Robotics versus laparoscopy - an experimental study of the transfer effect in maiden users

Annals of Surgical Innovation and Research

Volumn 4, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Anderberg, Magnus ^a   Larsson, Johan ^a   Kockum, Christina C ^a   Arnbjörnsson, Einar ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950547245     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17501164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1750-1164-4-3     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Subramonian K, Desylva S, Bishai P, et al. Acquiring surgical skills: a comparative study of open versus laparoscopic surgery. Eur J Urol 2004, 45:346-351.
2. Heemskerk J, van Gemert WG, de Vries J, Greve JW, Bouvy ND. Learning curves of Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery Compared With Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery: An Experimental Study Evaluating Skill Acquisition of Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Tasks Compared With Conventional Laparoscopic Tasks in Inexperienced Users. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2007, 17:171-174. 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31805b8346, 17581459.
3. Olthof E, Nio D, Bemelman WA. The learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Medical robotics 2008, 1-8. Vienna: I-Tech Education and Publishing, Bozovic V.
4. Meehan JJ, Meehan TD, Sandler A. Robotic fundoplication in children: resident teaching and a single institutional review of our first 50 patients. J Pediatr Surg 2007, 42:2022-2025. 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.08.022, 18082700.
5. Meehan JJ, Sandler A. Pediatric robotic surgery: A single-institutional review of the first 100 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 2008, 22:177-182. 10.1007/s00464-007-9418-2, 17522913.
6. Yohannes P, Rotariu P, Pinto P. Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve?. Urology 2002, 60:39-45. 10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01717-X, 12100918.
7. Blavier A, Gaudissart Q, Cadière GB, Nyssen AS. Comparison of learning curves and skill transfer between classical and robotic laparoscopy according to the viewing conditions: implications for training. Am J Surg 2007, 194:115-121. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.10.014, 17560922.
8. Heemskerk J, van Gemert WG, Greve JW, Bouvy ND. Robot-assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication: A Comparative Retrospective Study on Costs and Time Consumption. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2007, 17:1-4. 10.1097/01.sle.0000213756.76761.b7, 17318044.
9. Anderberg M, Clementson Kockum C, Arnbjörnsson E. Robotic fundoplication in children. Pediatr Surg Int 2007, 23:123-127. 10.1007/s00383-006-1817-2, 17047900.
10. Narazaki K, Oleynikov D, Stergiou N, et al. Robotic surgery training and performance. Identifying objective variables for quantifying the extent of proficiency. Surg Endosc 2006, 20:96-103. 10.1007/s00464-005-3011-3, 16374675.
11. Hernandez JD, Bann SD, Munz Y, et al. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated task on the da Vinci system. Surg Endosc 2004, 18:372-378. 10.1007/s00464-003-9047-3, 14752634.
12. Ro CY, Toumpoulis IK, Ashton RC, et al. A novel drill set for the enhancement and assessment of robotic surgical performance. Stud Health Technol Inform 2005, 111:418-421.
13. Stefanidis D, et al. Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload. Surg Endosc 2009, 24(2):377-82. 10.1007/s00464-009-0578-0, 19536599.
14. Byrn JC, Schluender S, Divino CM, et al. Three dimensional imaging improves surgical performance for both novice and experienced operators using the Da Vinci Robot system. Am J Surg 2007, 193:519-522. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.042, 17368303.
15. Reznick, Richard, Regehr, Glenn, et al. Testing Technical Skills Via an Innovative "Bench Station" Examination. The American Journal of Surgery 1997, 173(3):226-230.