Closure vs non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean delivery: 16 Year study

Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand

Volumn 87, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 1007-1011

  Weerawetwat, Waraporn ^a   Buranawanich, Sayan ^a   Kanawong, Manat ^a  

^a Paholpolpayuhasena Hospital   (Thailand)

Author keywords

16 year study; Adhesion; Cesarean delivery; Non closure peritoneum

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTITIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; ENDOMYOMETRITIS; FEMALE; FEVER; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTAL DELIVERY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PERITONEUM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOUND CLOSURE; WOUND INFECTION;

ADHESIONS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; FEVER; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; PERITONEUM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 5444274136     PISSN: 01252208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Duffy DM, diZerega GS. Is peritoneal closure necessary?. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1994; 49: 817-22.
2. Tulandi T, Al-Jaroudi D. Nonclosure of peritoneum: A reappraisal. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 609-12.
3. th ed. International ed. Prentice Hall International Inc. 637-40.
4. th ed. International ed 1999. Mc Graw - Hill. 1520-24.
5. Robbins GF, Brunchwig A, Foote FW. Deperitonealization; Clinical and experimental observations. Ann Surg 1949; 130: 466-72.
6. Hubbard TB, et al. The pathology of peritoneal repair. Its relation to the formation of adhesions. Ann Surg 1967; 165: 908-16.
7. Elkins TE, et al. A histological evaluation of peritoneal injury and repair: implication for adhesion formation, Obstet Gynecol 1987; 70: 225-8.
8. Swanwick RA, Stockdale PH, Milne FJ. Healing of parietal peritoneum in the horse, Br Vet J 1963; 129: 29-35.
9. McDonald MN, et al. Adhesion formation and prevention after peritoneal injury and repair in the rabbit, J Reprod Med 1988; 33: 436-9.
10. Pietrantoni M, et al. Peritoneal closure or non-closure at cesarean. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 293-6.
11. Hojberg K-E, et al. Closure versus non-closure of peritoneum at cesarean section-evaluation of pain, a randomized study. Acta Obsted Gynecol Scand 1998; 77: 741-5.
12. Hull DB, Varner MW. A Randomized study of Closure of the Peritoneum at Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 818-21.
13. Tulandi T, Hum HS, Gelfand MM. Closure of laparotomy incisions with or without peritoneal suturing and second-look laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 158: 536-7.
14. Chanrachakul B, Hamontri S, Herabutya Y. A randomized comparison of postcesarean pain between closure and nonclosure of peritoneum. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002 Feb 10; 101: 31-5.
15. Iron O, Luzuy F, Be'guin F. Nonclosure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at caesarean section: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Ob Gyn 1996; 103: 690-4.
16. Roset E, Boulvain M, Irion O. Nonclosure of the peritoneum during caesarean section: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2003; 108: 40-4.
17. Grundsell HS, Rizk DEE, Kuma RM. Randomized study of non-closure of peritoneum in lower segment cesarean section. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998; 77: 110-5.
18. Nagele F, et al. Closure or nonclosure of the visceral peritoneum at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174: 1366-70.
19. Kucuk M, Okman TK. Non-closure of visceral peritoneum at abdominal hysterectomy. Inter J Gynecol & Obstet 2001; 75: 317-9.
20. Franchi M, et al. Non-closure of peritoneum at radical abdominal hysterectomy and pelvic node dissection: a randomized study. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90(4 pt 1): 622-7.