Should we still believe in constrained supersymmetry?

European Physical Journal C

Volumn 73, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1-38

  Balázs, Csaba ^a   Buckley, Andy ^b   Carter, Daniel ^a   Farmer, Benjamin ^a   White, Martin ^c  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891090200     PISSN: 14346044     EISSN: 14346052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2563-y     Document Type: Article

References (152)

1. S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields. Vol. III: Supersymmetry (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).
2. G. L. Kane, Supersymmetry: Squarks, Photinos, and the Unveiling of the Ultimate Laws of Nature (Perseus Publishing, Cambridge, 2001).
3. M. Drees, R. Godbole, P. Roy, Theory and Phenomenology of Sparticles: An Account of Four-Dimensional N=1 Supersymmetry in High Energy Physics (World Scientific, Hackensack, 2004).
4. H. Baer, X. Tata, Weak scale supersymmetry: From superfields to scattering events (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006).
5. P. Binetruy, Supersymmetry: Theory, Experiment and Cosmology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006).
6. J. Terning, Modern Supersymmetry: Dynamics and Duality (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006).
7. N. Polonsky, Supersymmetry: structure and phenomena. Extensions of the standard model. Lect. Notes Phys. M 68, 1-169 (2001). arXiv: hep-ph/0108236 [hep-ph].
8. H. Pagels, J. R. Primack, Supersymmetry, cosmology and new TeV physics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 223 (1982).
9. H. Goldberg, Constraint on the photino mass from cosmology. Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1419 (1983).
10. P. Ramond, Journeys Beyond the Standard Model (Perseus Books, Cambridge, 1999).
11. H. Baer, C. Balazs, M. Brhlik, P. Mercadante, X. Tata et al., Aspects of supersymmetric models with a radiatively driven inverted mass hierarchy. Phys. Rev. D 64, 015002 (2001). arXiv: hep-ph/0102156 [hep-ph].
12. C. Balazs, M. S. Carena, A. Menon, D. Morrissey, C. Wagner, The supersymmetric origin of matter. Phys. Rev. D 71, 075002 (2005). arXiv: hep-ph/0412264 [hep-ph].
13. D. V. Nanopoulos, K. A. Olive, M. Srednicki, K. Tamvakis, Primordial inflation in simple supergravity. Phys. Lett. B 123, 41 (1983).
14. R. Holman, P. Ramond, G. G. Ross, Supersymmetric inflationary cosmology. Phys. Lett. B 137, 343-347 (1984).
15. S. Dimopoulos, H. Georgi, Softly broken supersymmetry and SU(5). Nucl. Phys. B 193, 150 (1981).
16. A. H. Chamseddine, R. L. Arnowitt, P. Nath, Locally supersymmetric grand unification. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 970 (1982).
17. H. Baer, C. Balazs, Chi**2 analysis of the minimal supergravity model including WMAP, g(mu)-2 and b → s gamma constraints. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 0305, 006 (2003). arXiv: hep-ph/0303114 [hep-ph].
18. J. R. Ellis, K. A. Olive, Y. Santoso, V. C. Spanos, Likelihood analysis of the CMSSM parameter space. Phys. Rev. D 69, 095004 (2004). arXiv: hep-ph/0310356 [hep-ph].
19. P. Bechtle, K. Desch, M. Uhlenbrock, P. Wienemann, Constraining SUSY models with Fittino using measurements before, with and beyond the LHC. Eur. Phys. J. C 66, 215-259 (2010). arXiv: 0907. 2589 [hep-ph].
20. P. Bechtle, K. Desch, H. Dreiner, M. Kramer, B. O'Leary et al., Present and possible future implications for mSUGRA of the non-discovery of SUSY at the LHC. arXiv: 1105. 5398 [hep-ph].
21. S. Heinemeyer, G. Weiglein, Predicting supersymmetry. Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 205-206, 283-288 (2010). arXiv: 1007. 0206 [hep-ph].
22. O. Buchmueller, R. Cavanaugh, D. Colling, A. De Roeck, M. Dolan et al., Frequentist analysis of the parameter space of minimal supergravity. Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1583 (2011). arXiv: 1011. 6118 [hep-ph].
