Observation of own exploration movements impairs haptic spatial perception

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 231, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 415-423

  Mueller, Stephanie ^a   Habermann, Stefanie ^a   Dudda, Janett ^a   Grunwald, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Limited capacity; Noninformative vision; Sensory integration; Stimulus complexity; Tactile touch; Working memory resources

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERROR; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LIMB MOVEMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESPONSE TIME; SELF EVALUATION; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; WORKING MEMORY;

ADULT; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; PROPRIOCEPTION; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; TOUCH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84890531000     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: 14321106     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3706-y     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Attneave F (1957) Physical determinants of the judged complexity of shapes. J Exp Psychol 53:221-227
2. Awh E, Jonides J, Reuter-Lorenz PA (1998) Rehearsal in spatial working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:780-790
3. Ballesteros S, Reales JM (2004) Visual and haptic discrimination of symmetry in unfamiliar displays extended in the z-axis. Perception 33:315-327
4. Brennan MJ, Allen D, Aleman D, Azmitia EC, Quartermain D (1984) Age-differences in within-session habituation of exploratory-behavior - effects of stimulus complexity. Behav Neural Biol 42:61-72
5. Diao FF, Sundar SS (2004) Orienting response and memory for web advertisements: exploring effects of pop-up window and animation. Commun Res 31:537-567
6. Eng HY, Chen DY, Jiang YH (2005) Visual working memory for simple and complex visual stimuli. Psychon Bull Rev 12:1127-1133
7. Ernst MO, Banks MS (2002) Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415:429-433
8. Ernst MO, Bulthoff HH (2004) Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends Cogn Sci 8:162-169
9. Gaschk JA, Kintz BL, Thompson RW (1968) Stimulus complexity free looking time and inspective exploration. Percept Psychophys 4:319-320
10. Grunwald M (2010) Haptic Pad's: Eine neue Methode zur Messung und zum Training haptischer Wahrnehmungsleistungen. Manuelle Medizin 6:474-476
11. Grunwald M, Weiss T, Krause W, Beyer L, Rost R, Gutberlet I, Gertz HJ (1999) Power of theta waves in the EEG of human subjects increases during recall of haptic information. Neurosci Lett 260:189-192
12. Grunwald M, Weiss T, Krause W, Beyer L, Rost R, Gutberlet I, Gertz HJ (2001) Theta power in the EEG of humans during ongoing processing in a haptic object recognition task. Cogn Brain Res 11:33-37
13. Harris JA, Arabzadeh E, Moore CA, Clifford CWG (2007) Noninformative vision causes adaptive changes in tactile sensitivity. J Neurosci 27:7136-7140
14. Hershberger WA, Misceo GF (1996) Touch dominates haptic estimates of discordant visual-haptic size. Percept Psychophys 58:1124-1132
15. Hillis JM, Ernst MO, Banks MS, Landy MS (2002) Combining sensory information: mandatory fusion within, but not between, senses. Science 298:1627-1630
16. Igarashi Y, Kitagawa N, Ichihara S (2010) Influence of the body on crossmodal interference effects between tactile and two-dimensional visual stimuli. Exp Brain Res 204:419-430
17. Klatzky RL, Lederman S, Reed C (1987) Theres more to touch than meets the eye - the salience of object attributes for haptics with and without vision. J Exp Psychol Gen 116:356-369
18. Knecht S, Kunesch E, Schnitzler A (1996) Parallel and serial processing of haptic information in man: effects of parietal lesions on sensorimotor hand function. Neuropsychologia 34:669-687
19. Kreitler S, Zigler E, Kreitler H (1974) Complexity of complexity. Hum Dev 17:54-73
20. Lang A (2000) The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. J Commun 50:46-70
21. Lawrence BM, Myerson J, Oonk HM, Abrams RA (2001) The effects of eye and limb movements on working memory. Memory 9:433-444
22. Locher PJ, Simmons RW (1978) Influence of stimulus symmetry and complexity upon haptic scanning strategies during detection, learning, and recognition tasks. Percept Psychophys 23:110-116
23. Lynn R (1966) Attention, arousal, and the orientation reaction. Pergamon, Oxford
24. Montague A (1978) Touching - the human significance of the skin. Harper & Row, New York
25. Newport R, Rabb B, Jackson SR (2002) Noninformative vision improves haptic spatial perception. Curr Biol 12:1661-1664
26. Postle BR, Idzikowski C, la Sala S, Logie RH, Baddeley AD (2006) The selective disruption of spatial working memory by eye movements. Q J Exp Psychol 59:100-120
27. Rosen B, Bjorkman A (2010) Momentary improvement of hand sensibility by excluding vision. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 44:302-305
28. Rosler F, Roder B, Heil M, Hennighausen E (1993) Topographic differences of slow event-related brain potentials in blind and sighted adult human-subjects during haptic mental rotation. Cogn Brain Res 1:145-159
29. Smyth MM, Scholey KA (1994) Interference in immediate spatial memory. Mem Cogn 22:1-13
30. Tastevin J (1937) Starting from Aristotle's experiment the artificial displacements of parts of the body are not followed by feeling in these parts or by the sensations which can be produced there. L'Encéphale: Revue de psychiatrie clinique biologique et thérapeutique 32:57-84
31. Taylor-Clarke M, Kennett S, Haggard P (2004) Persistence of visual-tactile enhancement in humans. Neurosci Lett 354:22-25
32. Wallraven C, Whittingstall L, Bülthoff HH (2013) Learning to recognize face shapes through serial exploration. Exp Brain Res 226(4):513-523. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3463-