Quantitative risk assessment of CO2 transport by pipelines-A review of uncertainties and their impacts

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 177, Issue 1-3, 2010, Pages 12-27

  Koornneef, Joris ^a   Spruijt, Mark ^b   Molag, Menso ^b   Ramírez, Andrea ^a   Turkenburg, Wim ^a   Faaij, André ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b TNO   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Carbon capture and storage; Carbon dioxide pipelines; CO2 transport; Quantitative risk assessment; Uncertainty analysis

Indexed keywords

CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE; CURRENT PRACTICES; DISPERSION MODELS; DOSE EFFECTS; FAILURE RATE; GOOD PRACTICES; IMPACT MODEL; INDIVIDUAL RISKS; JET DIAMETER; KNOWLEDGE GAPS; LITERATURE REVIEWS; MASS FRACTION; METEOROLOGICAL CONDITION; ORIFICE SIZE; PIPELINE PRESSURES; QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT; SOURCES OF UNCERTAINTY; SYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT;

CARBON DIOXIDE; DISPERSIONS; LEAKAGE (FLUID); PIPELINES; PRESSURE EFFECTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; RISK PERCEPTION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; GAS PIPELINE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ACCURACY; ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION; CARBON DIOXIDE TRANSPORT; CARBON STORAGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; HEALTH HAZARD; METEOROLOGICAL PHENOMENA; METEOROLOGY; PIPELINE; PROBABILITY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TEMPERATURE SENSITIVITY; UNCERTAINTY; VALIDATION PROCESS; VAPOR;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CHEMICAL HAZARD RELEASE; INHALATION EXPOSURE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 77749251959     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.11.068     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. IPCC IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage 2005, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom/New York, NY, USA, p. 442.
2. Kelliher J.T. Testimony of the Honorable Joseph T. Kelliher Chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 2008, Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of United States Senate.
3. 2 Transport, Health and Safety Issues 2008.
4. 2 and their environmental effects. Energy Convers. Manage. 1997, 38(Suppl. (1)):S279-S286.
5. TetraTech, Final Risk Assessment Report for the FutureGen Project Environmental Impact Statement, Lafayette, CA, USA, 2007.
6. 2 Storage Assessment 2005, CO2CRC, Melbourne, Australia.
7. 2-pipeline rupture. Energy Convers. Manage. 1996, 37(6-8):1013-1018.
8. 2 sequestration pipeline: a methodology & case study. Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies 8 2006.
9. Vendrig M., Spouge J., Bird A., Daycock J., Johnsen O. Risk Analysis of the Geological Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide 2003, Department of Trade and Industry, London, UK.
10. Cameron-Cole, Air dispersion modelling of well blowout and pipeline rupture scenarios. Salt Creek field, in: RETEC, EDM International Inc., Centennial Archaeology Inc., Cedar Creek Associates Inc., BKS Environmental Associates Inc. (Eds.), Environmental Assessment Howell Petroleum Phase III/IV CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery Project: Salt Creek Oil Field, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Casper Field Office, 2005.
11. Lievense, OCAP CO2 v.o.f. CO2 Greengas project - Risico analyse NPM-leiding document 042282 rev. 3, Raadgevend Ingenieursbureau Lievense B.V., Breda, 2005.
12. M. Molag, I.M.E. Raben, Externe veiligheid onderzoek CO2 buisleiding bij Zoetermeer, TNO, Apeldoorn, 2006, p. 46.
13. 2 in Barendrecht 2008, Tebodin, The Hague, Netherlands. Haskoning (Ed.).
14. NEB Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Souris Valley Pipeline Limited 1998, National Energy Board, Calgary, Canada.
15. J.J. Heinrich, H.J. Herzog, D.M. Reiner, Environmental assessment of geologic storage of CO2, MIT LFEE Report, 2004.
16. 2 storage-overview of mechanisms and current knowledge. Clim. Change 2006, 74(1):289-318.
