MSSM forecast for the LHC

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2010, Issue 5, 2010, Pages

  Cabrera, Maria Eugenia ^a   Casas, J Alberto ^a   De Austri, Roberto Ruiz ^b  

^a INSTITUTO DE FÍSICA TEÓRICA UAM CSIC   (Spain)

^b INSTITUTO DE FÍSICA CORPUSCULAR IFIC   (Spain)

Author keywords

Beyond standard model; Supersymmetric effective theories

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954961627     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP05(2010)043     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. B. C. Allanach and C. G. Lester, Multi-dimensional mSUGRA likelihood maps, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 015013 [hep-ph/0507283].
2. B. C. Allanach, Naturalness priors and fits to the constrained minimal super symmetric standard model, Phys. Lett. B 635 (2006) 123 [hep-ph/0601089].
3. R. R. de Austri, R. Trotta and L. Roszkowski, A Markov chain Monte Carlo analysis of the CMSSM, JHEP 05 (2006) 002 [hep-ph/0602028].
4. B. C. Allanach, K. Cranmer, C. G. Lester and A. M. Weber, Natural priors, CMSSM fits and LHC weather forecasts, JHEP 08 (2007) 023 [arXiv: 0705. 0487].
5. L. Roszkowski, R. Ruiz de Austri and R. Trotta, Implications for the constrained MSSM from a new prediction for b → sγ, JHEP 07 (2007) 075 [arXiv: 0705. 2012].
6. O. Buchmueller et al., Predictions for super symmetric particle masses in the CMSSM using indirect experimental and cosmological constraints, JHEP 09 (2008) 117 [arXiv: 0808.4128].
7. R. Trotta, F. Feroz, M. P. Hobson, L. Roszkowski and R. Ruiz de Austri, The Impact of priors and observables on parameter inferences in the constrained MSSM, JHEP 12 (2008) 024 [arXiv:0809.3792].
8. J. Ellis, Prospects for discovering supersymmetry at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 59 (2009) 335 [arXiv: 0810.1178].
9. S. S. AbdusSalam, B. C. Allanach, F. Quevedo, F. Feroz and M. Hobson, Fitting the phenomenological MSSM, arXiv: 0904. 2548.
10. O. Buchmueller et al., Likelihood functions for super symmetric observables in frequentist analyses of the CMSSM and NUHM1, Eur. Phys. J. C 64 (2009) 391 [arXiv: 0907. 5568].
11. G. D'Agostini, Probability and measurement uncertainty in physics - A bayesian primer, hep-ph/9512295.
12. R. Trotta, Bayes in the sky: bayesian inference and model selection in cosmology, Contemp. Phys. 49 (2008) 71 [arXiv: 0803.4089].
13. S. P. Martin, A super symmetry primer, hep-ph/9709356.
14. J. R. Ellis, K. Enqvist, D. V. Nanopoulos and F. Zwirner, Observables in low-energy superstring models, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 1 (1986) 57.
15. R. Barbieri and G. F. Giudice, Upper bounds on super symmetric particle masses, Nucl. Phys. B 306 (1988) 63.
16. B. de Carlos and J. A. Casas, One loop analysis of the electroweak breaking in super symmetric models and the fine tuning problem, Phys. Lett. B 309 (1993) 320 [hep-ph/9303291].
17. G. W. Anderson and D. J. Castano, Measures of fine tuning, Phys. Lett. B 347 (1995) 300 [hep-ph/9409419].
18. P. Athron and D. J. Miller, 2, A new measure of fine tuning, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 075010 [arXiv: 0705. 2241].
19. P. Ciafaloni and A. Strumia, Naturalness upper bounds on gauge mediated soft terms, Nucl. Phys. B 494 (1997) 41 [hep-ph/9611204].
20. J. A. Casas, J. R. Espinosa and I. Hidalgo, Implications for new physics from fine-tuning arguments. I: application to SUSY and seesaw cases, JHEP 11 (2004) 057 [hep-ph/0410298].
21. J. A. Casas, J. R. Espinosa and I. Hidalgo, Implications for new physics from fine-tuning arguments. II: little Higgs models, JHEP 03 (2005) 038 [hep-ph/0502066].
22. L. Giusti, A. Romanino and A. Strumia, Natural ranges of super symmetric signals, Nucl. Phys. B 550 (1999) 3 [hep-ph/9811386].
23. A. Strumia, Naturalness of super symmetric models, hep-ph/9904247.
24. F. Feruglio, A. Strumia and F. Vissani, Neutrino oscillations and signals in β and 0v2β experiments, Nucl. Phys. B 637 (2002) 345
25. [Addendum Nucl. Phys. B 659 (2003) 359] [hep-ph/0201291].
26. M. E. Cabrera, J. A. Casas and R. Ruiz de Austri, Bayesian approach and naturalness in MSSM analyses for the LHC, JHEP 03 (2009) 075 [arXiv:0812.0536].
27. J. O. Berger, B. Liseo and R. L. Wolpert, Integrated likelihood methods for eliminating nuisance variables, Stat. Sci. 14 (1999) 1.
28. B. C. Allanach, SOFTSUSY: a C+ + program for calculating super symmetric spectra, Comput. Phys. Commun. 143 (2002) 305 [hep-ph/0104145].
29. L. E. Ibaũez and C. Lopez, N = 1 supergravity, the weak scale and the low-energy particle spectrum, Nucl. Phys. B 233 (1984) 511.
