Performance and mechanism of arsenic removal from water by a nanofiltration membrane

Desalination

Volumn 245, Issue 1-3, 2009, Pages 82-94

  Nguyen, Cuong Manh ^a   Bang, Sunbaek ^a   Cho, Jaeweon ^a   Kim, Kyoung Woong ^a  

^a Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Arsenic removal; Nanofiltration; Performance and mechanism

Indexed keywords

APPLIED PRESSURE; ARSENIC CONCENTRATION; ARSENIC REMOVAL; ARSENIC SPECIATION; AS AND AS; DONNAN EXCLUSION; ELECTROKINETIC CHARGE; FEED SOLUTION; MEMBRANE PROPERTIES; MOLECULAR WEIGHT CUTOFF; MUTUAL INTERACTION; PERFORMANCE AND MECHANISM; PH RANGE; REJECTION EFFICIENCY; SEPARATION EFFICIENCY; STERIC EXCLUSION; SYNTHETIC WATERS; WIDE PH RANGE;

ARSENIC; DEWATERING; NANOFILTRATION; NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES; PH EFFECTS; REVERSE OSMOSIS; SODIUM CHLORIDE; WATER FILTRATION;

CHEMICALS REMOVAL (WATER TREATMENT);

ARSENIC; FILTRATION; MEMBRANE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; POLLUTANT REMOVAL; WATER TREATMENT;

EID: 67650708610     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2008.04.047     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Mondal P., Majumder C.B., and Mohanty B. Laboratory based approaches for arsenic remediation from contaminated water: Recent developments. J. Haz. Mat. B137 (2006) 464-479
2. Berg M., Tran H.C., Pham T.C., Pham H.V., Schertenleib R., and Giger W. Arsenic contamination of groundwater and drinking water in Vietnam: A human health threat. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35 (2001) 2621-2626
3. US EPA report. Technologies and Costs for Removal of Arsenic from Drinking Water, EPA 815R00028 (2000)
4. US EPA. Federal Register, Final Arsenic Rule, 40 CFR Parts 9 (2001) 141-142
5. US EPA report. Arsenic treatment technology evaluation handbook for small system, EPA 816R03014 (2003)
6. US EPA. Point-of-use or point-of-entry treatment options for small drinking water systems, EPA 815R06010 (2006)
7. J.J. Waypa, PhD Thesis, University of California, 1998.
8. Oh J.I., Yamamoto K., Kitawaki H., Nakao S., and Sugawara T. M.M. Rahman and M.H. Rahman. Desalination 131 (2000) 307-314
9. Vrijenhoek E.M., and Waypa J.J. Arsenic removal from drinking water by a loose nanofiltration membrane. Desalination 130 (2000) 265-277
10. Peeters J.M.M., Boom J.P., Mulder M.H.V., and Strathmann H. Retention measurements of nanofiltration membranes with electrolyte solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 145 (1998) 199-209
11. Schaep J., Bruggen B.V., Vandecasteele C., and Wilms D. Influence of ion size and charge in nanofiltration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 14 (1998) 155-162
12. Urase T., Oh J., and Yamamoto K. Effect of pH on rejection of different species of arsenic by nanofiltration membarane. Desalination 117 (1998) 11-18
13. Bowen W.R., Mohammad A.W., and Hilal N. Characterization of nanofiltration membranes for predictive purposes-use of salts, uncharged solutes and atomic force microscopy. J. Membr. Sci. 126 (1997) 91-105
14. Bowen W.R., and Mukhtar H. Characterization and prediction of separation performance of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 112 (1996) 263-274
15. Brookins D.G. pH-Eh Diagrams in Geochemistry (1998), Springer, Berlin York
16. Yan X., Kerrich R., and Hendry M.J. Distribution of arsenic (III), arsenic (V) and total inorganic arsenic in porewaters from a thick till and clay-rich aquitard sequence, Saskatchewan, Canada. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 62 15 (2000) 2637-2648
17. Lakshminarayanaiah N. Transport Phenomena in Membranes (1969), Academic Press, New York
18. Spiegler K.S., and Kedem O. Current Contents/. Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. 5 (1983) 16
19. Hodgson T.D. Desalination 8 (1970) 99
20. Childress A.E., and Elimelech M. Relating nanofiltration membrane performance to membrane charge (electrokinetic) characteristics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34 (2000) 3710-3716
21. Oka K., and Frusawa K. Electrophoresis, Electrical Phenomena at Interface: Fundamentals, Measurements, and Applications. 2nd ed. (1998), Marcel Dekker, New York
22. Shim Y., Lee H.J., Lee S., Moon S.H., and Cho J. Effects of natural organic matter and ionic species on membrane surface charge. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36 (2002) 3864-3871
23. Mori S., and Odamoto H. A united theory of determining the electrophoretic velocity of mineral particles in the rectangular micro-electrophoresis cell. Fusen 27 3 (1980) 117-124
24. Kitahara A., Furusawa K., Ozaki M., and Ohshima H. Zeta potential. Scientist Sha. (1995) 57-61 Tokyo
25. Boussu K., Zhang Y., Cocquyt J., Van der Meeren P., Volodin A., Van Haesendonck C., Martens J.A., and Van der Bruggen B. Characterization of polymeric nanofiltration membranes for systematic analysis of membrane performance. J. Membr. Sci. 278 (2006) 418-427
26. Bellona C., and Drewes J.E. The role of membrane surface charge and solute physico-chemical properties in the rejection of organic acids by NF membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 249 (2005) 227-234
27. Hong S.K., and Elimmelech M. Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM): fouling of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 132 (1997) 159-181
28. Cho J., Amy G., and Pellegrino J. Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: factors and mechanisms affecting rejection and flux decline with charged ultrafiltration (UF) membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 164 (2000) 89-110
29. Sato Y., and Kang M. T. Kamei and Y. Magara. Water Res. 36 (2002) 307-314
30. Saitua H., Campderros M., Cerutti S., and Padilla A.P. Effect of operating conditions in removal of arsenic from water by nanofiltration membrane. Desalination 172 (2004) 173-180