Validation of a novel robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy surgical training model

BJU International

Volumn 110, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 870-874

  Hung, Andrew J ^a   Ng, Casey K ^a   Patil, Mukul B ^a   Zehnder, Pascal ^b   Huang, Eric ^a   Aron, Monish ^a   Gill, Inderbir S ^a   Desai, Mihir M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

educational models; partial nephrectomy; robotic assisted; training; validation studies

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CAMERA; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTENT VALIDITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EX VIVO STUDY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT VALIDATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY; KIDNEY TUMOR; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; NONHUMAN; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; ROBOTIC ASSISTED PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; ROBOTICS; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SWINE; TRAINING; TURKEY FRAMER TEST; VALIDATION PROCESS; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

MODELS, ANATOMIC; NEPHRECTOMY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTICS;

EID: 84865462436     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10953.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu CY,. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med 2004; 23, 351: 1296-305
2. Fried LF, Katz R, Sarnak MJ, et al,. Kidney function as a predictor of noncardiovascular mortality. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005; 16: 3728-35
3. Sarnak MJ, Levey AS, Schoolwerth AC, et al,. Kidney disease as a risk factor for development of cardiovascular disease: a statement from the American heart association councils on kidney in cardiovascular disease, high blood pressure research, clinical cardiology, and epidemiology and prevention. Hypertension 2003; 42: 1050-65
4. Anavekar NS, McMurray JJ, Velazquez EJ, et al,. Relation between renal dysfunction and cardiovascular outcomes after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1285-95
5. Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR, et al,. Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol 2007; 178: 41-6
6. Deane LA, Lee HJ, Box GN, et al,. Robotic versus standard laparoscopic partial/wedge nephrectomy: a comparison of intraoperative and perioperative results from a single institution. J Endourol 2008; 22: 947-52
7. Taylor GD, Johnson DB, Hogg DC, Cadeddu JA,. Development of a renal tumor mimic model for learning minimally invasive nephron sparing surgical techniques. J Urol 2004; 172: 382-5
8. Yang B, Zeng Q, Yinghao S, et al,. A novel training model for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using porcine kidney. J Endourol 2009; 23: 2029-33
9. Mottrie A, De Naeyer G, Schatteman P, Carpentier P, Sangalli M, Ficarra V,. Impact of the learning curve on perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy for parenchymal renal tumours. Eur Urol 2010; 58: 127-32
10. Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS, Andrew CG, et al,. A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 2005; 190: 107-13
11. Lee JY, Mucksavage P, Sundaram CP, McDougall EM,. Best practices for robotic surgery training and credentialing. J Urol 2011; 185: 1191-7
12. Seixas-Mikelus SA, Kesavadas T, Srimathveeravalli G, Chandrasekhar R, Wilding GE, Guru KA,. Face validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator. Urology 2010; 76: 357-60
13. Seixas-Mikelus SA, Stegemann AP, Kesavadas T, et al,. Content validation of a novel robotic surgical simulaor. BJU Int 2011; 107: 1130-5
14. Sethi AS, Peine WJ, Mohammad Y, Sundaram CP,. Validation of a novel virtual reality robotic simulator. J Endourol 2009; 23: 503-8
15. Kenney PA, Wszolek MF, Gould JJ, Libertino JA, Moinzadeh A,. Face, content and construct validity of dV-trainer, a novel virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery. Urology 2009; 73: 1288-92
16. Lerner MA, Ayalew M, Peine WJ, Sundaram CP,. Does training on a virtual reality robotic simulator improve performance on the da Vinci surgical system? J Endourol 2010; 24: 467-72
17. Hung AJ, Zehnder P, Patil MB, et al,. Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator. J Urol 2011; 186: 1019-24
18. Gumbs AA, Hogle NJ, Fowler DL,. Evaluation of resident laparoscopic performance using global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 204: 308-13
19. Hogle NJ, Chang L, Strong VE, et al,. Validation of laparoscopic surgical skills training outside the operating room: a long road. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 1476-82
20. Ghaderi I, Vaillancourt M, Sroka G, et al,. Evaluation of surgical performance during laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: a multicenter study. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 2555-63
21. Hung AJ, Patil MB, Zehnder P, et al,. Concurrent and predictive validation of a novel robotic surgery simulator: a prospective randomized study. J Urol 2012; 187: 630-7