AAO-HNSF CORE grant acquisition is associated with greater scholarly impact

Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

Volumn 150, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 53-60

  Eloy, Jean Anderson ^a,b   Svider, Peter F ^c   Folbe, Adam J ^c   Setzen, Michael ^d,e   Baredes, Soly ^a  

^a RUTGERS NEW JERSEY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b RWJ Barnabas Health   (United States)

^c WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d NORTH SHORE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^e NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

AAO HNSF CORE grants; academic productivity; CORE grants; faculty productivity; h index; otolaryngology faculty productivity; scholarly productivity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIBLIOMETRICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FUNDING; HEAD AND NECK SURGERY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; MEDICAL EDUCATION; OTOLARYNGOLOGIST; OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY;

EID: 84890839122     PISSN: 01945998     EISSN: 10976817     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0194599813510258     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Svider PF, Mauro KM, Sanghvi S, Setzen M, Baredes S, Eloy JA. Is NIH funding predictive of greater research productivity and impact among academic otolaryngologists?. Laryngoscope. 2013 ; 123: 118-122
2. Colaco M, Svider PF, Mauro KM, Eloy JA, Jackson-Rosario I. Is there a relationship between National Institutes of Health funding and research impact on academic urology?. J Urol. 2013 ; 190: 999-1003
3. Kotchen TA, Lindquist T, Malik K, Ehrenfeld E. NIH peer review of grant applications for clinical research. JAMA. 2004 ; 291: 836-843 (Pubitemid 38543771)
4. Rezek I, McDonald RJ, Kallmes DF. Is the h-index predictive of greater NIH funding success among academic radiologists?. Acad Radiol. 2011 ; 18: 1337-1340
5. ZerhouniEA. From the desk of the NIH director: reviewing peer review. 2007. www.nihgov/about/director/newsletter/Summer2007htm. Accessed June 15, 2012.
6. Eloy JA, Svider PF, Kovalerchik O, Baredes S, Kalyoussef E, Chandrasekhar SS. Gender differences in successful NIH grant funding in otolaryngology. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 ; 149: 77-83
7. GarrisonHHDrehmanB. NIH research funding trends: FY1995-2013. Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 2013. www.faseb.org/Policy-and- Government-Affairs/Data-Compilations/NIH-Research-Funding-Trends.aspx#sthash. PW3i8pW4.dpbs
8. American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. Centralized Otolaryngology Research Efforts (CORE) program. www.entnet.org/ EducationAndResearch/COREGrants.cfm
9. Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 ; 102: 16569-16572 (Pubitemid 41688817)
10. Castillo M. Measuring academic output: the H-index. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 ; 31: 783-784
11. Sharma B, Boet S, Grantcharov T, Shin E, Barrowman NJ, Bould MD. The h-index outperforms other bibliometrics in the assessment of research performance in general surgery: a province-wide study. Surgery. 2013 ; 153: 493-501
12. Hirsch JE. Does the H index have predictive power?. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 ; 104: 19193-19198
13. Benway BM, Kalidas P, Cabello JM, Bhayani SB. Does citation analysis reveal association between h-index and academic rank in urology?. Urology. 2009 ; 74: 30-33
14. Rad AE, Brinjikji W, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF. The H-index in academic radiology. Acad Radiol. 2010 ; 17: 817-821
15. Pagel PS, Hudetz JA. An analysis of scholarly productivity in United States academic anaesthesiologists by citation bibliometrics. Anaesthesia. 2011 ; 66: 873-878
16. Pagel PS, Hudetz JA. H-index is a sensitive indicator of academic activity in highly productive anaesthesiologists: results of a bibliometric analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011 ; 55: 1085-1089
17. Pagel PS, Hudetz JA. Bibliometric analysis of anaesthesia journal editorial board members: correlation between journal impact factor and the median h-index of its board members. Br J Anaesth. 2011 ; 107: 357-361
18. Pagel PS, Hudetz JA. Scholarly productivity of United States academic cardiothoracic anesthesiologists: influence of fellowship accreditation and transesophageal echocardiographic credentials on h-index and other citation bibliometrics. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011 ; 25: 761-765
19. Lee J, Kraus KL, Couldwell WT. Use of the h index in neurosurgery: clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2009 ; 111: 387-392
20. Eloy JA, Svider P, Chandrasekhar SS, et al. Gender disparities in scholarly productivity within academic otolaryngology departments. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 ; 148: 215-222
21. Eloy JA, Svider PF, Cherla DV, et al. Gender disparities in research productivity among 9952 academic physicians. Laryngoscope. 2013 ; 123: 1865-1875
