Building community

The SAGE Handbook of New Approaches in Management and Organization

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 503-513

  Nikolova, Natalia ^a   Devinney, Timothy ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891539249     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781849200394.n87     Document Type: Chapter

References (71)

1. Ackroyd, S. and Fleetwood, S.(2000) ’Realism in contemporary organisation and management studies’, in S. Ackroyd and S. Fleetwood (eds), Realist Perspectives on Management and Organisations. London: Routledge. pp. 3-25.
2. Bechky, B. 'sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor’Organization Science 14 (3) 312-330 (2003)doi:10.1287/orsc.14.3.312.15162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.3.312.15162
3. Benford, R. Snow, D. ’Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment’Annual Review of Sociology 26 611-639 (2000)doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
4. Bettenhausen, K. Murnighan, J. ’The emergence of norms in competitive decision-making groups’Administrative Science Quarterly 30 (3) 350-372 (1985)doi:10.2307/2392667 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2392667
5. Blau, J. ’Organizations as overlapping jurisdictions: Restoring reason in organizational accounts’Administrative Science Quarterly 41 (1) 172-179 (1996)doi:10.2307/2393991 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393991
6. Bloomfield, B. P. Best, A. ’Management consultants: systems development, power and the translation of problems’The Sociological Review 41 533-560 (1992)
7. Boland, R. Tenkasi, R. ’Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing’Organization Science 6 (4) 350-372 (1995)doi:10.1287/orsc.6.4.350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.4.350
8. Bloor, G. Dawson, P. ’Understanding professional culture in organizational context’Organization Studies 15 (2) 275-295 (1994)doi:10.1177/017084069401500205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/017084069401500205
9. Brown, A. Coupland, C. 'sounds of silence: Graduate trainees, hegemony and resistance’Organization Studies 26 (7) 1049-1069 (2005)doi:10.1177/0170840605053540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0170840605053540
10. Brown, J. Duguid, P. ’Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation’Organization Science 2 (1) 40-57 (1991)doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.40 http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.40
11. Brown, J. Duguid, P. ’Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective’Organization Science 12 (2) 198-213 (2001)doi:10.1287/orsc.12.2.198.10116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.2.198.10116
12. Brown, J. Collins, A. Duguid, P. 'situated cognition and the culture of learning’Educational Researcher 18 (1) 32-42 (1989)
13. Bunge, M.(1983) Treatise on Basic Philosophy Vol. 5. Epistemology and Methodology I: Exploring the World. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
14. Bunge, M.(1996) Finding Philosophy in Social Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
15. Callon, M.(1986) 'some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay’, in J. Law (ed.), Power, Action and Belief. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. pp. 196-233.
16. Callon, M.(1991) ’Techno-economic networks and irreversibility’, in J. Law (ed.), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. London: Routledge. pp. 131-164.
17. Carley, K. ’A theory of group stability’American Sociological Review 56 (3) 331-354 (1991)doi:10.2307/2096108 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2096108
18. Carroll, J. ’Organizational learning activities in high-hazard industries: The logics underlying self-analysis’Journal of Management Studies 35 (6) 699-717 (1998)doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00116
19. Clegg, S.(1989) Frameworks of Power. London: Sage Publications.
20. Clegg, S. ’Changing concepts of power, changing concepts of politics’Administrative Theory and Practice 23 (2) 126-150 (2001)
21. Crossan, M. Lane, H. White, R. ’An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution’Academy of Management Review 24 (3) 522-537 (1999)
22. Czarniawska, B. Mazza, C. ’Consulting as a liminal space’Human Relations 56 (3) 267-290 (2003)doi:10.1177/0018726703056003612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018726703056003612
23. DiMaggio, P. ’Culture and cognition’Annual Review of Sociology 23 263-287 (1997)doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.263 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.263
24. Dougherty, D. ’Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms’Organization Science 3 (2) 179-202 (1992)doi:10.1287/orsc.3.2.179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.2.179