30. L. J. Hall, R. Rattazzi and U. Sarid, The Top quark mass in super symmetric SO (10) unification, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 7048 [hep-ph/9306309].
31. A. E. Nelson and L. Randall, Naturally large tan β, Phys. Lett. B 316 (1993) 516 [hep-ph/9308277].
32. V. S. Kaplunovsky and J. Louis, Model independent analysis of soft terms in effective supergravity and in string theory, Phys. Lett. B 306 (1993) 269 [hep-th/9303040].
33. G. F. Giudice and A. Masiero, A natural solution to the μ problem in supergravity theories, Phys. Lett. B 206 (1988) 480.
34. F. Feroz and M. P. Hobson, Multimodal nested sampling: an efficient and robust alternative to MCMC methods for astronomical data analysis, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 384 (2008) 449.
35. http://superbayes.org
36. th International Workshop on Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods in Science and Engineering, R. Fischer et al. eds., American Institute of Physics, (2004), pag. 395.
37. J. Skilling, Nested sampling for general Bayesian computation, Bayesian Analysis 1 (2006) 833.
38. ALEPH, DELHI and L3 collaboration, S. Schael et al., Search for neutral MSSM Higgs bosons at LEP, Eur. Phys. J. C 47 (2006) 547 [hep-ex/0602042].
39. J. A. Casas, J. R. Espinosa and H. E. Haber, The Higgs mass in the MSSM infrared fixed point scenario, Nucl. Phys. B 526 (1998) 3 [hep-ph/9801365].
40. H. Baer, C.-H. Chen, M. Drees, F. Paige and X. Tata, Supersymmetry reach of Tevatron upgrades: the large tanβ case, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 075008 [hep-ph/9802441].
41. M. Jurcisin and D. I. Kazakov, Infrared quasi fixed points and mass predictions in the MSSM. II: large tanβ scenario, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 14 (1999) 671 [hep-ph/9902290].
42. J. R. Ellis, T. Falk, G. Ganis, K. A. Olive and M. Srednicki, The CMSSM parameter space at large tan β, Phys. Lett. B 510 (2001) 236 [hep-ph/0102098].
43. CMS collaboration, G. L. Bayatian et al., CMS technical design report, volume II: physics performance, J. Phys. G 34 (2007) 995.
44. The ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Expected performance of the ATLAS experiment - Detector, trigger and physics, arXiv: 0901. 0512.
45. t, JHEP 09 (2009) 063 [arXiv: 0907.1922].
46. L. Susskind, Supersymmetry breaking in the anthropic landscape, hep-th/0405189.
47. Tevatron Electroweak Working Group collaboration, A combination of CDF and D0 results on the mass of the top quark, arXiv:0803.1683.
48. Particle Data Group collaboration, W. M. Yao et al., Review of particle physics, J. Phys. G 33 (2006) 1.
49. Z), Phys. Lett. B 649 (2007) 173 [hep-ph/0611102].
50. A. Dedes, G. Degrassi and P. Slavich, On the two-loop Yukawa corrections to the MSSM Higgs boson masses at large tan β, Nucl. Phys. B 672 (2003) 144 [hep-ph/0305127].
51. M. Awramik, M. Czakon, A. Freitas and G. Weiglein, Precise prediction for the W-boson mass in the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 053006 [hep-ph/0311148].
52. eff and indirect determination of the Higgs boson mass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 201805 [hep-ph/0407317].
53. A. Djouadi et al., Leading QCD corrections to scalar quark contributions to electroweak precision observables, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 4179 [hep-ph/9710438].
54. W. de Boer and C. Sander, Global electroweak fits and gauge coupling unification, Phys. Lett. B 585 (2004) 276 [hep-ph/0307049].
55. S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik and G. Weiglein, Electroweak precision observables in the minimal super symmetric standard model, Phys. Rept. 425 (2006) 265 [hep-ph/0412214].
56. R. Barbieri and A. Strumia, The 'LEP paradox', hep-ph/0007265.
57. R. Barbieri, A. Pomarol, R. Rattazzi and A. Strumia, Electroweak symmetry breaking after LEP-1 and LEP-2, Nucl. Phys. B 703 (2004) 127 [hep-ph/0405040].
58. sγ] in the MSSM with minimal flavor violation, Comput. Phys. Commun. 179 (2008) 759 [arXiv: 0712. 3265].
59. G. Degrassi, P. Gambino and P. Slavich, QCD corrections to radiative B decays in the MSSM with minimal flavor violation, Phys. Lett. B 635 (2006) 335 [hep-ph/0601135].
60. G. D'Ambrosio, G. F. Giudice, G. Isidori and A. Strumia, Minimal flavour violation: an effective field theory approach, Nucl. Phys. B 645 (2002) 155 [hep-ph/0207036].
61. J. Foster, K.-I. Okumura and L. Roszkowski, New Higgs effects in B physics in supersymmetry with general favour mixing, Phys. Lett. B 609 (2005) 102 [hep-ph/0410323].
