An integrated framework for online diagnostic and prognostic health monitoring using a multistate deterioration process

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 124, Issue , 2014, Pages 92-104

  Moghaddass, Ramin ^a,b   Zuo, Ming J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Condition monitoring; Model selection; Multistate degradation process; Online diagnostics and prognostics; Reliability analysis

Indexed keywords

CONDITION MONITORING; LOSSES; MAINTENANCE; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS;

CAPITAL-INTENSIVE INDUSTRY; CATASTROPHIC FAILURES; DEGRADATION PROCESS; HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM; MODEL SELECTION; MULTI-STATE DETERIORATIONS; ON-LINE DIAGNOSTICS; PROGNOSTICS AND HEALTH MANAGEMENTS;

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

EID: 84890946777     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2013.11.006     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. L. Doyen, and O. Gaudoin Modeling and assessment of aging and efficiency of corrective and planned preventive maintenance IEEE Trans Reliab 60 4 2011 759 769
2. A.K.S. Jardine, D. Lin, and D. Banjevic A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance Mech Syst Signal Process 20 7 2006 1483 1510
3. R. Moghaddass, and M.J. Zuo A parameter estimation method for a condition-monitored device under multi-state deterioration Reliab Eng Syst Saf 106 2012 94 103
4. Z.S. Ye, L.C. Tang, and H.Y. Xu A distribution-based systems reliability model under extreme shocks and natural degradation IEEE Trans Reliab 60 1 2011 246 256
5. G. Picciolo, F. Galli, A. Biamonti, and P. Magni Determining the maximum periodic inspection interval for medium voltage motors using a Markov model Prod Plann Control 19 4 2008 356 364
6. M.J. Kim, V. Makis, and R. Jiang Parameter estimation for partially observable systems subject to random failure Appl Stochastic Models Bus Ind 29 3 2012 279 294
7. W. Kuo, and M. Zuo Optimal Reliability Modeling: Principles and Applications 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Hoboken, NJ
8. Z. Li, and K.C. Kapur Continuous-state reliability measures based on fuzzy sets IIE Trans (Institute of Industrial Engineering) 44 11 2012 1033 1044
9. C. Guo, W. Wang, B. Guo, and X. Si A maintenance optimization model for mission-oriented system based on Wiener degradation Reliab Eng Syst Saf 111 2013 188 194
10. J. Xue, and K. Yang Dynamic reliability analysis of coherent multistate systems IEEE Trans Reliab 44 4 1995 683 688
11. C.C. Huang, and J. Yuan A two-stage preventive maintenance policy for a multi-state deterioration system Reliab Eng Syst Saf 95 11 2010 1255 1260
12. I.W. Soro, M. Nourelfath, and D. At-Kadi Performance evaluation of multi-state degraded systems with minimal repairs and imperfect preventive maintenance Reliab Eng Syst Saf 95 2 2010 65 69
13. M. Dong, and D. He Hidden semi-Markov model-based methodology for multi-sensor equipment health diagnosis and prognosis Eur J Oper Res 178 3 2007 858 878 (Pubitemid 44765150)
14. R. Moghaddass, M. Zuo, and X. Zhao Modeling equipment with multi-state degradation with nonhomogeneous continuous-time hidden semi-Markov process Diagnostics Prognostics Eng Syst: Methods Tech 2013 151 181 (IGI Global)
15. R.H. Yeh State-age-dependent maintenance policies for deteriorating systems with Erlang sojourn time distributions Reliab Eng Syst Saf 58 1 1997 55 60 (Pubitemid 127400917)
16. G. Morcous, Z. Lounis, and M.S. Mirza Identification of environmental categories for Markovian deterioration models of bridge decks J Bridge Eng 8 6 2003 353 361 (Pubitemid 40265131)
17. M. Dong, and D. He A segmental hidden semi-Markov model (HSMM)-based diagnostics and prognostics framework and methodology Mech Syst Signal Process 21 5 2007 2248 2266 (Pubitemid 46566399)