17. Barrie J., Brown K., Hatcher P.R., Schellhase H.U. Carbon dioxide pipelines: a preliminary review of design and risk. Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies 7 2004.
18. CPR Guidelines for Quantitative Risk Assessment-The 'Purple Book' 1999, Committee for the Prevention of Disasters (CPR), VROM, RIVM, The Hague, Netherlands.
19. CPR 'Yellow Book' Methods for the Calculation of Physical Effects-Due to Releases of Hazardous Materials (Liquids and Gases) 2005, Committee for the Prevention of Disasters (CPR), VROM, TNO, The Hague.
20. TNO TNO Safety Software EFFECTS Version 7 User and Reference Manual 2007, TNO Built Environment & Geosciences, Department of Industrial and External Safety, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
21. Ermak D.L. User's Manual for SLAB: An Atmospheric Dispersion Model for Denser-than Air Releases 1990, Physics Department, Atmospheric and Geophysical Sciences Division, University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore.
22. Harris R.J., Acton M.R. Development and implementation of risk assessment methods for natural gas pipelines. CHINA GAS 2001 International Conference with Special Focus on Gas Safety 2001.
23. 2-safety and economic considerations. Energy 2004, 29(9-10):1319-1328.
24. Dorling D.V. Analysis of Reportable Incidents for Natural Gas Transmission and Gathering Lines 1970-1984 1990, American Gas Association, Battelle Memorial Institute.
25. PHMSA, Hazardous liquid accident data, Last updated: 06/13/2008, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Office of Pipeline Safety, available at: , 2008. http://ops.dot.gov/stats/IA98.htm.
26. 2 quality recommendations. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2008, 2(4):478-484.
27. A. Oosterkamp, J. Ramsen, P.N. Seevam, J. Race, M. Downie, Pipeline transport of CO2 with impurities-a state of the art review, 2007.
28. DIPPR, DIPPR 801 Database v21.13, Design Institute for Physical Properties, 2007.
29. Azreg-Aïnou M. Low-temperature data for carbon dioxide. Monatsh. Chem. 2005, 136:2017-2027.
30. Morrow T.B., Bass R.L., Lock J.A. A LPG pipeline break flow model. J. Energy Res. Technol. 1983, 105:379-387.
31. Kukkonen J. Modelling Source Terms for the Atmospheric Dispersion of Hazardous Substances 1990, Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters, Helsinki, 111 pp. + app.
32. RIVM, Achtergronden bij de vervanging van zoneringafstanden hoge druk aardgastransportleidingen van de N.V. Nederlandse Gasunie, Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (RIVM), 2008.
33. Britter R.E. Atmospheric dispersion of dense gases. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 1989, 21(1):317-344.
34. DNV Flashing Liquid Jets and Two-phase Dispersion-A Review 2002, Det Norske Veritas, London.
35. NTSB Pipeline Accident Report. Natural Gas Pipeline Rupture and Fire Near Carlsbad, New Mexico August 19, 2000 2003, National Transportation Safety Board, Washington.
36. H.N. Duckworth, R. Eiber, Assessment of pipeline integrity of Kinder-Morgan conversion of the Rancho pipeline, Austin, TX, 2004.
37. Bartenev A.M., Gelfand B.E., Makhviladze G.M., Roberts J.P. Statistical analysis of accidents on the Middle Asia-Centre gas pipelines. J. Hazard. Mater. 1996, 46(1):57-69.
38. Bricard P., Friedel L. Two-phase jet dispersion. J. Hazard. Mater. 1998, 59(2-3):287-310.
39. Witlox H.W.M., Harper M., Oke A. Modelling and Validation of Discharge and Atmospheric Dispersion for Carbon Dioxide Releases 2008, DNV Software, London/College Station, TX.
40. Xu J.Q., Weir G., Paterson L., Black I., Sharma S. A case study of a carbon dioxide well test. APPEA J. 2007, Part 1:237-248.
41. Calay R.K., Holdo A.E. Modelling the dispersion of flashing jets using CFD. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 154(1-3):1198-1209.
42. Gebbeken B., Eggers R. Blowdown of carbon dioxide from initially supercritical conditions. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 1996, 9(4):285-293.
43. Witlox H., Harper M., Bowen P., Cleary V. Flashing liquid jets and two-phase droplet dispersion. II. Comparison and validation of droplet size and rainout formulations. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 142(3):797-809.