23. D. E. Lopez-Fogliani, L. Roszkowski, R. Ruiz de Austri, T. A. Varley, A Bayesian analysis of the constrained NMSSM. Phys. Rev. D 80, 095013 (2009). arXiv: 0906. 4911 [hep-ph].
24. M. E. Cabrera, J. A. Casas, R. Ruiz de Austri, MSSM forecast for the LHC. J. High Energy Phys. 1005, 043 (2010). arXiv: 0911. 4686 [hep-ph].
25. O. Buchmueller, R. Cavanaugh, D. Colling, A. De Roeck, M. Dolan et al., Supersymmetry and dark matter in light of LHC 2010 and Xenon100 data. Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1722 (2011). arXiv: 1106. 2529 [hep-ph].
26. J. Ellis, K. A. Olive, Revisiting the Higgs mass and dark matter in the CMSSM. arXiv: 1202. 3262 [hep-ph].
27. P. Bechtle, T. Bringmann, K. Desch, H. Dreiner, M. Hamer et al., Constrained supersymmetry after two years of LHC data: a global view with Fittino. arXiv: 1204. 4199 [hep-ph].
28. B. Allanach, Impact of CMS multi-jets and missing energy search on CMSSM fits. Phys. Rev. D 83, 095019 (2011). arXiv: 1102. 3149 [hep-ph].
29. B. Allanach, T. Khoo, C. Lester, S. Williams, The impact of the ATLAS zero-lepton, jets and missing momentum search on a CMSSM fit. J. High Energy Phys. 1106, 035 (2011). arXiv: 1103. 0969 [hep-ph].
30. G. Bertone, D. G. Cerdeno, M. Fornasa, R. Ruiz de Austri, C. Strege et al., Global fits of the cMSSM including the first LHC and XENON100 data. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 1201, 015 (2012). arXiv: 1107. 1715 [hep-ph].
31. A. Fowlie, A. Kalinowski, M. Kazana, L. Roszkowski, Y. S. Tsai, Bayesian implications of current LHC and XENON100 search limits for the constrained MSSM. arXiv: 1111. 6098 [hep-ph].
32. O. Buchmueller, R. Cavanaugh, A. De Roeck, M. Dolan, J. Ellis et al., Supersymmetry in light of 1/fb of LHC data. arXiv: 1110. 3568 [hep-ph].
33. O. Buchmueller, R. Cavanaugh, A. De Roeck, M. Dolan, J. Ellis et al., Higgs and supersymmetry. arXiv: 1112. 3564 [hep-ph].
34. G. D. Starkman, R. Trotta, P. M. Vaudrevange, Introducing doubt in Bayesian model comparison. arXiv: 0811. 2415 [physics. data-an].
35. M. E. Cabrera, J. Casas, V. A. Mitsou, R. Ruiz de Austri, J. Terron, Histogram comparison as a powerful tool for the search of new physics at LHC. Application to CMSSM. arXiv: 1109. 3759 [hep-ph].
36. S. AbdusSalam, B. Allanach, H. Dreiner, J. Ellis, U. Ellwanger et al., Benchmark models, planes, lines and points for future SUSY searches at the LHC. Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1835 (2011). arXiv: 1109. 3859 [hep-ph].
37. S. Sekmen, S. Kraml, J. Lykken, F. Moortgat, S. Padhi et al., Interpreting LHC SUSY searches in the phenomenological MSSM. arXiv: 1109. 5119 [hep-ph].
38. C. Strege, G. Bertone, D. Cerdeno, M. Fornasa, R. Ruiz de Austri et al., Updated global fits of the cMSSM including the latest LHC SUSY and Higgs searches and XENON100 data. arXiv: 1112. 4192 [hep-ph].
39. L. Roszkowski, E. M. Sessolo, Y.-L. S. Tsai, Bayesian implications of current LHC supersymmetry and dark matter detection searches for the constrained MSSM. arXiv: 1202. 1503 [hep-ph].