22. Eloy JA, Svider PF, Mauro KM, Setzen M, Baredes S. Impact of fellowship training on research productivity in academic otolaryngology. Laryngoscope. 2012 ; 122: 2690-2694
23. Eloy JA, Svider PF, Patel D, Setzen M, Baredes S. Comparison of plaintiff and defendant expert witness qualification in malpractice litigation in otolaryngology. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 ; 148: 764-769
24. Svider PF, Blake DM, Setzen M, Folbe AJ, Baredes S, Eloy JA. Rhinology fellowship training and its scholarly impact. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2013 ; 27: e131 - e134
25. Svider PF, Choudhry ZA, Choudhry OJ, Baredes S, Liu JK, Eloy JA. The use of the h-index in academic otolaryngology. Laryngoscope. 2013 ; 123: 103-106
26. Svider PF, Mady LJ, Husain Q, et al. Geographic differences in academic promotion practices, fellowship training, and scholarly impact. Am J Otolarygol. 2013 ; 34 (5). 464-470
27. Svider PF, Pashkova AA, Choudhry Z, et al. Comparison of scholarly impact among surgical specialties: an examination of 2429 academic surgeons. Laryngoscope. 2013 ; 123: 884-889
28. Sanfey H. Promotion to professor: a career development resource. Am J Surg. 2010 ; 200: 554-557
29. Sanfey H, Gantt NL. Career development resource: academic career in surgical education. Am J Surg. 2012 ; 204: 126-129
30. Sanfey H, Hollands C. Career development resource: promotion to associate professor. Am J Surg. 2012 ; 204: 130-134
31. Carr P, Friedman RH, Moskowitz MA, Kazis LE, Weed HG. Research, academic rank, and compensation of women and men faculty in academic general internal medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 1992 ; 7: 418-423
32. Jacob BA, Lefgren L. The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity. J Public Econ. 2011 ; 95: 1168-1177
33. Reed DA, Enders F, Lindor R, McClees M, Lindor KD. Gender differences in academic productivity and leadership appointments of physicians throughout academic careers. Acad Med. 2011 ; 86: 43-47
34. Suliburk JW, Kao LS, Kozar RA, Mercer DW. Training future surgical scientists: realities and recommendations. Ann Surg. 2008 ; 247: 741-749 (Pubitemid 351591508)
35. Jones RS, Debas HT. Research: a vital component of optimal patient care in the United States. Ann Surg. 2004 ; 240: 573-577 (Pubitemid 39281279)
36. Mann M, Tendulkar A, Birger N, Howard C, Ratcliffe MB. National Institutes of Health funding for surgical research. Ann Surg. 2008 ; 247: 217-221 (Pubitemid 351156762)
37. Ko CY, Whang EE, Longmire WP, McFadden DW. Improving the surgeon's participation in research: is it a problem of training or priority?. J Surg Res. 2000 ; 91: 5-8 (Pubitemid 30340888)
38. Orandi BJ, Blackburn S, Henke PK. Surgical mentors' and mentees' productivity from 1993 to 2006. Am J Surg. 2011 ; 201: 260-265
39. Rosenberg TL, Kelley K, Dowdall JR, et al. Section for residents and fellows-in-training survey results. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 ; 148: 582-588
40. BurkeyBB. Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. American College of Surgeons, Division of Education. 2011. www.facs.org/residencysearch/specialties/ oto.html
41. Atasoylu AA, Wright SM, Beasley BW, et al. Promotion criteria for clinician-educators. J Gen Intern Med. 2003 ; 18: 711-716 (Pubitemid 37174763)
42. Beasley BW, Wright SM, Cofrancesco J, Babbott SF, Thomas PA, Bass EB. Promotion criteria for clinician-educators in the United States and Canada: a survey of promotion committee chairpersons. JAMA. 1997 ; 278: 723-728 (Pubitemid 27377137)
43. Chapman T, Carrico C, Vagal AS, Paladin AM. Promotion as a clinician educator in academic radiology departments: guidelines at three major institutions. Acad Radiol. 2012 ; 19: 119-124
44. Jacob BA, Lefgren L. The impact of NIH postdoctoral training grants on scientific productivity. Res Policy. 2011 ; 40: 864-874
45. Svider PF, Husain Q, Folbe AJ, Couldwell WT, Liu JK, Eloy JA. Assessing NIH funding and scholarly impact in neurological surgery. J Neurosurg. :
46. Engqvist L, Frommen JG. The h-index and self-citations. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008 ; 23: 250-252 (Pubitemid 351626204)
47. Gaster N, Gaster M. A critical assessment of the h-index. Bioessays. 2012 ; 34: 830-832
48. von Bohlen Und Halbach O. How to judge a book by its cover? How useful are bibliometric indices for the evaluation of "scientific quality" or "scientific productivity"?. Ann Anat. 2011 ; 193: 191-196
49. Eloy JA, Svider PF, Folbe AJ, Couldwell WT, Liu JK. Comparison of plaintiff and defendant expert witness qualification in malpractice litigation in neurological surgery. J Neurosurg. :
50. Pashkova AA, Svider PF, Chang CY, Diaz L, Eloy JA, Eloy JD. Gender disparity among US anaesthesiologists: are women underrepresented in academic ranks and scholarly productivity?. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013 ; 57: 1058-1064
51. Svider PF, Lopez SA, Bhagat N, Eloy JA, Langer PD. The association between scholarly impact and national institutes of health funding in ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. :