Adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells on RGD nanopatterns of varied nanospacings

Organogenesis

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 280-286

  Wang, Xuan ^a   Ye, Kai ^a   Li, Zhenhua ^a   Yan, Ce ^a   Ding, Jiandong ^a  

^a FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Cell adhesion; Cell differentiation; Cell proliferation; Nanopattern; PEG hydrogel; RGD; Stem cell

Indexed keywords

ARGINYLGLYCYLASPARTIC ACID; MACROGOL; NANOMATERIAL; RGD NANOPATTERN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BONE MARROW; CELL ADHESION; CELL CONTACT; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CULTURE MEDIUM; HYDROGEL; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; NANOMEDICINE; NANOSPACING; NONHUMAN;

CELL ADHESION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; NANOPATTERN; PEG HYDROGEL; RGD; STEM CELL;

ANIMALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL COMMUNICATION; CELL COUNT; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; GOLD; HYDROGEL; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; NANOPARTICLES; OLIGOPEPTIDES; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY;

EID: 84891366222     PISSN: 15476278     EISSN: 15558592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/org.26080     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Thirumala S, Goebel WS, Woods EJ. Clinical grade adult stem cell banking. Organogenesis 2009; 5:143-54; PMID:20046678; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/org.5.3. 9811
2. Klemmt P. Application of amniotic fluid stem cells in basic science and tissue regeneration. Organogenesis 2012; 8:76; PMID:23187723; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/org.23023
3. Lagasse E, Connors H, Al-Dhalimy M, Reitsma M, Dohse M, Osborne L, Wang X, Finegold M, Weissman IL, Grompe M. Purified hematopoietic stem cells can differentiate into hepatocytes in vivo. Nat Med 2000; 6:1229-34; PMID:11062533; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/81326
4. Orlic D, Kajstura J, Chimenti S, Limana F, Jakoniuk I, Quaini F, Nadal-Ginard B, Bodine DM, Leri A, Anversa P. Mobilized bone marrow cells repair the infarcted heart, improving function and survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98:10344-9; PMID:11504914; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.181177898
5. Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials 2005; 26:5474-91; PMID:15860204; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002
6. Rustad KC, Sorkin M, Levi B, Longaker MT, Gurtner GC. Strategies for organ level tissue engineering. Organogenesis 2010; 6:151-7; PMID:21197216; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/org.6.3.12139
7. Pan Z, Ding JD. Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) porous scaffolds for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Interface Focus 2012; 2:366-77; PMID:23741612; http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2011.0123
8. Park D, Spencer JA, Koh BI, Kobayashi T, Fujisaki J, Clemens TL, Lin CP, Kronenberg HM, Scadden DT. Endogenous bone marrow MSCs are dynamic, fate-restricted participants in bone maintenance and regeneration. Cell Stem Cell 2012; 10:259-72; PMID:22385654; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2012.02. 003
9. Langer R, Tirrell DA. Designing materials for biology and medicine. Nature 2004; 428:487-92; PMID:15057821; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02388
10. Lutolf MP, Hubbell JA. Synthetic biomaterials as instructive extracellular microenvironments for morphogenesis in tissue engineering. Nat Biotechnol 2005; 23:47-55; PMID:15637621; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt1055
11. Graeter SV, Huang JH, Perschmann N, López-García M, Kessler H, Ding JD, Spatz JP. Mimicking cellular environments by nanostructured soft interfaces. Nano Lett 2007; 7:1413-8; PMID:17394372; http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ nl070098g
12. Nichols JE, Niles JA, Cortiella J. Design and development of tissue engineered lung: Progress and challenges. Organogenesis 2009; 5:57-61; PMID:19794900; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/org.5.2.8564
13. Zhang G. Biomimicry in biomedical research. Organogenesis 2012; 8:101-2; PMID:23275257; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/org.23395
14. Sun JG, Tang J, Ding JD. Cell orientation on a stripe-micropatterned surface. Chin Sci Bull 2009; 54:3154-9; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11434-009- 0240-1
15. Peng R, Yao X, Ding JD. Effect of cell anisotropy on differentiation of stem cells on micropatterned surfaces through the controlled single cell adhesion. Biomaterials 2011; 32:8048-57; PMID:21810538; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.biomaterials.2011.07.035
16. Pan Z, Yan C, Peng R, Zhao YC, He Y, Ding JD. Control of cell nucleus shapes via micropillar patterns. Biomaterials 2012; 33:1730-5; PMID:22133552; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.11.023
17. Humphries JD, Byron A, Humphries MJ. Integrin ligands at a glance. J Cell Sci 2006; 119:3901-3; PMID:16988024; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.03098
18. Hersel U, Dahmen C, Kessler H. RGD modified polymers: biomaterials for stimulated cell adhesion and beyond. Biomaterials 2003; 24:4385-415; PMID:12922151; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00343-0
