Steady-state first-pass perfusion (SSFPP): A new approach to 3D first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 71, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 133-144

  Giri, Shivraman ^a,b,c   Xue, Hui ^d   Maiseyeu, Andrei ^b,e   Kroeker, Randall ^f   Rajagopalan, Sanjay ^b,e   White, Richard D ^e   Zuehlsdorff, Sven ^c   Raman, Subha V ^b,e   Simonetti, Orlando P ^a,b,e  

^a The Ohio State University   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Siemens Healthcare   (United States)

^d SIEMENS CORPORATE RESEARCH   (United States)

^e OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f Siemens Healthcare Sector   (Canada)

Author keywords

cardiac MRI; first pass myocardial perfusion; steady state

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING; PHANTOMS; RECOVERY; SATURATION MAGNETIZATION;

CARDIAC MRI; HIGH SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PERFUSION IMAGING; PHANTOM EXPERIMENT; STEADY STATE; STEADY STATE FREE PRECESSIONS;

SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FIRST PASS EFFECT; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE QUALITY; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OXYGEN SATURATION; SCINTIGRAPHY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SIMULATION; STEADY STATE; STEADY STATE FIRST PASS PERFUSION;

CARDIAC MRI; FIRST-PASS MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION; STEADY STATE;

ALGORITHMS; CORONARY VESSELS; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84890792117     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24638     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Miller DD, Holmvang G, Gill JB, Dragotakes D, Kantor HL, Okada RD, Brady TJ,. MRI detection of myocardial perfusion changes by gadolinium-DTPA infusion during dipyridamole hyperemia. Magn Reson Med 1989; 10: 246-255.
2. Atkinson DJ, Burstein D, Edelman RR,. First-pass cardiac perfusion: evaluation with ultrafast MR imaging. Radiology 1990; 174 (3 Pt 1): 757-762.
3. Kellman P, Arai AE,. Imaging sequences for first pass perfusion-a review. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007; 9: 525-537.
4. Judd RM, Reeder SB, Atalar E, Mcveigh ER, Zerhouni EA,. A magnetization-driven gradient-echo pulse sequence for the study of myocardial perfusion. Magn Reson Med 1995; 34: 276-282.
5. DiBella EV, Chen L, Schabel MC, Adluru G, McGann CJ,. Myocardial perfusion acquisition without magnetization preparation or gating. Magn Reson Med 67: 609-613.
6. Gerber BL, Raman SV, Nayak K, Epstein FH, Ferreira P, Axel L, Kraitchman DL,. Myocardial first-pass perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance: history, theory, and current state of the art. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008; 10: 18.
7. Chen L, Adluru G, Schabel MC, McGann CJ, Dibella EV,. Myocardial perfusion MRI with an undersampled 3D stack-of-stars sequence. Med Phys 2012; 39: 5204-5211.
8. Manka R, Jahnke C, Kozerke S, Vitanis V, Crelier G, Gebker R, Schnackenburg B, Boesiger P, Fleck E, Paetsch I,. Dynamic 3-dimensional stress cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging: detection of coronary artery disease and volumetry of myocardial hypoenhancement before and after coronary stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57: 437-444.
9. Shin T, Hu HH, Pohost GM, Nayak KS,. Three dimensional first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging at 3T: feasibility study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008; 10: 57.
10. Di Bella EV, Parker DL, Sinusas AJ,. On the dark rim artifact in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI myocardial perfusion studies. Magn Reson Med 2005; 54: 1295-1299.
11. Storey P, Chen Q, Li W, Edelman RR, Prasad PV,. Band artifacts due to bulk motion. Magn Reson Med 2002; 48: 1028-1036.
12. Nagel E, Klein C, Paetsch I, Hettwer S, Schnackenburg B, Wegscheider K, Fleck E,. Magnetic resonance perfusion measurements for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2003; 108: 432-437.
13. Scheffler K, Lehnhardt S,. Principles and applications of balanced SSFP techniques. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 2409-2418.
14. Lauffer RB,. Paramagnetic metal-complexes as water proton relaxation agents for NMR imaging-theory and design. Chem Rev 1987; 87: 901-927.
15. Pintaske J, Martirosian P, Graf H, Erb G, Lodemann KP, Claussen CD, Schick F,. Relaxivity of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist), gadobutrol (Gadovist), and gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance) in human blood plasma at 0.2, 1.5, and 3 Tesla. Invest Radiol 2006; 41: 213-221.
16. Parker DL, Tsuruda JS, Goodrich KC, Alexander AL, Buswell HR,. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of cerebral arteries. A review. Invest Radiol 1998; 33: 560-572.
