A comparative study of boron and arsenic (III) rejection from brackish water by reverse osmosis membranes

Desalination

Volumn 310, Issue , 2013, Pages 109-114

  Teychene, Benoît ^a   Collet, Gaelle ^a   Gallard, Hervé ^a   Croue, Jean Philippe ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE POITIERS   (France)

^b KING ABDULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Arsenic (III); Boron; Brackish water; Reverse osmosis

Indexed keywords

BORON REJECTION; BRACKISH WATER; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; DISSOCIATION CONSTANT; EFFECT OF PH; LOW PRESSURES; MEMBRANE TYPES; OPERATING CONDITION; PERMEATE CONCENTRATIONS; REJECTION EFFICIENCY; RO MEMBRANE; THEORETICAL CALCULATIONS; TRANSMEMBRANE PRESSURES; WATER FLUX; ARSENIC(III);

ARSENIC; BORON; DISSOCIATION; MEMBRANES; REVERSE OSMOSIS; MICROFILTRATION; SEAWATER; WATER FILTRATION;

WATER FILTRATION; OSMOSIS MEMBRANES;

ARSENIC; BORON; BRACKISH WATER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FILTRATION; LOW PRESSURE; MEMBRANE; OSMOSIS; PERMEABILITY; PH; TESTING METHOD; SEAWATER;

EID: 84870860794     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2012.05.034     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Tu 12K.L., Nghiem L.D., Chivas A.R. Boron removal by reverse osmosis membranes in seawater desalination applications. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2010, 75(2):87-101.
2. Mickley M.C. Membrane Concentrate Disposal: Practices and Regulation 2001, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Mickley & Associates.
3. L.A. Senior, R.A. Sloto, Arsenic, Boron and Fluoride Concentrations in ground water in and near diabase intrusions, Newark Basin, Southeastern Pennsylvania. US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations report 2006-5261.
4. Frisbie S., Mitchell E., Mastera L., Maynard D., Yusuf A., Siddiq M., Ortega R., Dunn R., Westerman D., Bacquart T., Sarkar B. Public Healt strategies for western Bangladesh that address arsenic, manganese, uranium and other toxic elements in drinking water. Environ. Health Perspect. 2009, 117(3):410-416.
5. Guidelines for drinking-water quality 2011, World Health Organization. fourth edition.
6. Argust P. Distribution of boron in the environment. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 1998, 66:131-143.
7. Choi W.W., Chen K.Y. Evaluation of boron removal by adsorption on solids. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1979, 13(2):189-196.
8. Graber F.M., Lonsdale H.K., Milstead C.E., Cross B.P. Boron rejection by cellulose acetate reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 1970, 7(1):249-258.
9. Nadav N. Boron removal from seawater reverse osmosis permeate utilizing selective ion exchange resin. Desalination 1999, 124(1-3):131-135.
10. Prats D., Chillon-Arias M.F., Rodriguez-Pastor M. Analysis of the influence of pH and pressure on the elimination of boron in reverse osmosis. Desalination 2000, 128(3):269-273.
11. Sagiv A., Semiat R. Analysis of parameters affecting boron permeation through reverse osmosis membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 243(1-2):79-87.
12. Hyung H., Kim J.-H. A mechanistic study on boron rejection by sea water reverse osmosis membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 286:269-278.
13. Taniguchi M., Fusaoka Y., Nishikawa T., Kurihara M. Boron removal in RO seawater desalination. Desalination 2004, 167:419-426.
14. Cengeloglu Y., Arslan G., Tor A., Kocak I., Dursun N. Removal of boron from water by using reverse osmosis. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 64:141-146.
15. TM high rejection SWRO membranes. Desalination 2003, 156:229-238.
16. Koseoglu H., Kabay N., Yüksel M., Kitis M. The removal of boron from model solutions and seawater using reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 2008, 223:126-133.
17. Koseoglu H., Kabay N., Yüksel M., Sarp S., Arar Ö., Kitis M. Boron removal from seawater using high rejection SWRO membranes-impact oh pH, feed concentration, pressure, and cross-flow velocity. Desalination 2008, 227:253-263.
18. Rodriguez P.M., Ferrandiz R.A., Chillon M.F., Prats R.D. Influence of pH in the elimination of boron by means of reverse osmosis. Desalination 2001, 140:145-152.
19. Oo M.H., Ong S.L. Implication of zeta potential at different salinities on boron removal by RO membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 352(1-2):1-6.
20. Oo M.H., Ong S.L. Effect of pH and ionic strength on boron removal by RO membranes. Desalination 2009, 246(1-3):605-612.
21. Mascher R., Lippmann B., Holzinger S., Bergmann H. Arsenate toxicity: effects on oxidative stress response molecules and enzymes in red clover plants. Plant Sci. 2002, 163:961-969.
22. Xia S., Dong B., Zhang Q., Xu B., Gao N., Causserand C. Study of arsenic removal by nanofiltration and its application in China. Desalination 2007, 204:374-379.
23. Kang M., Kawasaki M., Tamada S., Kamei T., Magara Y. Effect of pH on the removal of arsenic and antimony using reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 2000, 131:293-298.
24. Urase T., Oh J.I., Yamamoto K. Effect of pH on rejection of different species of arsenic by nanofiltration. Desalination 1998, 117:11-18.
25. Geucke T., Deowan S.A., Hoinkis J., Pätzold Ch. Performance of a small-scale RO desalinator for arsenic removal. Desalination 2009, 239:198-206.
26. Ning R.Y. Arsenic removal by reverse osmosis. Desalination 2002, 143(3):237-241.
27. Schock G., Miquel A. Mass transfer and pressure loss in spiral wound modules. Desalination 1987, 64:339.
28. Li F., Meindersma W., de Haan A.B., Reith T. Optimization of commercial net spacers in spiral wound membrane modules. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 208(1-2):289-302.
29. Pontié M., Dach H., Leparc J., Hafsi M., Lhassani A. Novel approach combining physico-chemical characterizations and mass transfer modelling of nanofiltration and low pressure reverse osmosis membranes for brackish water desalination intensification. Desalination 2008, 221(1-3):174-191.
30. Grasshoff K., Kremling K., Ehrhardt M. Methods of seawater analysis 1999, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH. 3rd edition.
31. Rodier J., Legube B., Merlet N. L'Analyse de l'eau 1959, Edition Dunod.