Robotic general surgery experience: A gradual progress from simple to more complex procedures

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 486-491

  Al Naami, M ^a   Anjum, M N ^a   Aldohayan, A ^a   Al Khayal, K ^a   Alkharji, H ^a  

^a KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Da Vinci system; General surgery; Operative experience; Robotic; Set up

Indexed keywords

TRANSPLANTATION (SURGICAL);

BLOOD LOSS; COMPLEX PROCEDURE; CONVERSION RATES; DA VINCI SYSTEM; GENERAL SURGERY; INTRA-OPERATIVE; OPERATIVE EXPERIENCE; ROBOTICS SURGERY; SET-UP; SIMPLE++;

ROBOTIC SURGERY;

ANTICOAGULANT AGENT;

ADULT; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; ATELECTASIS; BLEEDING; BREATHING EXERCISE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; COLORECTAL SURGERY; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DUODENOJEJUNOSTOMY; DYSPHAGIA; FEMALE; GALLBLADDER PERFORATION; GASTRIC BANDING; GENERAL SURGERY; HEMATOMA; HEMOSTASIS; HERNIOPLASTY; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INFERIOR EPIGASTRIC VESSEL INJURY; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LIVER LACERATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; OPERATION DURATION; PELVIS ABSCESS; PERCUTANEOUS DRAINAGE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PYLOROPLASTY; ROBOTIC SURGERY; ROBOTICS; SEROMUSCULAR TEAR OF THE SIGMOID COLON; SPIROMETRY; SPLEEN INJURY; STOMACH FUNDOPLICATION; STOMACH PARESIS; STOMACH PERFORATION; SURGERY; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THORACIC SYMPATHECTOMY; TRUNCUS VAGOTOMY; VOMITING;

DA VINCI SYSTEM; GENERAL SURGERY; OPERATIVE EXPERIENCE; ROBOTIC; SET-UP;

ADULT; FEMALE; GENERAL SURGERY; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; OPERATIVE TIME; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RISK FACTORS; ROBOTICS; SAUDI ARABIA; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 84890424956     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1521     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Satava RM. Surgical robotics: the early chronicles: a personal historical perspective. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2002; 12: 6-16.
2. Ballantyne GH. The pitfalls of laparoscopic surgery: challenges for robotics and telerobotic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2002; 12: 1-5.
3. Morris B. Robotic surgery: applications, limitations, and impact on surgical education. Med Gen Med 2005; 7: 72.
4. Morthy K, Muntz Y, Dosis A, et al. Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 2004; 18: 790-795.
5. Anderberg M, Larsson J, Kockum C, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopy - an experimental study of the transfer effect in maiden users. Ann Surg Inn Res 2010; 4: 3.
6. Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, et al. Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 2003; 138: 777-784.
7. Corcione F, Eposito C, Cuccurullo D, et al. Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Preliminary experience. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 117-119.
8. Alimoglu O, Atak I, Kilic A, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer. Int J Med Robot 2012; 8: 371-374.
9. World Health Organization (WHO). Obesity: Preventing and Managing the Global Epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series No. 894. WHO: Geneva, 2000.
10. Al-Nuaim AR, Al-Rubeaan K, Al-Mazrou Y, et al. High prevalence of overweight and obesity in Saudi Arabia. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1996; 20: 547-552.
11. Al-Nozha MM, Al-Mazrou YY, Al-Maatouq MA, et al. Obesity in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 2005; 26: 824-829.
12. Daabiss M. American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification. Indian J Anaesth 2011; 55: 111-115.
13. Lomanto D, Cheah W-K, So JB, et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A pilot study. Arch Surg 2001; 136: 1106-1108.
14. Breitenstein S, Nocito A, Puhan M, et al. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a case-matched control study. Ann Surg 2008; 247: 987-993.
15. Langer D, Pudil J, Ryska M. Robotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Rozhl Chir 2006; 85: 450-454.
16. Vidovszky TJ, Smith W, Ghosh J, et al. Robotic cholecystectomy: learning curve, advantages and limitations. J Surg Res 2006; 136: 172-178.
17. Zhou HX, Guo YH, Yu XF, et al. Zeus robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy in comparison with conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hepatobil Pancreat Dis Int 2006; 5: 115-118.
18. Caratozzolo E, Recordare A, Massani M, et al. Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy: our experience on 29 patients. J Hepatobil Pancreat Surg 2005; 12: 163-166.
19. Ito F, Jarrard D, Gould JC. Transabdominal preperitoneal robotic inguinal hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 2008; 18: 397-399.
20. Nakamura LY, Nunez RN, Castle EP, et al. Different approaches to an inguinal hernia repair during simultaneous robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 2011; 25: 621-624.
21. Joshi AR, Spivak J, Rubach E, et al. Concurrent robotic-assisted trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal herniorrhaphy during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Int J Med Robot 2010; 6: 311-314.
22. Collins JN, Britt RC, Britt LD. Concomitant robotic repair of inguinal hernia with robotic prostatectomy. Am Surg 2011; 77: 238-239.
23. Ballantyne GH, Hourmont K, Wasielewski A. Telerobotic laparoscopic repair of incisional ventral hernias using intraperitoneal prosthetic mesh. JSLS 2003; 7: 7-14.
24. Allison N, Tieu K, Snyder B, et al. Technical feasibility of robot-assisted ventral hernia repair. World J Surg 2012; 36: 447-452.
25. Edelson PK, Dumon KR, Sonnad SS, et al. Robotic vs. conventional laparoscopic gastric banding: a comparison of 407 cases. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 1402-1408.
26. Huettner F, Alley R, Doubet J, et al. Robotic foregut surgery: one surgeon's experience with Nissen fundoplication, esophagectomy, and hiatal hernis repair. Surg Science 2012; 3: 1-9.
27. Stefanidis D, Wang F, Korndorffer JR, et al. Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 377-782.
28. Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR, et al. Computer-enhanced vs. standard laparoscopic antireflux surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2002; 6: 11-15.
29. Morino M, Pellegrino L, Giaccone C, et al. Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 553-558.
30. Draaisma WA, Ruurda JP, Scheffer RC, et al. Randomized clinical trial of standard laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 1351-1359.
31. Müller-Stich BP, Reiter MA, Wente MN, et al. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic fundoplication: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 1800-1805.
32. Albassam AA, Mallick MS, Gado A, et al. Nissen fundoplication, robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic procedure: a comparative study in children. Eur J Paediatr Surg 2009; 19: 316-319.
33. Ng KH, Lim YK, Ho KS, et al. Robotic-assisted surgery for low rectal dissection: from better views to better outcome. Singapore Med J 2009; 50: 763-767.
34. Luca F, Cenciarelli S, Valvo M, et al. Full robotic left colon and rectal cancer resection: technique and early outcome. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16: 1274-1278.
35. Koh DC, Tsang CB, Kim SH. A new application of the four-arm standard da Vinci® surgical system: totally robotic-assisted left-sided colon or rectal resection. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 1945-1952.
36. Alnaami MY. Robotic management of superior mesenteric artery syndrome. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2012; 22: e 144-147.
37. Wilson EB. The evolution of robotic general surgery. Scand J Surg 2009; 98: 125-129.