I endeavor to make it: Effort increases valuation of subsequent monetary reward

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 261, Issue , 2013, Pages 1-7

  Ma, Qingguo ^a,b   Meng, Liang ^a,b   Wang, Lei ^a,b   Shen, Qiang ^a,b,c,d  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^d BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Event related potential; Feedback related negativity; Outcome evaluation; P300; Reward processing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTIVATION; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; NORMAL HUMAN; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REWARD; TASK PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EVENT-RELATED POTENTIAL; FEEDBACK-RELATED NEGATIVITY; OUTCOME EVALUATION; P300; REWARD PROCESSING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; REWARD; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84890843476     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: 18727549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.11.045     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Stephens D.W.A.D. The adaptive value of preference for immediacy: when shortsighted rules have farsighted consequences. Behavioral Ecology 2001, 12:330-339.
2. Kolling N., Behrens T.E., Mars R.B., Rushworth M.F. Neural mechanisms of foraging. Science 2012, 336:95-98.
3. Hatfield E., Walster G.W., Berscheid E. Equity: theory and research 1978, Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
4. R K. The effects of effort and intrinsic motivation on risky choice. Marketing Science 2003, 22:477-502.
5. Phillips P.E., Walton M.E., Jhou T.C. Calculating utility: preclinical evidence for cost-benefit analysis by mesolimbic dopamine. Psychopharmacology 2007, 191:483-495.
6. Rudebeck P.H., Walton M.E., Smyth A.N., Bannerman D.M., Rushworth M.F. Separate neural pathways process different decision costs. Nature Neuroscience 2006, 9:1161-1168.
7. Botvinick M.M., Huffstetler S., McGuire J.T. Effort discounting in human nucleus accumbens. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience 2009, 9:16-27.
8. Aronson E., Mills J. The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1959, 59:177.
9. Zink C.F., Pagnoni G., Martin-Skurski M.E., Chappelow J.C., Berns G.S. Human striatal responses to monetary reward depend on saliency. Neuron 2004, 42:509-517.
10. Alessandri J., Darcheville J.C., Delevoye-Turrell Y., Zentall T.R. Preference for rewards that follow greater effort and greater delay. Learning & Behavior 2008, 36:352-358.
11. Vostroknutov A., Tobler P.N., Rustichini A. Causes of social reward differences encoded in human brain. Journal of Neurophysiology 2012, 107:1403-1412.
12. Muehlbacher S., Kirchler E. Origin of endowments in public good games: the impact of effort on contributions. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics 2009, 2:59-67.
13. Hernandez Lallement J., Kuss K., Trautner P., Weber B., Falk A., Fliessbach K. Effort increases sensitivity to reward and loss magnitude in the human brain. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2013, in press.
14. Miltner W.H., Braun C.H., Coles M.G. Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: evidence for a generic neural system for error detection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1997, 9:788-798.
15. Gehring W.J., Willoughby A.R. The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science 2002, 295:2279-2282.
16. Holroyd C.B., Coles M.G.H. The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review 2002, 109:679-709.
17. Nieuwenhuis S., Yeung N., Holroyd C.B., Schurger A., Cohen J.D. Sensitivity of electrophysiological activity from medial frontal cortex to utilitarian and performance feedback. Cerebral Cortex 2004, 14:741-747.
18. Holroyd C.B., Larsen J.T., Cohen J.D. Context dependence of the event-related brain potential associated with reward and punishment. Psychophysiology 2004, 41:245-253.
19. Bellebaum C., Polezzi D., Daum I. It is less than you expected: the feedback-related negativity reflects violations of reward magnitude expectations. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:3343-3350.
20. Hajcak G., Moser J.S., Holroyd C.B., Simons R.F. It's worse than you thought: the feedback negativity and violations of reward prediction in gambling tasks. Psychophysiology 2007, 44:905-912.
21. Zhou Z., Yu R., Zhou X. To do or not to do? Action enlarges the FRN and P300 effects in outcome evaluation. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:3606-3613.
22. Nieuwenhuis S., Aston-Jones G., Cohen J.D. Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system. Psychological Bulletin 2005, 131:510-532.
23. Nittono H., Otsuka Y., Ullsperger P. Asymmetrical effects of frequent gains and frequent losses in a gambling task. Neuroreport 2008, 19:1345-1349.
24. Yeung N., Sanfey A.G. Independent coding of reward magnitude and valence in the human brain. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 2004, 24:6258-6264.
25. Sato A., Yasuda A., Ohira H., Miyawaki K., Nishikawa M., Kumano H., et al. Effects of value and reward magnitude on feedback negativity and P300. Neuroreport 2005, 16:407-411.
26. Gu R., Lei Z., Broster L., Wu T., Jiang Y., Luo Y.J. Beyond valence and magnitude: a flexible evaluative coding system in the brain. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:3891-3897.
27. Shen Q., Jin J., Ma Q. The sweet side of inequality: how advantageous status modulates empathic response to others' gains and losses. Behavioural Brain Research 2013, 256:609-617.
28. Wu Y., Zhou X. The P300 and reward valence, magnitude, and expectancy in outcome evaluation. Brain Research 2009, 1286:114-122.
29. Hajcak G., Moser J.S., Holroyd C.B., Simons R.F. The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes. Biological Psychology 2006, 71:148-154.
30. Donkers F.C.L., van Boxtel G.J.M. Mediofrontal negativities to averted gains and losses in the slot-machine task. Journal of Psychophysiology 2005, 19:256-262.
31. Holroyd C.B., Nieuwenhuis S., Yeung N., Cohen J.D. Errors in reward prediction are reflected in the event-related brain potential. Neuroreport 2003, 14:2481-2484.
32. Yeung N., Holroyd C.B., Cohen J.D. ERP correlates of feedback and reward processing in the presence and absence of response choice. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15:535-544.
33. Li P., Jia S., Feng T., Liu Q., Suo T., Li H. The influence of the diffusion of responsibility effect on outcome evaluations: electrophysiological evidence from an ERP study. NeuroImage 2010, 52:1727-1733.
34. Ma Q., Shen Q., Xu Q., Li D., Shu L., Weber B. Empathic responses to others' gains and losses: an electrophysiological investigation. NeuroImage 2011, 54:2472-2480.