Oviposition preference and larval performance within a diverging lineage of lycaenid butterflies

Ecological Entomology

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 264-272

  Forister, Matthew L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecological speciation; Lycaenidae; Mitoura; Performance; Preference; Specialisation; Sympatric speciation

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; DIVERGENCE; GENE FLOW; LARVAL DEVELOPMENT; OVIPOSITION; PARAPATRY; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SYMPATRY;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

CALOCEDRUS DECURRENS; LEPIDOPTERA; LYCAENIDAE; MITOURA; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 2942620521     PISSN: 03076946     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0307-6946.2004.00596.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Berlocher, S.H. & Feder, J.L. (2002) Sympatric speciation in phytophagous insects: moving beyond controversy? Annual Review of Entomology, 47, 773-815.
2. Boughman, J.W. (2002) How sensory drive can promote speciation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17, 571-576.
3. Caillaud, M.C. & Via, S. (2000) Specialized feeding behavior influences both ecological specialization and assortative mating in sympatric host races of pea aphids. American Naturalist, 156, 606-621.
4. Capy, P., Veuille, M., Paillette; M., Jallon, J., Vouidibio, J. & David, J.R. (2000) Sexual isolation of genetically differentiated sympatric populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Brassaville, Congo: the first step towards speciation? Heredity, 84, 468-475.
5. Conover, W.J. (1999) Practical Nonparametric Statistics. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
6. Courtney, S.P. & Kibota, T.T. (1990) Mother doesn't know best: selection of hosts by ovipositing insects. Insect-Plant Interactions (ed. by E. A. Bernays), pp. 161-188. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
7. Craig, T.P. & Ohgushi, T. (2002) Preference and performance are correlated in the spittlebug Aphrophora pectoralis on four species of willow. Ecological Entomology, 27, 529-540.
8. Dethier, V.G. (1952) Evolution of feeding preferences in phytophagous insects. Evolution, 8, 33-54.
9. Diehl, S.R. & Bush, G.L. (1989) The role of habitat preference in adaptation and speciation. Speciation and its Consequences (ed. by D. Otte and J. A. Endler), pp. 345-365. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
10. Dobzhansky, T. (1951) Genetics and the Origin of Species, 3rd edn. Columbia University Press, New York.
11. Downey, J.C. (1962) Host-plant relations as data for butterfly classification. Systematic Zoology, 11, 150-159.
12. Drès, M. & Mallet, J. (2002) Host races in plant-feeding insects and their importance in sympatric speciation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 357, 471-192.
13. Feder, J.L. (1998) The apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella: flies in the face of conventional wisdom about speciation? Endless Forms: Species and Speciation (ed. by D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher), pp. 130-144. Oxford University Press, New York.
14. Fordyce, J.A., Nice, C.C., Forister, M.L. & Shapiro, A.M. (2002) The significance of wing pattern diversity in the Lycaenidae: mate discrimination by two recently diverged species. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 15, 871-879.
15. Fry, J.D. (2003) Multilocus models of sympatric speciation: Bush versus Rice versus Felsenstein. Evolution, 57, 1735-1746.
16. Funk, D.J. (1998) Isolating a role for natural selection in speciation: host adaptation and sexual isolation in Neochlamisus bebbianae leaf beetles. Evolution, 52, 1744-1759.
17. Futuyma, D.J. (1983) Selective factors in the evolution of host choice by phytophagous insects. Herbivorous Insects: Host-seeking Behavior and Mechanisms (ed. by S. Ahmad), pp. 227-244. Academic Press, New York.
18. Garth, J.S. & Tilden, J.W. (1986) California Butterflies. University of California Press, Berkeley.
19. Gervais, B.R. & Shapiro, A.M. (1999) Distribution of edaphicendemic butterflies in the Sierra Nevada of California. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 8, 151-162.
20. Harris, M.O., Sandanyaka, M. & Griffin, W. (2001) Oviposition preferences of the Hessian fly and their consequences for the survival and reproductive potential of offspring. Ecological Entomology, 26, 473-486.
21. Jaenike, J. (1990) Host specialization in phytophagous insects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 21, 243-273.
