Autotetraploids of Vicia cracca show a higher allelic richness in natural populations and a higher seed set after artificial selfing than diploids

Annals of Botany

Volumn 113, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 159-170

  Eliášová, Anežka ^a   Trávníček, Pavel ^a,b   Mandák, Bohumil ^b   Münzbergová, Zuzana ^a,b  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

allozymes; artificial pollination; Autopolyploidy; F statistics; fixed heterozygosity; genetic differentiation; genetic diversity; heterozygosity; inbreeding depression; mating system; meiotic chromosomes; Vicia cracca

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ALLOZYME; ANGIOSPERM; CHROMOSOME; CORRECTION; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENETIC VARIATION; HETEROZYGOSITY; INBREEDING; POLYPLOIDY;

CENTRAL EUROPE;

ISOENZYME;

ALLELE; ALLOZYMES; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL POLLINATION; AUTOPOLYPLOIDY; CZECH REPUBLIC; DIPLOIDY; EUROPE; F-STATISTICS; FIXED HETEROZYGOSITY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HETEROZYGOSITY; HETEROZYGOTE; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; MATING SYSTEM; MEIOTIC CHROMOSOMES; PLANT SEED; POLLINATION; POPULATION GENETICS; SELF FERTILIZATION; SLOVAKIA; TETRAPLOIDY; VICIA; VICIA CRACCA;

ALLOZYMES; ARTIFICIAL POLLINATION; AUTOPOLYPLOIDY; F-STATISTICS; FIXED HETEROZYGOSITY; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GENETIC DIVERSITY; HETEROZYGOSITY; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; MATING SYSTEM; MEIOTIC CHROMOSOMES; VICIA CRACCA;

ALLELES; CZECH REPUBLIC; DIPLOIDY; EUROPE; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; HETEROZYGOTE; ISOENZYMES; POLLINATION; SEEDS; SELF-FERTILIZATION; SLOVAKIA; TETRAPLOIDY; VICIA;

