The role of the European union in the Nagoya Protocol negotiations: Self-interested bridge building

Global Governance of Genetic Resources: Access and Benefit Sharing after the Nagoya Protocol

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 79-95

  Oberthür, Sebastian ^a   Rabitz, Florian ^a  

^a VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890552618     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203078020     Document Type: Chapter

References (39)

1. Aubertin, C. and Filoche, G. (2011) 'The Nagoya Protocol on the Use of Genetic Resources: One Embodiment of an Endless Discussion', Sustentabilidade em Debate 2(1): 51-63.
2. Boasson, E.L. and Wettestad, J. (2013) EU Climate Policy: Industry, Policy Interaction and External Environment, Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
3. Bretherton, C. and Vogler, J. (2006) The European Union as a Global Actor, 2nd edition, London: Routledge.
4. Buck, M. and C. Hamilton (2011) 'The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity', Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 20(1): 47-61.
5. CBD (2007) Analysis of Gaps in Existing National, Regional and International Legal and Other Instruments Relating to Access and Benefit-Sharing, UN Doc. UNEP/CBD/WGABS/5/3, 13 September 2007, Convention on Biological Diversity.
6. CBD (2008) Compilation of Submissions by Parties, Governments, Indigenous and Local Communities and Stakeholders on Concrete Options on Substantive Items on the Agenda of the Fifth and Sixth Meetings of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Access and Benefit Sharing, UN Doc. UNEP/CBD/WG-ABS/6/INF/3, 13 December 2007, Convention on Biological Diversity.
7. CBD (2009) Compilation of Submissions by Parties, Governments, International Organizations, Indigenous and Local Communities and Stakeholders in Respect of the Main Components of the International Regime on Access and Benefit-Sharing Listed in Decision IX/12, Annex I, UN Doc. UNEP/CBD/WG-ABS/7/INF/1, 2 February 2009, Convention on Biological Diversity.
8. Delreux, T. (2011) The EU as International Environmental Negotiator, Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
9. Delreux, T. (2012) 'The Rotating Presidency and the EU's External Representation in Environmental Affairs: The Case of Climate Change and Biodiversity Negotiations', Journal of Contemporary European Research 8(2): 210-227.
10. Eckersley, R. (2012) Does Leadership Make a Difference in International Climate Politics? Paper presented at the International Studies Association Annual Convention 2012, San Diego, 1-4 April 2012.
11. ENB (2010) The Tenth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP 10) to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), 18-29 October 2010, The Earth Negotiations Bulletin, http://www.iisd.ca/biodiv/cop10/ (accessed 21 April 2013).
12. European Commission (2007) Competitiveness of the European Biotechnology Industry, http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/biotechnology/files/docs/biotech_analysis_competitiveness_en.pdf (accessed 21 April 2013).
13. European Commission (2012) Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization in the Union, Doc. COM(2012) 576 final, Brussels, 4 October 2012: European Commission.
14. Falkner, R. (2007) 'The Political Economy of "Normative Power" Europe: EU Environmental Leadership in International Biotechnology Regulation', Journal of European Public Policy 14(4): 507-526.
15. Falkner, R. (2009) 'The Global Politics of Precaution: Explaining International Cooperation on Biosafety', in S. Brem and K. Stiles (eds.) Cooperating Without America: Theories and Case Studies of Non-Hegemonic Regimes, London: Routledge, 105-122.
16. Groenleer, M. and Van Schaik, L. (2007) 'United We Stand? The European Union's International Actorness in the Cases of the International Criminal Court and the Kyoto Protocol', Journal of Common Market Studies 45(5): 969-988.
17. Grubb, M. and Gupta, J. (2000) 'Leadership: Theory and Methodology', in J. Gupta and M. Grubb (eds.) Climate Change and European Leadership: A Sustainable Role for Europe? Dordrecht: Kluwer, 15-24.
18. Joseph, R. (2010) 'International Regime on Access and Benefit Sharing: Where Are We Now?' Asian Biotechnology and Development Review 12(3): 77-94.
19. Kamau, E.C., Fedder, B. and Winter, G. (2010) 'The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit Sharing: What is New and What Are the Implications for Provider and User Countries and the Scientific Community?' Law, Environment and Development Journal 6(3): 246-262.
20. Kelemen, R.D. (2010) 'Globalizing European Union Environmental Policy', Journal of European Public Policy 17(3): 335-349.
21. Kelemen, R.D. and D. Vogel (2010) 'Trading Places: The Role of the United States and the European Union in International Environmental Politics', Comparative Political Studies 43(1): 427-456.
22. Kingdon, J.W. (1995) Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, London: Longman.
23. Laatikainen, K.V. and Smith, K. (2006) 'Introduction-The European Union at the United Nations: Leader, Partner or Failure?' In K.V. Laatikainen and K. Smith (eds.) The European Union at the United Nations: Intersecting Multilateralisms, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 1-23.
24. Louka, E. (2004) Conflicting Integration: The Environmental Law of the European Union, Cambridge, UK: Intersentia.
25. Morgera, E. and Tsioumani, E. (2011) 'Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow: Looking Afresh at the Convention on Biological Diversity', Yearbook of International Environmental Law (2011): 1-38.
26. Nijar, G. (2011) The Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing of Genetic Resources: An Analysis, CEBLAW Brief, Kuala Lumpur: Centre of Excellence for Biodiversity Law.
27. Oberthür, S. (2011) 'The European Union's Performance in the International Climate Change Regime', Journal of European Integration 33(6): 667-682.
28. Papatryfon, I., Zika, E., Wolf, O., Gómez-Barbero, M., Stein, A.J. and Bock, A. (2008) Consequences, Opportunities and Challenges of Modern Biotechnology for Europe, Luxembourg/Seville: European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.
29. Parker, C.F. and Karlsson, C. (2010) 'Climate Change and the European Union's Leadership Moment: An Inconvenient Truth?' Journal of Common Market Studies 48(4): 923-943.
30. Rhinard, M. and Kaeding, M. (2006) 'The International Bargaining Power of the European Union in "Mixed" Competence Negotiations: The Case of the 2000 Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety', Journal of Common Market Studies 44(5): 1023-1050.
31. Rosendal, G.K. (2000) The Convention on Biological Diversity and Developing Countries, Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
32. Schirm, S. (2010) 'Leaders in Need of Followers: Emerging Powers in Global Governance', European Journal of International Relations 16(2): 197-221.
33. Schreurs, M.A. and Tiberghien, Y. (2007) 'Multi-Level Reinforcement: Explaining European Union Leadership in Climate Change Mitigation', Global Environmental Politics 7(4): 19-46.
34. Seville, C. (2009) EU Intellectual Property Law and Policy, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
35. Skodvin, T. and Andresen, S. (2006) 'Leadership Revisited', Global Environmental Politics 6(3): 13-27.
36. Stein, A.A. (1980) 'The Politics of Linkage', World Politics 33(1): 62-81.
37. Underdal, A. (1994) 'Leadership Theory: Rediscovering the Arts of Management', in I.W. Zartman (ed.) International Multilateral Negotiation: Approaches to the Management of Complexity, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 178-197.
38. van Beuzekom, B. and Arundel, A. (2009) OECD Biotechnology Statistics 2009, Without Place: OECD, www.oecd.org/dataoecd/4/23/42833898.pdf (accessed 23 April 2013).
39. van Schaik, L.G. and Schunz, S. (2012) 'Explaining EU Activism and Impact in Global Climate Politics: Is the Union a Norm-or Interest-Driven Actor?' Journal of Common Market Studies 50(1): 169-186.