Nash Equilibrium in a two-settlement electricity market using competitive coevolutionary algorithms

International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems

Volumn 57, Issue , 2014, Pages 148-155

  Ladjici, A A ^a   Tiguercha, A ^a   Boudour, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY HOUARI BOUMEDIENE   (Algeria)

Author keywords

Competitive coevolutionary algorithms; Deregulated electricity market; Nash Equilibrium calculation; Two settlement model

Indexed keywords

CO-EVOLUTIONARY APPROACH; COMPETITIVE COEVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; DEREGULATED ELECTRICITY MARKET; NASH EQUILIBRIA; NASH EQUILIBRIUM STRATEGIES; NONCOOPERATIVE GAME; SETTLEMENT MODELS; STRATEGIC INTERACTIONS;

COMMERCE; ELECTRIC INDUSTRY; GAME THEORY; OPTIMAL SYSTEMS;

ALGORITHMS;

EID: 84890449840     PISSN: 01420615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.11.045     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. OMalley M, Liu C-C. Power system restructuring and deregulation. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., ch. Competitive Wholesale Electricity Markets, pp. 76109, 2001.
2. C. Harris Electricity markets: pricing, structures and economics 2006 Wiley (The Wiley Finance Series)
3. Hogan WW. A competitive electricity market model. Center for Business and Government, Harvard University, Tech. Rep., October 1993.
4. Stefan. Jaehnert, and Gerard.L. Doorman Assessing the benefits of regulating power market integration in Northern Europe Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 43 1 2012 70 79
5. L.L. Lai Energy generation under the New Environment 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. p. 1-49, [Chapter 1]
6. Ladjici AA. Contribution à la Modelisation d'un Marché d'Electricité Dérégulé. PhD thesis, Department of electrical engineering, USTHB, Algeria, 2011.
7. Beck EV. On optimal bidding strategy modeling in the context of a liberalized electricity market. Ph.D dissertation, federal polytechnic school of Lausanne, 2007.
8. S. Prabhakar Karthikeyan, I. Jacob Raglend, and D.P. Kothari A review on market power in deregulated electricity market Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 48 June 2013 139 147
9. J.V. Neumann, and O. Morgenstern Theory of games and economic behavior 1944 Princeton University Press
10. M.J. Osborne, and A. Rubinstein A course in game theory 1994 MIT Press
11. J.F. Nash Non cooperative games Ann Math 54 1951 286 295
12. R. Kamat, and S. Oren Two-settlement systems for electricity market under network uncertainty and market power J Regul Econ 25 2004 5 37 (Pubitemid 39072578)
13. J. Yao, I. Adler, and S.S. Oren Modeling and computing two-settlement oligopolistic equilibrium in a congested electricity network Oper Res 56 2008 34 47 (Pubitemid 351463107)
14. Yao J. Cournot equilibrium in two-settlement electricity markets: Formulation and computation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley; 2006.
15. S. Soleymani Bidding strategy of generation companies using PSO combined with SA method in the pay as bid markets Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 33 7 2011 1272 1278
16. H. Chen, K.P. Wong, D.H.M. Nguyen, and C.Y. Chung Analyzing oligopolistic electricity market using coevolutionary computation IEEE Trans Power Syst 21 2006 143 152 (Pubitemid 43204713)
17. Tiguercha A. Calcul d'équilibre d'un marché d'électricité dérégulé à l'aide des Algorithmes coévolutionnaires coopératifs", Master's thesis, USTHB, Algiers, June 2009.
18. A.A. Ladjici, and M. Boudour Nash cournot equilibrium of a deregulated electricity market using competitive coevolutionary algorithms Electr Power Syst Res 81 4 2010 958 966
19. D. Srinivasan, and D. Woo Evolving cooperative bidding strategies in a power market Appl Intelligence 29 2008 162 173
20. Pinto L, Szcrupak J. An evolutionary game approach to energy markets. In: Proceedings of the 2003 International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, vol. 3, pp. 324-327, 2003.
21. Z. Liu, J. Yan, Y. Shi, K. Zhu, and G. Pu Multi-agent based experimental analysis on bidding mechanism in electricity auction markets Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 43 1 2012 696 702
22. V.S. Koritarov Real world market representation with agents IEEE Power Energy Mag 2004 32 46
23. D. Veit, A. Weidlich, J. Yao, and S. Oren Simulating the dynamics in two-settlement electricity markets via an agent-based approach Int J Manage Sci Eng Manage 1 2 2006 83 97
24. J.H. Holland, and J.H. Miller Artificial adaptive agents in economic theory Am Econ Rev 81 2 1991 365 370
25. LeBlanc G. Conccurence sur le marché d'énergie, CERNA, Paris, Cours Siminaire Economie d'énergie, Mars 2009.
26. H.R Varian Microeconomic analysis 1992 W.W. Norton Company NY, USA
27. A. Rudkevich Supply function equilibrium: theory and applications Hawaii Int Conf Syst Sci 2 2003 52a
28. R. Baldick Electricity market equilibrium models: the effect of parameterization IEEE Trans Power Syst 22 7 2002
29. Baldick R, Grant R, Kahn E. Linear supply function equilibrium: Generalizations, application, and limitations. University of California Energy Institute, Tech. Rep. POWER PWP078r, August 2000.
30. E. Popovici, A. Bucci, R.P Wiegand, and E.D deJong Coevolutionary principles, handbook of natural computing vol. 1 2010 Springer [Chapter 3]
31. Wiegand RP. An analysis of cooperative coevolutionary algorithms. Ph.D. dissertation, George Mason University, 2004, director-Jong, Kenneth A.
32. Ficici SG. Solution concepts in coevolutionary algorithms. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Computer Sciences, 2004.
33. T. Service, D. Tauritz, and W. Siever Infrastructure hardening: a competitive coevolutionary methodology inspired by neo-darwinian arms races Comput Software Appl Conf, Ann Int 1 2007 101 104 (Pubitemid 350301670)
34. C. Rosin, and R. Belew New methods for competitive coevolution Evol Comput 5 1996 1 29 (Pubitemid 127717836)