Relational engagement: Proportional reasoning with bilingual Latino/a students

Educational Studies in Mathematics

Volumn 85, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 143-160

  Dominguez, Higinio ^a   LópezLeiva, Carlos A ^b   Khisty, Lena Licón ^c  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Elementary mathematics; Engagement; Latinos as

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890870342     PISSN: 00131954     EISSN: 15730816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10649-013-9501-7     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Astin, A. W. (2003). From number crunching to spirituality. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XVIII) (pp. 1-56). Boston: Kluwer.
2. Barwell, R. (2003). Patterns of attention in the interaction of a primary school mathematics student with English as an additional language. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 53, 35-59.
3. Bishop, A., & Abreu, G. de (1991). Children's use of outside-school knowledge to solve mathematics problems in-school. In F. Furinghetti (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 128-135). Assisi, Italy.
4. Boaler, J. (2006). Opening our ideas: How a detracked mathematics approach promoted respect, responsibility, and high achievement. Theory into Practice, 45(1), 40-46.
5. Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. G. (2000). Identity, agency, and knowing in mathematics worlds. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 171-200). Westport: Alex.
6. Brenner, M. (2002). Everyday problem solving and curriculum implementation: An invitation to try pizza. In M. E. Brenner & J. N. Moschkovich (Eds.), Journal for research in mathematics education. Monograph, vol. 11, everyday and academic mathematics in the classroom (pp. 63-92). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
7. Burdick-Will, J., & Gómez, C. (2006). Assimilation versus multiculturalism: Bilingual education and the Latino challenge. Journal of Latinos and Education, 5(3), 209-231.
8. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
9. Cole, M., & Scribner, S. (1974). Culture and thought: A psychological introduction. New York: Wiley.
10. Delgado-Gaytán, C. (2004). Involving Latino families in schools: Raising student achievement through home-school partnerships. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
11. Dominguez, H. (2011). Using what matters to students in bilingual mathematics problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(3), 305-328.
12. Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-38). New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Forman, E. (1996). Learning mathematics as participation in classroom practice: Implications of sociocultural theory for educational reform. In L. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. Goldin, & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 115-130). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
14. Gibbs, G. (2007). Analyzing qualitative data. Thousand, Oaks: Sage.
15. Gutiérrez, R. (2012). Embracing Nepantla: Rethinking "knowledge" and its use in mathematics teaching. REDIMAT - Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 1(1), 29-56.
16. González, N., Andrade, R., Civil, M., & Moll, L. (2001). Bridging funds of distributed knowledge: Creating zones of practice in mathematics. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 6(1), 115-132.
17. Khisty, L. L., & Wiley, C. (2013). After-school: An innovative model to better understand the mathematics learning of Latinas/os. In B. Bevan, P. Bell, R. Stevens, & A. Razfar (Eds.), LOST opportunities: Learning in out of school time. New York: Springer.
18. Lamon, S. J. (2007). Rational numbers and proportional reasoning: Toward a theoretical framework for research. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 629-666). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
19. Lantolf, J. P. (Ed.). (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Leont'ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
22. Lesh, R., Hoover, M., Hole, B., Kelly, A., & Post, T. (2000). Principles for developing thought revealing activities for students and teachers. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 591-645). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. LoCicero, A. M., Fuson, K. C., & Allexsaht-Snider, M. (1999). Mathematizing children's stories, helping children solve word problems, and supporting parental involvement in math learning. In L. Ortiz-Franco, N. Hernandez, & Y. De La Cruz (Eds.), Changing the faces of mathematics: Perspectives on Latinos (pp. 156-167). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
24. Martin, D. B. (2000). Mathematics success and failure among African-American youth: The role of sociohistorical context, community forces, school influence, and individual agency. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Mercer, N. (2008). The seeds of time: Why classroom dialogue needs a temporal analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(1), 33-59.
26. Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & González, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132-141.
27. Morales, H., Khisty, L. L., & Chval, K. (2003). Beyond discourse: A multimodal perspective of learning mathematics in a multilingual context. In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty, & J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of PME 27(3), 133-140.
28. Moschkovich, J. (2005). Using two languages when learning mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64, 121-144.
29. Moschkovich, J. (2002). A situated and sociocultural perspective of bilingual mathematics learning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2(3), 189-212.
30. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: NCTM.
31. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington: Author.
32. Nieto, S., & Bode, P. (2011). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
33. Pitvorec, K., Willey, C., & Khisty, L. L. (2011). Toward a framework of principles for ensuring effective mathematics instruction for bilingual learners through curricula. In B. Atweh, M. Graven, W. Secada, & P. Valero (Eds.), Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education. New York: Springer.
34. Radford, L., & Roth, W.-M. (2011). Intercorporeality and ethical commitment: An activity perspective on classroom interaction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77(2-3), 227-245.
35. Radford, L., Schubring, G., & Seeger, F. (2011). Signifying and meaning making in mathematical thinking, teaching, and learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77(2-3), 149-156.
36. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
37. Rogoff, B., Paradise, R., Mejía Arauz, R., Correa-Chávez, M., & Angelillo, C. (2003). Firsthand learning through intent participation. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 175-203.
38. Rosebery, A., McIntyre, E., & González, N. (2001). Connecting students' cultures to instruction. In E. McIntyre, A. Rosebery, & N. González (Eds.), Classroom diversity: Connecting curriculum to students' lives (pp. 1-123). Portsmouth: Heinemann.
39. Roth, W.-M. (2004). What is the meaning of "meaning"? A case study from graphing. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23, 75-92.
40. Schoenfeld, A. (1991). On mathematics as sense-making: An informal attack on the unfortunate divorce of formal and informal mathematics. In J. F. Voss, S. N. Perkins, & J. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and instruction (pp. 311-343). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41. Simic-Muller, K., Turner, E., & Varley, M. (2009). Math club problem posing. Teaching Children Mathematics, 16(4), 206-212.
42. Skovsmose, O. (2005). Foregrounds and politics of learning obstacles. For the Learning of Mathematics, 25(1), 4-11.
43. Stake, R. (2004). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443-466). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
44. Turner, E., Dominguez, H., Maldonado, L., & Empson, S. (2013). English learners' participation in mathematical discussion: Shifting positionings and dynamic identities. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Special Equity Issue, 44(1), 199-234.
45. Varley Gutiérrez, M. (2009-2010). "I thought this U. S. place was supposed to be about freedom" Young Latinas engage in mathematics and social change to save their school. Rethinking Schools, 36-39.
46. Vélez-Ibáñez, C., & Greenberg, J. (1992). Formation and transformation of funds of knowledge among U. S. Mexican households. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 23(4), 313-335.
47. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Volume 1: Problems of general psychology. New York: Plenum.