Estimating the likelihood of pipeline failure in CO2 transmission pipelines: New insights on risks of carbon capture and storage

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

Volumn 21, Issue , 2014, Pages 49-60

  Duncan, Ian J ^a   Wang, Hui ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Carbon capture and storage; Incident rate; Risk analysis

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; DIGITAL STORAGE; FAILURE (MECHANICAL); GASES; NATURAL GAS; NATURAL GAS PIPELINES; PIPE LININGS; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK PERCEPTION; TRANSMISSIONS;

ACCIDENTAL RELEASE; CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGES (CCS); FACTORS OF SAFETIES; INCIDENT RATES; NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION PIPELINE; ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE; PIPELINE FAILURES; TRANSMISSION PIPELINES;

CARBON CAPTURE;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; ESTIMATION METHOD; NATURAL GAS; PIPELINE; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84890941387     PISSN: 17505836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Acton M.R., Baldwin P.J. Ignition probability for high pressure gas transmission pipelines. Proc. 7th International Pipeline Conference, v. 4 2008, 331.
2. ASME Gas transmission and distribution piping systems, ASME B31.8 2001.
3. ASME Managing system integrity of gas pipelines, ASME Code for Pressure Piping, B31 Supplement to ASME B31.8S 2004.
4. Barrie J., Brown K., Hatcher P.R., Schellhase H.U. Carbon dioxide pipelines: a preliminary review of design and risk. Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, v. 7 2004.
5. 2 pipeline integrity: a new evaluation methodology. Energy Proc. 2010, GHGT-10.
6. CERCDC Geologic Carbon Sequestration Strategies, Committee Workshop 2010, California Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission. http://www.energy.ca.gov/2007_energypolicy/documents/2007-10-01_workshop/2007-10-01_TRANSCRIPT.PDF.
7. 2 surface leakage at geologic carbon sequestration sites. Energy Proc. 2009, 1(1):1925-1932.
8. Connolly S., Cusco L. Hazards from high pressure carbon dioxide releases. Loss Prevent & Safety Perform in Process: Ind. Symposium, IChemE Symposium Series, v. 153 2007, 1-5.
9. Cosham A., Eiber R. Fracture control in carbon dioxide pipelines. J. Pipeline Eng. 2007, (3rd quarter):147-158.
10. Cowan I. Dense gas dispersion for LNG plant. . . some recent findings 2012, Presentation 18th October. http://ukelg.ps.ic.ac.uk/49IC.pdf.
11. 2 by pipeline for carbon capture and storage purposes. PTC 6th Pipeline Technology Conference 2011, http://www.pipeline-conference.com/abstracts/technical-challenges-facing-transport-anthropogenic-co2-pipeline-carbon-capture-and.
12. 2 quality recommendations. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2008, 2(4):478-484.
13. 2 pipelines 2010, Det Norske Veritas, Recommended Practice DNV-RP-J202, April.
14. 2 2006, (Chapter 4, IPCC Report).
15. DOE Mountaineer Project EIS 2012.
16. 2 migration at candidate CCS sites in the U.S. Energy Proc. 2011, 4:2222-2229.
17. 2 Pipeline Networks, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Report, PNNL-17381 2008, http://www.pnnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL-17381.pdf.
18. 2 pipelines in North America 2013, (to be submitted).
19. EGIG Gas Pipeline Incidents, 8th Report of the European Gas Pipeline Incident Data Group 2011, http://www.egig.eu/uploads/bestanden/96652994-c9af-4612-8467-9bc6c2ed3fb3.
20. EI Technical Guidance on Hazard Analysis or Onshore Carbon Capture Installations and Onshore Pipelines 2010, Energy Institute, London. http://www.energyinstpubs.org.uk/.
21. Esteves V., Morgado C., 2012. Carbon Capture and Storage - Technologies and Risk Management, Chapter 11. In: S. Khan (Ed.), Fossil Fuel and the Environment. http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/32337/InTech-Carbon_capture_and_storage_ccs_technologies_and_risk_management.pdf.
22. 2 - safety and economic considerations. Energy 2004, 29(9-10):1319-1328.
23. Goodfellow G., Haswell J. A comparison of inherent risk levels in ASME B31. 8 and UK gas pipeline design codes, IPC2006-10507. International Pipeline Conference, Calgary 2006.
24. GRI Natural Gas Transmission Pipelines: Integrity, Prevention, & Mitigation Practices, prepared by Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection Company, Gas Research Institute Report, GRI-00/0193 2000.
25. 2 Capture, Storage and Utilization 2009, http://rd.tetratech.com/climatechange/projects/doc/SPE_CCS_Conference_2_4_November_2009_V4.pdf.
26. 2. Second National Conference on Carbon Sequestration 2003, 5-8.
27. 2 CRC, Report No. RPT05-0108 2005, Melbourne, Australia.
28. Hopkins H., et al. Pipeline risk assessment: new guidelines. WTIA/APIA Welded Pipeline Symposium 2009.
29. HSE Reducing Risks, Protecting People 2001, UK Health and Safety Executive, London, Report R2P2.
30. 2 Capture and Storage: Issues and Challenges, Report to INGAA Foundation. IPCC, 2005. Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage 2009, Cambridge University Press.
