The role of non-state actors in the Nagoya Protocol negotiations

Global Governance of Genetic Resources: Access and Benefit Sharing after the Nagoya Protocol

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 60-78

  Orsini, Amandine ^a  

^a FACULTÉS UNIVERSITAIRES SAINT LOUIS   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890567135     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203078020     Document Type: Chapter

References (37)

1. Alcock, F. (2008) 'Conflicts and Coalitions Within and Across the ENGO Community', Global Environmental Politics 8(4): 66-91.
2. Arts, B. (1998) The Political Influence of Global NGOs: Case Studies on the Climate and Biodiversity Conventions, Utrecht: International Books.
3. Arts, B. and Mack, S. (2003) 'Environmental NGOs and the Biosafety Protocol: A Case Study on Political Influence', European Environment 13(1): 19-33.
4. Berne Declaration and Biowatch (2005) Briefing Paper: Responsibilities of User Countries Regarding the Sale of Biopirated Resources or Traditional Knowledge, prepared for WGABS-3, Bangkok, 14-18 February 2005, http://www.evb.ch/cm_data/public/Responsibilities_of_user_countries_regarding_the_sale_of_biopirated_resources_or_traditional__0.pdf (accessed 14 December 2012).
5. Berne Declaration, Biowatch, eed, German NGO Forum on Environment and Development, Tebtebba and TWN (2005a) Briefing Paper on the Scope of an International ABS Regime, prepared for WGABS-3, Bangkok, 14-18 February 2005, http://www.evb. ch/cm_data/public/On%20the%20Scope%20of%20an%20International%20ABS%20 Regime.pdf (accessed June 2013).
6. Berne Declaration, Biowatch, eed, German NGO Forum on Environment and Development, Tebtebba and TWN (2005b) Briefing Paper: Patents on Genetic Resources Contradict 'Facilitated Access', prepared for WGABS-3, Bangkok, 14-18 February 2005, http://www. evb.ch/cm_data/public/Patents_on_genetic_resources.pdf (accessed 14 March 2013).
7. Berne Declaration, Ecoropa, eed and TWN (2009) The International ABS Regime: Suggestions to Ensure the Enforcement of Provider Rights, prepared for WGABS-7, Paris, 2-8 April 2009, http://www.evb.ch/cm_data/ABSWG-7-NGO-Enforcement.pdf (accessed 14 December 2012).
8. Bernhagen, P. (2008) 'Business and International Environmental Agreements: Domestic Sources of Participation and Compliance by Advanced Industrialized Democracies', Global Environmental Politics 8(1): 78-110.
9. Berry, C. and Gabay, C. (2009) 'Transnational Political Action and 'Global Civil Society' in Practice: the Case of Oxfam', Global Networks 9(3): 339-358.
10. Betsill, M.M. and Corell, E. (eds.) (2007) NGO Diplomacy: The Influence of Nongovernmental Organizations in International Environmental Negotiations, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. BIO (2007) Letter to His Excellency Ahmed Djoghlaf, 30 November 2007, Washington, DC: Biotechnology Industry Organization, http://test.bio.org/ip/international/20071130.pdf (accessed 14 December 2012).
12. Bled, A.J. (2010) 'Technological Choices in International Environmental Negotiations: An Actor-Network Analysis', Business & Society 49(4): 570-590.
13. Boström, M. and Tamm Hallström, K. (2010) 'NGO Power in Global Social and Environmental Standard-Setting', Global Environmental Politics 10(4): 36-59.
14. Botetzagias, I., Robinson, P. and Venizelos, L. (2010) 'Accounting for Difficulties Faced in Materializing a Transnational ENGO Conservation Network: A Case-Study from the Mediterranean', Global Environmental Politics 10(1): 115-151.
15. Burgiel, S. (2007) 'Non-state Actors and the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety', in Betsill, M.M. and Corell, E. (eds.) NGO Diplomacy: The Influence of Nongovernmental Organizations in International Environmental Negotiations, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 67-100.
16. CISDL (2003) A New Regime on Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit-Sharing?, 14 March 2003, Montréal: Centre for International Sustainable Development Law, http://cisdl.org/public/docs/news/brief_biodiv.pdf (accessed 14 March 2013).
17. Doherty, B. (2006) 'Friends of the Earth International: Negotiating a Transnational Identity', Environmental Politics 15(5): 860-880.
18. Dombrowski, K. (2010) 'Filling the Gap? An Analysis of Non-Governmental Organizations Responses to Participation and Representation Deficits in Global Climate Governance', International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 10(4): 397-416.