25. Fairclough, N.(1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
26. Fairclough, N. ’Discourse analysis in organization studies: The case for critical realism’Organization Studies 26 (6) 915-939 (2005)doi:10.1177/0170840605054610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0170840605054610
27. Fish, S.(1980) Is there a Text in this Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Flyvbjerg, B.(1998) Rationality and Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. Ford, J. Ford, L. ’The role of conversations in producing intentional change in organizations’Academy of Management Review 20 (3) 541-570 (1995)
30. Fox, S. ’Communities of practice, Foucault and actor-network theory’Journal of Management Studies 37 (6) 853-867 (2000)doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00207 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00207
31. Foucault, M.(1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
32. Gherardi, S. Nicolini, D. ’Learning in a constellation of interconnected practices: Canon or dissonance?’Journal of Management Studies 39 (4) 419-436 (2002)doi:10.1111/1467-6486.t01-1-00298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.t01-1-00298
33. Gray, B. Bougon, M. Donnellon, A. ’Organizations as constructions and destructions of meaning’Journal of Management 11 (2) 83-98 (1985)doi:10.1177/014920638501100212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920638501100212
34. Hardy, C. ’Understanding power: Bringing about strategic change’British Journal of Management 7 (Special issue) S3-S16 (1996)
35. Hardy, C. Phillips, N. ’No joking matter: Discursive struggle in the Canadian refugee system’Organization Studies 20 (1) 1-24 (1999)doi:10.1177/0170840699201001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0170840699201001
36. Hardy, C. and Phillips, N.(2004) ’Discourse and power’, in D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick and L. Putnam (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Discourse. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. pp. 299-316. doi:10.4135/9781848608122 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848608122
37. Hardy, C. Palmer, I. Phillips, N. ’Discourse as a strategic resource’Human Relations 53 (9) 1227-1248 (2000)doi:10.1177/0018726700539006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018726700539006
38. Hardy, C. Lawrence, T. Grant, D. ’Discourse and collaboration: The role of conversations and collective identity’Academy of Management Review 30 (1) 58-77 (2005)doi:10.5465/AMR.2005.15281426 http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2005.15281426
39. Harris, S. ’A schema-based perspective on organizational culture’Academy of Management Proceedings 178-182 (1989)
40. Heracleous, L.(2004) ’Interpretivist approaches to organizational discourse’, in D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick and L. Putnam (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Discourse. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. pp. 175-192. doi:10.4135/9781848608122 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848608122
41. Heracleous, L. Barrett, M. ’Organizational change as discourse: Communicative actions and deep structures in the context of information technology implementation’Academy of Management Journal 44 (4) 755-778 (2001)doi:10.2307/3069414 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3069414
42. Hymes, D.(1980) Language in Education: Ethnolinguistic Essays. Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.
43. Koppl, R. Langlois, R. ’Organizations as language games’Journal of Management and Governance 5 (3/4) 287-305 (2001)doi:10.1023/A:1014098711639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1014098711639
44. Lakomski, G. ’On knowing in context’British Journal of Management 15 (Special issue) S89-S95 (2004)
45. Lave, J. and Wenger, E.(2002) Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Lawrence, T. Mauws, M. Dyck, B. ’The politics of organizational learning: Integrating power into the 4I framework’Academy of Management Review 30 (1) 180-191 (2005)doi:10.5465/AMR.2005.15281451 http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2005.15281451
47. Leinhardt, G. Young, K. Merriman, J. ’Integrating professional knowledge: The theory of practice and the practice of theory’Learning and Instruction 5 (4) 401-408 (1995)doi:10.1016/0959-4752(95)00025-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752%2895%2900025-9
48. Loasby, B.(1983) ’Knowledge, learning and enterprise’, in J. Wiseman (ed.), Beyond Positive Economics?London: Macmillan. pp. 104-121.
49. Lorenz, E. ’Models of cognition, the contextualisation of knowledge and organisational theory’Journal of Management and Governance 5 (4) 307-330 (2001)doi:10.1023/A:1014098928477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1014098928477