44. Connolly S., Cusco L. Hazards from high pressure carbon dioxide releases during carbon dioxide sequestration processes. International Symposium on Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries 2007.
45. 2 buisleiding bij Zoetermeer 2008, TNO, Utrecht, p. 17.
46. 2 transportation for carbon capture and storage: sublimation of carbon dioxide from a dry ice bank. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2008, 2(2):210-218.
47. 2 transportation facilities. 9th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-9) 2008, Elsevier - Energy Procedia.
48. Halpern P., Raskin Y., Sorkine P., Oganezov A. Exposure to extremely high concentrations of carbon dioxide: a clinical description of a mass casualty incident. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2004, 43(2):196-199.
49. Hsieh C.-C., Shih C.-L., Fang C.-C., Chen W.-J., Lee C.-C. Carbon dioxide asphyxiation caused by special-effect dry ice in an election campaign. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2005, 23(4):567.
50. National Research Council Carbon dioxide. Emergency and Continuous Exposure Guidance Levels for Selected Submarine Contaminants 2004, 37-53. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, (Chapter 3). Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology (Ed.).
51. National Research Council Carbon dioxide. Spacecraft Maximum Allowable Concentrations for Selected Airborne Contaminants 1996, vol. 2:105-188. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, (Chapter B3).
52. 2 2004, EPRI.
53. Benson S.M., Hepple R., Apps J., Tsang C.F., Lippmann M. Lessons Learned from Natural and Industrial Analogues for Storage of Carbon Dioxide in Deep Geological Formations 2002, Earth Sciences Division, E.O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, p. 135.
54. 2 levels on human and animal health. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. (CMLS) 1982, 38(10):1163-1168.
55. 2 from the geosphere and their bearing on the geological storage of carbon dioxide. Energy 2007, 32(7):1194-1201.
56. Hundseid H., Ingebrigtsen K.O. Human Resistance Against Thermal Effects, Explosion Effects, Toxic Effects and Obscuration of Vision 2001, DNV Technica, Scandpower.
57. 2 Capture and Storage Project (CCP) for Carbon Dioxide Storage in Deep Geologic Formations for Climate Change Mitigation 2005, vol. 2: Geologic Storage of Carbon Dioxide with Monitoring and Verification:1143-1172. Elsevier Publishing, Oxford, UK.
58. VROM, Interventiewaarden gevaarlijke stoffen 2007, Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieu, Den Haag, 2008.
59. VROM, Circulaire 'Zonering langs hogedruk aardgas-transportleidingen', Ministerie van VROM, Den Haag, the Netherlands, 1984.
60. Hopkins P., Fletcher R., Palmer-Jones R. A method for the monitoring and management of pipeline risk-a simple pipeline risk audit (SPRA). 3rd Annual Conference on 'Advances in Pipeline Technologies & Rehabilitation '99' 1999.
61. Corder I. The application of risk techniques to the design and operation of pipelines. IMechE Conference on 'Pressure Systems: Operation, and Risk Management' 1995.
62. Muhlbauer W.K. Enhanced Pipeline Risk Assessment. Part 1. Probability of Failure Assessments 2006, WKM Consultancy.
63. Vlek C. Environmental versus individual risk taking: perception, decision, behaviour. Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology 2004, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
64. VROM, Regeling externe veiligheid inrichtingen, 2009.
65. Refsgaard J.C., van der Sluijs J.P., Højberg A.L., Vanrolleghem P.A. Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process-a framework and guidance. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2007, 22(11):1543-1556.
66. Mazzoldi A., Hill T., Colls J.J. CFD and Gaussian atmospheric dispersion models: a comparison within leakages from carbon dioxide transportation and storage facilities. Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42(34):8046-8054.
67. HSE The Health and Safety Risks and Regulatory Strategy Related to Energy Developments 2006, Health and Safety Executive, London.