19. Falkner, R. (2008) Business Power and Conflict in International Environmental Politics, Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
20. Fisher, D.R. (2010) 'COP-15 in Copenhagen: How the Merging of Movements Left Civil Society Out in the Cold', Global Environmental Politics 10(2): 11-17.
21. Greenpeace International (2010) Annual Report 2010, Amsterdam: Greenpeace Interna tional, http://www.greenpeace.org/international/Global/international/publications/greenpeace/2011/GPI_Annual_Report_2010.pdf (accessed 14 December 2012).
22. Gulbrandsen, L.H. and Andresen, S. (2004) 'NGO Influence in the Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol: Compliance, Flexibility Mechanisms, and Sinks', Global Environmental Politics 4(4): 54-75.
23. ICC (2006) Discussion Paper: Protecting Traditional Knowledge, ICC Doc. No. 450/2009, 12 January 2006, Paris: International Chamber of Commerce, http://www.iccwbo.org/Advocacy-Codes-and-Rules/Document-centre/2006/Protecting-traditional-knowledge/(accessed 14 December 2012).
24. ICC (2010a) Priority Areas of Concern for Business, for Interregional Negotiating Group, 18-21 September 2010, Montreal, ICC Doc. No. 450/1058, 9 September 2010, Paris, France: International Chamber of Commerce, http://www.iccwbo.org/Data/Documents/Intellectual-property/Convention-on-Biological-Diversity/Priority-Areasof-Concern-for-Business-(for-Interregional-Negotiating-Group,-18-21-September2010-Montreal)/ (accessed 14 December 2012).
25. ICC (2010b) Nagoya Protocol Requires Legal Certainty, ICC says, Nagoya, Japan, 2 November 2010, ICC News section, International Chamber of Commerce, http://www. iccwbo.org/News/Articles/2010/Nagoya-Protocol-requires-legal-certainty,-ICC-says/ (accessed 14 December 2012).
26. ICC (2012) Nagoya Protocol Implementation in the EU: Comments on a Possible Due Diligence System and the EU Timber Regulation, International Chamber of Commerce, ICC Doc. No. 450/1075, 18 June 2012, http://www.iccwbo.org/Advocacy-Codesand-Rules/Document-centre/2012/Nagoya-Protocol-Implementation-in-the-EUComments-on-a-possible-due-diligence-system-and-the-EU-Timber-Regulation/ (accessed 14 December 2012).
27. Josselin, D. and Wallace, W. (eds.) (2001) Non-State Actors in World Politics, Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
28. Kautto, P. (2009) 'Nokia as an Environmental Policy Actor: Evolution of Collaborative Corporate Political Activity in a Multinational Company', Journal of Common Market Studies 47(1): 103-125.
29. Morin, J.-F. and Orsini, A. (2011) 'Linking Regime Complexity to Policy Coherency: The Case of Genetic Resources', GR:EEN Working Paper Series 15/2011.
30. Orsini, A. (2011) 'Thinking Transnationally, Acting Individually: Business Lobby Coalitions in International Environmental Negotiations', Global Society 25(3): 311-329.
31. RAIPON (2011) To the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, submission by the Russian Association of Indigenous Peoples of the North, 29 August 2011, http://www.cbd.int/abs/submissions/em-compliance/raipon-en.pdf (accessed 14 December 2012).
32. Raustiala, K. (1997) 'States, NGOs, and International Environmental Institutions', International Studies Quarterly 41(4): 719-740.
33. Rosendal, G.K. (2006) 'Balancing Access and Benefit-Sharing and Legal Protection of Innovations from Bioprospecting: Impacts on Conservation of Biodiversity', Journal of Environment and Development 15(4): 428-447.
34. Rÿser, R.C. (2010) 'Access & Benefit: Genes', Fourth World Eye Blog, 3 November 2010, http://cwis.org/FWE/2010/11/03/council-of-the-creeconvention-on-biodiversitynyoyaprotocolindigenous-peoples/ (accessed 14 March 2013).
35. Shawki, N. (2011) 'Organizational Structure and Strength and Transnational Campaign Outcomes: A Comparison of Two Transnational Advocacy Networks', Global Networks 11(1): 97-117.
36. Tienhaara, K., Orsini, A. and Falkner, R. (2012) 'Global Corporations', in Biermann, F. and Pattberg, P. (eds.) Global Environmental Governance Reconsidered, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 45-68.
37. Vormedal, I. (2008). 'The Influence of Business and Industry NGOs in the Negotiation of the Kyoto Mechanisms: The Case of Carbon Capture and Storage in the CDM'. Global Environmental Politics 8(4): 36-65.