Comparison of polyamide nanofiltration and low-pressure reverse osmosis membranes on As(III) rejection under various operational conditions

Desalination

Volumn 334, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 10-16

  Chang, Fang fang ^a   Liu, Wen jun ^a   Wang, Xiao mao ^a  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Arsenic(III); Groundwater; Low pressure reverse osmosis (LPRO); Nanofiltration (NF); Operational conditions

Indexed keywords

ARSENIC(III); ELECTROSTATIC EFFECT; LOW-PRESSURE REVERSE OSMOSIS; OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS; REJECTION MECHANISMS; REJECTION PERFORMANCE; REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES; TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURES;

FUNCTIONAL GROUPS; GROUNDWATER; IONIC STRENGTH; MEMBRANES; NANOFILTRATION; REVERSE OSMOSIS;

MICROFILTRATION;

ARSENIC; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); FILTRATION; GROUNDWATER; MEMBRANE; OSMOSIS; PH; WATER CHEMISTRY;

EID: 84890855137     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2013.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Saha J.C., Dikshit A.K., Bandyopadhyay M., Saha K.C. A review of arsenic poisoning and its effects on human health. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 29:281-313.
2. Choong T.S.Y., Chuah T.G., Robiah Y., Koay F.L.G., Azni I. Arsenic toxicity, health hazards and removal techniques from water: an overview. Desalination 2007, 217:139-166.
3. Kartinen E.O., Martin C.J. An overview of arsenic removal processes. Desalination 1995, 103:79-88.
4. van der Bruggen B., Vandecasteele C. Removal of pollutants from surface water and groundwater by nanofiltration: overview of possible applications in the drinking water industry. Environ. Pollut. 2003, 122:435-445.
5. Radjenovic J., Petrovic M., Ventura F., Barcelo D. Rejection of pharmaceuticals in nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane drinking water treatment. Water Res. 2008, 42:3601-3610.
6. Bellona C., Drewes J.E., Xu P., Amy G. Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes during NF/RO treatment-a literature review. Water Res. 2004, 38:2795-2809.
7. Waypa J.J., Elimelech M., Hering J.G. Arsenic removal by RO and NF membranes. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 1997, 89:102-114.
8. Smedley P.L., Kinniburgh D.G. A review of the source, behavior and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Appl. Geochem. 2002, 17:517-568.
9. Ning R.Y. Arsenic removal by reverse osmosis. Desalination 2002, 143:237-241.
10. Shih M.C. An overview of arsenic removal by pressure-driven membrane processes. Desalination 2005, 172:85-97.
11. Saitua H., Campderros M., Cerutti S., Padilla A.P. Effect of operating conditions in removal of arsenic from water by nanofiltration membrane. Desalination 2005, 172:173-180.
12. Kang M., Kawasaki M., Tamada S., Kamei T., Magara Y. Effect of pH on the removal of arsenic and antimony using reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 2000, 131:293-298.
13. Wang X.L., Tsuru T., Nakao S., Kimura S. The electrostatic and steric-hindrance model for the transport of charged solutes through nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 135:19-32.
14. Bowen W.R., Welfoot J.S. Modelling the performance of membrane nanofiltration - critical assessment and model development. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2002, 57:1121-1137.
15. Bandini S., Vezzani D. Nanoltration modeling: the role of dielectric exclusion in membrane characterization. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2003, 58:3303-3326.
16. Brandhuber P., Amy G. Alternative methods for membrane filtration of arsenic from drinking water. Desalination 1998, 117:1-10.
17. US EPA Office of Water Technologies and cost for removal of arsenic from drinking water, EPA 815-R-00-028 2000.
18. Oh J.I., Yamamoto K., Kitawaki H., Nakao S., Sugawara T., Rahman M.M., Rahman M.H. Application of low-pressure nanofiltration coupled with a bicycle pump for the treatment of arsenic-contaminated groundwater. Desalination 2000, 132:307-314.
19. Akin I., Arslan G., Tor A., Cengeloglu Y., Ersoz M. Removal of arsenate [As(V)] and arsenite [As(III)] from water by SWHR and BW-30 reverse osmosis. Desalination 2011, 281:88-92.
20. Teychene B., Collet G., Gallard H., Croue J.-P. A comparative study of boron and arsenic (III) rejection from brackish water by reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 2013, 310:109-114.
21. Sato Y., Kang M., Kamei T., Magara Y. Performance of nanofiltration for arsenic removal. Water Res. 2002, 36:3371-3377.
22. Oh J.I., Lee S.H., Yamamoto K. Relationship between molar volume and rejection of arsenic species in groundwater by low-pressure nanofiltration process. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 234:167-175.
23. Urase T., Oh J., Yamamoto K. Effect of pH on rejection of different species of arsenic by nanofiltration. Desalination 1998, 117:11-18.
24. Xia S.J., Dong B.Z., Zhang Q.L., Xu B., Gao N.Y., Causseranda C. Study of arsenic removal by nanofiltration and its application in China. Desalination 2007, 204:374-379.
25. Nguyen C.M., Bang S., Cho J., Kim K.W. Performance and mechanism of arsenic removal from water by a nanofiltration membrane. Desalination 2009, 245:82-94.
26. Vrijenhoek E.M., Waypa J.J. Arsenic removal from drinking water by a "loose" nanofiltration membrane. Desalination 2000, 130:265-277.
27. Boussu K., Zhang Y., Cocquyt J., van der Meeren P., Volodin A., Van Haesendonck C., Martens J.A., van der Bruggen B. Characterization of polymeric nanofiltration membranes for systematic analysis of membrane performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 278:418-427.
28. Tay J.H., Liu J.L., Sun D.D. Effect of solution physico-chemistry on the charge property of nanofiltration membranes. Water Res. 2002, 36:585-598.
29. Hagmeyer G., Gimbel R. Modelling the salt rejection of nanofiltration membranes for ternary ion mixtures and for single salts at different pH values. Desalination 1998, 117:247-256.
30. Hussain A.A., Nataraj S.K., Abashar M.E.E., Al-Mutaz I.S., Aminabhavi T.M. Prediction of physical properties of nanofiltration membranes using experiment and theoretical models. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 310:321-336.
31. Kosutic K., Kunst B. RO and NF membrane fouling and cleaning and pore size distribution variations. Desalination 2002, 150:113-120.
32. Peeters J.M.M., Boom J.P., Mulder M.H.V., Strathmann H. Retention measurements of nanofiltration membranes with electrolyte solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 1998, 145:199-209.
33. Paugam L., Taha S., Dorange G., Jaouen P., Quemeneur F. Mechanism of nitrate ions transfer in nanofiltration depending on pressure, pH, concentration and medium composition. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 231:37-46.
34. Bandini S., Vezzani D. Nanofiltration modeling: the role of dielectric exclusion in membrane characterization. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2003, 58:3303-3326.
35. Seidel A., Waypa J.J., Elimelech M. Role of charge (Donnan) exclusion in removal of arsenic from water by a negatively charged porous nanofiltration membrane. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2000, 18:105-113.
36. Geucke T., Deowan S.A., Hoinkis J., Patzold C. Performance of a small-scale RO desalinator for arsenic removal. Desalination 2009, 239:198-206.
37. Al-Rashdi B.A.M., Johnson D.J., Hilal N. Removal of heavy metal ions by nanofiltration. Desalination 2013, 315:2-17.