Avoidance of reproductive interference causes resource partitioning in bean beetle females

Population Ecology

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 73-80

  Kishi, Shigeki ^a   Tsubaki, Yoshitaka ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Callosobruchus; Interspecific competition; Resource competition; Resource specialization

Indexed keywords

AVOIDANCE REACTION; BEETLE; FEMALE BEHAVIOR; FITNESS; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; NICHE PARTITIONING; OVIPOSITION; SPECIALIZATION;

CALLOSOBRUCHUS; CALLOSOBRUCHUS CHINENSIS; CALLOSOBRUCHUS MACULATUS; COLEOPTERA;

EID: 84890878282     PISSN: 14383896     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10144-013-0390-5     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Avidov Z, Berlinger MJ, Applebaum SW (1965) Physiological aspects of host specificity in the Bruchidae: III. Effect of curvature and surface area on oviposition of Callosobruchus chinensis L. Anim Behav 13: 178-180.
2. Begon M, Harper JL, Townsend CR (2006) Ecology: from individuals to ecosystems, 4th edn. Blackwell Publishing, Malden.
3. Bellows TS, Hassell MP (1984) Models for interspecific competition in laboratory populations of Callosobruchus spp. J Anim Ecol 53: 831-848.
4. Crowder DW, Horowitz AR, Breslauer H, Rippa M, Kontsedalov S, Ghanim M, Carrière Y (2011) Niche partitioning and stochastic processes shape community structure following whitefly invasions. Basic Appl Ecol 12: 685-694.
5. Forister ML (2004) Oviposition preference and larval performance within a diverging lineage of lycaenid butterflies. Ecol Entomol 29: 264-272.
6. Fox CW (1993) A quantitative genetic analysis of oviposition preference and larval performance on two hosts in the bruchid beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus. Evolution 47: 166-175.
7. Gröning J, Hochkirch A (2008) Reproductive interference between animal species. Q Rev Biol 83: 257-282.
8. Hochkirch A, Gröning J, Bücker A (2007) Sympatry with the devil: reproductive interference could hamper species coexistence. J Anim Ecol 76: 633-642.
9. Ishii S (1952) Studies of the host preference of the cowpea weevil (Callosobruchus chinensis L.). Bull Nat Inst Agr Sci Ser C 1: 185-256.
10. Kishi S, Nakazawa T (2013) Analysis of species coexistence co-mediated by resource competition and reproductive interference. Popul Ecol 55: 305-313.
11. Kishi S, Nishida T, Tsubaki Y (2009) Reproductive interference determines persistence and exclusion in species interactions. J Anim Ecol 78: 1043-1049.
12. Konuma J, Chiba S (2007) Ecological character displacement caused by reproductive interference. J Theor Biol 247: 354-364.
13. Kuno E (1992) Competitive exclusion through reproductive interference. Res Popul Ecol 34: 275-284.
14. Kyogoku D, Nishida T (2012) The presence of heterospecific males causes an Allee effect. Popul Ecol 54: 391-395.
15. Kyogoku D, Nishida T (2013) The mechanism of the fecundity reduction in Callosobruchus maculatus caused by Callosobruchus chinensis males. Popul Ecol 55: 87-93.
16. Liu S-S, De Barro PJ, Xu J, Luan J-B, Zang L-S, Ruan Y-M, Wan F-H (2007) Asymmetric mating interactions drive widespread invasion and displacement in a whitefly. Science 318: 1769-1772.
17. Miyatake T, Matsumura F (2004) Intra-specific variation in female remating in Callosobruchus chinensis and C. maculatus. J Insect Physiol 50: 403-408.
18. Noriyuki S, Osawa N, Nishida T (2011) Prey capture performance in hatchlings of two sibling Harmonia ladybird species in relation to maternal investment through sibling cannibalism. Ecol Entomol 36: 282-289.
19. Noriyuki S, Osawa N, Nishida T (2012) Asymmetric reproductive interference between specialist and generalist predatory ladybirds. J Anim Ecol 81: 1077-1085.
20. Ohsaki N, Sato Y (1994) Food plant choice of Pieris butterflies as a trade-off between parasitoid avoidance and quality of plants. Ecology 75: 59-68.
21. Okuzaki Y, Takami Y, Sota T (2010) Resource partitioning or reproductive isolation: the ecological role of body size differences among closely related species in sympatry. J Anim Ecol 79: 383-392.
22. R Development Core Team (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
23. Ribeiro JMC, Spielman A (1986) The satyr effect: a model predicting parapatry and species extinction. Am Nat 128: 513-528.
24. Runquist RB, Stanton ML (2013) Asymmetric and frequency-dependent pollinator-mediated interactions may influence competitive displacement in two vernal pool plants. Ecol Lett 16: 183-190.
25. Schoener TW (1974) Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185: 27-39.
26. Shinoda K, Yoshida T (1990) Life history of the azuki bean weevil, Callosobruchus chinensis L. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae), in the field. In: Fujii K, Gatehouse AMR, Johnson CD, Mitchel R, Yoshida T (eds) Bruchids and legumes: economics, ecology and coevolution, Series Entomologica. Springer, Netherlands, pp 149-159.
27. Soederbaeck B (1994) Reproductive interference between two co-occurring crayfish species, Astacus astacus L. and Pacifastacus leniusculus Dana. Nord J Freshwat Res 69: 137-143.
28. Takafuji A, Kuno E, Fujimoto H (1997) Reproductive interference and its consequences for the competitive interactions between two closely related Panonychus spider mites. Exp Appl Acarol 21: 379-391.
29. Takakura K-I, Fujii S (2010) Reproductive interference and salinity tolerance differentiate habitat use between two alien cockleburs: Xanthiumoccidentale and X. italicum (Compositae). Plant Ecol 206: 309-319.
30. Takakura K-I, Nishida T, Matsumoto T, Nishida S (2009) Alien dandelion reduces the seed-set of a native congener through frequency-dependent and one-sided effects. Biol Invasions 11: 973-981.
31. Thompson JN (1988) Coevolution and alternative hypotheses on insect/plant interactions. Ecology 69: 893-895.
32. Thum AR (2007) Reproductive interference, priority effects and the maintenance of parapatry in Skistodiaptomus copepods. Oikos 116: 759-768.
33. Toquenaga Y (1993) Contest and scramble competitions in Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) II. Larval competition and interference mechanisms. Res Popul Ecol 35: 57-68.
34. Toquenaga Y, Fujii K (1991) Contest and scramble competitions in Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Res Popul Ecol 33: 199-211.
35. Umeya K (1987) Biology of bruchid beetles. Tsukiji Shokan, Tokyo.
36. Utida S (1953) Interspecific competition between two species of bean weevil. Ecology 34: 301-307.
37. Wasserman SS (1986) Genetic variation in adaptation to foodplants among populations of the southern cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus: Evolution of oviposition preference. Entomol Exp Appl 42: 201-212.
38. Watanabe N (1985) Comparative studies on ecology of the azuki bean weevil, Callosobruchuschinensis (L.) and the cowpea weevil, C. maculatus (E.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). II. Relation between female body size and degree of creeping into the stored pile of seeds. Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool 29: 107-112 (in Japanese with English summary).
39. Yoshida T (1966) Studies on the interspecific competition between bean weevils. Mem Fac Lib Arts Educ Univ Miyazaki 20: 59-98.
40. Yoshimura J, Clark CW (1994) Population dynamics of sexual and resource competition. Theor Popul Biol 45: 121-131.