19. Zhang Z, Lai YX, Yu L, Ding JD. Effects of immobilizing sites of RGD peptides in amphiphilic block copolymers on efficacy of cell adhesion. Biomaterials 2010; 31:7873-82; PMID:20674012; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. biomaterials.2010.07.014
20. Bellis SL. Advantages of RGD peptides for directing cell association with biomaterials. Biomaterials 2011; 32:4205-10; PMID:21515168; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.02.029
21. Zhang Z, Ni J, Chen L, Yu L, Xu JW, Ding JD. Encapsulation of cell-adhesive RGD peptides into a polymeric physical hydrogel to prevent postoperative tissue adhesion. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2012; 100:1599-609; PMID:22692943; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.32728
22. Xiong JP, Stehle T, Zhang RG, Joachimiak A, Frech M, Goodman SL, Arnaout MA. Crystal structure of the extracellular segment of integrin alpha Vbeta3 in complex with an Arg-Gly-Asp ligand. Science 2002; 296:151-5; PMID:11884718; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1069040
23. Huang JH, Ding JD. Nanostructured interfaces with RGD arrays to control cell-matrix interaction. Soft Matter 2010; 6:3395-401; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1039/b927168f
24. Sun JG, Graeter SV, Yu L, Duan SF, Spatz JP, Ding JD. Technique of surface modification of a cell-adhesion-resistant hydrogel by a cell-adhesion-available inorganic microarray. Biomacromolecules 2008; 9:2569-72; PMID:18646821; http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bm800477s
25. Huang JH, Grater SV, Corbellini F, Rinck S, Bock E, Kemkemer R, Kessler H, Ding J, Spatz JP. Impact of order and disorder in RGD nanopatterns on cell adhesion. Nano Lett 2009; 9:1111-6; PMID:19206508; http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ nl803548b
26. Wang X, Yan C, Ye K, He Y, Li ZH, Ding JD. Effect of RGD nanospacing on differentiation of stem cells. Biomaterials 2013; 34:2865-74; PMID:23357372; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.01.021
27. Lai YX, Xie C, Zhang Z, Lu WY, Ding JD. Design and synthesis of a potent peptide containing both specific and non-specific cell-adhesion motifs. Biomaterials 2010; 31:4809-17; PMID:20346502; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. biomaterials.2010.02.064
28. Peng R, Yao X, Cao B, Tang J, Ding JD. The effect of culture conditions on the adipogenic and osteogenic inductions of mesenchymal stem cells on micropatterned surfaces. Biomaterials 2012; 33:6008-19; PMID:22681981; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.010
29. Kingshott P, Griesser HJ. Surfaces that resist bioadhesion. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 1999; 4:403-12; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1359-0286(99) 00018-2
30. Yu L, Ding JD. Injectable hydrogels as unique biomedical materials. Chem Soc Rev 2008; 37:1473-81; PMID:18648673; http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b713009k
31. Zhang Z, Ni J, Chen L, Yu L, Xu JW, Ding JD. Biodegradable and thermoreversible PCLA-PEG-PCLA hydrogel as a barrier for prevention of postoperative adhesion. Biomaterials 2011; 32:4725-36; PMID:21482434; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.03.046
32. Yan C, Sun JG, Ding JD. Critical areas of cell adhesion on micropatterned surfaces. Biomaterials 2011; 32:3931-8; PMID:21356556; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.078
33. Walsh K, Perlman H. Cell cycle exit upon myogenic differentiation. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1997; 7:597-602; PMID:9388774; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959- 437X(97)80005-6
34. Jakoby M, Schnittger A. Cell cycle and differentiation. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2004; 7:661-9; PMID:15491914; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2004.09.015
35. Grossel MJ, Hinds PW. From cell cycle to differentiation: an expanding role for cdk6. Cell Cycle 2006; 5:266-70; PMID:16410727; http://dx.doi.org/10. 4161/cc.5.3.2385
36. Buttitta LA, Edgar BA. Mechanisms controlling cell cycle exit upon terminal differentiation. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2007; 19:697-704; PMID:18035529; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2007.10.004
37. McBeath R, Pirone DM, Nelson CM, Bhadriraju K, Chen CS. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell 2004; 6:483-95; PMID:15068789; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1534-5807(04)00075-9
38. Yao X, Peng R, Ding JD. Effects of aspect ratios of stem cells on lineage commitments with and without induction media. Biomaterials 2013; 34:930-9; PMID:23140997; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.10.052
39. Tang J, Peng R, Ding JD. The regulation of stem cell differentiation by cell-cell contact on micropatterned material surfaces. Biomaterials 2010; 31:2470-6; PMID:20022630; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.12.006
40. Allred DC, Clark GM, Elledge R, Fuqua SAW, Brown RW, Chamness GC, Osborne CK, McGuire WL. Association of p53 protein expression with tumor cell proliferation rate and clinical outcome in nodenegative breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85:200-6; PMID:8423624; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/85.3. 200
41. Peister A, Mellad JA, Larson BL, Hall BM, Gibson LF, Prockop DJ. Adult stem cells from bone marrow (MSCs) isolated from different strains of inbred mice vary in surface epitopes, rates of proliferation, and differentiation potential. Blood 2004; 103:1662-8; PMID:14592819; http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/ blood-2003-09-307