40. A. O'Hagan, Fractional bayes factors for model comparison. J. Royal Stat. Soc. Ser. B, Methodol. 57(1), 99-138 (1995).
41. J. Berger, L. Pericchi, The intrinsic bayes factor for model selection and prediction. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 91(433), 109-122 (1996).
42. J. Berger, J. Mortera, Default bayes factors for nonnested hypothesis testing. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 94(446), 542-554 (1999).
43. B. Allanach, Naturalness priors and fits to the constrained minimal supersymmetric standard model. Phys. Lett. B 635, 123-130 (2006). arXiv: hep-ph/0601089 [hep-ph].
44. B. C. Allanach, K. Cranmer, C. G. Lester, A. M. Weber, Natural priors, CMSSM fits and LHC weather forecasts. J. High Energy Phys. 0708, 023 (2007). arXiv: 0705. 0487 [hep-ph].
45. M. E. Cabrera, J. A. Casas, R. Ruiz de Austri, Bayesian approach and naturalness in MSSM analyses for the LHC. J. High Energy Phys. 03, 075 (2009). arXiv: 0812. 0536 [hep-ph].
46. M. E. Cabrera, Bayesian study and naturalness in MSSM forecast for the LHC. arXiv: 1005. 2525 [hep-ph].
47. L. J. Hall, D. Pinner, J. T. Ruderman, A natural SUSY Higgs near 126 GeV. arXiv: 1112. 2703 [hep-ph].
48. P. Athron, D. J. Miller, A new measure of fine tuning. Phys. Rev. D 76, 075010 (2007). arXiv: 0705. 2241 [hep-ph].
49. S. Cassel, D. Ghilencea, G. Ross, Testing SUSY. Phys. Lett. B 687, 214-218 (2010). arXiv: 0911. 1134 [hep-ph].
50. D. Horton, G. Ross, Naturalness and focus points with non-universal Gaugino masses. Nucl. Phys. B 830, 221-247 (2010). arXiv: 0908. 0857 [hep-ph].
51. S. Cassel, D. Ghilencea, G. Ross, Testing SUSY at the LHC: electroweak and dark matter fine tuning at two-loop order. Nucl. Phys. B 835, 110-134 (2010). arXiv: 1001. 3884 [hep-ph].
52. S. Akula, M. Liu, P. Nath, G. Peim, Naturalness, supersymmetry and implications for LHC and dark matter. arXiv: 1111. 4589 [hep-ph].
53. A. Arbey, M. Battaglia, F. Mahmoudi, Implications of LHC searches on SUSY particle spectra: the pMSSM parameter space with neutralino dark matter. Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1847 (2012). arXiv: 1110. 3726 [hep-ph].
54. S. Cassel, D. Ghilencea, S. Kraml, A. Lessa, G. Ross, Fine-tuning implications for complementary dark matter and LHC SUSY searches. J. High Energy Phys. 1105, 120 (2011). arXiv: 1101. 4664 [hep-ph].
55. M. Papucci, J. T. Ruderman, A. Weiler, Natural SUSY endures. arXiv: 1110. 6926 [hep-ph].
56. T. Li, J. A. Maxin, D. V. Nanopoulos, J. W. Walker, Natural predictions for the Higgs boson mass and supersymmetric contributions to rare processes. Phys. Lett. B 708, 93-99 (2012). arXiv: 1109. 2110 [hep-ph].
57. Z. Kang, J. Li, T. Li, On the naturalness of the (N)MSSM. arXiv: 1201. 5305 [hep-ph].
58. E. Jaynes, G. Bretthorst, Probability Theory: The Logic of Science (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003).
59. F. Feroz, B. C. Allanach, M. Hobson, S. S. AbdusSalam, R. Trotta et al., Bayesian selection of sign(mu) within mSUGRA in global fits including WMAP5 results. J. High Energy Phys. 0810, 064 (2008). arXiv: 0807. 4512 [hep-ph].
60. S. S. AbdusSalam, B. C. Allanach, M. J. Dolan, F. Feroz, M. P. Hobson, Selecting a model of supersymmetry breaking mediation. Phys. Rev. D 80, 035017 (2009). arXiv: 0906. 0957 [hep-ph].
