a Swedish population. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 1995;30(11):1125-8.
40. Newell 1992 Newell DJ. Intention-to-treat analysis: implications for quantitative and qualitative research. International Journal of Epidemiology 1992;21(5):837-41.
41. NIH 1992 NIH consensus statement on gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement September 14-16, 1992. http://consensus.nih.gov/1992/ 1992GallstonesLaparoscopy090html.htm (accessed 28 February 2007).
42. RevMan 2003 RevMan. Review Manager (RevMan). 4.2 for Windows. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2003.
43. Royle 2003 Royle P, Milne R. Literature searching for randomized controlled trials used in Cochrane reviews: rapid versus exhaustive searches. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2003;19(4):591-603.
44. Schulz 1995 Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995;273(5):408- 12.
45. Senapati 2003 Senapati PS, Bhattarcharya D, Harinath G, Ammori BJ. A survey of the timing and approach to the surgical management of cholelithiasis in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis and acute cholecystitis in the UK. Annals of Royal College of Surgeons of England 2003;85(5):306-12.
46. Shamiyeh 2004 Shamiyeh A, Wayand W. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early and late complications and their treatment. Langenbecks Archives of Surgery 2004;389(3):164-71.
47. Sweeting 2004 Sweeting MJ, Sutton AJ, Lambert PC. What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data. Statistics in Medicine 2004;23(9):1351-75.
48. Tsimoyiannis 1998 Tsimoyiannis EC, Glantzounis G, Lekkas ET, Siakas P, Jabarin M, Tzourou H. Intraperitoneal normal saline and bupivacaine infusion for reduction of postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgical Laparoscopy & Endoscopy 1998;8(6):416-20.