Reproductive interference, priority effects and the maintenance of parapatry in Skistodiaptomus copepods

Oikos

Volumn 116, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 759-768

  A Thum, Ruan ^a,b  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COEXISTENCE; CONSPECIFIC; CRUSTACEAN; GENE FLOW; INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION; LABORATORY METHOD; MATING BEHAVIOR; PARAPATRY;

COPEPODA; SKISTODIAPTOMUS; SKISTODIAPTOMUS OREGONENSIS; SKISTODIAPTOMUS PYGMAEUS;

EID: 34247546250     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15782.x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Anderson, R. F. V. 1977. Ethological isolation and competition of allospecies in secondary contact Am. Nat. 111:939 949.
2. Andrews, R. et al. 1982. Reproductive interference between three parapatric species of reptile tick Oecologia 52:281 286.
3. Barton, N. H. Hewitt, G. M. 1985. Analysis of hybrid zones Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16:113 148.
4. Berger, I. Maier, G. 2001. The mating and reproductive biology of the freshwater planktonic calanoid copepod Eudiaptomus gracilis Freshwater Biol. 46:787 794.
5. Blades-Eckelbarger, P. I. 1991. Functional morphology of spermatophores and sperm transfer in calanoid copepods Bauer, R. T. Martin, J. W. Crustacean sexual biology. Columbia Univ. Press 246 270.
6. Bull, C. M. 1991. Ecology of parapatric distributions Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 22:19 38.
7. Carter, J. C. H. et al. 1980. Distribution and zoogeography of planktonic crustaceans and dipterans in glaciated eastern North America Can. J. Zool. 58:1355 1387.
8. Case, T. J. et al. 2005. The community context of species' borders: ecological and evolutionary perspectives Oikos 108:28 46.
9. Chilton, N. B. Andrews, R. H. 1988. Mating-behavior and parapatry in two species of Australian reptile tick Oecologia 75:146 152.
10. Chow-Fraser, P. Maly, E. 1988. Aspects of mating, reproduction, and co-occurrence in three freshwater calanoid copepods Freshwater Biol. 19:95 108.
11. Crawley, M. J. 1993. GLIM for ecologists. Blackwell Science.
12. De Meester, L. et al. 2002. The monopolization hypothesis and the dispersal-gene flow paradox in aquatic organisms Acta Oecol.-Int. J. Ecol. 23:121 135.
13. DeFrenza, J. et al. 1986. The relationships of sex size ratio and season to mating intensity in some calanoid copepods Limnol. Oceanogr. 31:491 496.
14. Figuerola, J. et al. 2005. Invertebrate eggs can fly: evidence of waterfowl-mediated gene flow in aquatic invertebrates Am. Nat. 165:274 280.
15. Fujimoto, H. et al. 1996. Reproductive interference between Panonychus mori Yokotama and P. citri (McGregor) (Acari: Tetranychidae) in peach orchards Appl. Entomol. Zool. 31:59 65.
16. Harrison, R. G. 1990. Hybrid zones: windows on the evolutionary process Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol. 7:69 128.
17. Harrison, R. G. 1993. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford Univ. Press.
18. Hettyey, A. Pearman, P. B. 2003. Social environment and reproductive interference affect reproductive success in the frog Rana latastei Behav. Ecol. 14:294 300.
19. Hewitt, G. M. 1988. Hybrid zones-natural laboratories for evolutionary studies Trends Ecol. Evol. 3:158 167.
20. Howard, D. J. Harrison, R. G. 1984. Habitat segregation in ground crickets: the role of interspecific competition and habitat selection Ecology 65:69 76.
21. Hutchinson, G. E. 1951. Copepodology for the ornithologist Ecology 32:571 577.
22. Jackson, J. A. Tinsley, R. C. 1998. Reproductive interference in concurrent infections of two Protopolystoma species (Monogenea: Polystomatidae) Int. J. Parasitol. 28:1201 1204.
