CORONIS - International study of caesarean section surgical techniques: The follow-up study

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Volumn 13, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Abalos, Edgardo ^a   Oyarzun, Enrique ^b   Addo, Victor ^c   Sharma, J B ^d   Matthews, Jiji ^e   Oyieke, James ^f   Masood, Shabeen Naz ^g   El Sheikh, Mohamed A ^h   Brocklehurst, Peter ⁱ   Farrell, Barbara ⁱ   Gray, Shan ⁱ   Hardy, Pollyanna ⁱ   Jamieson, Nina ⁱ   Juszczak, Ed ⁱ   Spark, Patsy ⁱ  

^a Centro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales   (Argentina)

^b PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

^c KOMFO ANOKYE TEACHING HOSPITAL   (Ghana)

^d ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

^e CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

^f UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI   (Kenya)

^g Fatima Bai Hospital   (Pakistan)

^h UNIVERSITY OF KHARTOUM   (Sudan)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMIC CATGUT; POLYGLACTIN;

ABDOMINAL WALL HERNIA; ARTICLE; BLUNT TRAUMA; CESAREAN SECTION; CHROMIC CATGUT SUTURE; DYSMENORRHEA; DYSPAREUNIA; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; INTESTINE OBSTRUCTION; LAPAROSCOPY; NULL HYPOTHESIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PELVIC PAIN; PERITONEUM; POLYGLACTIN SUTURE; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANT WOMAN; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); UROGENITAL TRACT DISEASE; UTERUS SURGERY; WOMEN'S HEALTH; WOUND CLOSURE;

ABORTION, SPONTANEOUS; BIRTH INTERVALS; CESAREAN SECTION; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; DYSMENORRHEA; DYSPAREUNIA; FALLOPIAN TUBES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; INCIDENCE; INFANT MORTALITY; INFANT, NEWBORN; OVARY; PELVIC PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RESEARCH DESIGN; URINATION DISORDERS;

EID: 84890552811     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712393     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-215     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. The Information Centre 2010, http://www.ic.nhs.uk.
2. Tully L, Gates S, Brocklehurst P, McKenzie-McHarg K, Ayers S. Surgical techniques used during caesarean section operations: results of a national survey of practice in the UK. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002, 102:120-126. 10.1016/S0301-2115(01)00589-9, 11950477.
3. Gates S, McKenzie-McHarg K, Hurley P. Effects of surgical techniques of caesarean section on maternal health. Fetal Matern Med Rev 2001, 12:105-137.
4. Bamigboye AA, Hofmeyr GJ. Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at cesarean section. In: The Cochrane Library 2003, (4):CD0003577.
5. Enkin MW, Wilkinson C. Single versus two layer suturing for closing the uterine incision at caesarean section. In: The Cochrane Library 2002, (2):CD000192.
6. Jacobs-Jokhan D, Hofmeyr GJ. Extra-abdominal versus intra-abdominal repair of the uterine incision at caesarean section. In: The Cochrane Library 2004, (4):CD000085.
7. Anderson ER, Gates S. Techniques and materials for closure of the abdominal wall in caesarean section. In: The Cochrane Library 2004, (4):CD004663.
8. Walsh C. Evidence based cesarean technique. Curr Opin Obstet Gynaecol 2010, 22:110-115.
9. Berghella V, Baxter J, Chauhan S. Evidence-based surgery for caesarean delivery. Am J of Obstet Gynecol 2005, 193:1607-1617.
10. Weerawetwat W, Buranawanich S, Kanawong M. Closure vs non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean delivery: 16 year study. J Med Assoc Thai 2004, 87:1007-1011.
11. Kenyon S, Taylor DJ, Tarnow-Mordi W, for the ORACLE Collaborative Group Broad-spectrum antibiotics for spontaneous preterm labour: the ORACLE II randomised Trial. Lancet 2001, 357:989-994. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04234-3, 11293641, for the ORACLE Collaborative Group.
12. Kenyon S, Pike K, Jones DR, Brocklehurst P, Marlow N, Salt A, Taylor DJ. Childhood outcomes following the prescription of antibiotics to pregnant women with spontaneous preterm labour: 7 years follow-up of the ORACLE II trial. Lancet 2008, 372:1319-1327. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61203-9, 18804276.
13. Chapman SJ, Owen J, Hauth JC. One versus two layer closure of a low transverse cesarean: the next pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1997, 89:16-18. 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)84257-3, 8990429.
14. Roset E, Boulvain M, Irion O. Nonclosure of the peritoneum during caesarean section: long-term follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Obst Gyn Reprod Biol 2002, 108:40-44.
15. Bujold E, Bujold C, Hamilton EF, Harel F, Gauthier RJ. The impact of a single-layer or double-layer closure on uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002, 186:1326-1330. 10.1067/mob.2002.122416, 12066117.
16. Durnwald C, Mercer B. Uterine rupture, perioperative and perinatal morbidity after single-layer and double-layer closure at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003, 189:925-929. 10.1067/S0002-9378(03)01056-1, 14586327.
17. Mozurkewich EL, Hutton EK. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000, 183:1187-1197. 10.1067/mob.2000.108890, 11084565.
18. Chauhan SP, Martin JN, Henrichs CE, Morrison JC, Magann EF. Maternal and perinatal complications with uterine rupture in 142,075 patients who attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a review of the literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003, 189:408-417. 10.1067/S0002-9378(03)00675-6, 14520209.
19. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2001, 345:3-8. 10.1056/NEJM200107053450101, 11439945.
20. Clark SL, Koonings PP, Phelan JP. Placenta previa/accreta and prior cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol 1985, 66:89-92.
21. Knight M, Kurinczuk JJ, Spark P, Brocklehurst P. Cesarean delivery and peripartum hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2008, 111:97-105. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000296658.83240.6d, 18165397.
22. O'Brien JM, Barton JR, Donaldson ES. The management of placenta percreta: conservative and operative strategies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996, 175:1632-1638. 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70117-5, 8987952.
23. The CAESAR study collaborative group Caesarean section surgical techniques: a randomised factorial trial (CAESAR). BJOG 2010, 117:1366-1376. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02686.x, The CAESAR study collaborative group.
24. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, for the CONSORT Group CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010, 340:c332. 10.1136/bmj.c332, 2844940, 20332509, for the CONSORT Group.
25. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG, for the CONSORT Group CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trial. BMJ 2010, 340:c869. 10.1136/bmj.c869, 2844943, 20332511, for the CONSORT Group.
26. Peto R, Pike MC, Armitage P, et al. Design and analysis of randomised clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. Analysis and examples. Br J Cancer 1977, 35:1-39. 10.1038/bjc.1977.1, 2025310, 831755.
27. Magpie Trial Follow-Up Study Collaborative Group The Magpie Trial: a randomised trial comparing magnesium sulphate with placebo for pre-eclampsia. Outcome for children at 18 months. Br J Obset Gynaecol 2007, 114:289-299. Magpie Trial Follow-Up Study Collaborative Group.
28. Belizán JM, Villar J, Bergel E, et al. Long-term effect of calcium supplementation during pregnancy on the blood pressure of offspring: follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 1997, 315:218-285.