61. μ consistent within the constrained MSSM? arXiv: 0903. 2487 [hep-ph].
62. μ in the CMSSM. Phys. Rev. D 84, 015006 (2011). arXiv: 1011. 5935 [hep-ph].
63. M. Pierini, H. Prosper, S. Sekmen, M. Spiropulu, Model inference with reference priors. arXiv: 1107. 2877 [hep-ph].
64. D. MacKay, Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003).
65. R. Solomonoff, A formal theory of inductive inference. Part I. Inf. Control 7(1), 1-22 (1964). http://www. sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0019995864902232.
66. S. Fichet, Quantified naturalness from Bayesian statistics. arXiv: 1204. 4940 [hep-ph].
67. P. Bock, J. Carr, S. De Jong, F. Di Lodovico, E. Gross, P. Igo-Kemenes, P. Janot, W. Murray, M. Pieri, A. L. Read, V. Ruhlmann-Kleider, A. Sopczak (ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, LEP Electroweak Working Group Collaboration), Lower bound for the standard model Higgs boson mass from combining the results of the four lep experiments. Tech. rep., CERN, Geneva (1998). http://cdsweb. cern. ch/record/353201.
68. ALEPH, CDF, D0, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP Electroweak Working Group, Tevatron Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak and Heavy Flavour Groups Collaboration, Precision Electroweak Measurements and Constraints on the Standard Model. arXiv: 1012. 2367 [hep-ex].
69. -1 of pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV with ATLAS. arXiv: 1202. 1414 [hep-ex].
70. *→lνlν decay channel in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector. arXiv: 1112. 2577 [hep-ex].
71. -1 of pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV with ATLAS. arXiv: 1202. 1415 [hep-ex].
72. -1 of pp collision data at √s = 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B 710, 49-66 (2012). arXiv: 1202. 1408 [hep-ex].
73. F. Feroz, M. P. Hobson, M. Bridges, MultiNest: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 398, 1601-1614 (2009). arXiv: 0809. 3437 [astro-ph].
74. F. Feroz, M. P. Hobson, Multimodal nested sampling: an efficient and robust alternative to MCMC methods for astronomical data analysis. arXiv: 0704. 3704 [astro-ph].
75. J. Skilling, Nested sampling. AIP Conf. Proc. 735(1), 395-405 (2004). http://link. aip. org/link/?APC/735/395/1.
76. Y. Akrami, P. Scott, J. Edsjo, J. Conrad, L. Bergstrom, A profile likelihood analysis of the constrained MSSM with genetic algorithms. J. High Energy Phys. 1004, 057 (2010). arXiv: 0910. 3950 [hep-ph].
77. M. Bridges, K. Cranmer, F. Feroz, M. Hobson, R. Ruiz de Austri et al., A coverage study of the CMSSM based on ATLAS sensitivity using fast neural networks techniques. J. High Energy Phys. 1103, 012 (2011). arXiv: 1011. 4306 [hep-ph].
78. F. E. Paige, S. D. Protopopescu, H. Baer, X. Tata, ISAJET 7. 69: A Monte Carlo event generator for p p, anti-p p, and e+ e- reactions. arXiv: hep-ph/0312045.
79. G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, A. Semenov, micrOMEGAs: a tool for dark matter studies. arXiv: 1005. 4133 [hep-ph].
80. G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, A. Semenov, Dark matter direct detection rate in a generic model with micrOMEGAs2. 1. Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 747-767 (2009). arXiv: 0803. 2360 [hep-ph].
81. G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs2. 0: a program to calculate the relic density of dark matter in a generic model. Comput. Phys. Commun. 176, 367-382 (2007). arXiv: hep-ph/0607059.
82. F. Mahmoudi, SuperIso: a program for calculating the isospin asymmetry of B -> K* gamma in the MSSM. Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 745-754 (2008). arXiv: 0710. 2067 [hep-ph].
83. F. Mahmoudi, SuperIso v2. 3: a program for calculating flavor physics observables in supersymmetry. Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 1579-1613 (2009). arXiv: 0808. 3144 [hep-ph].
