Development and validation of a ureteral anastomosis simulation model for surgical training

Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 346-351

  Tunitsky, Elena ^a,b   Murphy, Alana ^b   Barber, Matthew D ^a   Simmons, Matthew ^b   Jelovsek, J Eric ^a  

^a Gynecology and Women's Health Institute   (United States)

^b LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Education; Robotics; Simulation model; Ureteral anastomosis; Ureteral reimplantation

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION; LAPAROSCOPY; ROBOTICS;

ASSESSMENT SCALE; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; REIMPLANTATION; ROBOTIC SURGERY; SIMULATION MODEL; SURGICAL TRAINING; URETERAL ANASTOMOSIS;

SURGERY;

ADULT; ALLIGATOR CLIP; ARTICLE; CLIP; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTAINER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACE VALIDITY; FEMALE; GLOBAL OPERATIVE ASSESSMENT OF LAPAROSCOPIC SKILLS SCALE; GYNECOLOGIST; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; JJ STENT; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LARGE BAG CLIP; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NORMAL HUMAN; OPERATION DURATION; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; RATING SCALE; RESIDENT; ROBOTICS; SCISSORS; SIMULATION; SURGICAL TAPE; SURGICAL TRAINING; URETERONEOCYSTOSTOMY; URETEROURETEROSTOMY; UROLOGIST; ANASTOMOSIS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EDUCATION; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOMETRY; REIMPLANTATION; SURGERY; TEACHING; URETER; VALIDATION STUDY; METHODOLOGY;

ADULT; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPLANTATION; ROBOTICS; TEACHING; URETER;

EID: 84891508574     PISSN: 21518378     EISSN: 21544212     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3182a331bf     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Kozinn SI, Canes D, Sorcini A, et al. Robotic versus open distal ureteral reconstruction and reimplantation for benign stricture disease. J Endourol 2012;26:147-151.
2. Rassweiler JJ, Gozen AS, Erdogru T, et al. Ureteral reimplantation for management of ureteral strictures: a retrospective comparison of laparoscopic and open techniques. Eur Urol 2007;51:512-522; discussion 522-523.
3. Uberoi J, Harnisch B, Sethi AS, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic distal ureterectomy and ureteral reimplantation with psoas hitch. J Endourol 2007;21:368-373; discussion 372-373.
4. Gilmour DT, Das S, Flowerdew G. Rates of urinary tract injury from gynecologic surgery and the role of intraoperative cystoscopy. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:1366-1372.
5. Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, et al. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2011;306:978-988.
6. Jansen JJ, Scherpbier AJ, Metz JC, et al. Performance-based assessment in continuing medical education for general practitioners: construct validity. Med Educ 1996;30:339-344.
7. van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LW. Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes. Med Educ 2005;39:309-317.
8. Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS, Andrew CG, et al. A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 2005;190:107-113.
9. Chen CC, Korn A, Klingele C, et al. Objective assessment of vaginal surgical skills. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:79.e1-79.e8.
10. Reznick R, Regehr G, MacRae H, et al. Testing technical skill via an innovative "bench station" examination. Am J Surg 1997;173:226-230.
11. Burrows PJ, Bingham L, Brailovsky CA. A modified contrasting groups method used for setting the passmark in a small scale standardised patient examination. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 1999;4:145-154.
12. Clauser BE, Clyman SG. A contrasting-groups approach to standard setting for performance assessments of clinical skills. Acad Med 1994;69:S42YS44.
13. Fraser SA, Klassen DR, Feldman LS, et al. Evaluating laparoscopic skills: setting the pass/fail score for the MISTELS system. Surg Endosc 2003;17:964-967.
14. Gumbs AA, Hogle NJ, Fowler DL. Evaluation of resident laparoscopic performance using global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills. J Am Coll Surg 2007;204:308-313.
15. Hung AJ, Ng CK, Patil MB, et al. Validation of a novel robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy surgical training model. BJU Int 2012;110:870-874.