Mediofrontal negativities to averted gains and losses in the slot-machine task: A further investigation

Journal of Psychophysiology

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 256-262

  Donkers, Franc C L ^a   van Boxtel, Geert J M ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Feedback related negativity; FRN; Mediofrontal negativity; MFN; Monetary gains; Monetary losses; N2

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CINGULATE GYRUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERROR; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; GAME; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MONEY; NEGATIVE FEEDBACK; NORMAL HUMAN; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PROBABILITY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 27844506956     PISSN: 02698803     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/0269-8803.19.4.256     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Donkers, F.C.L., Nieuwenhuis, S., & Van Boxtel, G.J.M. (2005). Mediofrontal negativities to averted gains and losses in the absence of responding. Manuscript submitted for publication.
2. Falkenstein, M., Hohnsbein, J., Hoormann, J., & Blanke, L. (1990). Effects of errors in choice reaction tasks on the ERP under focused and divided attention. In C.H.M. Brunia, A.K.W. Gaillard, & A. Kok (Eds.), Psychophysiological brain research (Vol. 1, pp. 192-195). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
3. Gehring, W.J., Goss, B., Coles, M.G.H., Meyer, D.E., & Donchin, E. (1993). A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychological Science, 4, 385-390.
4. Gehring, W.J., & Willoughby, A.R. (2002). The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science, 295, 2279-2282.
5. Gratton, G., Coles, M.G.H., & Donchin, E. (1983). A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55, 468-484.
6. Hajcak, G., Holroyd, C.B., Moser, C.B., & Simons, R.F. (2005). Brain potentials associated with expected and unexpected good and bad outcomes. Psychophysiology, 42, 161-170.
7. Holroyd, C.B. (2004). A note on the oddball N200 and the feedback ERN. In M. Ullsperger & M. Falkenstein (Eds.), Errors, conflict and the brain: Current opinions on performance monitoring (pp. 211-218). Leipzig: MPI of Cognitive Neurosciences.
8. Holroyd, C.B., & Coles, M.G.H. (2002). The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 109, 679-709.
9. Holroyd, C.B., Larsen, J.T., & Cohen, J.D. (2004). Context dependence of the event-related brain potential associated with reward and punishment. Psychophysiology, 41, 245-253.
10. Holroyd, C.B., Nieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., & Cohen, J.D. (2003). Reward prediction errors are reflected in the event related potential. Neuroreport, 18, 1481-1484.
11. Miltner, W.H.R., Braun, C.H., & Coles, M.G.H. (1997). Event related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time estimation task: Evidence for a generic neural system for error detection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 787-796.
12. Nieuwenhuis, S., Holroyd, C.B., Mol, N., & Coles, M.G.H. (2004). Reinforcement-related brain potentials from medial frontal cortex: Origins and functional significance. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 441-448.
13. Nieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., Holroyd, C.B., Schurger, A., & Cohen, J.D. (2004). Sensitivity of electrophysiological activity from medial frontal cortex to utilitarian and performance feedback. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 741-747.
14. Pritchard, W.S., Shappell, S.A., & Brandt, M.E. (1991). Psychophysiology of N200/N400: A review and classification scheme. In J.R. Jennings, P.K. Ackles, & M.G. Coles (Eds.), Advances in psychophysiology (Vol. 4, pp. 43-106). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
15. Van Boxtel, G.J.M., & Böcker, K.B.E. (2004). Cortical measures of anticipation. Journal of Psychophysiology, 18, 61-76.
16. Vasey, M.W., & Thayer, J.F. (1987). The continuing problem of false positives in repeated measures ANOVA in psychophysiology: A multivariate solution. Psychophysiology, 24, 479-486.
17. Yeung, N., Holroyd, C.B., & Cohen, J.D. (2005). ERP correlates of feedback and reward processing in the presence and absence of response choice. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 535-544.