84. A. Djouadi, J. Kalinowski, M. Spira, HDECAY: a program for Higgs boson decays in the standard model and its supersymmetric extension. Comput. Phys. Commun. 108, 56-74 (1998). arXiv: hep-ph/9704448 [hep-ph].
85. F. Feroz, K. Cranmer, M. Hobson, R. Ruiz de Austri, R. Trotta, Challenges of profile likelihood evaluation in multi-dimensional SUSY scans. J. High Energy Phys. 06, 042 (2011). arXiv: 1101. 3296 [hep-ph].
86. K. Nakamura, et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics. J. Phys. G, Nucl. Part. Phys. 37(7A), 075021 (2010), and 2011 partial update for the 2012 edition. http://stacks. iop. org/0954-3899/37/i=7A/a=075021.
87. H. Jeffreys, Theory of Probability (1961).
88. R. Barbieri, G. F. Giudice, Upper bounds on supersymmetric particle masses. Nucl. Phys. B 306(1), 63-76 (1988).
89. L. Roszkowski, R. Ruiz de Austri, R. Trotta, Efficient reconstruction of CMSSM parameters from LHC data-a case study. Phys. Rev. D 82, 055003 (2010). arXiv: 0907. 0594 [hep-ph].
90. D. M. Ghilencea, H. M. Lee, M. Park, Tuning supersymmetric models at the LHC: a comparative analysis at two-loop level, 23 pp., 46 figs. arXiv: 1203. 0569 [hep-ph].
91. D. Ghilencea, G. Ross, The fine-tuning cost of the likelihood in SUSY models. arXiv: 1208. 0837 [hep-ph].
92. E. Komatsu et al. (WMAP Collaboration), Seven-year Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe (WMAP) observations: cosmological interpretation. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 192, 18 (2011). arXiv: 1001. 4538 [astro-ph. CO].
93. - and φ{symbol} decay issues and its consequences on g-2 VMD estimates. Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1848 (2012). arXiv: 1106. 1315 [hep-ph].
94. D. Asner et al. (Heavy Flavor Averaging Group Collaboration), Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and tau-lepton properties. arXiv: 1010. 1589 [hep-ex].
95. *γ. arXiv: 0808. 1915 [hep-ex].
96. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Observation of the semileptonic decays and evidence for. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 021801 (2008). arXiv: 0709. 1698 [hep-ex].
97. M. Antonelli et al. (FlaviaNet Working Group on Kaon Decays Collaboration), Precision tests of the standard model with leptonic and semileptonic kaon decays. arXiv: 0801. 1817 [hep-ph].
98. W.-M. Yao et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics. J. Phys. G 33 (2006). http://pdg. lbl. gov.
99. V. Barger, P. Langacker, H.-S. Lee, G. Shaughnessy, Higgs sector in extensions of the MSSM. Phys. Rev. D 73, 115010 (2006). arXiv: hep-ph/0603247.
100. E. Aprile et al. (XENON100 Collaboration), Dark matter results from 100 live days of XENON100 data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 131302 (2011). arXiv: 1104. 2549 [astro-ph. CO].
101. -1. arXiv: 1110. 2411 [hep-ex].
102. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for squarks and gluinos using final states with jets and missing transverse momentum with the ATLAS detector in √s = 7 TeV proton-proton collisions. arXiv: 1109. 6572 [hep-ex].
103. O. Buchmueller, R. Cavanaugh, D. Colling, A. de Roeck, M. Dolan et al., Implications of initial LHC searches for supersymmetry. Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1634 (2011). arXiv: 1102. 4585 [hep-ph].
104. E. Aprile et al. (XENON100 Collaboration), Likelihood approach to the first dark matter results from XENON100. Phys. Rev. D 84, 052003 (2011). arXiv: 1103. 0303 [hep-ex].
105. G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, O. Vitells, Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics. Eur. Phys. J. C, Part. Fields 71(2), 1-19 (2011). arXiv: 1007. 1727 [data-an].