EID: 84891518276     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mct252     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Aarssen LW, Hall IV, Jensen KIN. 1986. The biology of Canadian weeds. 76
2. Vicia angustifolia L., V. cracca L., V. sativa L., V. tetrasperma L Schreb. and V. villosa Roth. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 66: 711-737
3. Abbott RJ, Lowe AJ. 2004. Origins, establishment and evolution of new polyploid species: Senecio cambrensis and S. eboracensis in the British Isles. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 82: 467-474
4. Ainouche ML, Baumel A, Salmon A. 2004. Spartina anglica C. E. Hubbard: A natural model system for analysing early evolutionary changes that affect allopolyploid genomes. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 82: 475-484
5. Balao F, Casimiro-Soriguer R, Talavera M, Herrera J, Talavera S. 2009. Distribution and diversity of cytotypes in Dianthus broteri as evidenced by genome size variations. Annals of Botany 104: 965-973
6. Barringer BC. 2007. Polyploidy and self-fertilization in flowering plants. American Journal of Botany 94: 1527-1533
7. Berglund A-BN, Saura A, Westergergh A. 2006. Electrophoretic evidence for disomic inheritance and allopolyploid origin of the octoploid Cerastium alpinum (Caryophyllaceae). Journal of Heredity 97: 296-302
8. Bever JD, Felber F. 1992.Thetheoretical population genetics of autopolyploidy. In: Antonovics J, Futuyma D. eds. Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 185-217
9. Buyukkartal HNB. 2008. Causes of low seed set in the natural tetraploid Trifolium pratense L. (Fabaceae). African Journal of Biotechnology 7: 1240-1249
10. Castro S, Loureiro J, Procházka T, Münzbergová Z. 2012. Cytotype distribution at a diploid-hexaploid contact zone in Aster amellus (Asteraceae). Annals of Botany 110: 1047-1055
11. Chrtková A. 1995. Vicia L. In: Slavik B. ed. KvětenaC ̌ eské republiky 4. Prague: Academia, 386-414
12. Chrtková-Ž ertová A. 1973. Cytotaxonomic study of Vicia cracca complex 1. Czechoslovak taxa. Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica 8: 67-93
13. Van Dijk P, Bakx-Schotman T. 1997. Chloroplast DNA phylogeography and cytotype geography in autopolyploid Plantago media. Molecular Ecology 6: 345-352
14. Van Dijk P, Hartog MV, Van Delden W. 1992. Single cytotype areas in autopolyploid Plantago media L. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 46: 315-331
15. Duchoslav M, S ̌ afářová L, Krahulec F. 2010. Complex distribution patterns, ecology and coexistence of ploidy levels of Allium oleraceum (Alliaceae) in the Czech Republic. Annals of Botany 105: 719-735
16. Dvořák F, Dadáková B, Grüll F. 1977. Studies of the morphology of chromosomes of some selected species. Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica 12: 343-375
17. Eilam T, Anikster Y, Millet E, Manisterski J, Feldman M. 2009. Genome size in natural and synthetic autopolyploids and in natural segmental allopolyploid of several Triticeae species. Genome 52: 275-285
18. Eliášová A. 2008. Evaluation of cytotype and morphological variability of Vicia cracca L. (Fabaceae) in central Europe. Masters Thesis, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic
19. Galloway LF, Etterson Jr. 2007. Inbreeding depression in an autotetraploid herb: A three cohort field study. New Phytologist 173: 383-392
20. Halverson K, Heard SB, Nason JD, Stireman JO. 2008. Origins, distribution, and local co-occurrence of polyploid cytotypes in Solidago altissima (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 95: 50-58
21. Hamrick JL, GodtMJW. 1996. Effects of life history traits on genetic diversity in plant species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Biological Sciences 351: 1291-1298
22. Hanelt P, Mettin D. 1989. Biosystematics of the genus Vicia L. (Leguminosae). Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20: 199-223
23. Hardy OJ, Vekemans X. 2001. Patterns of allozyme variation in diploid and tetraploid Centaurea jacea at different spatial scales. Evolution 55: 943-954
24. Hardy OJ, Vekemans X. 2002. SPAGeDi: A versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Molecular Ecology Notes 2: 618-620
25. Hardy OJ, De Loose M, Vekemans X, Meerts P. 2001. Allozyme segregation and inter-cytotype reproductive barriers in the polyploid complex Centaurea jacea. Heredity 87: 136-145
26. Husband BC, Schemske DW. 1997.Theeffect of inbreeding in diploid and tetraploid populations of Epilobium angustifolium (Onagraceae): Implications for the genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Evolution 51: 737-746
27. Jaaska V. 2005. Isozyme variation and phylogenetic relationships in Vicia subgenus Cracca (Fabaceae). Annals of Botany 96: 1085-1096