62. F. Mahmoudi, SuperIso v2.3: a program for calculating flavor physics observables in supersymmetry, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 1579 [arXiv: 0808.3144].
63. http://lepewwg.web.cern.ch/LEPEWWG
64. J. P. Miller, E. de Rafael and B. L. Roberts, Muon g - 2: review of Theory and Experiment, Rept. Prog. Phys. 70 (2007) 795 [hep-ph/0703049].
65. - spectral functions revisited and the consequences for the muon magnetic anomaly, Eur. Phys. J. C 66 (2010) 127 [arXiv: 0906. 5443].
66. s oscillation frequency, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 062003 [hep-ex/0606027].
67. s oscillations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 242003 [hep-ex/0609040].
68. Heavy Flavor Averaging Group collaboration, E. Barberio et al., Averages of b-hadron and c-hadron properties at the end of 2007, arXiv:0808.1297.
69. *γ, arXiv: 0808.1915.
70. -v̄ (τ), Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 021801 [arXiv: 0709.1698].
71. FlaviaNet Working Group on Kaon Decays collaboration, M. Antonelli et al., Precision tests of the standard model with leptonic and semileptonic kaon decays, arXiv: 0801.1817.
72. ±?, JHEP 04 (2009) 121 [arXiv:0902.2393].
73. WMAP collaboration, J. Dunkley et al., Five-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: likelihoods and parameters from the WMAP data, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 180 (2009) 306 [arXiv:0803.0586].
74. s oscillations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 242003 [hep-ex/0609040].
75. The LEP Higgs working group, http://lephiggs.web.cern. ch/LEPHIGGS.
76. LEP Working Group for Higgs boson searches collaboration, R. Barate et al., Search for the standard model Higgs boson at LEP, Phys. Lett. B 565 (2003) 61 [hep-ex/0306033].
77. LEP Working Group for Higgs boson searches collaboration, R. Barate et al., Search for the standard model Higgs boson at LEP, Phys. Lett. B 565 (2003) 61 [hep-ex/0306033].
78. L. Roszkowski, R. R. de Austri and R. Trotta, On the detectability of the CMSSM light Higgs boson at the Tevatron, JHEP 04 (2007) 084 [hep-ph/0611173].
79. J. R. Ellis, G. Ridolfi and F. Zwirner, On radiative corrections to super symmetric Higgs boson masses and their implications for LEP searches, Phys. Lett. B 262 (1991) 477.
80. Y. Okada, M. Yamaguchi and T. Yanagida, Upper bound of the lightest Higgs boson mass in the minimal super symmetric standard model, Prog. Theor. Phys. 85 (1991) 1.
81. H. E. Haber and R. Hempfling, Can the mass of the lightest Higgs boson of the minimal super symmetric model be larger than m (Z)?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) 1815.
82. R. Barbieri, M. Frigeni and F. Caravaglios, The super symmetric Higgs for heavy superpartners, Phys. Lett. B 258 (1991) 167.
83. J. R. Ellis, K. A. Olive and Y. Santoso, The MSSM parameter space with non-universal Higgs masses, Phys. Lett. B 539 (2002) 107 [hep-ph/0204192].
84. - cross section data from BABAR, Eur. Phys. J. C 66 (2010) 1 [arXiv:0908.4300].
85. S. Heinemeyer, D. Stöckinger and G. Weiglein, Electroweak and super symmetric two-loop corrections to (g - 2) (μ), Nucl. Phys. B 699 (2004) 103 [hep-ph/0405255].
86. S. Marchetti, S. Mertens, U. Nierste and D. Stöckinger, tan β-enhanced super symmetric corrections to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 013010 [arXiv: 0808.1530].
87. μ consistent within the constrained MSSM?, arXiv: 0903. 2487.
88. G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski and K. Griest, Super symmetric dark matter, Phys. Rept. 267 (1996) 195 [hep-ph/9506380].
89. G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs: a program for calculating the relic density in the MSSM, Comput. Phys. Commun. 149 (2002) 103 [hep-ph/0112278].
90. G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs: version 1.3, Comput. Phys. Commun. 174 (2006) 577 [hep-ph/0405253].
91. L. Knox and M. S. Turner, Inflation at the electroweak scale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 371 [astro-ph/9209006].
92. J. Garcia-Bellido, D. Y. Grigoriev, A. Kusenko and M. E. Shaposhnikov, Non-equilibrium electroweak baryogenesis from preheating after inflation, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 123504 [hep-ph/9902449].
93. A. Ibarra and D. Tran, Decaying dark matter and the PAMELA anomaly, JCAP 02 (2009) 021 [arXiv:0811.1555].
94. rd ed., Oxford Classics series, Oxford University Press, Oxford U. K. (1961), reprinted 1998.
95. J. O'Ruanaidh and W. Fitzgerald, Numerical bayesian methods applied to signal processing, Springer Verlag, New York U. S. A. (1996).