106. s technique. J. Phys. G, Nucl. Part. Phys. 28(10), 2693 (2002). http://stacks. iop. org/0954-3899/28/i=10/a=313.
107. J. M. Alarcon, J. M. Camalich, J. A. Oller, The chiral representation of the πN scattering amplitude and the pion-nucleon sigma term. arXiv: 1110. 3797 [hep-ph].
108. M. M. Pavan, I. I. Strakovsky, R. L. Workman, R. A. Arndt, The pion nucleon Sigma term is definitely large: results from a GWU analysis of pi N scattering data. PiN Newslett. 16, 110-115 (2002). arXiv: hep-ph/0111066.
109. J. Gasser, H. Leutwyler, M. Sainio, Sigma-term update. Phys. Lett. B 253(1-2), 252-259 (1991). http://www. sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/037026939191393A.
110. R. Koch, A new determination of the pi N sigma term using hyperbolic dispersion relations in the (nu**2, t) plane. Z. Phys. C 15, 161-168 (1982).
111. J. Giedt, A. W. Thomas, R. D. Young, Dark matter, the CMSSM and lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 201802 (2009). arXiv: 0907. 4177 [hep-ph].
112. R. D. Young, A. W. Thomas, Octet baryon masses and sigma terms from an SU(3) chiral extrapolation. Phys. Rev. D 81, 014503 (2010). arXiv: 0901. 3310 [hep-lat].
113. J. Gasser, H. Leutwyler, Quark masses. Phys. Rep. 87, 77-169 (1982).
114. B. Borasoy, U.-G. Meissner, Chiral expansion of baryon masses and sigma-terms. Ann. Phys. 254, 192-232 (1997). arXiv: hep-ph/9607432.
115. M. E. Sainio, Pion nucleon sigma-term: a review. PiN Newslett. 16, 138-143 (2002). arXiv: hep-ph/0110413.
116. M. Knecht, Working group summary: pi N sigma term. PiN Newslett. 15, 108-113 (1999). arXiv: hep-ph/9912443.
117. J. R. Ellis, K. A. Olive, C. Savage, Hadronic uncertainties in the elastic scattering of supersymmetric dark matter. Phys. Rev. D 77, 065026 (2008). arXiv: 0801. 3656 [hep-ph].
118. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), The ATLAS experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. J. Instrum. 3, S08003 (2008).
119. R. Adolphi et al. (CMS Collaboration), The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC. J. Instrum. 3, S08004 (2008).
120. -1 of 7 TeV proton-proton collision data with the ATLAS detector. arXiv: 1111. 4116 [hep-ex].
121. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Searches for supersymmetry with the ATLAS detector using final states with two leptons and missing transverse momentum in √s = 7 TeV proton-proton collisions. arXiv: 1110. 6189 [hep-ex].
122. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for new phenomena in final states with large jet multiplicities and missing transverse momentum using √s = 7 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector. J. High Energy Phys. 1111, 099 (2011). arXiv: 1110. 2299 [hep-ex].
123. -1 of ATLAS data. arXiv: 1109. 6606 [hep-ex].
124. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for supersymmetry at the LHC in events with jets and missing transverse energy. http://cdsweb. cern. ch/record/1381201.
125. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for supersymmetry in all-hadronic events with MT2. http://cdsweb. cern. ch/record/1377032.
126. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for supersymmetry in all-hadronic events with missing energy. http://cdsweb. cern. ch/record/1378478.
127. N. Desai, B. Mukhopadhyaya, Constraints on supersymmetry with light third family from LHC data. arXiv: 1111. 2830 [hep-ph].
128. - and LHC limits on supersymmetry. Phys. Lett. B 705, 493-497 (2011). arXiv: 1109. 6775 [hep-ex].
129. -1 ATLAS search in the minimal anomaly mediated supersymmetry breaking model. arXiv: 1110. 1119 [hep-ph].
130. S. Gieseke, D. Grellscheid, K. Hamilton, A. Papaefstathiou, S. Platzer et al., Herwig++ 2. 5 release note. arXiv: 1102. 1672 [hep-ph].