28. Jiao Y, Wickett NJ, Ayyampalayam S, et al. 2011. Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature 473: 97-100
29. Johnson M, Husband BC, Burton TL. 2003. Habitat differentiation in diploid and tetraploid Galax urceolata (Diapensiaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 164: 703-710
30. Klebesadel LJ. 1980. Birdvetch. Forage crop, ground cover, ornamental, or weed? Agroborealis 12: 46-49
31. Kolář F, S ̌ tech M, Trávníček P, et al. 2009. Towards resolving the Knautia arvensis agg. (Dipsacaceae) puzzle: Primary and secondary contact zones and ploidy segregation at landscape and microgeographic scales. Annals of Botany 103: 963-974
32. Levin D. 1975. Minority cytotype exclusion in local plant populations. Taxon 24: 35-43
33. López-Pujol J, Orellana MR, Bosch M, Simon J, Blanché C. 2007. Lowgenetic diversity and allozymic evidence for autopolyploidy in the tetraploid Pyrenean endemic larkspur Delphinium montanum (Ranunculaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 155: 211-222
34. Maceira NO, Jacquard P, Lumaret R. 1993. Competition between diploid and derivative autotetraploid Dactylis glomerata L. from Galicia. Implications for the establishment of novel polyploid populations. New Phytologist 124: 321-328
35. Mahy G, Bruederle LP, Connors B, Van Hofwegen M, Vorsa N. 2000. Allozyme evidence for genetic autopolyploidy and high genetic diversity in tetraploid cranberry, Vaccinium oxycoccos (Ericaceae). American Journal of Botany 87: 1882-1889
36. MandákB, Bímová K, Plačková I, Mahelka V, Chrtek J. 2005. Loss of genetic variation in geographically marginal populations of Atriplex tatarica (Chenopodiaceae). Annals of Botany 96: 901-912
37. Mandáková T, Münzbergová Z. 2008. Morphometric and genetic differentiation of diploid and hexaploid populations of Aster amellus agg. in a contact zone. Plant Systematics and Evolution 274: 155-170
38. MathSoft Inc. 1999. S-Plus 2000 Professional Release 2. Seattle, USA: Data Analysis Products Division, MathSoft
39. Meirmans PG, Van Tienderen PH. 2013. The effects of inheritance in tetraploids on genetic diversity and population divergence. Heredity 110: 131-137
40. Moody ME, Mueller LD, Soltis DE. 1993. Genetic variation and random drift in autotetraploid populations. Genetics 134: 649-657
41. MrázP, Š ingliarová B, Urfus T, Krahulec F. 2008. Cytogeography of Pilosella officinarum (Compositae): Altitudinal and longitudinal differences in ploidy level distribution in the CzechRepublic and Slovakia and the general pattern in Europe. Annals of Botany 101: 59-71
42. MrázP, Garcia-Jacas N, Gex-Fabry E, Susanna A, Barres L, Müller-Schärer H. 2012. Allopolyploid origin of highly invasive Centaurea stoebe s.l. (Asteraceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 62: 612-623
43. Münzbergová Z, Surinová M, Castro S. 2013. Absence of gene flow between diploids and hexaploids of Aster amellus at multiple spatial scales. Heredity 110: 123-130
44. Nei M. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 70: 3321-3323
45. Ness BD, Soltis DE, Soltis PS. 1989. Autopolyploidy in Heuchera micrantha (Saxifragaceae). American Journal of Botany 76: 614-626
46. Oswald BP, Nuismer SL. 2007. Neopolyploidy and pathogen resistance. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B. Biological Sciences 274: 2393-2397
47. Ozimec B, Husband BC. 2011. Effect of recurrent selfing on inbreeding depression and mating system evolution in an autopolyploid plant. Evolution 65: 2038-2049
48. Parisod C, Holderegger R, BrochmannC. 2010.Evolutionary consequences of autopolyploidy. New Phytologist 186: 5-17
49. Van deeper Y, Fawcett JA, Proost S, Sterck L, Vandepoele K. 2009. The flowering world: A tale of duplications. Trends in Plant Science 14: 680-688
50. Petit C, Bretagnolle F, Felber F. 1999. Evolutionary consequences of diploidpolyploid hybrid zones in wild species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 306-311
51. Qu LP, Hancock JF, Whallon JH. 1998. Evolution in an autopolyploid group displaying predominantly bivalent pairing at meiosis: Genomic similarity of diploid Vaccinium darrowi and autotetraploid V. corymbosum (Ericaceae). American Journal of Botany 85: 698-703
52. Ramsey J, Schemske DW. 1998. Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29: 467-501
53. Ramsey J, Schemske DW. 2002. Neopolyploidy in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 589-639
54. Rausch JH, Morgan MT. 2005. The effect of self-fertilization, inbreeding depression, and population size on autopolyploid establishment. Evolution 59: 1867-1875
55. Rodriguez DJ. 1996. A model for the establishment of polyploidy in plants. American Naturalist 147: 33-46