23. Jacoby, C. A. Youngbluth, M. J. 1983. Mating behavior in three species of Pseudodiaptomus (Copepoda: Calanoida) Mar. Biol. 76:77 86.
24. Jenkins, D. G. Buikema, A. L., Jr. 1998. Do similar communities develop in similar sites? A test with zooplankton structure and function Ecol. Monogr. 68:421 443.
25. Keitt, T. H. et al. 2001. Allee effects, invasion pinning, and species' borders Am. Nat. 157:203 216.
26. Kelly, L. S. Snell, T. W. 1998. Role of surface glycoproteins in mate-guarding of the marine harpacticoid Tigriopus japonicus Mar. Biol. 130:605 612.
27. Kelly, L. S. et al. 1998. Chemical communication during mating of the harpacticoid Tigriopus japonicus Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353:737 744.
28. Key, K. H. L. 1968. The concept of stasipatric speciation Syst. Zool. 17:14 22.
29. Kumar, S. et al. 2004. MEGA3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment Briefings Bioinformatics 5:150 163.
30. Kuno, E. 1992. Competitive exclusion through reproductive interference Res. Popul. Ecol. 34:275 284.
31. Lonsdale, D. J. et al. 1998. The role of chemical signals in copepod reproduction J. Mar. Syst. 15:1 12.
32. MacArthur, R. 1972. Geographical ecology. Harper & Row.
33. Maguire, B. J. 1963. The passive dispersal of small aquatic organisms and their colonization of isolated bodies of water Ecol. Monogr. 33:161 185.
34. Maly, E. J. 1984. Interspecific copulation in and co-occurrence of similar-sized freshwater centropagid copepods Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 35:153 165.
35. Miller, R. S. 1967. Pattern and process in competition Adv. Ecol. Res. 4:1 74.
36. Nei, M. Kumar, S. 2000. Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. Oxford Univ. Press.
37. Proctor, V. W. 1964. Viability of crustacean eggs recovered from ducks Ecology 45:656 658.
38. Rebeiro, J. M. C. Spielman, A. 1986. The satyr effect: a model predicting parapatry and species extinction Am. Nat. 128:513 528.
39. Sarnelle, O. Knapp, R. A. 2004. Zooplankton recovery after fish removal: limitations of the egg bank Limnol. Oceanogr. 49:1382 1392.
40. Soderback, B. 1995. Replacement of the native crayfish Astacus astacus by the introduced species Pacifastacus leniusculus in a Swedish lake-possible causes and mechanisms Freshwater Biol. 33:291 304.
41. States, J. B. 1976. Local adaptations in chipmunk Eutamias amoenus populations and evolutionary potential at species borders Ecol. Monogr. 46:221 256.
42. Stemberger, R. S. 1995. Pleistocene refuge areas and postglacial dispersal of copepods of the northeastern United States Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 52:2197 2210.
43. Takafuji, A. et al. 1997. Reproductive interference and its consequences for the competitive interactions between two closely related Panonychus spider mites Exp. Appl. Acarol. 21:379 391.
44. Thum, R. A. 2004. Using 18S rDNA to resolve diaptomid copepod (Copepoda: Calanoida: Diaptomidae) phylogeny: an example with the North American genera Hydrobiologia 519:135 141.
45. Thum, R. Stemberger, R. 2006. Pure spatial and spatially-structured environmental variables explain Skistodiaptomus copepod range limits in the northeastern US Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 63:1397 1404.
46. Ting, J. H. et al. 2000. Identification of sex, age and species-specific proteins on the surface of the harpacticoid copepod Tigriopus japonicus Mar. Biol. 137:31 37.
47. Watras, C. J. 1983. Mate location by diaptomid copepods. J Plankton Res 17:417 423.
48. Wilson, M. S. 1959. Calanoida Edmondson, W. T. Fresh-water biology. Wiley 738 794.