18. J. Yang, J.Y. Yang, D. Zhang, and J.F. Lu Feature fusion: parallel strategy vs serial strategy Pattern Recognition 36 2003 1369 1381 (Pubitemid 36225872)
19. A. Ghasemi, S. Yacout, and M.S. Ouali Optimal condition based maintenance with imperfect information and the proportional hazards model Int J Prod Res 45 4 2007 989 1012
20. A. Blasi, J. Janssen, and R. Manca Numerical treatment of homogeneous and non-homogeneous semi-Markov reliability models, Communications in Statistics Theory Methods 33 3 2004 697 714
21. J. Chiquet, M. Eid, and N. Limnios Modeling and estimating the reliability of stochastic dynamic systems with Markovian switching Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93 12 2008 1801 1808
22. I.T. Yu, and C.D. Fuh Estimation of time to hard failure distributions using a three-stage method IEEE Trans Reliab 59 2 2010 405 412
23. Jiang L, Feng Q, Coit DW. Reliability analysis for dependent failure processes and dependent failure threshold. In: Proceedings of international conference on quality, reliability, risk, maintenance, and safety engineering, ICQR2MSE'11; 2011. p. 30-4.
24. F. Wang, F. Sun, and B.G. Cao Feature fusion of mechanical faults based on evolutionary computation Insight Non-Destr Test Cond Monit 49 8 2007 471 475 (Pubitemid 47316427)
25. Z. Shen, Z. He, X. Chen, C. Sun, and Z. Liu A monotonic degradation assessment index of rolling bearings using fuzzy support vector data description and running time Sensors 12 8 2012 10109 10135
26. X. Zhao, M.J. Zuo, and T. Patel Application of fuzzy preference based rough set model to condition monitoring Lect Notes Comput Sci 6086 2010 688 697 ([including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics, LNAI])
27. M. Gen, and Y. Yun Soft computing approach for reliability optimization: State-of-the-art survey Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91 9 2006 1008 1026 (Pubitemid 43975761)
28. Saxena A, Goebel K.C-MAPSS Data Set, NASA Ames Prognostics Data Repository. Moffett Field, CA, NASA Ames. 〈http://ti.arc.nasa.gov/project/ prognostic-data-repository〉; 2008.
29. Saxena A, Goebel K, Simon D, Eklund N. Damage propagation modeling for aircraft engine run-to-failure simulation. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on prognostics and health management (PHM08), Denver CO; 2008.
30. T. Boutros, and M. Liang Detection and diagnosis of bearing and cutting tool faults using hidden Markov models Mech Syst Signal Process 25 6 2011 2102 2124
31. Q. He, R. Yan, F. Kong, and R. Du Machine condition monitoring using principal component representations Mech Syst Signal Process 23 2 2009 446 466
32. A. Malhi, and R.X. Gao PCA-based feature selection scheme for machine defect classification IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 53 6 2004 1517 1525
33. C.T. Yiakopoulos, K.C. Gryllias, and I.A. Antoniadis Rolling element bearing fault detection in industrial environments based on a K-means clustering approach Expert Syst Appl 38 3 2011 2888 2911
34. S. Yue, and P. Pilon A comparison of the power of the t test, Mann-Kendall and bootstrap tests for trend detection Hydrol Sci J 49 1 2004 21 38 (Pubitemid 38231723)
35. E.J. Ward A review and comparison of four commonly used Bayesian and maximum likelihood model selection tools Ecol Modeling 211 1-2 2008 1 10
36. A. Berg, R. Meyer, and J. Yu The DIC as a Model Comparison Criterion for Stochastic Volatility Models J Bus Econ Stat 22 1 2004 107 120 (Pubitemid 38148394)
37. Li D, Biem A, Subrahmonia J. HMM topology optimization for handwriting recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing, ICASSP; 2001. p. 1521-24. (Pubitemid 32838885)
38. Park MN Ha, JY. Model selection criterion using confusion models for HMM topology optimization. In: SICE-ICASE international joint conference, Art. no. 4109104; 2006. p. 1004-8.