56. Ronfort J, Jenczewski E, Bataillon T, Rousset F. 1998. Analysis of population structure in autotetraploid species. Genetics 150: 921-930
57. Roose ML, Gottlieb LD. 1976. Genetic and biochemical consequences of polyploidy in Tragopogon. Evolution 30: 818-830
58. Rosquist G. 2001. Reproductive biology in diploid Anthericum ramosum and tetraploid A. liliago (Anthericaceae). Oikos 92: 143-152
59. Roti-Michelozzi G. 1984. Biosystematic investigations on north western Italian populations of the Vicia cracca aggregate: Preliminary observations. Webbia 38: 815-827
60. Rousi A. 1961. Cytotaxonomical studies on Vicia cracca L, V. tenuifolia Roth. I. Chromosome numbers and karyotype evolution. Hereditas 47: 81-110
61. Rousi A. 1962. Cytotaxonomical studies on Vicia cracca L, V. tenuifoliaRoth. II. Meiosis. Hereditas 48: 390-408
62. Rousi A. 1973. Cytotaxonomical studies on Vicia cracca L, V. tenuifolia Roth. III. The relation between karyotype and morphology. Annales Botanici Fennici 10: 89-96
63. Segraves KA, Thompson JN, Soltis DE, Soltis PS. 1999. Multiple origins of polyploidy and the geographic structure of Heuchera grossulariifolia. Molecular Ecology 8: 253-262
64. Shannon CE. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27: 379-423, 623-656
65. S ̌ingliarová B, Hodalová I, Mráz P. 2011. Biosystematic study of the diploidpolyploid Pilosella alpicola group with variation in breeding system: Patterns and processes. Taxon 60: 450-470
66. Soltis DE, Soltis PS. 1993. Molecular data and the dynamic nature of polyploidy. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 12: 243-273
67. Soltis PS, Soltis DE. 2000. The role of genetic and genomic attributes in the success of polyploids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 97: 7051-7057
68. Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Pires JC, Kovarik A, Tate JA, Mavrodiev E. 2004.Recent and recurrent polyploidy in Tragopogon (Asteraceae): Cytogenetic, genomic and genetic comparisons. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 82: 485-501
69. Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Schemske DW, et al. 2007. Autopolyploidy in angiosperms: Have we grossly underestimated the number of species? Taxon 56: 13-30
70. Soltis DE, Albert VA, Leebens-Mack J, et al. 2009. Polyploidy and angiosperm diversification. American Journal of Botany 96: 336-348
71. StatSoft, Inc. 2004. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 7. www.statsoft.com
72. Stebbins GL. 1985. Polyploidy, hybridization, and the invasion of new habitats. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 72: 824-832
73. Stuessy TF, Weiss-Schneeweiss H, Keil DJ. 2004. Diploid and polyploid cytotype distribution in Melampodium cinereum and M. leucanthum (Asteraceae, Heliantheae). American Journal of Botany 91: 889-898
74. Suda J, Weiss-Schneeweiss H, Tribsch A, Schneeweiss GM, Trávníček P, SchönswetterP. 2007.Complex distribution patterns of di-, tetra-And hexaploid cytotypes in the European high mountain plant Senecio carniolicus (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 94: 1391-1401
75. Sveshnikova IN. 1937. Some aspects of morphogenesis in perennial forms of Vicia. Biologicheskii Zhurnal 6: 949-970
76. Trávníček P, Eliášová A, Suda J. 2010. The distribution of cytotypes of Vicia cracca in Central Europe: The changes that have occurred over the last four decades. Preslia 82: 149-163
77. Trávníček P, Kubátová B, C ̌ urn V, et al. 2011.Remarkable coexistence of multiple cytotypes of the Gymnadeniaconopsea aggregate (the fragrant orchid): Evidence from flow cytometry. Annals of Botany 107: 77-87
78. Vallejos CE. 1983. Enzyme activity staining. In: Tanksley SD, Orton TJ. eds. Isozymes in plant genetics and breeding. Part A. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 469-515
79. Weeden NF, Wendel JF. 1989. Genetics of plant isozymes. In: Soltis DS, Soltis PS. eds. Isozymes in plant biology. Advances in plant sciences series. Vol. 4. Portland, OR: Dioscorides Press
80. Weir BS, Cockerham CC. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358-1370
81. Weiss H, Dobes C, Schneeweiss GM, Greimler J. 2002. Occurrence of tetraploid and hexaploid cytotypes between and within populations in Dianthus sect. Plumaria (Caryophyllaceae). New Phytologist 156: 85-94
82. Wright S. 1951. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97-159
83. Zhang X, Mosjidis JA. 1998. Rapid prediction ofmating system of Vicia species. Crop Science 38: 872-875
84. Žertová A. 1962. Vicia oreophila, montane Art aus der Gruppe Vicia cracca L. Prague: Novitates Botanicae Horti Botanici Universitatis Carolinae Pragensis, 51-53