22. Johnson, P.A. & Gullberg, U. (1998) Theory and models of sympatric speciation. Endless Forms: Species and Speciation (ed. by D. J. Howard and S. H. Berlocher), pp. 79-89. Oxford University Press, New York.
23. Kawecki, T.J. (1996) Sympatric speciation driven by beneficial mutations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 263, 1515-1520.
24. Kingsolver, J.G. (1988) Thermoregulation, flight, and the evolution of wing pattern in pierid butterflies: the topography of adaptive landscapes. American Zoologist, 28, 899-912.
25. Lande, R. (1981) Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 78, 3721-3725.
26. Levins, R. & MacArthur, R.H. (1969) An hypothesis to explain the incidence of monophagy. Ecology, 50, 910-911.
27. Lill, J.T., Marquis, R.J. & Ricklefs, R.E. (2002) Host plants influence parasitism of forest caterpillars. Nature, 417, 170-173.
28. Lu, G. & Bernatchez, L. (1999) Correlated trophic specialization and genetic divergence in sympatric lake whitefish ecotypes (Coregonus clupeaformis): support for the ecological speciation hypothesis. Evolution, 53, 1491-1505.
29. Mayhew, P.J. (1997) Adaptive patterns of host-plant selection by phytophagous insects. Oikos, 79, 417-248.
30. Maynard Smith, J. (1966) Sympatric speciation. American Naturalist, 100, 637-650.
31. Mayr, E. (1942) Systematics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.
32. Nice, C.C., Fordyce, J.A., Shapiro, A.M. & Ffrench-Constant, R. (2002) Lack of evidence for reproductive isolation among ecologically specialised lycaenid butterflies. Ecological Entomology, 27, 702-712.
33. Nice, C.C. & Shapiro, A.M. (2001) Population genetic evidence of restricted gene flow between host races in the butterfly genus Mitoura (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 94, 257-267.
34. Nosil, P., Crespi, B.J. & Sandoval, C.P. (2002) Host-plant adaptation drives the parallel evolution of reproductive isolation. Nature, 417, 440-443.
35. Opler, P.A. & Wright, A.B. (1999) Western Butterflies. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, U.S.A.
36. Orr, M.R. & Smith, T.B. (1998) Ecology and Speciation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13, 502-506.
37. Orr, H.A. & Turelli, M. (2001) The evolution of postzygotic isolation: accumulating Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities. Evolution, 55, 1085-1094.
38. Robbins, R.K. (1982) How many butterfly species? News of the Lepidopterist's Society, 1982, 40-41.
39. Schluter, D. (2000) The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
40. Schluter, D. (2001) Ecology and the origin of species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16, 372-380.
41. Scott, J.A. (1986) The Butterflies of North America. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.
42. Singer, M.C. & Lee, J.R. (2000) Discrimination within and between hosts species by a butterfly: implications for design of preference experiments. Ecology Letters, 3, 101-105.
43. Singer, M.C., Ng, D. & Thomas, C.D. (1988) Heritability of oviposition preference and its relationship to offspring performance within a single insect population. Evolution, 42, 977-985.
44. Singer, M.C., Stephanescu, C. & Pen, I. (2002) When random sampling does not work: standard design falsely indicates maladaptive host preference in a butterfly. Ecology Letters, 5, 1-6.
45. Thomas, C.D., Ng, D., Singer, M.C., Mallet, J.L.B., Parmesan, C. & Billington, H.L. (1987) Incorporation of a European weed into the diet of a North American herbivore. Evolution, 41, 892-901.
46. Thompson, J.N. (1988) Evolutionary ecology of the relationship between oviposition preference and performance of offspring in phytophagous insects. Entomolgia Experimentalis et Applicata, 47, 3-14.
47. Thompson, J.N. & Pellmyr, O. (1991) Evolution of oviposition behavior and host preference in Lepidoptera. Annual Review of Entomology, 36, 65-89.
48. Van Emden, H.F., Sponagl, B., Wagner, E., Baker, T., Ganguly, S. & Douloumpaka, S. (1996) Hopkins' 'host selection principle', another nail in its coffin. Physiological Entomology, 21, 325-328.
49. Via, S. (2001) Sympatric speciation in animals: the ugly duckling grows up. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16, 381-390.
50. Wolf, C.B. & Wegener, W.E. (1948) The New World Cypresses. Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Anaheim, California.
51. Zangerl, A.R. & Berenbaum, M.R. (2003) Phenotype matching in wild parsnip and parsnip webworms: causes and consequences. Evolution, 57, 806-815.