Feedback in writing: Issues and challenges

Assessing Writing

Volumn 19, Issue , 2014, Pages 1-5

  Lee, Icy ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891624171     PISSN: 10752935     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.009     Document Type: Editorial

References (24)

1. Bitchener J. Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing 2008, 17(2):102-118.
2. Bitchener J., Ferris D.R. Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing 2012, Routledge, New York.
3. Bitchener J., Knoch U. The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research 2008, 12(3):409-431.
4. Black P., Wiliam D. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education 1998, 5(1):7-74.
5. Ellis R., Sheen Y., Murakami M., Takashima H. The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System 2008, 36(3):353-371.
6. Ferris D.R. The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing 1999, 8:1-10.
7. Ferris D.R. Treatment of error in second language student writing 2002, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
8. Ferris D.R. Response to student writing: Implications for second language students 2003, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
9. Gardner J. Assessment and learning 2006, Sage, London.
10. Goldstein L.M. For Kyla: What does the research say about responding to ESL writers. On second language writing 2001, 73-90. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. T. Silva, P. Matsuda (Eds.).
11. Guenette D. Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback on writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 2007, 16:40-53.
12. Hume A., Coll R.K. Assessment of learning, for learning, and as learning: New Zealand case studies. Assessment Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 2009, 16(3):269-290.
13. Hyland F. Future directions on feedback in second language writing: Overview and future research agenda. International Journal of English Studies 2010, 10(2):171-182.
14. Lee I. Feedback revolution: What gets in the way?. ELT Journal 2011, 65(1):1-12.
15. Liu J., Hansen J.G. Peer response in second language writing classrooms 2002, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
16. Parr J.M., Timperley H.S. Feedback to writing, assessment for teaching, and learning and student progress. Assessing Writing 2010, 15:68-85.
17. Sadler D.R. Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 1998, 5(1):77-84.
18. Sadler D.R. Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 2010, 35:535-550.
19. Storch N. Critical feedback on written corrective feedback research. International Journal of English Studies 2010, 10(2):29-46.
20. Truscott J. The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning 1996, 46(2):327-369.
21. van Beuningen C.G., De Jong N.H., Kuiken F. The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on L2 learners' written accuracy. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 2008, 156:279-296.
22. van Beuningen C.G., De Jong N.H., Kuiken F. Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing. Language Learning 2012, 62(1):1-41.
23. Vygotsky L.S. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes 1978, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
24. Zhu W., Mitchell D. Participation in peer response as activity: An examination of peer response stances from an activity theory perspective. TESOL Quarterly 2012, 46(2):362-386.