Independent coding of reward magnitude and valence in the human brain

Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 24, Issue 28, 2004, Pages 6258-6264

  Yeung, Nick ^a   Sanfey, Alan G ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision making; Error related negativity; Event related potential; Feedback; Medial frontal negativity; P300

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN FUNCTION; CODING; COGNITION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTIVATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REWARD; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS, P300; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; GAMBLING; HUMANS; MALE; MOTIVATION; REWARD; RISK-TAKING;

EID: 3242706795     PISSN: 02706474     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4537-03.2004     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Breiter HC, Aharon I, Kahneman D, Dale A, Shizgal P (2001) Functional imaging of neural responses to expectancy and experience of monetary gains and losses. Neuron 30:619-639.
2. Delgado MR, Locke HM, Stenger VA, Fiez JA (2003) Dorsal striatum responses to reward and punishment: effects of valence and magnitude manipulations. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 3:27-38.
3. Elliott R, Friston KJ, Dolan RJ (2000) Dissociable neural responses in human reward systems. J Neurosci 20:6159-6165.
4. Gehring WJ, Willoughby AR (2002) The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science 295:2279-2282.
5. Gratton G, Coles MGH, Donchin E (1983) A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 55:468-484.
6. Holroyd CB, Coles MGH (2002) The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychol Rev 109:679-709.
7. Holroyd CB, Larsen JT, Cohen JD (2004) Context dependence of the event-related brain potential associated with reward and punishment. Psychophysiology 41:245-253.
8. Ito T, Larsen JT, Smith NK, Cacioppo JT (1998) Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: the negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. J Pers Soc Psychol 75:887-900.
9. Johnston VS (1979) Stimuli with biological significance. In: Evoked brain potentials and behavior (Begleiter H, ed), pp 1-12. New York: Plenum.
10. Knutson B, Westdorp A, Kaiser E, Hommer D (2000) fMRI visualization of brain activity during a monetary incentive delay task. NeuroImage 12:20-27.
11. Miltner WHR, Braun CH, Coles MGH (1997) Event-related potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: evidence for a "generic" neural system for error detection. J Cogn Neurosci 9:788-798.
12. Nieuwenhuis S, Yeung N, Holroyd CB, Schurger A, Cohen JD (2004) Sensitivity of electrophysiological activity from medial frontal cortex to utilitarian and performance feedback. Cereb Cortex 14:741-747.
13. Sutton S, Tueting P, Zubin J, John ER (1967) Information delivery and the sensory evoked potential. Science 155:1436-1439.
14. Sutton S, Tueting P, Hammer M, Hakerem G (1978) Evoked potentials and feedback. In: Multidisciplinary perspectives in event-related potential research (Otto D, ed), pp 184-188. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.