17. Barth M, Moser E,. Proton NMR relaxation times of human blood samples at 1.5 T and implications for functional MRI. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) 1997; 43: 783-791.
18. Hargreaves BA, Vasanawala SS, Pauly JM, Nishimura DG,. Characterization and reduction of the transient response in steady-state MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 2001; 46: 149-158.
19. Tofts PS, Shuter B, Pope JM,. Ni-DTPA doped agarose-gel-a phantom material for Gd-DTPA enhancement measurements. Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 11: 125-133.
20. Bernstein MA, King KF,. Handbook of MRI pulse sequences. Amsterdam; Oxford: Academic Press; 2004. xxii, 1017 p.
21. Xue H, Guehring J, Srinivasan L, Zuehlsdorff S, Saddi K, Chefdhotel C, Hajnal JV, Rueckert D,. Evaluation of rigid and non-rigid motion compensation of cardiac perfusion MRI. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2008; 11 (Pt 2): 35-43.
22. Lauerma K, Virtanen KS, Sipila LM, Hekali P, Aronen HJ,. Multislice MRI in assessment of myocardial perfusion in patients with single-vessel proximal left anterior descending coronary artery disease before and after revascularization. Circulation 1997; 96: 2859-2867.
23. Fenchel M, Helber U, Simonetti OP, Stauder NI, Kramer U, Nguyen CN, Finn JP, Claussen CD, Miller S,. Multislice first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging: Comparison of saturation recovery (SR)-TrueFISP-two-dimensional (2D) and SR-TurboFLASH-2D pulse sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 19: 555-563.
24. Laub G, Kroeker R,. syngo TWIST for dynamic time-resolved MR angiography. MAGNETOM Flash 2006; 34: 92-95.
25. Hermosillo G, Chefdhotel C, Faugeras O,. Variational methods for multimodal image matching. Int J Comp Vis 2002; 50: 329-343.
26. Xue H, Zuehlsdorff S, Kellman P, Arai A, Nielles-Vallespin S, Chefdhotel C, Lorenz CH, Guehring J,. Unsupervised inline analysis of cardiac perfusion MRI. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2009; 12 (Pt 2): 741-749.
27. Epstein FH, London JF, Peters DC, Goncalves LM, Agyeman K, Taylor J, Balaban RS, Arai AE,. Multislice first-pass cardiac perfusion MRI: validation in a model of myocardial infarction. Magn Reson Med 2002; 47: 482-491.
28. Hsu L-Y, Kellman P, Gatehouse P, Zuehlsdorff S, Glielmi C, Groves D, Aletras A, Bandettini P, Arai A,. Comparison of arterial input function measured from dual-bolus and dual-sequence dynamic contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 13 (Suppl 1): O8.
29. Christian TF, Rettmann DW, Aletras AH, Liao SL, Taylor JL, Balaban RS, Arai AE,. Absolute myocardial perfusion in canines measured by using dual-bolus first-pass MR imaging. Radiology 2004; 232: 677-684.
30. Gatehouse PD, Elkington AG, Ablitt NA, Yang GZ, Pennell DJ, Firmin DN,. Accurate assessment of the arterial input function during high-dose myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 20: 39-45.
31. Larsson HBW, FritzHansen T, Rostrup E, Sondergaard L, Ring P, Henriksen O,. Myocardial perfusion modeling using MRI. Magn Reson Med 1996; 35: 716-726.
32. Hsu LY, Kellman P, Arai AE,. Nonlinear myocardial signal intensity correction improves quantification of contrast-enhanced first-pass MR perfusion in humans. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 27: 793-801.
33. Lyne JC, Gatehouse PD, Assomull RG, Smith GC, Kellman P, Firmin DN, Pennell DJ,. Direct comparison of myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance sequences with parallel acquisition. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 26: 1444-1451.
34. Barkhausen J, Ruehm SG, Goyen M, Buck T, Laub G, Debatin JF,. MR evaluation of ventricular function: True fast imaging with steady-state precession versus fast low-angle shot cine MR imaging: feasibility study. Radiology 2001; 219: 264-269.
35. Carr JC, Simonetti O, Bundy J, Li DB, Pereles S, Finn JP,. Cine MR angiography of the heart with segmented true fast imaging with steady-state precession. Radiology 2001; 219: 828-834.
36. Eitel I, von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Bernhardt P, Carbone I, Muellerleile K, Aldrovandi A, Francone M, Desch S, Gutberlet M, Strohm O, Schuler G, Schulz-Menger J, Thiele H, Friedrich MG,. Clinical characteristics and cardiovascular magnetic resonance findings in stress (takotsubo) cardiomyopathy. JAMA 306: 277-286.
37. Abdel-Aty H, Boye P, Zagrosek A, Wassmuth R, Kumar A, Messroghli D, Bock P, Dietz R, Friedrich MG, Schulz-Menger J,. Diagnostic performance of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with suspected acute myocarditis: comparison of different approaches. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 1815-1822.