Conceptual models for co2 release and risk assessment: A review

Chemical Engineering Transactions

Volumn 26, Issue , 2012, Pages 573-578

  Vianello, Chiara ^a   MacChietto, Sandro ^b   Maschio, Giuseppe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; RISK ANALYSIS;

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; CONCEPTUAL MODEL; CURRENT MODELS; STATE OF THE ART;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84864445170     PISSN: 22839216     EISSN: 22839216     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3303/CET1226096     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. CPR, 2005a. Committee for the Prevention of Disasters, 'Yellow Book' Methods for the Calculation of Physical Effects-Due t Releases of Hazardous Materials (Liquids and Gases), VROM, TNO Hague,The Netherlands.
2. CPR, 2005b. Committee for the Prevention of Disasters, 'Purple Book', VROM, TNO Hague, The Netherlands
3. EGIG, 2007. European Gas pipeline Incident data Group 7th Report, , Accessed 30/04/2011.
4. Ermak D.L., 1990. User's Manual for SLAB: An Atmospheric Dispersion Model for Denser-than Air Releases, Physics Department, Atmospheric and Geophysical Sciences Division, University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, United States.
5. Hooper B., Murray L., Gibson-Poole C., 2005, Latrobe Valley CO2 Storage Assessment, CO2 CRC, Report Report No: RPT05-0108 Melbourne, Australia. HSE-Health and Safety Executive, London, UK, Comparison of risk from carbon dioxide and natural gas pipelines, Research report RR749, 2009.
6. IPCC, 2005. IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom/New York, NY, USA, 2005.
7. Kadnar J.O., 2008. Experience in CO2 transportation via pipeline, in:CCS Web Conference on CO2 Transport, Health and Safety Issues, International Energy Agency, Paris, France.
8. Kelliher J.T., 2008. Testimony of the Honorable Joseph T. Kelliher Chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Committee on energy and Natural Resources of United States Senate.
9. Koornneef J., Spruijt M., Molag M., Ramez A., Faaij A., Turkenburg W., 2009, Uncertainties in risk assessment of CO2 pipelines, Energy Procedia, 1, 1587-1594.
10. Koornneef J., Spruijt M., Molag M., Ramez A., Turkenburg W., Faaij A., 2010, Quantitative risk assessment of CO2 transport by pipelines-A review of uncertainties and their impacts, Journal of Hazardous Material, 177, 12-27.
11. Kruse H., Tekiela M., 1996. Calculating the consequences of a CO2-pipeline rupture, Energy Convers. Mgmt, 37 (6-8), 1013-1018. (Pubitemid 126356681)
12. Mazzoldi A., Hill T., Colls J.J., 2011. Assesing the risk for CO2 transportation within CCS projects, CFD modelling. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 5(4), 816-825.
13. NEB, 1998. National Engineering Board, Reasons for decision, Souris Valley Pipeline Limited, MH-1-98, October 1998 Calgary, Canada
14. NIOSH, 2007. NIOSH pocket guide to chemical hazards, September 2007, US Department of Health and Human Services (NIOSH) Publication No. 2005-149, Washington, USA
15. Turner ,R., Hardy, N., Hooper, B., 2006, Quantifying the risks to the public associated with a CO2 sequestration pipeline: A methodology & case study, in: Proc. of Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies 8, Trondheim, Norway.
16. Vendrig, M., Spouge, J., Bird, A., Daycock, J., Johnsen, O., 2003. In: Crown (Ed.), Risk Analysis of the Geological Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide. Department of Trade and Industry's Cleaner Coal Tech. Transfer Programme, Report R246 DTI/Pub URN 03/1320., DNV Consulting, London, UK.