131. S. Ovyn, X. Rouby, V. Lemaitre, DELPHES, a framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment. arXiv: 0903. 2225 [hep-ph].
132. W. Beenakker, R. Hopker, M. Spira, PROSPINO: a program for the production of supersymmetric particles in next-to-leading order QCD. arXiv: hep-ph/9611232 [hep-ph].
133. S. Agostinelli et al. (GEANT4 Collaboration), GEANT4: a simulation toolkit. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 506, 250-303 (2003).
134. A. Buckley, A. Shilton, M. J. White, Fast supersymmetry phenomenology at the Large Hadron Collider using machine learning techniques. arXiv: 1106. 4613 [hep-ph].
135. A. Hoecker, P. Speckmayer, J. Stelzer, J. Therhaag, E. von Toerne, H. Voss, TMVA: toolkit for multivariate data analysis. PoS ACAT, 040 (2007). arXiv: physics/0703039.
136. J.-H. Zhong, R.-S. Huang, S.-C. Lee, R.-S. Huang, S.-C. Lee, A program for the Bayesian neural network in the ROOT framework. Comput. Phys. Commun. 182, 2655-2660 (2011). arXiv: 1103. 2854 [physics. data-an].
137. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for squarks and gluinos using final states with jets and missing transverse momentum with the atlas detector in √s = 7 tev proton-proton collisions. Tech. rep., CERN, Geneva, Mar (2012). http://cdsweb. cern. ch/record/1432199.
138. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for supersymmetry with the razor variables at cms. http://cdsweb. cern. ch/record/1430715.
139. -1 of pp collisions data taken at a center-of-mass energy of 7 TeV with the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. Tech. Rep. ATLAS-CONF-2011-163, CERN, Geneva, Dec (2011). http://cdsweb. cern. ch/record/1406358.
140. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Combination of sm Higgs searches. http://cdsweb. cern. ch/record/1406347.
141. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Combined results of searches for the standard model Higgs boson in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV. arXiv: 1202. 1488 [hep-ex].
142. S. Akula, B. Altunkaynak, D. Feldman, P. Nath, G. Peim, Higgs boson mass predictions in SUGRA unification, recent LHC-7 results, and dark matter. Phys. Rev. D 85, 075001 (2012). arXiv: 1112. 3645 [hep-ph].
143. M. Kadastik, K. Kannike, A. Racioppi, M. Raidal, Implications of the 125 GeV Higgs boson for scalar dark matter and for the CMSSM phenomenology. arXiv: 1112. 3647 [hep-ph].
144. H. Baer, V. Barger, A. Mustafayev, Neutralino dark matter in mSUGRA/CMSSM with a 125 GeV light Higgs scalar. arXiv: 1202. 4038 [hep-ph].
145. A. Azatov, R. Contino, J. Galloway, Model-independent bounds on a light Higgs. arXiv: 1202. 3415 [hep-ph].
146. A. Hoecker, The hadronic contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment and to the running electromagnetic fine structure constant at MZ-overview and latest results. Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 218, 189-200 (2011). arXiv: 1012. 0055 [hep-ph].
147. T. Goecke, C. S. Fischer, R. Williams, Hadronic light-by-light scattering in the muon g-2: a Dyson-Schwinger equation approach. Phys. Rev. D 83, 094006 (2011). arXiv: 1012. 3886 [hep-ph].
148. 2) re-evaluated using new precise data. J. Phys. G 38, 085003 (2011). arXiv: 1105. 3149 [hep-ph].
149. S. Bodenstein, C. Dominguez, K. Schilcher, Hadronic contribution to the muon g-2: a theoretical determination. Phys. Rev. D 85, 014029 (2012). arXiv: 1106. 0427 [hep-ph].
150. T. Goecke, C. S. Fischer, R. Williams, Hadronic contribution to the muon g-2: a Dyson-Schwinger perspective. arXiv: 1111. 0990 [hep-ph].
151. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B (2012). arXiv: 1207. 7214 [hep-ex].
152. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B (2012). arXiv: 1207. 7235 [hep-ex].