Derivation of ship system safety criteria by means of risk-based ship system safety analysis

Proceedings of the International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering - OMAE

Volumn 2, Issue , 2008, Pages 255-263

  Rüde, Erich ^a   Hamann, Rainer ^a  

^a DNV GL   (Norway)

Author keywords

ALARP; Event tree; Fault tree; Risk acceptance criteria; Risk analysis; Ship system safety analysis

Indexed keywords

ALARP; EVENT TREES; FAULT TREE; RISK ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA; SHIP SYSTEM SAFETY ANALYSIS;

ARCTIC ENGINEERING; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; COSTS; DESIGN; FAULT TREE ANALYSIS; FUEL OILS; HEALTH RISKS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; MECHANICS; OIL TANKERS; PROBABILITY; QUALITY ASSURANCE; RELIABILITY; RISK ANALYSIS; SAFETY ENGINEERING; SECURITY SYSTEMS; SHIPBUILDING; SHIPS;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 77958014664     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/OMAE2008-57248     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. FSA Glossary, 2008: www.iacs.org.uk/publications/publications.aspx? pageid=4§ionid=6.
2. HSE, 2001: Reducing Risks, Protecting People. HSE's decision-making process. UK Heath and Safety Executive.
3. Hamann, R.; Rüde, E.; Uhlig, A.; Papadopoulos, Y.; Grätz, U.; Walker, M.; Lien, R.; 2008: Semi Automatic Failure Analysis of Subsea Systems. OMAE 2008-57257.
4. Hansson and Kiaeær, 1997: Technical Failures, System Criticality Ranking. SAFECO Work Package II.6, MARINTEK report no. MT23 F96-0360/233509.00. 01.
5. Krapp, R., 1996: "Why is Increased Redundancy Needed?". The Motorship, The 18th Annual Marine Propulsion Conference.
6. MSC 72/16, 2000: Formal Safety Assessment. Decision parameters including risk acceptance criteria. IMO, 14th February 2000.
7. MSC 83/INF.2, 2007: Formal Safety Assessment. IMO, 14th May 2007.
8. MSC 83/INF.8, 2007: FSA - Container Vessels - Details of the Formal Safety Assessment. IMO 3rd July 2007.
9. MSC 81/INF.6, 2006: Goal-Based new ship construction standards, Linkage between FSA and GBS. Submitted by IACS, IMO 2006.
10. MSC/Circ.1023, 2002: Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO-Rule-Making Process. IMO 2002.
11. MSC. 1/Circ. 1212, 2006: Guidelines on alternative design and arrangements for SOLAS chapters II-1 and III. IMO 2006.
12. MSC/Circ.1002, 2001: Guidelines on alternative design and arrangements for fire safety. IMO 2001.
13. OREDA 2002: Offshore Reliability Data Handbook. ISBN 82-14-02705-5.
14. Papadopoulos Y., J.A. McDermid, R. Sasse and G. Heiner, 2001: "Analysis and Synthesis of the Behaviour of Complex Systems in Conditions of Failure", RESS, 71(3):229-247.
15. Skjong, Eide, Andreassen, Vanem, 2006: Acceptance Criteria for Main Ship Functions', SAFEDOR D4.5.3.
16. Skjong R., Vanem E., Endresen ø., 2005: Risk Evaluation Criteria. SAFEDOR report D 4.5.2.
17. Skjong, R., 2002: 'Setting Target Reliabilities by Marginal Safety Returns.' Joint Committee on structural Safety (JCSS), Workshop on Reliability Based Code Calibration, Zurich, Switzerland, March 21st - 22nd, 2002.