50. Marshak, R. Keenoy, T. Oswick, C. Grant, D. ’From outer words to inner worlds’The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 36 (2) 245-258 (2000)doi:10.1177/0021886300362008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021886300362008
51. Marshall, N. Rollinson, J. ’May be Bacon had a point: The politics of interpretation in collective sensemaking’British Journal of Management 15 (Special issue) S71-S86 (2004)
52. Martin, J. Siehl, C. ’Organizational culture and counterculture: An uneasy symbiosis’Organizational Dynamics 12 (2) 52-64 (1983)doi:10.1016/0090-2616(83)90033-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616%2883%2990033-5
53. Maturana, H.(1980) ’Biology of cognition’, in H. Maturana and F. Varela (eds), Autopoesis and Cognition. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. pp. 2-62.
54. Meindl, J. Stubbart, C. Porac, J. ’Cognition within and between organizations: Five key questions’Organization Science 5 (3) 289-293 (1994)doi:10.1287/orsc.5.3.289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.3.289
55. Mohammed, S. Ringseis, E. ’Cognitive diversity and consensus in group decision making: The role of inputs, processes, and outcomes’Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 85 (2) 310-335 (2001)doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2943
56. Mumby, D. Stohl, C. ’Power and discourse in organization studies: Absence and the dialectic of control’Discourse and Society 2 (3) 313-332 (1991)doi:10.1177/0957926591002003004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926591002003004
57. Mumby, D. and Clair, R.(1997) ’Organizational discourse’, in T. A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Structure and Process: Discourse Studies Vol. 2. London: Sage. pp. 181-205. doi:10.4135/9781446221884 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446221884
58. Neisser, U.(1976) Cognition and Reality. New York: Freeman.
59. Phillips, N. Brown, J. ’Analyzing communication in and around organizations: A critical hermeneutic approach’Academy of Management Journal 36 (6) 1547-1576 (1993)doi:10.2307/256821 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256821
60. Prahalad, C. Bettis, R. ’The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance'strategic Management Journal 7 (6) 485-501 (1986)doi:10.1002/smj.4250070602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250070602
61. Reed, M.(2004) ’Getting real about organizational research’, in D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick and L. Putnam (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Discourse. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. pp. 413-420. doi:10.4135/9781848608122 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848608122
62. Reihlen, M. and Ringberg, T.(2004) ’Exploring competing views on knowledge in management studies’. Unpublished working paper, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
63. Scott, J.(2001) Power. Oxford: Blackwell.
64. Sillince ’Rhetorical power, accountability and conflict in committees: An argumentation approach’Journal of Management Studies 37 (8) 1125-1156 (2000)doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00219
65. Somech, A. Drach-Zahavy, A. ’Relative Power and influence strategy: The effects of agent/target organizational power on superiors’ choices of influence strategies’Journal of Organizational Behavior 23 167-179 (2002)doi:10.1002/job.133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.133
66. Tsoukas, H. Vladimirou, E. ’What is organizational knowledge?’Journal of Management Studies 38 (7) 973-993 (2001)doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00268
67. Van Dijk, T. ’Principles of critical discourse analysis’Discourse and Society 4 (2) 249-283 (1993)doi:10.1177/0957926593004002006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006
68. Watson, T. ’Group ideologies and organizational change’Journal of Management Studies 19 (3) 259-275 (1982)doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1982.tb00108.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1982.tb00108.x
69. Weick, K. E.(1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
70. Yukl, G. Falbe, C. ’Influence tactics and objectives in upward, downward and lateral influence attempts’Journal of Applied Psychology 75 (2) 132-140 (1990)doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.2.132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.2.132
71. Zelizer, B. ’Journalists as interpretive communities’Critical Studies in Mass Communication 10 219-237 (1993)doi:10.1080/15295039309366865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15295039309366865