31. 2, DNV, report number 2008-1993 2009.
32. Johnson N., Ogden J. Detailed Spatial Modeling of Carbon Capture and Storage Infrastructure Deployment in the Southwestern United States 2011, http://steps.ucdavis.edu/Events/2011-steps-symposium/posters/Johnson%20-%20Jan2011.pdf.
33. Kaufman K.-D. Carbon Dioxide Transport in Pipelines - Under Special Consideration of Safety-Related Aspects 2008.
34. Kiefner J. Pipeline Integrity Basics, Presentation June 22, 2011 2011, http://springcreekhomesteading.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/pipeline-integrity-basics-kiefner.pdf.
35. 2 pipelines. J. Pipeline Eng. 2010, 9(4):253-264.
36. 2 pipelines. Energy Proc. 2009, 1:1587-1594.
37. 2 transport by pipelines - a review of uncertainties and their impacts. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 177:12-27.
38. 2 Pipelines 2012, UK Health and Safety Laboratory. http://www.sieso.org.uk/Comah18_Lisbona_CO2.ppt.
39. 2 pipelines. Proceedings of Brazilian Petroleum, Gas and Biofuels Institute Brazilian Petroleum 2011, 1-10. Brazilian Petroleum, Gas and Biofuels Institute, Rio de Jeneior, Brazil.
40. Mahgerefteh H., Saha P., Economou I.G. A study of the dynamic response of emergency shutdown valves following full bore rupture of gas pipelines. Proc. Safety Environ. Protect. 1997, 75(4):201-209.
41. 2 transportation within CCS projects, CFD modelling. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2011, 5(4):816-825.
42. Mazzoldi A., et al. Simulation-based estimates of safety distances for pipeline transportation of carbon dioxide. Greenh. Gas Sci. Technol. 2012, 2:1-18.
43. McGillivray A., Wilday J. Comparison of risks from carbon dioxide and natural gas pipelines 2009, Health and Safety Laboratory, Health and Safety Executive, HSE, Books, Sudbury, Suffolk, Research Report RR749.
44. Mohitpour M., et al. Pipeline Transportation of Carbon Dioxide Containing Impurities, ASME E-Book 2012, 10.1115/1.859834.
45. 2 pipelines. Energy Proc. 2011, 4:2301-2307.
46. Morrow T.B., Bass R.L., Lock J.A. A LPG pipeline break flow model. J. Energy Res. Technol. 1983, 105:379-387.
47. NEB National Engineering Board, Reasons for Decision 1998, October, Souris Valley Pipeline Limited, Calgary, Canada, MH-1-98.
48. Neele F., et al. Large-scale CCS transport and storage networks in North-west and Central Europe, GHGT-10 2010.
49. Neurert U. Special considerations related to the quantitative risk assessment (QRA) of gas transmission pipelines, 3R International, Special Issue Pipeline Integrity 2011, http://www.ilf.com/fileadmin/user_upload/publikationen/3R_Special-Edition-1-2011_Editorial_CO2_QRA_AHF_Kaufmann_Neunert.pdf.
50. NRC Improving Risk Communication 1989, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
51. NRC Alerting America Effective Risk Communication - Summary of a Forum 2003, October 31, 2002, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
52. Nyman D.J., et al. Task 3: Assess Carbon Dioxide Transportation Options in the Illinois Basin, U.S. DOE Contract: DE-FC26-03NT41994 2004, October 1, 2003-September 30, 2004.
53. PHMSA The State of the National Pipeline Infrastructure 2010, U.S. Department of Transportation. http://opsweb.phmsa.dot.gov/pipelineforum/docs/Secretarys%20Infrastructure%20Report_Revised%20per%20PHC_103111.pdf.
54. 2. Carbon Dioxide Capture for Storage in Deep Geologic Formations 2005, vol. 2:937-953. Elsevier Ltd, Oxford, UK.
55. Snyder S., et al. Canada's Fossil Energy Future: The Way Forward on Carbon Capture and Storage Report to: The Minister of Alberta Energy and The Minister of Natural Resources Canada 2008, http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/sites/www.nrcan.gc.ca/files/pdf/com/resoress/publications/fosfos/fosfos-eng.pdf.
56. TetraTech Final Risk Assessment Report for the FutureGen Project Environmental Impact Statement 2007, Lafayette, CA, USA.
57. Trabucchi C., et al. Valuation of Human Health and Ecological Risks Arising from Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Final Study Observations 2012, Industrial Economics, Inc., Unpublished Report.
58. 2 sequestration pipeline: a methodology & case study. Greenh. Gas Control Technol. 2006, 8. Trondheim.
59. URS Carbon Dioxide Pipeline Risk Analysis, HECA Project Site Kern County, California, Appendix E. Prepared for Hydrogen Energy International LLC, Long Beach, CA 2009, http://www.energy.ca.gov/sitingcases/hydrogen_energy/documents/08-AFC-8/applicant/revised_afc/Volume_II/Appendix%20E.pdf.
60. Vendrig M., Spouge J., Bird A., Daycock J., Johnsen O. Risk analysis of the geological sequestration of carbon dioxide. Department of Trade and Industry's Cleaner Coal Tech Transfer Programme 2003.
61. 2 release and risk assessment: a review. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2012, 26:573-578.
62. Wade S., Trabucchi C. Understanding potential GS risk: a multi-disciplinary framework to foster responsible stewardship. Energy Proc. 2009, 1:4567-4573.
63. Wang H., Duncan I.J. Causes and consequences of focused leakage and rupture of US natural gas transmission pipelines. J. Loss Prevent. Process Ind. 2013, (submitted for publication).