An incentive model for closed-loop supply chain under the EPR law

Journal of the Operational Research Society

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 88-96

  Li, X ^a   Li, Y ^a   Govindan, K ^b  

^a NANKAI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

closed loop supply chain; extended producer responsibility; incentive theory; optimal contract

Indexed keywords

MANUFACTURE; NUMERICAL METHODS; PRODUCT DESIGN;

CLOSED-LOOP SUPPLY CHAIN; EXTENDED PRODUCER RESPONSIBILITY; INCENTIVE MODELS; INCENTIVE THEORIES; INCOMPLETE INFORMATION; INFORMATION RENTS; INFORMATION VALUE; OPTIMAL CONTRACT;

SUPPLY CHAINS;

EID: 84890489158     PISSN: 01605682     EISSN: 14769360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/jors.2012.179     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Aras N, Verter V and Boyaci T (2006). Coordination and priority decisions in hybrid manufacturing/remanufacturing systems. Production and Operations Management 15(4): 528-543.
2. Atasu A, Van Wassenhove LN and Sarvary M (2009). Efficient take-back legislation. Production and Operation Management 18(3): 243-258.
3. Dekker R, FleischmannM, Inderfurth K and Van Wassenhove LN (2004). Reverse Logistics: Quantitative Models for Closed-Loop Supply Chains. Springer: New York.
4. Driesch H and Flapper S (2005). Recovery of car engines: The Mercedes-benz case. In: Flapper S, Van Nunen J and Van Wassenhove LN (eds). Managing Closed-Loop Supply Chains. Springer: New York.
5. Guide Jr. VDR and Van Wassenhove LN (2009). The evolution of closed-loop supply chain research. Operations Research 57(1): 10-18.
6. Ilgin MA and Gupta SM (2010). Environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery (ECMPRO): A review of the state of the art. Journal of Environmental Management 91(3): 563-591.
7. Karakayali I, Emir-Farinas H and Akcali E (2007). An analysis of decentralized collection and processing of end-of-life products. Journal of Operations Management 25(6): 1161-1183.
8. Kaya O (2010). Incentive and production decisions for remanufacturing operations. European Journal of Operational Research 201(2): 442-453.
9. Laffont J and Martimort D (2001). The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model. Princeton University Press: Princeton.
10. Plambeck E and Wang Q (2009). Effects of e-waste regulation on new product introduction. Management Science 55(3): 333-347.
11. Savaskan C and Van Wassenhove LN (2006). Reverse channel design: The case of competing retailers. Management Science 52(1): 1-14.
12. Savaskan C, Bhattacharya S and Van Wassenhove LN (2004). Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing. Management Science 50(2): 239-252.
13. Subramanian R, Gupta S and Talbot B (2009). Product design and supply chain coordination under extended producer responsibility. Production and Operation Management 18(3): 259-277.
14. Toktay LB, WeinM and Zenios SA (2000). Inventory management of remanufacturable products. Management Science 46(11): 1412-1426.
15. Toyasaki F, Boyaci T and Verter V (2011). An analysis of monopolistic and competitive take-back schemes for WEEE recycling. Production and Operation Management 20(6): 805-823.
16. Webster S and Mitra S (2007). Competitive strategy in remanufacturing and the impact of take-back laws. Journal of Operations Management 25(6): 1123-1140.